Site Feedback

[NCK30]

8 hours ago, killer905 said:

In theory, it would be enough to set the club as ‘Private’ then it would not have requests to join.

 

In fact you only have to see the thumbs up on NCK30 and Ashal's posts to see new accounts used exclusively for harassment.

 

Yeah. We are the Cream of the Crop. A shame this site has degraded to such low standards.

[renferal]

I get these a lot whenever I'm trying to upload pictures to my blog. Usually whenever I see these I assume the upload failed, and then I just try it again, but today I logged in to see that they actually seemed to have worked on one of my blog posts that I have yet to publish.

So what should I do whenever I see these when uploading pictures for a new entry? Should I just wait and check back later? Or should I be removing them and trying the upload again?



Further Technical Info:

It looks like the network call for my upload itself responds with a 200 OK response, so it looks to be uploading fine. But then the following network call to get the thumbnail, or picture, for the image returns 404 Not Found. 

[Sirgod]

8 hours ago, NCK30 said:

 

The Club was essentially dead. Nobody ever came by except the same 3-4 people. Even though I stated that I wanted members to be active.

 

Now I am back to being a downloader like in the old days. It feels nice. I have done my part.

 

Glad to see that there are others that appreciated what I did.

 

 

Only had endorsements from Pirates that made a new account to wish me Goodbye (irony).

 

I really did. IT was nice seeing where you where going with, more intimate stuff, instead of all the balls deep whatever. Don't get me wrong, time and a place for everything. 

I just worked like 12 to 16 hours a day, for months on end, and finally got some time off. Again, thanks for what you have done. 

[Ashal]

3 hours ago, renferal said:

I get these a lot whenever I'm trying to upload pictures to my blog. Usually whenever I see these I assume the upload failed, and then I just try it again, but today I logged in to see that they actually seemed to have worked on one of my blog posts that I have yet to publish.

So what should I do whenever I see these when uploading pictures for a new entry? Should I just wait and check back later? Or should I be removing them and trying the upload again?



Further Technical Info:

It looks like the network call for my upload itself responds with a 200 OK response, so it looks to be uploading fine. But then the following network call to get the thumbnail, or picture, for the image returns 404 Not Found. 

 

 

The uploads themself work fine. It just tries to display the thumbnail a split second too fast before it's done propagating across the cdn, which then results in it caching the response as 404. A few minutes later once the response cache expires, it shows up fine. I've been trying to work out a fix for a while, but I haven't had much luck so far.

[Dorabella]

Tell me what is not allowed in this

 

Spoiler

 

[renferal]

On 2/15/2025 at 4:25 PM, Ashal said:

 

 

The uploads themself work fine. It just tries to display the thumbnail a split second too fast before it's done propagating across the cdn, which then results in it caching the response as 404. A few minutes later once the response cache expires, it shows up fine. I've been trying to work out a fix for a while, but I haven't had much luck so far.

Gotcha. Yeah I noticed shortly after I made this post and futz'd with it a bit more, that the images all uploaded fine to the blog. I won't worry about it too much then. Thanks for the quick response.

[Pamatronic]

21 hours ago, Dorabella said:

Tell me what is not allowed in this

Opera

[Psalam]

While this conversation is educational, it is off topic. Let me suggest that you open a Thread to continue it and leave this Thread for site-specific conversation.

[NCK30]

Lord Pepega,

 

Better delete the last two posts. I deleted mine. But I have PM's disabled so I don't get "Fan mail".

 

Maybe We we will meet in another thread. See yah!!

 

Edited February 18, 2025 by NCK30

[gas4gaz]

Hello, when I used the Carbon theme, the site appeared broken, with content all over the place.

[marukisenpai98]

28 minutes ago, gas4gaz said:

Hello, when I used the Carbon theme, the site appeared broken, with content all over the place.

Can Confirm this is happening to me too

[Hex Bolt]

Can json be added to the list of allowed file attachment types?

[DrSeptimus]

Can Edit Details Silently applies to upload/edit/delete screenshot and version details?

 

I have to use "Upload a new version features" each time I make a change and it bump my mod to front pages.

 

One mod won't be issues but it looks like a spam if I does it to multiple mod of mine at same time.

Edited February 19, 2025 by DrSeptimus

[Ashal]

51 minutes ago, DrSeptimus said:

Can Edit Details Silently applies to upload/edit/delete screenshot and version details?

 

I have to use "Upload a new version features" each time I make a change and it bump my mod to front pages.

 

One mod won't be issues but it looks like a spam if I does it to multiple mod of mine at same time.

 

I don't think so.

