Jump to content

Guest

Recommended Posts

Posted

That shit is not about girls, boys, or fuck whatever you can think off, it is about personal gain. And where is point of discussing that?

I get what you're trying to say I guess. Here's an excerpt from a different Guardian article  back in September, overall it's a pretty even handed write up  i'd say:

 

The last fortnight has seen that powder keg explode. A spiteful blogpost by the ex-lover of indie games developer Zoe Quinn, and the launch of the latest Tropes vs Women video by Sarkeesian, which analyses the sexist depiction of women in some games, have led to reams of appalling threats and abuse online. Both women have feared for their safety. Games writers have been seen to close ranks and defend the developers, criticising the gamer community, which has responded by huddling around the #gamergate hashtag on Twitter. Questions have been asked about the close relationship between development studios and games critics – sometimes to a ludicrous extent, with charts and diagrams posted online showing the connections between key figures. 

 

So you can say it ain't so, but it definitely looks like a bunch of people have got a hard on for anti-feminism, and a fair number of them have allied themselves with GG.

 

I totally agree with you, videogame journalism is in  a fucking terrible state of affairs right now, it's long overdue for it to clean up it's act, no question. I'm just not sure what that has to do with Zoe Quinn's dad getting a phone call from somebody screaming "YOUR DAUGHTER'S A WHORE", and all the other stuff that's been allowed to get swept up with it all. 

 

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

Posted

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

 

The difference is, other than Jack Thompson being arguably worse and more ignorant and hateful, is that Jack Thompson doesn't get death threats, as far as I've ever heard. I've never heard anyone threaten to shoot up a school over Jack Thompson, then for other people to immediately pass off the threats as Thompson's own doing. I don't hear endless complaining about Jack Thompson all day, despite trying to blame videogames for every problem in the world. Can you think of any other difference between Thompson and Sarkeesian? Something more physical perhaps?

I also seem to vaguely remember some controversy surrounding that Kane and Lunch game, where someone was fired for giving it a bad review...or they were bribed to give it good reviews, something like that, I don't really remember, all I know is it was easily a much bigger violation of gaming journalism integrity than whatever the fuck Zoe Quinn was accused of doing. But it got about 2% of the attention this whole issue got and everyone forgot about it rather quickly, obviously because there was no vagina to blame it all on. Just one of the many many reasons I've been pretty much tuning out all the anus brains who have been bitching about Quinn but want everyone to believe this is just about gaming journalism and blah blah whatever, nobody believes you idiots, shut up and go fuck your anime body pillows.

And as for Sarkeesian, I just really really don't care. I agree that what she's doing is ridiculous and pointless, but why should anyone really care? What effect is it gonna have on anything? Until I hear about how what she's doing is somehow halting the production of Fallout 4, I just really couldn't care less.

Posted

The Kane and Lynch story did eventually got outed and sort of "solved" itself in the end.

The person who reviewed the game gave it a less than stellar score. It wasn't exactly "bad review posted, and him out the door tomorrow" kind of thing, it lingers on a little longer, months if I recall correctly.

 

Long story short him and a few who left with him founded a new gaming website and that turned out quite successful.

 

With a few twist and turns along the way and at end (present) of course, read into that however you will.

Posted

 

That shit is not about girls, boys, or fuck whatever you can think off, it is about personal gain. And where is point of discussing that?

I get what you're trying to say I guess. Here's an excerpt from a different Guardian article  back in September, overall it's a pretty even handed write up  i'd say:

 

The last fortnight has seen that powder keg explode. A spiteful blogpost by the ex-lover of indie games developer Zoe Quinn, and the launch of the latest Tropes vs Women video by Sarkeesian, which analyses the sexist depiction of women in some games, have led to reams of appalling threats and abuse online. Both women have feared for their safety. Games writers have been seen to close ranks and defend the developers, criticising the gamer community, which has responded by huddling around the #gamergate hashtag on Twitter. Questions have been asked about the close relationship between development studios and games critics – sometimes to a ludicrous extent, with charts and diagrams posted online showing the connections between key figures. 

 

So you can say it ain't so, but it definitely looks like a bunch of people have got a hard on for anti-feminism, and a fair number of them have allied themselves with GG.

