Search the Community

SLO Aroused NG View File SLO Aroused NG Next-generation arousal for SexLab and OStim, based on SL Aroused NG 0.2.2 by ponzi with an NG plugin. Arousal is calculated dynamically from MCM-configurable effects and updates smoothly on request — no external heavy state updating needed. Solves the problem of other mods competing for the state. A modern, high-performance rewrite of SL Aroused. ⚡ MIRROR This is a mirror of the Nexus mod page: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/151502 User guide ✨ FEATURES - Full support for: SexLab, SLP+, SLSO, OStim, OAroused bridge - Devious Devices integration - Aroused animations (optional) – Thanks to kzrp - Masturbation hotkey (OStim uses furniture if nearby) - Improved performance: native arousal calculations, no state-changing overhead. NG-based native SKSE plugin. - More realistic arousal model – avoids nympho behavior by default (toggleable) - Includes Baka + SLAX keywords - Advanced Nudity support: Nude / Bottomless / Topless / Genitals factions - SLAM effects (active/passive) + mod event hooks (e.g., CEE) - In-game keyword editor (with optional export to KID file) - Soft compatibility with many external mods - Creature support - SLP+ stats integration - Arousal notifications (optional) - Fully replaces all versions of SL Aroused – requires new game unless you're on NG 0.2.2 - User guide: https://crajjjj.github.io/SexlabArousedNG/ 🔥 BUILT-IN EFFECTS (all configurable in MCM) - Naked Exposure: Gain arousal from seeing nudity (up to 50 / 15 for non-preferred gender) - Sex: Arousal rises from participating in or witnessing sex - Satisfaction: Post-orgasm relief, decays quickly - Exhaustion: Reduces arousal after each SexLab scene - Timed: Gradual increase after long abstinence (accounts for belts/plugs) - Trauma: Lowers arousal after rough encounters (unless extremely lewd) - Sleep: Some arousal is added after sleep for PC - Conditional Expressions Extended has lots of dynamic effects - cold, pain, headache etc. https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/91438 🔄 COMPATIBILITY - Works with Skyrim SE / AE / VR 📦 REQUIREMENTS Hard Requirements: - Address Library — https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/32444 - PapyrusUtil SE — https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/13048 Soft Dependencies (for full features): - powerofthree's Papyrus Extender — https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/22854 - SexLab - OStim Standalone — https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/98163 - Milk Mod Economy - Devious Devices / NG - SLEN - FNIS, Nemesis, or Open Animation Replacer – if enabling aroused animations 📝 NOTES - This mod replaces all previous SL Aroused versions - Uninstall older versions before installing - Requires a new save unless already using SexLab Aroused NG 0.2.2 - Join the dev chat here: https://discord.com/invite/mycaxFPSeV - View the source code on GitHub: https://github.com/crajjjj/SexlabArousedNG For mod authors – How to integrate?: https://crajjjj.github.io/SexlabArousedNG/authors/compatibility/ ❓ FAQ Q: Do I really need a new game? A: Yes, unless you were already using SexLab Aroused NG 0.2.2. Earlier versions used a different system for storing arousal data, which is incompatible. MCM won't initialise either. Q: Can I disable specific effects like Trauma or Timed arousal? A: Yes. All effects are fully configurable through the mod's MCM menu. Q: Does it support XXX? A: Short answer - yes. Long answer: It uses the same interface as other SLA mods + optional OSLAroused bridge. Sometimes, mods like SLEN implement complicated logic on top of old interfaces to do what the SLOANG mod does. It will still work for those, but patches make it more correct and efficient. Q: Is this compatible with CBBE/3BA/BHUNP bodies? A: Yes. Body type does not affect arousal calculations. This mod focuses on logic and stat tracking, not body mesh handling. Q: Do I need animations? A: No, but if you want visual feedback (e.g., aroused idles or masturbation), you'll need to enable animations and use a compatible engine (FNIS, Nemesis, or OAR). Q: Is this safe to uninstall mid-playthrough? A: No. This mod creates persistent native forms and hooks. You should uninstall it only if you're starting a new game or using a save that has never seen it. Q: The MCM menu isn't showing up. What should I do? A: - Double-check requirements – ensure Address Library, PapyrusUtil SE, and soft dependencies are correctly installed. - Check if SexLabAroused.esm is already present in your load order. If it exists from an older mod, it may block initialization. Remove/disable it. - Check that plugins are enabled. - Use Papyrus Tweaks NG – it can help resolve MCM registration issues by fixing script load order or timing. https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/77779 - Try MCM Menu Maid 2 – it forces stuck MCM entries to initialize. https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/67556 - Wait in-game or save & reload – sometimes the MCM loads after a scene transition. Q: Any way to disable notifications? A: Disable notifications in MCM. Also consider the Notification Filter mod: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/67925 SubscribeStar: https://subscribestar.adult/crajjjj 🎉 CREDITS - ponzi – Core rewrite & NG overhaul - Contributors to Aroused, Baka, SLAX, SLAM Enjoy your immersive, dynamic arousal system! Submitter crajjjj Submitted 06/22/26 Category Adult Mods Requirements Requirements: https://crajjjj.github.io/SexlabArousedNG/players/requirements/ Regular Edition Compatible No Install Instructions User guide  

OSL Aroused - Arousal Reborn (SSE & AE) View File OSL Aroused - Arousal Reborn OSL Aroused is a framework independent, SKSE based Arousal Framework. It is meant to be a drop-in replacement for both Sexlab Aroused and OAroused, and is fully backwards compatable with all mods using those frameworks. This is not a direct port of either mod, but created from the ground up, with an SKSE core with goal of minimizing Papyrus script load, while still being fully compatable with mods using either SL Aroused or OAroused. You can use OSL Aroused if you run just Sexlab, Just OStim, Both Sexlab and Ostim, or neither. Integration with sex framework is automatically detected and enabled if you have the framework installed. Primary Features/Goals Performance - The core of the system is written in a native SKSE dll to reduce script load There is no script polling or cloaks, any and all perimeter checks are run within native code. All data is managed within the OSLAroused SKSE cosave, *not* Papyrus Utils. This allows for better state management, and players can clear all data at any point from within MCM. (Ie. Significantly reduces and user can solve co-save bloat that SL Aroused traditionally causes) New Arousal Mechanics - Complete redesign of how Arousal is updated over time. Performance improvements allow for a more dynamic and reactive system. A "Baseline Arousal" value tracks what an actors arousal wants to move towards over time. This is impacted by things such as Being Naked, Viewing Naked Actors, Wearing Lewd Clothes, Wearing Devices, Sex Scene Participation, etc... This allows for arousal to be impacted by an actors current "State". "Current Arousal" value tracks an actors overall arousal value. It will want to gradually move towards the actors current Baseline Arousal. "Libido" value represents the minimum baseline arousal. It very slowly moves towards the actors current arousal level. Backwards Compatible - Should Work with majority of mods using SL Aroused or OAroused without requiring any patches. (Note: Ive only tested a subset of mods, so especially in this pre-alpha state likely many mods that I will need to make updates to properly support if they use SLAroused in funky ways) Minimal Dependencies - All unneccessary dependencies are pruned, and neither sexlab nor Ostim are required to run this mod. The adapters for each framework are loaded at runtime if those mods are installed. Cross Framework Arousal - Because this is a replacement for both