Jump to content

What's on your mind?


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, landess said:

After Graduation we had the choice to cut the flag up, with each getting a piece, or (we chose) to give it to the Instructor/Company Commander.

 

 

BTW - We did earn most every flag attainable, but for reasons, we were not permitted to win the Hall of Fame flag since it needed the Color Company flag of which we weren't eligible (they gave that to one of the other weekly graduating companies) and we performed 3 graduations including our own. All USNTC companies beginning with 9 were these 'special' companies.

 

OK I think every company did that, give the flag to the CC.   I don't think we were even offered the choice.   

 

BTW, we did win every flag and was awarded Hall of Fame (C153) .......but I guess those records are gone since NTC Orlando is now boutique  shops and homes.

 

I don't recall seeing any 9XX company graduating with us, 4 other male companies as the women's company got disbanded after they threw a blanket party for their recruit Chief, breaking her collarbone. 

Link to comment
12 hours ago, RitualClarity said:

No you aren't being naively optimistic. You are open to consider alternate possibilities. That is all that anyone can hope to do. You also have a valid point as well.  Great study if you were a psychology major. :P 

Lol i guess i should've gone for psychology instead of economics then lol. Yeah for now all we can do is guess and postulate, until the time comes there's no concrete way to tell what'll happen. I think people should hope for the best, try their best and prepare for the worst. Being robust is the key and not everybody finds it.

Link to comment
10 hours ago, Mr.Otaku said:

Lol i guess i should've gone for psychology instead of economics then lol. Yeah for now all we can do is guess and postulate, until the time comes there's no concrete way to tell what'll happen. I think people should hope for the best, try their best and prepare for the worst. Being robust is the key and not everybody finds it.

In economics there is no concrete way to tell what direction things are going to with 100% accuracy. Some are better but it takes time .. min of 10 years before you can truly see the fallout of what was decided (policy wise etc) in economics.  Even longer to do a full encompassing study.

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, RitualClarity said:

In economics there is no concrete way to tell what direction things are going to with 100% accuracy. Some are better but it takes time .. min of 10 years before you can truly see the fallout of what was decided (policy wise etc) in economics.  Even longer to do a full encompassing study.

Yeah, it's just a game of gambling with about two hundred extra steps lol. I find it so bizarre that so many of the economic figureheads and "leaders" as in politicians don't understand much about economics, it's shocking how little they know. Bad decisions after bad decisions led so many things off rails and now what's the national debt? 3 trillion or something last i checked? Insane.

 

Wait, i just checked and it's showing 27 trillion... Yeah that's a whole lotta "WHAT THE FUCK" from me.

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Mr.Otaku said:

it's showing 27 trillion...

*The following is a paid rant and is not intended to represent the views of those responsible for anything.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Open the borders and hope gay people can breed - need more citizens to tax.

 

The Romans would kill the rich and take their assets. (Trickle down economics) Goodbye Gates, Zuckerberg, Bloomberg, several Ex-Presidents and most CEO's and the problem is solved! Or we could just pillage another country - Oops, did that.....

 

Balancing the budget sounds more like damage control and not any kind of sustainable recovery plan. This is why you don't give the irresponsible a credit card.

 

>Did some math: If every man, woman, *alphabet person and child in the country gives the government just under 82 thousand dollars we can beat this! It's not that much now, really! Do your part....

 

27,000,000,000,000 / 330,052,960 = 81,805.05 (rounded down so we still have a minute debt - this is the US after all)

 

 

 

*New laws including LGBTQ************ must be written - we ARE inclusive!

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Mr.Otaku said:

Yeah, it's just a game of gambling with about two hundred extra steps lol. I find it so bizarre that so many of the economic figureheads and "leaders" as in politicians don't understand much about economics, it's shocking how little they know. Bad decisions after bad decisions led so many things off rails and now what's the national debt? 3 trillion or something last i checked? Insane.

 

Wait, i just checked and it's showing 27 trillion... Yeah that's a whole lotta "WHAT THE FUCK" from me.

If you are interested you can look at the national deficit and see when the % is lower according to the GDP it is usually in years that have great economic growth and opportunities. AS this changes the opportunities change.

 

 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, landess said:

The following is a paid rant and is not intended to represent the views of those responsible for anything.

OBEY AND SERVE. DO NOT QUESTION ANYTHING. FREE THOUGHT IS HATEFUL THOUGHT. FREE SPEECH IS HATE SPEECH. BORDERS ARE RACIST. EVERYTHING IS SEXIST. THERE ARE MORE THAN TWO GENDERS. THE RICH NEED TO PAY.

 

WE ARE THE PROGRESSIVE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS, WE ARE BRAINLESS, WE WILL RULE THIS LAND.

*Taxes will not apply to official members of the left wing brigades.

Link to comment
55 minutes ago, Mr.Otaku said:

OBEY AND SERVE. DO NOT QUESTION ANYTHING. FREE THOUGHT IS HATEFUL THOUGHT. FREE SPEECH IS HATE SPEECH. BORDERS ARE RACIST. EVERYTHING IS SEXIST. THERE ARE MORE THAN TWO GENDERS. THE RICH NEED TO PAY.

 

WE ARE THE PROGRESSIVE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS, WE ARE BRAINLESS, WE WILL RULE THIS LAND.

*Taxes will not apply to official members of the left wing brigades.