 

I totally agree with you, videogame journalism is in  a fucking terrible state of affairs right now, it's long overdue for it to clean up it's act, no question. I'm just not sure what that has to do with Zoe Quinn's dad getting a phone call from somebody screaming "YOUR DAUGHTER'S A WHORE", and all the other stuff that's been allowed to get swept up with it all. 

 

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

 

 

For instance, last time I played Archage I was mining, while I did that I mined one rock faster than other guy did. He told me that he hope that I and my family will horrible die in real life.

 

Of cores I called police, FBI, KGB, went to hiding in rented ( on my cat name, be safe than  sorry!)bunker.

Posted

gaming journalism is a job now. Nice work if you can get it, eh.

This has been half of my opinion on the entire thing. Who even cares about these people or what they say? The only one I listen to is Angry Joe, because he's hilarious, not because I care about his opinion. :D The other half is "hey, jerks on the internet are getting dox and sending threats? It's 1995 all over again!@*#&$" This is not news. ;)

Posted

 

gaming journalism is a job now. Nice work if you can get it, eh.

"The only one I listen to is Angry Joe, because he's hilarious, not because I care about his opinion. :D  ;)  :P  :D  :lol: "

 

ok i must add Gopher cuz we have similar taste

Posted

 

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

 

The difference is, other than Jack Thompson being arguably worse and more ignorant and hateful, is that Jack Thompson doesn't get death threats, as far as I've ever heard. I've never heard anyone threaten to shoot up a school over Jack Thompson, then for other people to immediately pass off the threats as Thompson's own doing. I don't hear endless complaining about Jack Thompson all day, despite trying to blame videogames for every problem in the world. Can you think of any other difference between Thompson and Sarkeesian? Something more physical perhaps?

I also seem to vaguely remember some controversy surrounding that Kane and Lunch game, where someone was fired for giving it a bad review...or they were bribed to give it good reviews, something like that, I don't really remember, all I know is it was easily a much bigger violation of gaming journalism integrity than whatever the fuck Zoe Quinn was accused of doing. But it got about 2% of the attention this whole issue got and everyone forgot about it rather quickly, obviously because there was no vagina to blame it all on. Just one of the many many reasons I've been pretty much tuning out all the anus brains who have been bitching about Quinn but want everyone to believe this is just about gaming journalism and blah blah whatever, nobody believes you idiots, shut up and go fuck your anime body pillows.

And as for Sarkeesian, I just really really don't care. I agree that what she's doing is ridiculous and pointless, but why should anyone really care? What effect is it gonna have on anything? Until I hear about how what she's doing is somehow halting the production of Fallout 4, I just really couldn't care less.

 

Thompson did get death threats as far as I know, it's just that nobody really cared because the whole gaming related press was against him. With Sarkeesian it's a different story because most of the gaming related media supports her in one way or another. It's funny though because both of them say that video games are dangerous because they poison your mind, Thompson said video games make you violent and angry, Sarkeesian says video games make you violent and angry towards women. It's hard to say who of them got more hate in the end, but I am pretty sure that the hate Sarkeesian gets is brought a lot more to attention than how Thompson was treated.

 

Anyway, the good thing is that there is some light shed on how toxic the community actually is. The most interesting thing is not necessarily the statement made, but the reactions it receives.

 

 

My opinion on the matter is that video games don't do shit. They make no one violent and they make no one hate anybody - obvious exception are multiplayer games of course - if anything, they are at most a mirror of what people think and want. But even then it would be a pretty bad and broken mirror because a kind and peaceful person can play a murder simulator like GTA without secretly wanting to kill everybody. The assumption that what kind of video games you play tells who you really are is quite a stupid one.

 

Posted

 

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

 

The difference is, other than Jack Thompson being arguably worse and more ignorant and hateful, is that Jack Thompson doesn't get death threats, as far as I've ever heard. I've never heard anyone threaten to shoot up a school over Jack Thompson, then for other people to immediately pass off the threats as Thompson's own doing. I don't hear endless complaining about Jack Thompson all day, despite trying to blame videogames for every problem in the world. Can you think of any other difference between Thompson and Sarkeesian? Something more physical perhaps?