 

At least, not easily and not without making some significant modifications. Which I'd rather avoid since v5 of the forum software is coming out really soon and will change how a lot of things work.

 

Changing files/screenshots means a new file record is made or altered, which changes the "last updated" timestamp, which is what causes the bump. For screenshots/file changes, they would have to be backdated, which creates a whole different mess.

 

The edit details silently button is primarily to avoid bumping and notifications when fixing typos and the like, not for when files are altered.

 

2 hours ago, Hex Bolt said:

Can json be added to the list of allowed file attachment types?

 

Done.

 

9 hours ago, gas4gaz said:

Hello, when I used the Carbon theme, the site appeared broken, with content all over the place.

 

Fixed.

[DrSeptimus]

4 hours ago, Ashal said:

Which I'd rather avoid since v5 of the forum software is coming out really soon and will change how a lot of things work.

 

 

Cool.. so it would include such a features right? Is there any ETA for it?

[Guest]

> I wonder if Inbox would be more flexible than turning it off for all LL members. I mean if we were able to choose whom we would let write in our inbox, like getting information in the form of "This person sent you a mail, accept it or not" If you reject that person's mail, he/she wouldn't be able to write you again unless you permit him.

[Raven 54]

14 hours ago, Evaloves4 said:

> I wonder if Inbox would be more flexible than turning it off for all LL members. I mean if we were able to choose whom we would let write in our inbox, like getting information in the form of "This person sent you a mail, accept it or not" If you reject that person's mail, he/she wouldn't be able to write you again unless you permit him.

That or a Request to use, "May I send you a PM"    Allow, Disallow

[Raven 54]

The other thing I would like to see, if it is seen as acceptable, is another icon by the like button to dislike  a post so no words are necessary that would start a fight or be removed by the moderators.

Respectfully disagree type of thing.

Thanks to Ashal & the Moderators who work hard here!

Edited February 23, 2025 by Raven 54

[porkybork]

9 hours ago, Raven 54 said:

The other thing I would like to see, if it is seen as acceptable, is another icon by the like button to dislike  a post so no words are necessary that would start a fight or be removed by the moderators.

Respectfully disagree type of thing.

Thanks to Ashal & the Moderators who work hard here!

I think this would be a good addition as long as there’s no score tracking feature added with it. This isn’t Reddit, we don’t need people getting all bent out of shape over their karma score or whatever lol.

[Benmc20]

On 2/23/2025 at 1:48 PM, Raven 54 said:

The other thing I would like to see, if it is seen as acceptable, is another icon by the like button to dislike  a post so no words are necessary that would start a fight or be removed by the moderators.

Respectfully disagree type of thing.

Thanks to Ashal & the Moderators who work hard here!

@Ashal will have the last word about this. I remember that she was against such functionnality fearing harrasmenent. And, personnaly, I think downvote is a bad idea for these reasons.

[Raven 54]

49 minutes ago, Benmc20 said:

@Ashal will have the last word about this. I remember that she was against such functionnality fearing harrasmenent. And, personnaly, I think downvote is a bad idea for these reasons.

I appreciate your thoughts.  

[JB.]

Many thanks to @DoctaSax for pinning a post of mine ,so it doesn't get lost among the dozens of bug reports.

 

I would like in the future, if it's possible, to implement this function for those who upload mods/open threads.

Edited February 26, 2025 by JB.

[Nonsequitur]

Not having a Downvote... No vote at all says a lot... don't you think? And yes, it includes all those that haven't seen the post and those that just don't care... lol 

[Raven 54]

@Ashal

This is exactly what I mean about the hypocrisy of the moderators and Religious content here on LL.

I reported this post twice over two days to see it still is not removed, some of my posts that have been removed have had far less direct comments on the subject.

In the support thread for wartimes ad's tweak this is posted. I ask you why talking of a singular deity and using the phrase one hears at millions of Religious sites daily is not a Religious statement. Please... if we have rules they should not be pick and choose, or Do as I do not as I say.

Thank you.

• Members
• •  12

Posted Wednesday at 10:42 PM

  On 3/5/2025 at 2:48 AM, dertcz said:

SLSO: try enable (then disabled, and enabled game) sexlab animation always climax. This issue happen if slso is installed, but not sending event.

God bless you, that actually worked.

[Raven 54]

On 2/28/2025 at 10:38 AM, Nonsequitur said:

No vote at all says a lot... don't you think? And yes, it includes all those that haven't seen the post and those that just don't care.

That is one silly statement, No up vote doesn't mean anything as it is no reaction at all. How can that include users who have not even seen said post at all, if they have not seen it then it is automatically a negative for the post?!

Then following your logic there is a ton of content posted here that everyone has not seen.