Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Can't find monoman's patreon site either :(  Anyone able to post the data for the missing mods?

Edited by SkyTem
Posted
15 hours ago, SkyTem said:

Let me know if these work for you.  Get them while you can.  And let me know how long they were up if they poof again ?

If they got removed, maybe take the hint and don't upload them? Especially not to the exact same thread the author removed the files from?

Posted
On 10/22/2023 at 11:02 PM, SkyTem said:

Let me know if these work for you.  Get them while you can.  And let me know how long they were up if they poof again ?

They poofed again,.

Posted

I've been playing mono's mods since before wartimes and will always cherish the hard work it must have over the years to put forth so many changes that jell really well. I dunno whats going on with the modder but you have my thanks for sharing them as long as you did.  Its not the first time I have seen this happen even with skyrim mods. I always keep back of backups to my favorites and this is one of them. I feel bad for future players of mods that can not get these anymore and I also feel bad it came to whatever situation  that drove mono to remove everything.

Posted

Well said the last 2 posts above this. Monoman had the ideas and succesfully implemented them into a stable fully customisable mod. 

 

I have no idea why he pulled his work but it remains his work and he is free to do as he chooses with it.

 

It is morally wrong to reupload versions of the mod if the author has decided he or she no longer wishes for them to be available, perhaps thoose that are doing so could spend more time learning to mod themselves rather than critising others for removing theirs.

 

Mod authors have no responsibility to the community to maintain or provide their FREE content.

 

Perhaps if nefram is not happy with it being removed then they shouldnt have labeled it a buggy overpowering mess of a mod on their description?

 

Perhaps if modders had sought to enhance SLS rather than copy bits of it to release as seperate mods then it might still exist.

 

I thank monoman for the content he provided and treasure my copy of his mod. I appreciate the effort he put into making it and the support that he gave to everyone that had an issue.

 

I sincerly hope that he comes back with something new that blows us all away but at the same time I would completely understand if we never see him again.

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, audhol said:

Perhaps if nefram is not happy with it being removed then they shouldnt have labeled it a buggy overpowering mess of a mod on their description?

 

Is that the working theory? That Monoman1 was unhappy with Wabbajack modlists?

Posted (edited)

For anyone interested in learning mod development, I'd take this a good opportunity to get started. While we can't reupload its code or assets, there's nothing stopping anyone from picking up where the original left off - just look at Gyra's continuation of BananaManiac's Licenses or Dasha17's CumSwallowNeedsAddon. The best part about splitting the mod into its constituent parts is each component can be improved and expanded in parallel without one person needing to do everything themselves.

 

Hopefully, we'll get replacements for each major feature eventually and who knows they might even supersede Monoman's excellent work.

 

EDIT: to preemptively clarify what I mean by pick up where they left off, I do not mean copying the scripts and making slight edits. I was thinking more along the lines of conceptual inspiration.

Edited by ponzipyramid
Posted
4 hours ago, audhol said:

It is morally wrong to reupload versions of the mod if the author has decided he or she no longer wishes for them to be available, perhaps thoose that are doing so could spend more time learning to mod themselves rather than critising others for removing theirs.

 

Perhaps if modders had sought to enhance SLS rather than copy bits of it to release as seperate mods then it might still exist.

 

I'd argue it's (far) more amoral to suddenly delete/attempt to make a (highly popular) mod unavailable than it is to simply preserve what was already publicly available for years.

 

And I can't say I'm particularly keen on your righteous high-horse blame throwing, either...

 

I can't fault anyone for being upset that SLS has seemingly vanished overnight, nor for seeking alternate sources to obtain it. Ofc MM1 did great work and he's well within his rights to do what he wants with his account/files/posts, but that doesn't mean we should cheer on his decision to nuke everything without warning, and we certainly shouldn't be shaming people for still wanting access to SLS.

Posted
1 hour ago, ponzipyramid said:

For anyone interested in learning mod development, I'd take this a good opportunity to get started. While we can't reupload its code or assets, there's nothing stopping anyone from picking up where the original left off - just look at Gyra's continuation of BananaManiac's Licenses or Dasha17's CumSwallowNeedsAddon. The best part about splitting the mod into its constituent parts is each component can be improved and expanded in parallel without one person needing to do everything themselves.

 

Hopefully, we'll get replacements for each major feature eventually and who knows they might even supersede Monoman's excellent work.

 

EDIT: to preemptively clarify what I mean by pick up where they left off, I do not mean copying the scripts and making slight edits. I was thinking more along the lines of conceptual inspiration.

Pretty much all I wanted from Survival was whats covered in the new CumSwallowNeedsAddon. That feature was not enough to instal SLS and then have what I didn't want cause issues with other mods. Should be more modularity with mods rather than cram in a crapton of features

Posted
7 hours ago, Herowynne said:

Is that the working theory? That Monoman1 was unhappy with Wabbajack modlists?