You forgot that porn/porn mods objectify women and Trans/gay individuals. IE This site, and others like it, need to be banned from the internet forever. 

Link to comment
32 minutes ago, Alkpaz said:

You forgot that porn/porn mods objectify women and Trans/gay individuals. IE This site, and others like it, need to be banned from the internet forever. 

Ah shit, i guess i still need more time in the reeducation camp so that i can become a better and obedient citizen. Welp, off i go then! Everything is fine! The world is at peace, all the isms and phobes are no more!

 

#Winning #SmashThePatriarchy #Resist #CommunismForLyfe #LGBTQRSPUVWXYZ #YassQueenSlay #AllMenArePigs #BanThePolice

Link to comment
Quote

In an effort to keep the site & community inviting and friendly we do not allow several categories of conversation. This is not intended as censorship or endorsement of any particular view, but rather a move to keep this site neutral and open. The categories of conversation that are not welcome include those discussing politics and religion. Too often these discussions descend into pointless bickering and lead to offending one party or the other (if not both). This sends the wrong message of what this site is all about. There are plenty of forums, blogs and other online outlets available for these types of conversations, this site is not one of them.

LoversLab is first and foremost a gaming community. As such, we wish to be welcoming and friendly to all genders, orientations, nationalities, religions, and beliefs. Those who are not conducive to that environment will be dealt with in whatever reasonable manner we deem appropriate. What is deemed "political or religious" is up to staff discretion and no others.

OK, this is the final time I'm giving a general warning not to bring politics to this thread, or the other ones.

 

The only way to make certain that the site is equally welcoming to all, open, is if no one can just post blanket statements disparaging the people they don't like. Including, yes, people on the left, people who are ok with multiple genders & orientations, or people who believe covid's a serious enough problem to warrant wearing masks - to name just the targets in recent pages. That's probably half our userbase being regularly insulted and alienated in here this year, and it needs to end.

 

The only way to end it without staff getting an earful about how biased we are when we judge these things on a case-by-case basis is to completely disallow politics altogether, no exceptions. Apolitical is as politically neutral as it gets. 'Politics' includes posting opinions about politicians, parties, current affairs proven to be divisive, and whatever else is clearly meant to express or confirm a political bias. It includes linking to outside sources that do the same.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, DoctaSax said:

OK, this is the final time I'm giving a general warning not to bring politics to this thread, or the other ones.

 

The only way to make certain that the site is equally welcoming to all, open, is if no one can just post blanket statements disparaging the people they don't like. Including, yes, people on the left, people who are ok with multiple genders & orientations, or people who believe covid's a serious enough problem to warrant wearing masks - to name just the targets in recent pages. That's probably half our userbase being regularly insulted and alienated in here this year, and it needs to end.

 

The only way to end it without staff getting an earful about how biased we are when we judge these things on a case-by-case basis is to completely disallow politics altogether, no exceptions. Apolitical is as politically neutral as it gets. 'Politics' includes posting opinions about politicians, parties, current affairs proven to be divisive, and whatever else is clearly meant to express or confirm a political bias. It includes linking to outside sources that do the same.

Fair enough. Just to clarify, can there be a separate section for people that might discuss politics even sarcastically? Like a thread or a group that gives sufficient warnings for all those that might participate? I feel like completely cutting off any political talk at all is also a slight form of alienation to those that might feel the need to express few things, like in the form of rants and there are threads dedicated to that.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Mr.Otaku said:

Fair enough. Just to clarify, can there be a separate section for people that might discuss politics even sarcastically? Like a thread or a group that gives sufficient warnings for all those that might participate? I feel like completely cutting off any political talk at all is also a slight form of alienation to those that might feel the need to express few things, like in the form of rants and there are threads dedicated to that.

Perhaps a 'club' might fall under a 'fair game' ruling, but someone in charge would have to confirm.

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, DoctaSax said:

The only way to make certain that the site is equally welcoming to all, open, is if no one can just post blanket statements disparaging the people they don't like. Including, yes, people on the left, people who are ok with multiple genders & orientations, or people who believe covid's a serious enough problem to warrant wearing masks - to name just the targets in recent pages. That's probably half our userbase being regularly insulted and alienated in here this year, and it needs to end.

Clarification: Are you going to dictate what are or are not facts about COVID-19?

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Mr.Otaku said:

Fair enough. Just to clarify, can there be a separate section for people that might discuss politics even sarcastically? Like a thread or a group that gives sufficient warnings for all those that might participate? I feel like completely cutting off any political talk at all is also a slight form of alienation to those that might feel the need to express few things, like in the form of rants and there are threads dedicated to that.

I'm no moderator (because I think they're overworked and underpaid, among other things) but I understand the absolute ban on religious and political speech on LL. I have had a number of threads I've started get hijacked and the result was anything but pleasant and/or enlightening.

 

As far as a "let me just get this off my chest" thread is concerned, how the hell would you moderate such a thing. "Dewey is a New York scumbag, man I feel better." "Truman is a would-be tin pot dictator with illusions of godhood." Now, place your favorite current politicians names in those quotes and ask yourself, "how would I react?" My guess is badly and this sort of thing is best avoided here. I am certain that there are sites that would welcome this sort of thing. Maybe start a thread with links to places where this sort of speech is not just welcome but encouraged? That sounds like a workable compromise.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use