Jump to content

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, darkfender666 said:

Changed PC and reinstalled everything... now Sasha has grey face :( any idea?

 

I run NPC of dibella also. maybe its related?

Wich should i run first?

Not sure if this'll help as i did not have this issue, but check these:

http://www.loverslab.com/topic/44852-ok-please-explain-the-gray-face-bug-and-fixing-it/

https://forums.nexusmods.com/index.php?/topic/3172354-grey-face-bug-help/

Link to comment
1 hour ago, moduseonly said:

Is the download link just sending anyone else straight to mega.nz and not giving them the opportunity to actually download the file? It doesn't even show up on the mega site just information on what mega is and how to get an account.

https://mega.nz/&#!uV0WCJBJ!csUWqC1AGf7ZoA9dGQfNYv0Y26AJsmTExmZ_SsiOtXQ

 

I just kinda took the thing it says when trying to download it and paste it randomly in the Mega link. Apperantly this should work

Link to comment

I am missing the captured princess quest in the Alternate start menu. Is it still there and I am doing something wrong or was it deleted for a reason?

Thank you in advance and don't know, if this was asked before. My apologies...

 

Found it, I didn't check a checkbox on the documentation menu. Sorry about this, all solved now - stupid me...

Edited by mabuse786
Found cure
Link to comment
19 minutes ago, Kimy said:

The actual update is not far off now. We just need to brush a few things for DD 4.0. I cannot release DCL 6.2 before DD 4.0, as it's relying on it.

As someone currently on the DD4 dev builds, will the new cursed loot version require a new game?

Link to comment
57 minutes ago, Kimy said:

The actual update is not far off now. We just need to brush a few things for DD 4.0. I cannot release DCL 6.2 before DD 4.0, as it's relying on it.

Should 6.2 be renamed to 7.0 if it will require the newer 4.0 DDi?

 

Some users associate minor versions with minor changes, but since you make it sound like 6.2 won't be backward compatible with 4.0, I feel giving it a more significant version number may convey the distinction to users: that it is not backwards compatible with previous DD versions and they should treat it like it has major changes.

 

Just a thought.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use