I also seem to vaguely remember some controversy surrounding that Kane and Lunch game, where someone was fired for giving it a bad review...or they were bribed to give it good reviews, something like that, I don't really remember, all I know is it was easily a much bigger violation of gaming journalism integrity than whatever the fuck Zoe Quinn was accused of doing. But it got about 2% of the attention this whole issue got and everyone forgot about it rather quickly, obviously because there was no vagina to blame it all on. Just one of the many many reasons I've been pretty much tuning out all the anus brains who have been bitching about Quinn but want everyone to believe this is just about gaming journalism and blah blah whatever, nobody believes you idiots, shut up and go fuck your anime body pillows.

And as for Sarkeesian, I just really really don't care. I agree that what she's doing is ridiculous and pointless, but why should anyone really care? What effect is it gonna have on anything? Until I hear about how what she's doing is somehow halting the production of Fallout 4, I just really couldn't care less.

 

For sure. The internet was quite a different place back when Jack Thompson was at his shit stirring peak. Things can move much more rapidly today, now that everyone including your granny are taking to Twitter every time they have a brain fart and want the rest of the world to know about it. But I hear you. Had he been a woman, for example someone like Tipper Gore,  I can easily imagine things taking quite a darker turn.

 

What Zoe Quinn is primarily accused of is being a gigantic pain in the ass. But for a certain kind of benighted operator it's not enough to just robustly attempt to refute her, they want to entirely knock her out of play with the 'dirty slut' card.  Many women who have been determined to speak their brains publicly and had something uncompromising to say will probably  at some point have experienced the same sort of treatment to a greater or lesser degree.

 

I guess the question is, how much of this sort of shit has to do with GG as a valid movement? I honestly have no idea, though I reckon these sorts of things are an inevitable consequence of the methods these campaigns use to spread their message. My opinion, contrary to what another poster claimed earlier, is that GG's lack of any formal structure makes it easier to co-opt, not harder. 

Posted

 

 

That shit is not about girls, boys, or fuck whatever you can think off, it is about personal gain. And where is point of discussing that?

I get what you're trying to say I guess. Here's an excerpt from a different Guardian article  back in September, overall it's a pretty even handed write up  i'd say:

 

The last fortnight has seen that powder keg explode. A spiteful blogpost by the ex-lover of indie games developer Zoe Quinn, and the launch of the latest Tropes vs Women video by Sarkeesian, which analyses the sexist depiction of women in some games, have led to reams of appalling threats and abuse online. Both women have feared for their safety. Games writers have been seen to close ranks and defend the developers, criticising the gamer community, which has responded by huddling around the #gamergate hashtag on Twitter. Questions have been asked about the close relationship between development studios and games critics – sometimes to a ludicrous extent, with charts and diagrams posted online showing the connections between key figures. 

 

So you can say it ain't so, but it definitely looks like a bunch of people have got a hard on for anti-feminism, and a fair number of them have allied themselves with GG.

 

I totally agree with you, videogame journalism is in  a fucking terrible state of affairs right now, it's long overdue for it to clean up it's act, no question. I'm just not sure what that has to do with Zoe Quinn's dad getting a phone call from somebody screaming "YOUR DAUGHTER'S A WHORE", and all the other stuff that's been allowed to get swept up with it all. 

 

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

 

 

For instance, last time I played Archage I was mining, while I did that I mined one rock faster than other guy did. He told me that he hope that I and my family will horrible die in real life.

 

Of cores I called police, FBI, KGB, went to hiding in rented ( on my cat name, be safe than  sorry!)bunker.

 

I get the sarcastic tone, I think I still get what you're trying to say, though you could have been just a little less cryptic. 

 

But empathy is underrated. Imagine yourself on the receiving end of a concerted hate campaign that gets a grip of your real life and takes in people you care about even though they have nothing to do with anything?

 

How glib about it would you be then? 

Posted

 

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

 

The difference is, other than Jack Thompson being arguably worse and more ignorant and hateful, is that Jack Thompson doesn't get death threats, as far as I've ever heard. I've never heard anyone threaten to shoot up a school over Jack Thompson, then for other people to immediately pass off the threats as Thompson's own doing. I don't hear endless complaining about Jack Thompson all day, despite trying to blame videogames for every problem in the world. Can you think of any other difference between Thompson and Sarkeesian? Something more physical perhaps?