OAroused and SL Aroused, It acts to bridge the arousal system between both frameworks so they both share the same arousal state. Keyword Configuration - Built in support for adding keywords to armor at runtime. Currently just Bakas "EroticArmor" and SLS "Bikini" keywords, but trivial for me to add additional keywords (or ability for users to define there own) if there is desire. Requirements Address Library for SKSE SKYUI Installation Place towards the bottom of your load order, MUST OVERWRITE ALL OTHER MODS (like SLSO) DO NOT INSTALL SexLab Aroused OR OAroused, THIS IS A REPLACEMENT Both AE and SSE versions are included in the FOMOD, just select correct version on install If you do not use any mods that use OAroused, you can disable OAroused.esp UnInstallation Shouldn't require any additional steps beyond removing from your load order Configuration MCM Menu has lots of options. Use the show arousal key (RCtrl default) while aiming at npc to edit there stats in mcm Press while not aiming at npc to be able to edit player stats Credits This mod is built off the shoulders of Giants. All the Mechanics/arousal algorithm is pulled from OAroused/SL Aroused Anyone who worked on SLA or any variant (redneck2x, fishburger67, Lupine00, Baka and anyone else) Sairon350 for OAroused powerof3 whose amazing SKSE mods i used for references in learning SKSE How Is It Backwards Compatible Within the zip there is stubbed out versions of SexlabAroused.esm, OAroused.esp, OArousedScript.pex, slaFrameworkScr.pex, slaUtilScr.pex The scripts redirect all mod requests to OSL Aroused which quickly pipes them to the native dll. OSL Aroused then keeps certain faction/global state that SexLab Aroused requires populated. The "Adapter" scripts for sexlab/ostim are only loaded if the given framework is found, and handle managing arousal based off scenes. Arousal Mode Selection There is now an "Arousal Mode" selector in the MCM to switch between original SL Aroused Mechanics (Timerate/Exposure) and OSL mechanics described below. NEW AROUSAL MECHANICS As of version 2.0.0, the Arousal mechanics has been completely redesigned. These Mechanics should still largely be backwards compatible with sexlab aroused mods. OSL Aroused uses a robust Arousal Management system, where both "state" and "event" based arousal modification is supported, Baseline Arousal represents the state of arousal the player "wants" to be in. And their Current Arousal will gradually move towards that value. Certain events can directly manipulate your arousal, which will gradually "normalize" back to baseline Many settings are configurable in MCM and can help explain what is impacting what. Historically, Arousal systems primarily drive arousal by a constant increase over time, and increasing arousal by a set amount based off events, or at set intervals if certain conditions are met. Although "Event Based" arousal modification can fit in with those systems rather nicely, there isn't really a mechanism to support "state based" arousal modification beyond just adding to arousal at a set interval. Designing this capability into the fundamental system I believe will provide for a much more reactive system, and opens up a lot of possibilities for the future. Core Attributes - there are 3 primary values that drive the underlying arousal system. Current Arousal - This value is analogous to the historical Arousal value. It represents an actor's current arousal. This value is modified over time based off Baseline Arousal. Also manipulated based off "Events" (ex. Plug Vibration, Actor Orgasm, Butt Slap, etc... Any "one time" action) Baseline Arousal - Represents a "baseline" value that your Current Arousal wants to move towards over time. This Value is determined off of the actors current state. Things like Worn Clothes, Worn Devices, Nearby Naked Actors/Sex Scenes, all impact this value. Libido - Represents actors minimum Baseline Arousal value. It very slowly moves towards actors current arousal value. This is used as a "Longer Term" tracker of arousal state. Remaining at High Arousal will increase your libido, making it easier to remain at high arousal and harder to remain low arousal. Remaining at high arousal will increase your libido towards that arousal value, and to lower libido you need to keep your arousal below your current libido value Raise Current Arousal: Arousal gains can be triggered from other mods (What SLAroused mods use to manipulate arousal). OSLAroused will also cause direct arousal gains when a sex scene begins and stage is changed. Maintaining a Baseline Arousal above Current Arousal will gradually raise your arousal. Lower Current Arousal: Arousal Loss can also be triggered from other mods (What SLAroused mods use to manipulate arousal). OSLAroused will also cause direct arousal Loses when an actor orgasms. Maintaining a Baseline Arousal below Current Arousal will gradually lower your arousal. Raise Baseline Arousal: The following states will increase your Arousal Baseline. See "Baseline Status" MCM menu for breakdown. Values configurable in "Settings" Actor Nude, or spectating another nude actor Participating in a sex scene, or spectating a sex scene Wearing Lewd Clothes (EroticArmor Keyword) Wearing Devices (Devious Devices and TOYS support) Lower Baseline Arousal: Remove any equipment/states that raise baseline above (ex. clothes, devices etc...) Baseline is suppressed (lowered) when actor standing in rain [NOTE: Not Implemented yet] All the rates and values are configurable via MCM. Future Ideas: Spells/Potions to manipulate arousal Vanilla drinks/food? (ale?) Nearby Dead bodies suppress Baseline Arousal. Killing Reduces Arousal ??? Things to be worked on / What I need from you guys - This is the initial pass at new system. Any feedback on overall design and changes people would like to see are greatly appreciated. - Feedback on gameplay that people would like and any ideas on things that should manipulate arousal. - Overall bugs/issues, Let me know if you run into any issues. Or if anything seems off What im Currently working on - Bug Fixes Whats Next? - A Robust Sex Skill/Addiction framework. Haven't decided whether to bake this into this mod, or have it as a separate optional mod. Ideally I think it should be pretty tightly associated with more robust arousal mechanics mentioned in previous point. Script Source: https://github.com/ozooma10/OSLAroused Changelog Version 2.7.0 Added option to switch to original SL Aroused Mechanics (Arousal Mode switch in MCM) Check for sla plug keywords Better OStim and SL Scene management Many bug fixes Version 2.6.1 Fix Compatibility issues with Paradise Halls - Home Sweet Home Add "Satisfied" Buff to Lovers Desire effect Add missing DD patches Version 2.6.0 Arousal for Nearby Actors automatically updates. Creatures Should be suppoted and working now. Version 2.5.0 Ability To Register any Keyword to armor In MCM, Just enter the editorId of the keyword you want to (ex. "SLA_HasStockings"), and that keyword will be available in list after next game load. OStim standalone support (Uninstall any patches previously used) Hold "Show Arousal" key to trigger a self-pleasure event. (Restored from OG SLA) Naked check looks for ArmorCuirass keyword as well as slots (Fixes some 2 piece top/bottom armor) Fixed Applied Keywords being lost between saves Fixed Debuff Descriptions Fixed compatibility with slew of SL mods. (Added slaInternal quest to SexlabAroused.esm) Should fix (SL Interactive Arousal, Follower Player Dynamic Arousal, Sexlab Relationship Dialog System) any many others If you have any feature requests/recommendations PLEASE LET ME KNOW Thanks for anyone who checks this out. Still Early days but im hoping this becomes pretty awesome. Submitter ozooma10 Submitted 02/08/22 Category Adult Mods Requirements SKSE Regular Edition Compatible No Install Instructions

I use Sexlab, FLower Girls (less so these days), OSTIM Standalone. Right now I have these Arousal Mods SexLabAroused Redux Baka Factory v28 SLO Aroused NG OSL Aroused OSL and Boobies Keywords (KID) - Various Armor Patches Is one of them a "Best of the lot" or are all 3 of use?