I have no clue what Mono's reasoning was, my comments were based purely on how I would feel if I was in his place.

Posted
8 hours ago, tamai said:

No offense to you, but you're not a mod creator nor have you probably produced any type of content. If you have then you should understand why he needs to remove his content if nothing else but for his own mental wellbeing. I also know he didn't remove it for selfish reasons, however at the end of the day I would rather be understanding and give my blessing.

 

I've created over a dozen mods across various games (including Oblivion) on my main acc, and I have been intending to create Skyrim mods once I have time (and SL p+ matures), but also that doesn't matter in the slightest. Nice gatekeeping tho.

Posted
8 hours ago, tamai said:


No offense to you, but you're not a mod creator nor have you probably produced any type of content. If you have then you should understand why he needs to remove his content if nothing else but for his own mental wellbeing. I also know he didn't remove it for selfish reasons, however at the end of the day I would rather be understanding and give my blessing.

How do you know they are not a mod creator?

 

Example me. The name I use here is not what I use elsewhere, So no mods made by me doesn't no equate to no mods anywhere.

I thought you kids were all about not assuming things about people these days? ;)

Posted
9 hours ago, audhol said:

I have no clue what Mono's reasoning was, my comments were based purely on how I would feel if I was in his place.

 

Thanks for the reply. I am a huge fan of SL Survival and all of Monoman1's mods. I am very sad to see him withdraw his mods from LoversLab. I feel that such actions diminish the community, but I also respect and understand that mod authors have a right to do that.

Posted
4 hours ago, Thurlam said:

I've created over a dozen mods across various games (including Oblivion) on my main acc, and I have been intending to create Skyrim mods once I have time (and SL p+ matures), but also that doesn't matter in the slightest. Nice gatekeeping tho.

@tamai assumption that you are not a mod creator was perhaps presumptuous but their points after are valid. I see no difference between a mod creator removing their mod and someone deleting a tiktok or instagram post only to find out that their old posts are being reuploaded. Also gatekeeping implies that someone is blocking access to something because they feel they have a greater right to its access than a new user, now you are assuming that their intention is not moral but mearly to deny access to it for selfish reasons.

 

19 hours ago, Thurlam said:

And I can't say I'm particularly keen on your righteous high-horse blame throwing, either...

If you percieve my use of the word perhaps to give possible reasons as to why mono removed SLS  as being blame throwing then that is your problem. Wheteher you are keen or not on what I have to say matters little to me.

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, audhol said:

@tamai assumption that you are not a mod creator was perhaps presumptuous but their points after are valid. I see no difference between a mod creator removing their mod and someone deleting a tiktok or instagram post only to find out that their old posts are being reuploaded. Also gatekeeping implies that someone is blocking access to something because they feel they have a greater right to its access than a new user, now you are assuming that their intention is not moral but mearly to deny access to it for selfish reasons.

 

If you percieve my use of the word perhaps to give possible reasons as to why mono removed SLS  as being blame throwing then that is your problem. Wheteher you are keen or not on what I have to say matters little to me.

 

That's totally different, tiktok and instagram are monetized. Freebooting/content theft is a whole different topic than software preservation. Even still, it should be well known that if you post something publicly to the internet, you should expect it to be out there forever. Especially if it's something popular that has existed publicly for years.

 

And no, that is not what gatekeeping means.

 

And all the word 'perhaps' does in that sentence is make it speculative blame throwing, which is all anyone can do because not only did MM1 suddenly delete everything, he opted not to ever even provide any sort of rudimentary explanation.

Posted

If we get down to the nitty gritty of it all, the mod, (Possibly) from the perspective of the creator is a gift that is given as it is available. If removed, it would be treated similarily to burning art that was a reminder to a memory wanted to be forgotten. Depending on ones self at this point, it is left to the users that still have it to decide what is moral or not. For some it would be to freely distribute... For others, to cherish what they are given and hold to the mod as a reminder of a great artist. Then there are those that may take it a step further and remove the mods from their lists to respect the desicion of the creator who charged nothing for the work, allowing, true rebirth. Maybe Monoman needed this to move on with something in life. Wouldnt it be better to simply move on and let the present lead our course?

Its up to you, but until new content is created or Monoman realeases anew their work. It may be time to say goodbye to Wartimes and Survival, sad as it may be.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Monoman1 said:

3. Attitudes such as: 

May not be intended but from my POV there's a serious bang of entitlement and ungratefulness about this post. Maybe you wouldn't have these alternatives if I hadn't put in the initial effort so... you're welcome I guess? I don't know why you felt to need to say this. And to say it in this thread...

 

 

I did not intend to come across like, so apologies for having done so. I just thought honesty was the best policy. What I was trying to express was that for me the cons outweighed the pros with SLS. I also accept that the smaller, more modular mods might not exist without yours.

 

I hope things calm down for you soon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...