I also seem to vaguely remember some controversy surrounding that Kane and Lunch game, where someone was fired for giving it a bad review...or they were bribed to give it good reviews, something like that, I don't really remember, all I know is it was easily a much bigger violation of gaming journalism integrity than whatever the fuck Zoe Quinn was accused of doing. But it got about 2% of the attention this whole issue got and everyone forgot about it rather quickly, obviously because there was no vagina to blame it all on. Just one of the many many reasons I've been pretty much tuning out all the anus brains who have been bitching about Quinn but want everyone to believe this is just about gaming journalism and blah blah whatever, nobody believes you idiots, shut up and go fuck your anime body pillows.

And as for Sarkeesian, I just really really don't care. I agree that what she's doing is ridiculous and pointless, but why should anyone really care? What effect is it gonna have on anything? Until I hear about how what she's doing is somehow halting the production of Fallout 4, I just really couldn't care less.

This is probably why Jack Thompson didn't get real death threats.

http://www.gamerheadlines.com/2014/09/anita-sarkeesian-faked-death-threats/

 

Something else to consider is Thompson didn't have a rabid misandrist fan base lowing like internet cattle over his every move, the way Sarkeesian does.  Her insidious and LAZY approach already brings her credibility into question.  If she is going to lie about something as meaningless as a video game content, she is certainly capable of lying about more substantial issues.

So, on August 26th Sarkeesian claims she was threatened by a Bill Dobson and she has the tweets to 'prove' it.  She then proceeded to quote him on her own twitter account and engage in a prolonged exchange with her followers.  She then 'fled her own home in fear for her life' and tweeted about that.  Afterward, she claims she filed a report with the San Francisco Police Department, a police department that has no record of her filing an incident report.  Sarkeesian then reproduces snipits of a conversation she had with the SFPD where they tell her that if she doesn't want to be threatened, she should stop what she's doing... :lol: You gotta be fucking kidding me!  The liberal-ass SFPD is going to tell someone that?  Seriously?

________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

My Conclusion:  Anita Sarkeesian is a liar, that's a proven fact since her own words condemn her in the game play videos she posts.  This whole 'I was threaten for my beliefs' circus is just another fabrication for her ongoing internet Surrealist theater.  Think Anita Sarkeesian, think Monty Python.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

I don't believe she was threatened at all.  I have no reason to, she's a liar.  I think she stirred up a bunch of drama behind NOTHING (since she's a liar) and when certain elements of the gaming populace got wind of it they mounted a counteroffensive to shut her up.  But Sarkeesian being what she is, she rallied her troops and dug in.  Her fan base, being what it is (they already have a neurotic need to fight a cause) she plays on that and fabricates more controversy to entertain the troops...because that's what she does.

 

I hope the person who posted those twitter threats against her is caught and made to pay the price.  If 'Bill Dobson' is caught I hope he spends a few months in jail, get slapped with some hefty fines and does a shit load of community service for a cause he loathes.  If Sarkeesian herself fabricated this or if one of her SJW stooges staged the whole thing, I hope they get the same punishment.

 

In all, what we have for 'gaming journalism' is people like Sarkeesian, the meat puppets on MSNBC and generally dubious creatures like Kotaku, Polygon, Gamespot, etc.  It isn't about ethical conduct of 'journalists'.  It boils down to Comscore slots, site traffic, etc.  It never was ethical to begin with and now we have misogynists, misandrists, SJWs and all of other internet flotsam washing up on our peaceful gamer beaches.

 

I do agree with you on the point about what they're doing being irrelevant.  There's nothing they can do about the games I already have and I doubt the bean counters for corporations like Ubisoft or Bethesda are willing to alienate their fan base for the sake of being 'politically correct' to satisfy the likes of the Sarkeesians of the world.

Posted

 

That shit is not about girls, boys, or fuck whatever you can think off, it is about personal gain. And where is point of discussing that?