Sex Attributes Helper (now does Arousal & Willpower) View File Ingesting, Rads, Combat, SAKR state, location + more can affect Arousal+Willpower levels. SAKR+CSL support + Dripping/Gushing etc via Arousal value + Violate "Too Horny/Weak" Auto Surrender + Commonwealth Moisturizer (Cum) on Skin effects + Nude Modesty (external mod/s needed (you probably have most of them already)) the only "Hard" Requirement is Sex Attributes. Basically it breaks out the Arousal *and* Willpowers values and allows them to be modified by a heap more things (as seen in the images above and below as a wall of text). Before you jump in You will likely need to change sliders around to your preferences, however your playstyle will affect what you need to change, it likely is "too easy" at the current settings. Food that adds rads will have 2 ticks, one for the food itself, and one for the radiation. Getting hit with a Radium Rifle is a similar affair, Rads + Combat arousal/willpower damage. Locations and Adrenaline and SAKR score modifiers all functioning at the same time will increase the gains/losses in each direction (unless you do an opposite), so keep all this in mind before you increase things too much. This mod cannot "see" or change arousal gained from other mods, only what it changes itself. List of what is available: -All sliders can be 0'd with fair steppings (usually 0.1), so you have total control over what and what doesn't affect your pawn. Most sliders than can go negative, do, so actions can reduce arousal/willpower instead of increasing it are easy to achieve, and vice versa. -Almost anything your character can consume, can affect their Arousal+Willpower stat, positive or negative. This is broken up into goods via formlists, zero rad food, food with rads, waters, sodas, chems, other medicines. Few certain things were ignored like the Vault 81 cure just because I don't think they matter/couldn't think of what list to put them in. -An optional addon to add non-RobCo patcher Better Living Through Cumistry support is included (requires original mod obviously) -Taking Rad damage can increase your characters values (direct), losing rads can decrease arousal/willpower (or vice versa, like everything) -SAKR support so the game can detect when you are skimpy/exposed boobs/crotch, skimpy clothing has a % gain modifier, exposure gives passive gains (33% for chest exposed, 66% for crotch, 100% of passive gain rate if both). You can get the skimpy modifier at the same time as being partially nude, but when you are fully exposed the modifier stops working. -An arousal level dripping-when-aroused type of system. Dripping, Squirting, Gushing, Cumming, Leaking Cum, CumFarting?. Modesty?? (needs mod/s below). Set your own arousal level for the effect to be equipped (its an item that gets equipped, it shouldn't get in the way). -Cum on your skin from Commonwealth Moisturizer can change your players Arousal/Willpower. -AAF scenes involving the player+orgasms can affect their Willpower. Arousal is already handled by Sex Attributes itself. Thanks to @Cookiemonsta234 who provided most of the code. -When the player has an exposed top and/or bottom and the 'Covering Hands' mod is installed, the player can be combat-locked (toggle) and will cover themselves. The options for this are as follows: Arousal Only, Semi-Nude (top or bottom missing), Nude, Semi-Nude+Arousal Rating, Fully-Nude+Arousal Rating This can be equipped at the same time as the above animations (which only 1 will work at any given time in addition to this) -- The mod "Perverted Mechanics" has more complete support for modesty and uses a different/conflicting animation. It is not recommended to use this covering hands support at the same time as that mod. This should not be an issue if you set the arousal value to 101 in this mod ((default)), to disable the animation being equipped from this side). That mod also has its own SAKR arousal-changing values and possibly other things that may interact here so take care to not double up to avoid problems. Both mods should operate fine with each other outside of this (I use both and recommend that for covering animations instead of this). -Location support, so areas can alter arousal/willpower by % of what you'd be gaining (like a raider camp or a vault). It can be a little jank with updating and being accurate with what you're seeing vs where it tells you that you are. Typically needs a location change for settings to take hold. I did not manually name all these locations, they're pulling from fallout 4's base code, all I did was group them. -Combat Arousal: on getting hit you can gain or lose arousal/willpower, depending on "what" sort of damage it was, most basic damage types covered, kills and attacks on the enemy can alter your arousal/willpower as well. Gambles and weapons have different amounts of arousal gain, amounts controllable via MCM, there is also a Maximum Arousal level which when reached you will be unable to use your weapons (of course the value can be changed). -Your maximum arousal-to-attack limit can also trigger you to surrender to your enemies due to being too damn horny or weak willed (if you have Violate). -Combat strip lite support : Each item stripped, add/remove X arousal/willpower -Adrenaline ranks can affect gain/loss (survival only) -Swimming can change your players values over time, more time spent, more effect. -Multiplier/Gamble options exist for a heap of the sliders as well, so you could set a low value with a low chance and a large multiplier for a shock as an example -Practically all of the basic in-game and DLC ingestible items have been listed so it should just work out of the box and not ruin anything else you have going on, plus there's an easy to use MCM. It should have robco patcher support (I created 3 extra nodes to latch onto) so anything else people want to use with it (like to add more items) should be able to use those nodes to hook onto, I dont even know if they are needed I actually don't know how to use robco, I just didn't want to create another dependency. It should work out of the box with BLTC but that is untested, as are all robco things. The robco lists are : CustomGroup1 CustomGroup2 CustomGroup3 globals: CustomGroup1Gain CustomGroup2Gain CustomGroup3Gain Permissions and Dev info: Current possible known issues: "Seems ok 2 me 4 now" You will want to play with scoring. The obviously required framework: Optional but highly recommended: SAKR for SAKR stuff Combat Strip Lite for Combat Strip Lite Support Better Living Through Cumistry for ingestible support UAP for Effects when aroused | Bad End Animation Pack (Release_BadEnd_v01_05.zip) for more effects | Possible alternates can be used with a little work for both packs Covering Hands (Modesty TD animation edit) - may replace an existing holding-broken-arm animation AAF Violate for "Auto-Surrender when too horny" support. Commonwealth Moisturizer for cum hornyness/will changes Submitter Franco Cozzo Submitted 01/03/26 Category Other Requirements Hard: Sex Attributes 2.8.0 Soft : Skimpy Armor Keyword Resource, CombatStripLite, AAF_Violate, Hard with included extension: Better Living Through Cumistry

