[mod] Stellaris Sexy Xenos and more (SSX) 1.11.8

[Toronam]

Installation instructions updated.

[Wolf470]

If I may suggest something - assigning portraits to the empty slots -SSX1 through SSX5 might help with the empty or blank portraits that pop up from time to time.  I have no idea why they pop up but since it does so in a non-modded game.  Anyway thought I figured that the idea might help.  If someone else has already suggested this just add my vote (not that we're in a democracy or nuttin).

[JesusKreist]

Nope it won't help.

 

The AI can't choose something that is not there.

 

The occasional empty portrait was a bug apparently that happened when a race got uplifted or altered it's genetic code and stellaris fucked up the generation.

The bug was not related to custom portraits and happened in unmodded games as well.

Don't actually recall when/if the bug has been fixed, though.

 

 

And btw. I do play 2.2 since it got released and I never encountered a species with blank portraits. Similarly I found no recent reports of that bug.

It might be something wrong with you game.

[sila]

Hmm, I am not sure if maybe I installed this incorrectly or am missing dlc or something but only the SSX tab has races selectable,  SSX1-6 are completely blank.

Or are the other sections not implemented yet in the new update?

 

As for the SSX ships, they look the same as the molluscoid ones in a slightly different color, are they actually different?

[JesusKreist]

3 minutes ago, sila said:

Hmm, I am not sure if maybe I installed this incorrectly or am missing dlc or something but only the SSX tab has races selectable, SSM and SSX1-6 are completely blank.

Or are the other sections not implemented yet in the new update?

 

*sigh*

 

Seriously?

 

Reading the very fist sentence on the mod page is too complex/hard/taxing for you?

[sila]

4 minutes ago, JesusKreist said:

 

*sigh*

 

Seriously?

 

Reading the very fist sentence on the mod page is too complex/hard/taxing for you?

So SSX1 does not count as an SSX tab? Ok then.... You did not need to get so annoyed about it -.-

If they are just blank tabs why are they there at all?

 

Edit: aah ok then, I think I get it now. I had read that before but apparently did not get what it meant. I assumed SSX1-6 would be included in SSX.

 

Are the ships supposed to be the same as molluscoid ones?

[JesusKreist]

 

3 minutes ago, sila said:

So SSX1 does not count as an SSX tab? Ok then.... You did not need to get so annoyed about it -.-

If they are just blank tabs why are they there at all?

Same answer:

 

5 minutes ago, JesusKreist said:

 

*sigh*

 

Seriously?

 

Reading the very fist sentence on the mod page is too complex/hard/taxing for you?

 

Seemingly you don't even try to read.

Otherwise you'd know and won't ask.

[sila]

3 minutes ago, JesusKreist said:

 

Same answer:

 

 

Seemingly you don't even try to read.

Otherwise you'd know and won't ask.

Again, you did not need to get rude about it. I apologize for not understanding what the OP meant by that line. As I said I had assumed SSX1-6 would be included in "SSX".

 

 

[Vylade]

Thank you for having this updated for the latest version! ❤️

[Absentia616]

Um.... Is this correct? because this feels very broken

[JesusKreist]

The new additions right after the patch are in the very first iteration i.e. not balanced yet.

That part of the mod is labeled beta and toronam has stated some parts are unfinished while others were cut completely for the beta.

[Absentia616]

Yeah I know, and I know this tech has been updated, I was just wondering whether it was a typo in the mod files or whether it was intentional is all

[JesusKreist]

More likely not balanced.

A typo would mean it's supposed to bring 20 admin cap. Way to few for a rare tier 3 tech. You could get that with the third unity trait in a very good (with 2.2) unity tree.

After the report it likely gets toned down to ~ 40 or 50 in the following version. Still very good but not as OP as 200.

[Absentia616]

Fair point, might have just thrown a number in their so the tech did something, it just took me by surprise I went from 30 to 230 with a single tech, lol and I'm not complaining

[TheFinalxBoss]

personal harem does not work because { leader_cost = -0.75 } should be { leaders_cost_mult = -0.75 and leaders_upkeep_mult = -0.75 }

[Toronam]

The sexyxenos trait and more beta is updated. 1 new empire wide edict, more tweaking, and 4 new civics freshly baked and not tested. ?

 

Thanks for your feedbacks, it's alway important.

[sila]

11 hours ago, Toronam said:

The sexyxenos trait and more beta is updated. 1 new empire wide edict, more tweaking, and 4 new civics freshly baked and not tested. ?

 

Thanks for your feedbacks, it's alway important.

Is the Illegal Masturbation civic supposed to be just a handicap? The only effect it lists is -33% to society research from jobs.  Does it have any kind of hidden bonuses or something?

I thought it sounded like an interesting one but I don't really want to take it if it is really just a negative trait taking a civic slot.

[Toronam]

It's a big mistake. Normally it's + 20%.

[Zatrian]

Errrrrr. I've read the first sentense and I don't understand. I mean OK I Understood that it's normal that sections ssx1-6 are blank BUT! How cam I get dragon potrait? Cause AI could use it, but I can't!

[Toronam]

2 hours ago, Zatrian said:

Errrrrr. I've read the first sentense and I don't understand. I mean OK I Understood that it's normal that sections ssx1-6 are blank BUT! How cam I get dragon potrait? Cause AI could use it, but I can't!

[Zatrian]

9 minutes ago, Toronam said:

But... Welll. Ok. I'll use muy imagination to say that its a dragon... Thanks anysway

[Raana]

2 hours ago, Zatrian said:

But... Welll. Ok. I'll use muy imagination to say that its a dragon... Thanks anysway

A lot of the portraits in that set do look a bit more plain reptillian than they do draconian, but there are quite a few genuine dragons (both western and eastern) among the portraits to choose from.

[Toronam]

For me, they are dragons, but it's only my interpretation of what I see.  They are  maybe badly named. They can be also seen as demons. ?

 

Sorry for my troll answer.

[Chakatsilverpaw]

Most of them appear to be Dragons, like 90% of them.

[Kharadin]

There be dragons!

Some of them don't necessarily look like dragons, but those portraits are rare.

Also, slightly unrelated question: is there any mod to make simple pops portraits bigger in the current version of Stellaris? I'm playing on 2.1.3, but tried 2.2 in multiplayer with a friend not long ago and specialists' portraits seemed much smaller than pop portraits in older game versions.