I get what you're trying to say I guess. Here's an excerpt from a different Guardian article  back in September, overall it's a pretty even handed write up  i'd say:

 

The last fortnight has seen that powder keg explode. A spiteful blogpost by the ex-lover of indie games developer Zoe Quinn, and the launch of the latest Tropes vs Women video by Sarkeesian, which analyses the sexist depiction of women in some games, have led to reams of appalling threats and abuse online. Both women have feared for their safety. Games writers have been seen to close ranks and defend the developers, criticising the gamer community, which has responded by huddling around the #gamergate hashtag on Twitter. Questions have been asked about the close relationship between development studios and games critics – sometimes to a ludicrous extent, with charts and diagrams posted online showing the connections between key figures. 

 

So you can say it ain't so, but it definitely looks like a bunch of people have got a hard on for anti-feminism, and a fair number of them have allied themselves with GG.

 

I totally agree with you, videogame journalism is in  a fucking terrible state of affairs right now, it's long overdue for it to clean up it's act, no question. I'm just not sure what that has to do with Zoe Quinn's dad getting a phone call from somebody screaming "YOUR DAUGHTER'S A WHORE", and all the other stuff that's been allowed to get swept up with it all. 

 

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

 

 

How'd they get Zoe Quinns dads phone number?

 

Posted

 

 

 

That shit is not about girls, boys, or fuck whatever you can think off, it is about personal gain. And where is point of discussing that?

I get what you're trying to say I guess. Here's an excerpt from a different Guardian article  back in September, overall it's a pretty even handed write up  i'd say:

 

The last fortnight has seen that powder keg explode. A spiteful blogpost by the ex-lover of indie games developer Zoe Quinn, and the launch of the latest Tropes vs Women video by Sarkeesian, which analyses the sexist depiction of women in some games, have led to reams of appalling threats and abuse online. Both women have feared for their safety. Games writers have been seen to close ranks and defend the developers, criticising the gamer community, which has responded by huddling around the #gamergate hashtag on Twitter. Questions have been asked about the close relationship between development studios and games critics – sometimes to a ludicrous extent, with charts and diagrams posted online showing the connections between key figures. 

 

So you can say it ain't so, but it definitely looks like a bunch of people have got a hard on for anti-feminism, and a fair number of them have allied themselves with GG.

 

I totally agree with you, videogame journalism is in  a fucking terrible state of affairs right now, it's long overdue for it to clean up it's act, no question. I'm just not sure what that has to do with Zoe Quinn's dad getting a phone call from somebody screaming "YOUR DAUGHTER'S A WHORE", and all the other stuff that's been allowed to get swept up with it all. 

 

edit: and just for the record, I can't stand Anita Sarkeesian, she's the feminist equivalent of Jack Thompson, a talking head with a pretty ugly persona who wants to cause trouble for people she doesn't give two shits about. 

 

 

For instance, last time I played Archage I was mining, while I did that I mined one rock faster than other guy did. He told me that he hope that I and my family will horrible die in real life.

 

Of cores I called police, FBI, KGB, went to hiding in rented ( on my cat name, be safe than  sorry!)bunker.

 

I get the sarcastic tone, I think I still get what you're trying to say, though you could have been just a little less cryptic. 

 

But empathy is underrated. Imagine yourself on the receiving end of a concerted hate campaign that gets a grip of your real life and takes in people you care about even though they have nothing to do with anything?

 

How glib about it would you be then? 

 

 

There is no easy answer to that, but I don't have much empathy for thief and liars like Anita is. Or Quinn, to be honest I even don't know why she is calling herself developer... Her "game" can be written in notepad in around 30s. She maybe a writer but not developer - Anyway that is irrelevant. Fucking for approval is not a way to go in business. More to that, she call everyone that digress with her a anti-feminist and misogynist - WTF?

 

But still I'm far away from death threats - they are made by such mad people like one I described in case of archage.

I'm not fucking calling police or blog about "OMG they are want to kill me because I'm a woman" when I'm threaten online

 

Honestly.

 

Ps

And that guy who is harrasing her dad should got tracked and face justice system.

 

Posted

 

 

How'd they get Zoe Quinns dads phone number?