I am using SexLabAroused Redux Baka Factory v28 and SLO Aroused NG on game 1170 on PC. Also the usual sort of dodgy mod list that LL residents use. I've nothing against these mods doing their job, but too often I get my Dovah-Lass up to 100 Arousal when it's just really inconvenient. Like exploring a dungeon, or being attacked by 10,000 spriggans, etc. Sometime I also just want some peace and quiet to explore a view. I mean, no-one goes exploring a copper mine whilst on heat, do they? I've asked about this before, and I get stock answers like "use SLEN", or "don't I realise that I can do a small arithmetic function on a NASA computer and arousal goes down", etc, etc. No. What I want is this: an easy little mod that if I hit a hotkey, or cast a spell / power or drink a potion, Dovah-Lass's arousal immediately crashes by 90% so it settles at 10. If this doesn't exist, I could knock one together as a Power, but just need help with a script because I can break a script on the first line. In hope.

Brimming Arousal Reveals Everything (BARE) View File B.A.R.E: Brimming Arousal Reveals Everything This mod changes worn outfits based on the arousal stage leveraging the Various States of Undress (VSU) Framework. As the player (or NPC) becomes more aroused, it will expose herself (Female Only) - Nudity Addiction Update Nexus Release https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/176778 This version is the same as the one in the new nexus release. Outfits: https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrimspecialedition/mods/177539 I'll keep both versions in sync. How It Works: We leverage the VSU framework to swap between 2 variations of the same outfit dynamically depending on the arousal level, configurable through the MCM. Optional (and Highly Recommended) to use Advanced Nudity Detection(A.N.D.),as it provides more granularity for the player BARE provides 2 alternative ways to swap outfits Arousal Only Based: For the player or female NPC, if they are equipped with an outfit with a exposed variation, it will automatically change the outfit if the arousal is higher than the threshold. There is a different threshold for Actors in the Exhibitionist faction. Exhibitionist and non exhibitionist have a different slider. A.N.D. Based (Player Only): Recently A.N.D, rolled a new "Modesty faction", that dynamically determines if the player should use the modesty animations (Using DFFM), depending on how comfortable is with being exposed, the more the player progresses to the faction, the higher the threshold it is to cover herself. We use the same faction here to determine at which arousal level will the player change the outfit. The ranks for the modesty faction (from Dynamic Modesty) are: Each rank in the modesty faction has its own configurable threshold, hence a player that is modes (rank0), will have a very high arousal threshold to change outfits, while a shameless(rank6) player will have an extremely low threshold, and basically will always change to the more exposed outfit NOTE: If the arousal threshold for a rank is too low, higher ranks may also be affected. for example, by setting the modest arousal threshold at 1, all ranks will be swap outfits at 1 arousal, even if their sliders are higher. This is by design. VSU: Bare relies on VSU to swap outfits, although VSU supports up to 3 variations, most outfits only have 2, so I opted for only 2 variations, There is an argument to use 3 variations for Exposing breast, and genitals. I tried, and the results were not good enough, so I decided to use 2 states only, covered and exposed. BARE|0x10D6A5~Skyrim.esm|0xD74~KSO Mage Robes.esp|NONE|0|1 As we are using VSU there is potential for minor incompatibilities between this file, and other configuration files, especially if the outfits are the same, I cannot validate configs for other VSU applications, like ostim, and degradation. I avoided damaged variations in my files for this reason. Nudity Addiction: Now BARE comes with an optional Nudity Addiction feature (Player only). The nudity addiction depends on AND and will not work if its not installed, the rest of the mod should still work without it. As the player progresses through the modesty rankings will start refusing wearing outfits that cover too much and will unequip them. A notification message will play out in this case. Starting from the "comfortable" rank, the player will refuse to wear items that belong to 3 levels below, so for comfortable that means wearing outfits that do not at least show bra. So when the addiction feature is on: Comfortable(3) - Must at least show Bra Tease(4) - Must at least show Bra and Panties Brazen(5) - Must at least show breasts and panties Shameless(6) - Must at least show breasts and genitals Permanent Shameless - When addicted, Permanent shameless will only wear jewelry (No boots, capes, gloves, masks, etc), some items may be ignored due to the slots used. Be wary of becoming permanent shameless, or you will be walking around skyrim completely naked (To be fair, that's probably the goal). I've also added some leeway for curtains, so even if shameless, you can still wear curtains and be considered as "not showing" anything, but only the more risky curtains are allowed in the higher tiers (So for example in shameless only ultra high flash risk chest curtains may be allowed). The item filtering is keyword based, if an item does not have any of the allowed keywords or if it has any of the blacklisted keywords it will be unequipped Important Note: The Nudity addiction will allow you to equip the items, but if during the BARE cycle (each cooldown) determines that your items are not revealing enough then they are unequipped, this behavior allows the player to equip the items and they can still be swapped to the more revealing variant that could still be allowed. Additional Files: I'm providing 2 configuration files: Sunjeong selected outfits: Several outfits from Sunjeong that have both a covered and exposed variant KSO robes: This is intended to use the KSO replacer and the KSO standalone files. Build the KSO replacer as is, and the standalone with the zaps for bra and panties. Take care of selecting the same outfits For the replacer I chose Apprentice robes2 and Journeyman Robes2. The file will still work with the other options, but it won't be consistent. I've also created a blog to hold files created by the community Bare Community Files Upgrading: - Reset Scripts will probably work, but NEW SAVE is highly recommended. Requirements: - Various States of Undress (VSU) Framework - MCM Helper - Scrab's Papyrus Extender - An arousal Framework SLO Aroused NG or OSL Aroused - Arousal Reborn - Advanced Nudity Detection (Optional, but highly recommended) - Dylbills Papyrus Functions: required if AND is installed. - B.e.e.s (For those under 1.6.1170) Important This mod is NOT affiliated to Advanced Nudity Detection (AND), Please do not ask support questions for BARE in Nymph server. I'm Also active in Citadel, so you can ask question there in NSFW-Support, Please be sure to tag me so I can see the message Maybe Future Work: - Option to skip actors in Ostim animations. (Let me know if this is an issue, so far no one seems to care) - MCM to configure the blacklisted/Whitelist keywords for each addition state. (Only if there are enough requests) Submitter Arkbar. Submitted 06/22/25 Category Adult Mods Requirements Regular Edition Compatible No Install Instructions

Title says it, really. When Heroine reaches 100 arousal and there's no activity for X minutes, activity, she blows. (Ditto with male). Job done, arousal set back to zero. Using Cumshot NG / Ocum / SLOAroused NG Like double over, drop to ground, orgasm, (cumshot/squirt) then climb back to feet. And that's it. If none, is anyone willing to script? It can't be that difficult...? (I have tried a number of mods , but none of them do this simple thing.)

