Sexlab Submit 01SEP14 1133

[dkatryl]

Most Recent Changes
29APR14 2127

• Framework 5.4 had deprecated some of the scripts I referenced.  Updated Submit to reference the current Framework scripts.  This largely affected checks for Sentient and Non-Sentient creatures.
• Removed 'Combat' checks for player surrender.  Given both Submit's built in scene abort (Push the hotkey during sex) as well as the Framework's own abort hotkey, there is no real concern for getting stuck in a sex scene while getting attacked.
• Additionally, added a Global state to ignore invalid target checks after the player had already surrendered and been taken at least once per scenario.  This Global is reset after everything is over and you escape.
• This above should resolve the erroneous "You are still in combat!" messages.  That message has been changed to "Your opponent doesn't accept your surrender!", which should now only play if you try to surrender and there are NO valid targets and your character hadn't been assaulted yet.
• Removed the 'Sexual Preference' check on the second person if you are trying to initiate a threesome to make the process easier.  The check is still valid on the first person you try to seduce per scenario.
• Due to development using the Framework 5.4, the mod requirements section has been updated.

[venomg3]

an update to the only sexlab mod ive ever needed.

 

the bandits in dungeons will be weeping

[germanicus]

Thanks a lot DK. Waited for this. many hugs for hard work.

 

 

tested the mod - WORKS LIKE A CHARM. ( I have more hugs for you but somehow I have a feeling that you do not enjoy in man's hugs)

[Bolwig]

Does this mod also affect npc vs npc? Defeat is being buggy with me at the moment and im thinking of trying out this mod.

[germanicus]

Does this mod also affect npc vs npc? Defeat is being buggy with me at the moment and im thinking of trying out this mod.

 

No, it is a different way of submitting enemies from Defeat mod.

[vagonumero13]

Finally the bug I had since some January release, that caused any tied characters not sitting but lying down in the ground, is fixed, even if it is not in changelog.

[dkatryl]

Finally the bug I had since some January release, that caused any tied characters not sitting but lying down in the ground, is fixed, even if it is not in changelog.

I don't recall there was such a bug. 

 

Okay, well, then, huzzah!

[stclairstv]

only problem i have so far is when i submit to guard it drops me in prison and i cannot move other than that this is awesome.  I do use prison overhaul, defeat, death alternative.  Those all work great.  Tested each one by themslves and together before I installed submit.  Had same problem with last version also.  Anyone know a trick to get control of the player wwhen this happens.  I can jump then float for a second but thats it.

 

Oh one more thing all my follwers are naked after the rape to.  Some even bound and that awesome but they do not redress afterwards.

 

Is it possible to have all followers tied up ?  that would be kick ass

[LewdA]

 

Finally the bug I had since some January release, that caused any tied characters not sitting but lying down in the ground, is fixed, even if it is not in changelog.

I don't recall there was such a bug. 

 

Okay, well, then, huzzah!

 

it only happens if Prison Overhaul is installed after Submit. 

[pinky6225]

Thanks for the update will try it now.

[Kinky]

Make no mistake.  I have no intention of any massive reworks.

 

I am simply making sure it will play nicely with the current Framework (5.4), and try to address some bugs that make the mod relatively unplayable to those that were experiencing them.  Maybe a minor tweak here and there, sure, but that's pretty much the extent of it.

 

Ok i wasnt aware that this would be such a massive change. Thanks for the update.

[blindmankind]

 

Most Recent Changes

29APR14 2127

• Framework 5.4 had deprecated some of the scripts I referenced.  Updated Submit to reference the current Framework scripts.  This largely affected checks for Sentient and Non-Sentient creatures.
• Removed 'Combat' checks for player surrender.  Given both Submit's built in scene abort (Push the hotkey during sex) as well as the Framework's own abort hotkey, there is no real concern for getting stuck in a sex scene while getting attacked.
• Additionally, added a Global state to ignore invalid target checks after the player had already surrendered and been taken at least once per scenario.  This Global is reset after everything is over and you escape.
• This above should resolve the erroneous "You are still in combat!" messages.  That message has been changed to "Your opponent doesn't accept your surrender!", which should now only play if you try to surrender and there are NO valid targets and your character hadn't been assaulted yet.
• Removed the 'Sexual Preference' check on the second person if you are trying to initiate a threesome to make the process easier.  The check is still valid on the first person you try to seduce per scenario.
• Due to development using the Framework 5.4, the mod requirements section has been updated.

 

 

me thanks

 

[Caturday]

Make no mistake.  I have no intention of any massive reworks.

 

I am simply making sure it will play nicely with the current Framework (5.4), and try to address some bugs that make the mod relatively unplayable to those that were experiencing them.  Maybe a minor tweak here and there, sure, but that's pretty much the extent of it.

 

Could FrameWork marked aggressive Undress options be a minor tweak? Id like my char to keep her socks on.