 

 

 

:dodgy:

let me guess 

you still believe in santa claus

:P  :D  :lol:

 

 

No its a honest question as lets say an average joe (totally hypothetically as i'm not encouraging any such behavior) decides he wants to death threat/comment on there sexual habits etc to the parents of the dude that wrote that god awful review of dragon age 2 (94% best combat rpg ever etc) Rich McCormick so other than googling/trying every public number you could find assosiated with the surname and getting lucky i don't get how you'd go about it.

 

The way its spoken of makes it sound like its a common occurence or something instead of the work of nut jobs that should be treated as nut jobs

Posted

 

Online phone directories.

Pay enough money and you can find anything about anyone.

That, our someone can pretend their family was threatened.  Just as effective for on-line sympathy.  Not that any of these people involved would EVER fabricate anything... :dodgy:

Posted

 

 

Online phone directories.

Pay enough money and you can find anything about anyone.

That, our someone can pretend their family was threatened.  Just as effective for on-line sympathy.  Not that any of these people involved would EVER fabricate anything... :dodgy:

 

somebody get point

Posted

somebody get point

I'll do it.

 

Anita Sarkeesian just tweeted this to my AKC standard poodle;

 

@Kendo2's dog

You muther-fucker.  UR gonna pay.  I had enough of you and your bullshit.  I'm gonna paint you pink and then I'm gonna paint Kendo2.

 

My dog has already contacted PETA and the ASPCA.  He's terrified and sheltering with close and trusted friends.  SanFran PD told him that if he wanted the threats of pink pooches to stop he should just keep quiet but he's not going to.  His voice (barking) WILL be heard!

 

DISCLAIMER:  Anita Sarkeesian really did threaten my dog.  I just posted proof...or as much proof as Zoe and Anita can provide for their alleged threats.

 

Posted

I got some death threats when my mod was shown on youtube, more people saying I should kill myself and such, but either way I didn't really care, and I did a lot less to piss people off than Zoe and Anita did. A friend of mine got online death threats for saying something bad about some fuckin sports team once, but because she's a woman she also got rape threats. She didn't take any of it serious either though. My point is, it's not hard to get internet death threats, so I find it extremely hard to believe they didn't get any and they made this all up. That's exactly what the shitty pricks behind all this want you to believe anyway.

Guest carywinton
Posted

 

somebody get point

I'll do it.

 

Anita Sarkeesian just tweeted this to my AKC standard poodle;

 

@Kendo2's dog

You muther-fucker.  UR gonna pay.  I had enough of you and your bullshit.  I'm gonna paint you pink and then I'm gonna paint Kendo2.

 

My dog has already contacted PETA and the ASPCA.  He's terrified and sheltering with close and trusted friends.  SanFran PD told him that if he wanted the threats of pink pooches to stop he should just keep quiet but he's not going to.  His voice (barking) WILL be heard!

 

DISCLAIMER:  Anita Sarkeesian really did threaten my dog.  I just posted proof...or as much proof as Zoe and Anita can provide for their alleged threats.

 

 

Bow, wow, wow, bwhahahah! Righteous point of factual innuendo.

 

Posted

 

somebody get point

I'll do it.

 

Anita Sarkeesian just tweeted this to my AKC standard poodle;

 

@Kendo2's dog

You muther-fucker.  UR gonna pay.  I had enough of you and your bullshit.  I'm gonna paint you pink and then I'm gonna paint Kendo2.

 

My dog has already contacted PETA and the ASPCA.  He's terrified and sheltering with close and trusted friends.  SanFran PD told him that if he wanted the threats of pink pooches to stop he should just keep quiet but he's not going to.  His voice (barking) WILL be heard!

 

DISCLAIMER:  Anita Sarkeesian really did threaten my dog.  I just posted proof...or as much proof as Zoe and Anita can provide for their alleged threats.

 

 

Careful calling PETA they will want to help your dog by "Freeing" it.. sadly their version of Animal freedom is death >.>

Posted

I seriously gotta make a sock puppet 'Anita Sarkeesian' account at Nexus.  Dark0ne's asshole would slam shut so tight he'd shit Tiffany cufflinks for us.

Posted

Kendo.. maybe a play on that name.. Just enough to let him know it is her but not so direct. Maybe Anita SarkAsian... ? Otherwise he might think someone is playing with him. Most members won't use their real name.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...