I originally thought I'd write about ideas for punishing or rewarding the player, but the question of what a "player reward" looks like turns out to be complicated. Recently, in a long post on the SexLab Survival forum, addressing amputation mechanics, I alluded to an "iceberg" that amputation mechanics were the tip of, but I never explained what iceberg I had in mind. The broader topic of punishment and reward mechanics was what I was referring to. On reflection calling it an iceberg doesn't do it justice. For brevity in future, we need a jargon term to describe the general class of mods I'm talking about. Some can probably guess right away: slavery mods, combat defeat outcomes, "sexist" mods that create continual penalties and hazards on female characters, with an emphasis on the sex part, and other disparity mods that try to create varying experiences for the PC, from pregnancy to running a brothel. The PC doesn't have to be female, but usually is. There's also usually some kind of intentional conflict between a submissive role being imposed on them, and the tasks that vanilla Skyrim makes available (or requires to progress). I'm going to call this very broad category "oppressive" mods. Oppressive mods all have significant capacity to punish the PC. Punishment and reward are at the heart of so many LL mods, particularly those with an emphasis on slavery, combat defeat, or bondage games. In short, oppressive mods are about punishment and reward. Punishment and reward are also at the heart of why so many of these mods don't work well together and why authors aren't inspired to make them work well together. I will present an argument for why this is so. I suspect that conflicts between punishment and reward are also the underlying reason for many players ultimately getting tired of this kind of mod and turning away from it. They're certainly the cause of many frustrations. I will also try to argue why this is not simply an arbitrary claim. Bondage and slavery mechanics add new and exciting ways to punish and reward the PC. Isn't that fun? You may ask, "Why is there a problem?" Let's take a step back... Player character punishments and rewards are NOT player punishments and rewards There are two ways of looking at punishment and reward, we can look at them impacting the PC - the character - or we can look at how they impact the player. The two are different things; potentially a world apart and often in direct conflict with each other. For example, the player fails at combat and the PC is defeated. DCL combat defeat is enabled. The PC is raped (brutal punishment for the PC, but amusement for the player) and then gear may be taken (punishment for both PC and player), and the character may be teleported to some annoying place (punishment for both PC and player), and they may be left wearing devices (punishment mainly for the PC, because the player might enjoy this quite a bit). In oppressive mods, there are many events that take place that are horrible for the PC, but amusing for the player. The kennel in SexLab Survival is a good example of the contrast, the conflict, and the confusion. It's typically an amusing event for the player, but it may well be awful for the poor PC. Unless she is deep into SLS cum-addiction, there is no upside for the PC to be raped by the kennel-keeper or his pets, and she probably isn't going to get a good night's sleep. SLS is a great example of how things get complicated and ambiguous. Is being forced to drink cum a good thing or a bad thing? In SLS, is shifts from one to the other as the addiction increases and it becomes necessary to satisfy it. The player has limited options to prevent the onset of the addiction. Self-gagging might help a little, but it comes with numerous down-sides. The player's reaction to cum-addiction may vary considerably with where they are in their game. At early stages they may seek it out, but at later stages it may start to become a tiresome annoyance. Not only do different mods have different ideas of what events are good or bad for the PC, but the same mod may change its idea as play progresses. The player's idea of what is entertaining remains relatively constant, unless they're over-exposed to a repetitive event that turns what was once amusing into fatiguing boredom. Even this isn't a solid rule. As noted above, the player tends to start to drift away from the oppressive content as their character levels up, and clearing vanilla content (or vanilla-like content) often becomes more of a priority. One thing that's deeply lacking in the majority of mods is any kind of alignment between PC and player punishment and reward. Combat defeat mods are supposed to be punishing the player, but often what they're offering is a lot of sex scenes - which players may find rewarding unless they grow boring - and it's only the character that is getting punished. Even when the PC's items are taken away, the player suffers a great deal less than the PC. And what is the point of putting mechanics into mods that are intentionally boring? Even in a combat defeat mod? There is limited scope to punish the player, and such an approach needs to be used sparingly if players are not to grow disinterested. A certain amount of peril increases excitement, but inevitable failure and punishment are simply annoying and frustrating. To what extent are modders thinking about their mechanics in these terms? Are they considering the difference between PC punishment/reward vs player punishment/reward? Some may be doing this, but I suspect that most have not crystallized that distinction clearly in their minds (until reading this?) There's no doubt that modders are trying to create mechanics that are consistently fun for the player, but the design of existing mods and the way that their authors write about them suggests that they conflate almost everything their mod does with an attempt to deliver player reward, even if it's indirectly. For example, SLS amputations are, to in part, an attempt simply to deliver more excuses for kinky animal sex with a kind of sexual frisson from the underlying reluctance. Only combat defeat mods have reason to seriously consider the topic of player punishment, which they deliver via a very limited toolkit: item theft, disruptive teleportation, and various other annoyances that amount to time-sinks. SD+, if considered as a combat defeat outcome, consists almost entirely of extremely tiresome time-sinking. SexLab Adventures (seems to evidence thinking that the bounties for doing forbidden things are a punishment for both the player and the PC, but in practice they punish the PC far more than they punish the player. The player doesn't set up punishing bounties unless they think they are going to be fun somehow. Loss of time is really the only punishment that can be inflicted on the player, and all other punishments are just indirect routes to this. The things that are lost can almost always be regained with sufficient effort. Whether the PC is being robbed, fined, sent to an inconvenient location, locked in a cell, or chain-raped for two real hours straight, it's all just something that soaks up the player's time in a way that doesn't seem to offer any kind of satisfying progress. In some extreme cases, the punishment takes away from past progress. To what extent the player is genuinely troubled is another matter. After all, they are installing these mods because they like them, and as often as not, they rather enjoy having PoP suck up hours of play while their character is dragged around the countryside on a leash by NPCs who path badly and frequently get stuck. Even when things the player has struggled for are taken away - fancy armors, money, titles, reputation, NPC relationships, levels or skills - it usually comes down to a measurement of time invested that was lost. The things themselves can always be replaced with other things, given more time. What is Player Character Reward or Punishment? How can a collection of data in your computer be punished or rewarded? Is it punishment when her simulation values are modified in a non-advantageous way? I don't believe so. That sort of thinking is nonsense with no reference point or connection to any meaningful context. Reducing the PC's health value is a negative simulation outcome, but without assigning a meaning to it, it is neither punishment or reward. Only the