[Lorelei]

Thanks for the update!

[WaxenFigure]

 

Make no mistake.  I have no intention of any massive reworks.

 

I am simply making sure it will play nicely with the current Framework (5.4), and try to address some bugs that make the mod relatively unplayable to those that were experiencing them.  Maybe a minor tweak here and there, sure, but that's pretty much the extent of it.

 

Could FrameWork marked aggressive Undress options be a minor tweak? Id like my char to keep her socks on.

 

There are separate strip options in the Framework for aggressive vs normal already.

 

Another possibility is to edit the MOD that provides the socks and add a keyword "SexLabNoStrip" and then add that keyword to any piece of clothing you don't want removed (in aggressive or normal sex). In my case I added it to the piercings mods because it didn't make sense to have a genital or breast piercing and then remove them when having sex.

[Pinute]

 

 

Make no mistake.  I have no intention of any massive reworks.

 

I am simply making sure it will play nicely with the current Framework (5.4), and try to address some bugs that make the mod relatively unplayable to those that were experiencing them.  Maybe a minor tweak here and there, sure, but that's pretty much the extent of it.

 

Could FrameWork marked aggressive Undress options be a minor tweak? Id like my char to keep her socks on.

 

There are separate strip options in the Framework for aggressive vs normal already.

 

Another possibility is to edit the MOD that provides the socks and add a keyword "SexLabNoStrip" and then add that keyword to any piece of clothing you don't want removed (in aggressive or normal sex). In my case I added it to the piercings mods because it didn't make sense to have a genital or breast piercing and then remove them when having sex.

 

 

A different option (if you use Devious Devices) is to change nipple to slot 56 and labia to slot 49 since you need to disable stripping for those in Sexlab anyway. A nice side effect is you won't have jewelry dangling through the belt.

[dkatryl]

On, the subject of player stripping:

 

Originally, you had 100% of your gear stolen if you surrendered which would naturally result in your being fully nekkid.  So MCM stripping preferences were kind of moot.

 

People complained about losing all of their gear (Or having to reclaim it from the bandit that stole it), which I was kind of like, well, yeah, but normally you'd be dead and reloading, right? 

 

But then they also pointed out that you'd have all of your favorites deleted if the weapon(s) got removed from your inventory, and you'd have to recreate them each time, and I agreed, *that* was a major pain in the ass.

 

So I implemented the MCM option to not have the gear stolen (other than gold), but to simulate the same feel of being robbed, I just fully strip you, because those bandits are greedy and they would normally take everything.

 

So, long story short, eh, I'll take another look at it, maybe I can change how the stripping is handled.  No promises, but, eh, fresh eyes might see an easy solution I overlooked in the past.

[germanicus]

DK - I understand that you like sadomasochism, which is fine with me , but is there a possibility to make a choice that bandits will take either your gold or armour? Or, just a proposal, they take nothing but (if that is an option) they will rape you until your stamina, life and magicka drains to zero? So I believe that there are bandits too who aren't interesting only in gold and equipment but are perverted and all they have in mind is sex (like me ). So, what are you think?

[dkatryl]

Now I remember the reason I had left the stripping the way I had it.  There was never a function that allowed me to disable the redressing of a victim if the player didn't prevent it via the Framework's MCM options.

 

So, if I did the stealing AFTER they assaulted you, it would look kind of stupid if you got partially got stripped, then immediately got dressed as soon as it finished, and then got stripped again when your stuff was stolen.

 

But that was pre-1.5x Framework.  Maybe Ashal added something to disable redressing, in which case, problem solved.

 

Otherwise, it is kind of stuck the way it was.

[dkatryl]

Ashal said he would add a API command to disable victim redressing so I can properly control the scene, allowing me to move the gear robbing portion to after the initial assault.

 

That should make everyone requesting that I just use the Framework MCM stripping settings happy.

 

Can't give any ETA, since it will require 1.55 to be released first.

[nutluck]

Ashal said he would add a API command to disable victim redressing so I can properly control the scene, allowing me to move the gear robbing portion to after the initial assault.

 

That should make everyone requesting that I just use the Framework MCM stripping settings happy.

 

Can't give any ETA, since it will require 1.55 to be released first.

 

No worries and take it easy. You for a few months cranked out a ton of updates. You earned the right to take any future updates slowly.

 

[Nuvenor]

The file just refuses to download for me Can someone reup it as an attachment?

[Abinath]

I love the dialog options from this mod adds a much more immersive way to have consensual sex and I love that I cant just have sex anywhere. Bloody guards lol Thanks for making an awesome mod

[Dapper Dan Pomade]

I have a dumb question, but here goes:

 

What's the wording for the NPC dialog options available for this mod? I've got more than a few SexLab mods installed, so it's hard to tell which dialog options come from which mods. It seems like quite a few of them add their own romance and proposition dialogs.

[Abinath]

hold up a moment I have something important to discuss with you or something along those lines.