player can assign meaning to these events. Does that mean that there's no such thing as PC punishment or reward? The reference for what is a punishment for the PC is always the story of the PC. There are events that she, as a story character, is supposed to enjoy, and events she is supposed to hate. The player (whether they intend to or not) to some extent cannot help but have some empathy with the human-looking graphic on their screen. She is not just there to create a pornographic visual; if that were the aim then why play Skyrim at all? You could just run SexLab animations in a loop, and a SexLab theater would be the most popular mod around. Instead, there is only modest interest in such mods, and most of that is from people who really are only interested in screen archery - and many of those are still telling stories! However, player empathy with the PC doesn't mean that they player feels misery when the PC is imagined to feel it. Often the PC relishes the horrors inflicted upon their character. There are many reasons for this, but they are topics applicable to media in general, and not Skyrim oppression mods in general. Nevertheless, the determinant of PC punishment or reward is simply the resulting story that the player creates in their head to explain the events and how the character reacts to them. So what's the problem with any of that? The lack of alignment between PC and player punishment and reward leads to a weak and uninvolving experience, shallow immersion, and incoherent story events. Take an example of the PC developing a sex-addiction. This might be simulated as a constantly high arousal value which either doesn't decrease after sex, or doesn't decrease much, and can only be reduced by extreme sexual encounters, or a fast increase in arousal whenever it's low, or both these approaches. In addition, one or more mods may impose stat or XP penalties for this continuing high arousal state. Such additions are generally seen as improving the simulation. In addition, the constant sex events may lead to Wear&Tear on the PC, with additional penalties as a result, again this is seen as an improvement in the simulation. XP penalties are supposed to be a punishment for the player, but they are an ineffectual one because leveling in Skyrim is not terribly important for the player. The stat penalties are inconvenient, and quite likely to involve movement speed or something else that mildly irritates the player, but in many cases may not even be noticed, and may very likely be drowned out by some other mod doing something completely unrelated (needs mod tiredness, for example). The issue here is that a sex-addicted PC is supposed to long for orgasms, but getting them makes almost no difference to the PC or to the player. There is no alignment between the supposed situation - the story you're creating in your head - and the game events. Instead we have a questionable simulation of sex-addiction, with mechanics that are inspired by the simulation concepts. Various conflicting outcomes follow from the simulation, which itself is the product of multiple mods that were not written to produce any single clear outcome or with any special intent - they are essentially simulation rules - they are devoid of any compelling story. We're supposed to believe that the PC is constantly distracted by her desire, leading to impaired learning. If there's a Wear&Tear mod, we are also (probably) supposed to understand that the PC is physically (and magically) impaired by pain resulting from past sexual activities and abuse. None of this simulation exists, or makes any sense in the context of vanilla Skyrim, where healing spells and potions cure sword cuts and simple praying cures diseases. Some players struggle with the contradictions, and add more mods in an attempt to resolve them: needs mods with harsh diseases, limitations on potions, or potion consumption, limitations on healing capacity and PC recovery, wounds mods that create lasting effects for combat injuries that can't simply be healed away. It's more complexity and more mods to solve a problem that was created by the original mod setting up a questionable simulation that was at odds with vanilla Skyrim. Players typically take the position that vanilla Skyrim is inadequate to support and enhance their fantasies for the PC, so they impose extra perils and dangers upon her. She needs warm clothes and fires, she needs to eat and drink, she needs to get a good night's sleep, she needs to pee (and fart!)... it doesn't stop there... she needs to sleep in comfy clothes, she she needs to eat good food, she gets tired of camping, and she gets hurt and penalized by ... just about everything. Players add mods where the PC can get pregnant, or seems to easily submit to forced sex, mods where she can resist forced sex up to a point, they add mods where everyone wants to enslave and sell her, mods where she can be auctioned, mods where she is hurt by sex, and mods where she becomes addicted to it, or to sex with animals. There are even mods where you can become inseminated with GEMS by animals and give birth to ROCKS! And of course they add mods that tie her up. Lots and lots of those. I could digress into a discussion of what this means about the female gender role in society, but that sounds hazardously close to politics. The point is that the simulation rules we apply to the PC get ever more complex and perilous. They are profoundly weighted in favor of punishing, humiliating and terrorizing the poor PC. If there is something she is ever allowed to enjoy, you can be almost certain that it's some kind of destructive addiction or submissive mental break. This is where player frustration can set in. A player initially believes that modding can deliver new and surprising experiences in their game. As time goes by, modding becomes more of a struggle to balance the conflicting ideas of reward and punishment in the web of mods that they've installed, or simply to get some beloved feature to work as they want it to. Frustration and exhaustion, combined with a loss of belief in the idea that oppressive punishment-oriented mods can deliver any substantially new content leads them to look to other genres, or to abandon the undertaking completely. There's a real shortage of mods that emphasize PC enjoyment, fun or satisfaction. There is no mod where eating cakes gives the PC more happiness. There is no mod where she will pay a fortune to taste chocolate but not be addicted to it like a drug. There is no mod where she enjoys a smile from a child. I guess the majority of players don't want these things in their game for some reason. This isn't some political comment. It's just that game design has conventionally always been about peril and punishment, with the reward being from overcoming those hazards ... but there are games (like Candy Crush) that are composed only of rewards, albeit weak ones. Problematic conflicts arise because each mod is trying to guess how their user-base feels about a certain scenario, and to provide events that are titillating. Each one envisages a slightly different scenario for the PC, then (usually) tries to produce it indirectly through simulation rules. Mods that are direct about the outcomes they want are less common, but the root conflicts begin with the stories. As the intended outcomes (stories) conflict, the simulation rules also interact at cross-purposes. There's no clear direction. Even if these mods can interoperate what would that interoperation look like when they have disparate concepts of a proper outcome? Players tweak mods, put mods in, take mods out, and post on forums, over and over, seeking changes of one kind or another, so that they can get the outcome they imagine as perfect. However, for every modder there are numerous players (even for unpopular mods) who all have slightly different ideas in their heads. With only one modder and all those players, any mod can only please each player a certain amount, and the modder may not be pleased with what they delivered either. (I know I am never satisfied with what I make). Even among the most eager fans of a mod, there are different story expectations. Conflicts Everywhere The conflicts are not only between the mods and vanilla, but between each mod. These conflicts flow directly from different concepts of what is a player or PC punishment or reward. It's inevitably the case that two mods get in a fight over some stat that they both want to change in opposing ways, or some situation or scenario that they want to resolve in profoundly different ways. Superficially, Estrus Chaurus (EC+) appears to be punishing the PC for sex with chaurus monsters, or from picking flowers, or (if you have certain patches or extensions) from collecting chaurus eggs. Of course that's not its true purpose. Its core reason for existence is to amuse the player with tentacle-sex and violation fantasies, then to pile a body-modification fetish on top of it, allowing the player to view their character distorted with huge breasts and belly due to a foul "pregnancy", a parasite infestation that can easily end in a horrid mess of skittering creatures. EC+ punishes the PC but rewards the player. Its pregnancies conflict awkwardly with other pregnancy mods (which have equally complex internal intentions), including combat defeat mods. The EC+ encumbered PC is weakened in combat, suffers additional defeats, and additional indignities, but we're now slipping into territory where the player is ostensibly to be punished for letting their character become inflated with alien eggs to the point that she can barely waddle along. This is a recurring pattern. A mod that offers player entertainment also adds penalties to the PC, and other mods interpret those penalties as an intent to punish the player. And in some cases, they act on that intent, amplifying the "punishment", or attempting to counteract of moderate it. The different mods had different outcomes in mind. EC+ seems to think that the pregnancy is more or less the end of the problem, but don't get caught too often or you'll end up inflated for good. OTOH, DiD thinks that tentacle-sex is both a way to lose trauma and also to gain it. I can't figure out what DiD's overall expected outcome is, but it's clearly different to the original intent of EC+ otherwise it wouldn't need to add any new simulation rules. The first problem is that mod X has no way to tell whether the things mod Y were done to amuse the PC, or are supposed to be some kind of disincentive. The second problem is that mod X and mod Y almost certainly have a different outcome in mind, even given the same set of preconditions. Returning to the EC+ example, the mod itself is also internally conflicted. It does things that please the player, while also doing things to annoy them (such adding little scuttling creatures to areas). Of course, the player can control some of these decisions, but the player was always controlling them, from the very point that they installed EC+ they were superficially in control. However, because mods rarely deliver a coherent experience to the player, we see, again and again, the addition of more and more mods trying to resolve a nest of conflicts that can only grow as a result of this approach - and I don't mean script or ESP conflicts, but gameplay experience and immersion conflicts - it's a way of modding that creates an endless appetite for more and more mods and features. Another conflict is that players wish to surrender control, while at the same time exercising it. They choose to add a mod that does things to the PC, but want to feel that the outcomes are beyond their control, or at least beyond the PC's control. They want the story of helplessness, or struggle. They want story events to take them by surprise ... but not too much surprise. They chose the mods they put in their game, and chose how to configure them, but then they want to play within the limits they've created for themselves, with the perils they have so carefully prepared. This is a conflict over control rather than reward and punishment, but it manifests as reward and punishment. When mods go off the rails and break the game, or simply send it in an unwanted direction, the player (as well as the PC) is punished. Often enough, total success for the PC ends up being seen as failure by the player. Again, the mods didn't do the intended job. Is Coherence Possible? (And would we want it?) Is it even technically possible to create coherence between the PC experience and the player experience? Would this be better or worse? It is possible for mods to agree on the nature of an experience, so they all augment it, instead of breaking it? Now we're into more difficult territory. It took until now to crystallize the true nature of this problem, and I imagine that many readers are still not at all convinced there's anything here but a confusing web of points that they feel they have easy counter-arguments to. It's not easy to explain the network of ideas and realizations that have brought me to write this, and it will be a journey of its own for me to learn how to express those ideas clearly and succinctly. For now, the ideas are present, but they're still new. There's scope to improve and refine them, and even more scope to improve how to describe them. But returning to the question at hand, I can offer some examples. In the case of sex addiction, what if the player received increasing rewards for orgasms? The more extreme the addiction, or the longer the period of denial, the greater the player reward would be. Pay attention here, I'm talking about player reward, not PC reward. This could be applied to any addiction mechanic, but its most notable for sex-addiction, because orgasms are rarely a reward, even for the PC (not the player); instead loss of arousal is the reward, if it's even granted, and who that reward is aimed at is ambiguous. Is it the player, who is happy that her character is now better able to function? Or is it the PC, who is supposed to relish the reduction in danger that the sexual-satisfaction leads to? Or (as I suspect) some combination of the two. In the case of combat defeat, can we genuinely punish the player for losing? In the case of being caught without a license in SexLab Survival (SLS), there's a conflicted message. The player is supposed to be punished by losing access to items and abilities, but they may also be enjoying the peril that their character has been placed into. They may well get considerable enjoyment from their character being placed in punishment devices that are clearly intended to be a (story) punishment for the PC. What if the sexist problems imposed by SLS were entirely punishing for the player, and overcoming them entirely rewarding? Is that even possible? One thing is for sure, a mod that has an alignment between PC reward and player reward would be unlike the majority of mods we see, which have almost no consideration of PC reward, and are composed almost entirely of PC punishment. Would alignment in PC and player reward help align mods together? I think it would, up to a point, because it immediately becomes clear what is supposed to be a player reward or punishment. In current mods, two mods that disagree are both trying to deliver player reward (and PC punishment). It's impossible to intuit which player punishments are supposed to be producing player enjoyment, and which are trying to be player punishments. But if the punishment and reward are simplistically objective, it's easier to get alignment between mods. For example, Deviously Enchanted Chests likes to put the PC into bondage gear. While this is somewhat a reward for the player, it's substantially supposed to be a punishment. The goal is (ostensibly) to get out of the bondage gear as quickly as possible and return to business as usual. Devious Training tries to mitigate the penalties of being in bondage gear long-term, while adding extra visual rewards (for body modification fetishists anyway). It's a given you won't install DT unless you like the modification part, but the penalty mitigation is a bonus player reward. DT is at odds with DEC in some areas, aligned in others. However, if we have an objective way to know whether the PC likes being bound ... if the PC's rewards are aligned with the player's, then we also know whether the player wants the PC to be bound. Given this data, a bondage mod no longer needs to guess what to do. The player wants mechanics that make being bound rewarding. So, there's a light at the end of the tunnel ... we can potentially solve some problems by using data about the PC, or the player, and if we put the two into alignment we can create novel experiences, align mods together better, and store less data.

Hello everyone I’m going through you since Mara has an astronomical number of e-mails, so the time she reads them, we haven’t arrived... ? It’s concerns Bishop and no one else?, Bishop to of animations who him are own; and no matter what version of Skyrim Romance, I’ve always had this problem, either animation this suspends, or I have no animation at all. I don’t know if I should count the animation of the kiss, since it works but there is clearly a problem with, but it’s not the problem who bores me the most. The problem is Bishop?: the animation that I got that I finally didn't get since that she its blocked before he had time to put myself me ground?: this animation is Bishop’s favorite position when he puts his forefinger and thumb between the chin and the mouth; then my character and Bishop freeze for 3-4 seconds. At the time, I was using version 2.1 of Skyrim Romance and when he did it, I used arousal 28v (I don’t know if it’s related), and this is the last time I had an animation! I never understood why it didn’t work with me?: and no matter what version of Skyrim Romance it has never worked?. Thinking about it again I’m certainly not an isolated since I watched of let’s play from: Skyrim Romance on Youtube and not the slightest action on the part of Bishop, it’s as if no one knew, that they to of animations who him are own. And in more Mara is unreachable, he has 404 errors a little all over his Skyrim Romance site, impossible to log in. Do you have any advice, solutions, correctives, parameters to propose me? of the time it's radical and without risk I take. It bores me, I am very frustrated☹️. Bishop doesn't want to sleep, I've try different mods for that and it still doesn't work and I've used a mod to sleep together in the same bed it doesn't work, as soon as I get out of the demand it gets up right away: it always did with all versions of Skyrim Romance this is that with the version 3.0 that I started to use those mods but it doesn't worked Do you have any advice, solutions, correctives, parameters to propose me? of the time it's radical and without risk I take. There is a very recent persistent bug that appears as soon as BodySlide I install I have NPC heads that are brown or black and Skyrim Romance amplifies bugs, I find this very boring, without counting the crashes, memory problems, the version 3.2 of Skyrim Romance is a memory chasm and causes purple textures Mara is already on it since February last year, but the NPC heads that are brown or black as soon as BodySlide is installed this is new I’ve put correctives bugs for this but it doesn’t worke.? I also have the worst bug in the history of video games: I have all the characters, guards and children in the Northeast of Skyrim attacking me without me doing anything, whatever. no matter the list of mods, I say that because I changed my list of mods I went back 19 saves, then went back to level 69 in Windhelm I did the exact same thing I went to the Candelâtre inn I asked for a room and I slept 10h the next day pagan takes a few steps the characters attack me the only ones who do not attack me is Ulfric and the guards of Windhelm everyone in the northeast attacks me except them (I don't know where this bug comes from).☹️ I thought I’d give you my list of mods to see if there are any mods no compatible with Skyrim Romance, I wouldn’t give you the whole list since I have deleted of mods, in so much fed up, ha! It me heated seriously all the crashes, memory and performance issues and bugs related to Skyrim Romance. of crashs and of bugs; I’ve removed them all?: I still kept the mods I find essential. I think the only way out is to make a good patch for Skyrim Romance, effective and radical.? Good let’s move on to something else do you have any mods to propose to me to make it coherent, more realistic, more immersive Skyrim Romance and above all; mods that force Skyrim Romance to to have the animations that Bishop should have, that he not since as I was saying its animations that it’s own do not work, and also if you knew of mods that you could propose to me that could make so that, Skyrim Romance get approaching the more that possible to the novels de Ruru (of Skyrim Romance) it's would perfect!? Same an extension of this type if necessary, ho yes an extension for Skyrim Romance based on the novels of Ruru: same more need look at the general subtitles, it's would very well Skyrim Romance fully animated, it's would be too good! would bring out the personality of Bishop, it would put his personality forward it's would be really excellent! for this it would be add distinctly more conversations between Bishop and the Dragonborn, distinctly more interactions between Bishop and the Dragonborn, distinctly more scenaristic possibilities between Bishop and the Dragonborn, and more animations: it would expand AI (the behavior) Bishop since Actually Skyrim Romance is limited: for be able to have all potential and the capabilities of Bishop, it is clearly not sufficient, Arousal should be in perfect symbiosis with Bishop and SexLab: since Bishop is based on excitement (the desire), she plays a big role on his behavior since it is based on desire (excitement), to have Arousal, Bishop, SexLab in perfect symbiosis would allow that the consequences: the actions (the animations) of Bishop are triggered since there is visibly a problem since his own consequential animations don't work, normally they are triggered during the flirt or later it depends on his degree of excitement, Bishop is like this: either he will just say: don't titillate me by rising the tone (he doesn't like to be titillated. [But it's so funny to titillate him, the reaction he has when my character hugs her when she's naked it's too funny, listening to him talk you can hear in what he says that he's tempted and the head of completely delighted that he does it's too funny: and to by this he doesn't like to be titillated, this is this yes. I love tease him this is so much amusing]) and it will have for effect of a consequence during the journey or if he is too titillated he will jump on the dragonborn right away?: an animation of the style his favorite position (these kind of animations are special animations cinse they this triggered by she themselves) so he must algorithms, markers for make ensure Bishop detects the different situations to that they are not triggered at the wrong time. Don't forget that he is crazy of desir of the dragonborn, and that he doesn't to never enough of her and wants to make love that with her❗ ? For this, it requires the good modders developers and the necessary resources for an such project ambitious!