Old Book Posted May 1, 2016 Posted May 1, 2016 I feel bad because he was so hot to get away from Valerica he didn't even find out how to get his soul back. And that's a second issue - I should have Serana and Valerica both tell the player he's gonna need his soul back if the player chose that route. A helpful hint from me to the player. Adding extra quest relevant info like that is another way that Amorous vastly improves Skyrim's vanilla quests. I was shocked by how much better both the entire Companions quest line and Dawnguard were with Amorous.
FoxFingers Posted May 1, 2016 Author Posted May 1, 2016 So, I've been working on these new lovers options. Finished Lydia - my perennial test subject. It's pretty nice. Lydia talks like Lydia does in the options. Not using the generic one liners every lover that has her voice type uses. And there's some randomization to mix up what she says a little. If the raison d'être of this Mod is to Go Deep on specific characters because the player loooves them, then it adds immersion and is pretty great I guess. On the other hand... what a pain in the ass. I've got near 30 characters on my sheet to personalize lovers options for. If I did one a day, that would be a month. And I ain't doing one a day. Still, it's nice. Makes it all a bit more immersive and adds a certain luxury value to lovers with the personalized voiced dialogue. Some new features I'm testing on Lydia: - She wants attention after a few days without. Who wouldn't? - You can ask two of your Lovers to make out together - You can Break Up - ... and all the other stuff you could already do, just voiced In-Character and randomized a bit so Lydia always feels like your Lydia saying something. So, it's nice in the way leather bucket seats are, I guess. But will take awhile to do a lot of characters and kind of a pain in the butt. I suggest you only do like the "top 10" more popular NPCs this way. Lydia, Serana, Mjoll and Aela for sure, then ask who has favorite characters and do the ones who have multiple people that really love that character. That way you can do this in a manner that will be felt in the mod by most people, without tiring yourself out utterly. Sound advice indeed. Hard to pick just 10, but that would be best.
FoxFingers Posted May 1, 2016 Author Posted May 1, 2016 I've seen some discussion elsewhere recently about this Mod in regards to the Vanilla Bethesda relationship ranks. That is - why don't I cheese up Bethesda's relationship ranks. The fact that I don't is apparently described as "off-putting". This Mod does, in fact, cheese up the vanilla Bethesda relationship ranks to a point. If (HadSex) If (aLover.IsInFaction(AmorAdvLoverFaction)) iLoversRank = aLover.GetFactionRank(AmorAdvLoverFaction) iLoversRank += 1 aLover.SetFactionRank(AmorAdvLoverFaction, iLoversRank) Debug.Trace("RemoveMyLover: " + aLover.GetLeveledActorBase().GetName() + " Lover Rank is " + iLoversRank) If (iLoversRank >= 5) Int d25 = Utility.RandomInt(1,25) If (d25 < iLoversRank ) If (aLover.GetRelationshipRank(PlayerRef) < 3) aLover.SetRelationshipRank(PlayerRef, 3) aLover.AddToFaction(PotentialFollowersFaction) AmorAdvDispositionImpMSG.Show() Debug.Trace("Lover " + aLover.GetLeveledActorBase().GetName() + " Lovers disposition improves towards you") EndIf EndIf EndIf EndIf EndIf If you have sex with a lover 5 or more times then a d25 is rolled. If it rolls less than the number of times sex was had, then... - Vanilla relationship rank cheesed to 3 - NPC added as a Potential Follower And this is how you can end up arming lovers like Ysolda or Camilla with a sword and taking them on adventures Vanilla style via this Mod. This is how it's always been. So, big cheese - up to Vanilla rank 3. Which leads us to the final rank: 4. Why not rank 4? For one, there's only one place in the Skyrim code that sets rank 4 - the marriage ceremony. My general philosophy is to do no harm as a modder to someones game or to create a situation that interferes with other Mods. That rank is special in the base game for a reason. For two, philosophically I consider this a Romance Mod. And I know for a fact that a lot of players find their special someone, marry them and decline further romances that are offered in the Mod. So, rank 4 retains its "Special-ness". Whatever bit of Special it may or may not have, doesn't matter - that is between you and whoever your RP Character fell in love with - gamewise, right? It's not for me to judge or interfere with by setting everyone you banged in Skyrim to Rank 4. And that is why this Mod doesn't turn up to 4. Thanks!
Guest Posted May 1, 2016 Posted May 1, 2016 I've seen some discussion elsewhere recently about this Mod in regards to the Vanilla Bethesda relationship ranks. That is - why don't I cheese up Bethesda's relationship ranks. The fact that I don't is apparently described as "off-putting". This Mod does, in fact, cheese up the vanilla Bethesda relationship ranks to a point. If (HadSex) If (aLover.IsInFaction(AmorAdvLoverFaction)) iLoversRank = aLover.GetFactionRank(AmorAdvLoverFaction) iLoversRank += 1 aLover.SetFactionRank(AmorAdvLoverFaction, iLoversRank) Debug.Trace("RemoveMyLover: " + aLover.GetLeveledActorBase().GetName() + " Lover Rank is " + iLoversRank) If (iLoversRank >= 5) Int d25 = Utility.RandomInt(1,25) If (d25 < iLoversRank ) If (aLover.GetRelationshipRank(PlayerRef) < 3) aLover.SetRelationshipRank(PlayerRef, 3) aLover.AddToFaction(PotentialFollowersFaction) AmorAdvDispositionImpMSG.Show() Debug.Trace("Lover " + aLover.GetLeveledActorBase().GetName() + " Lovers disposition improves towards you") EndIf EndIf EndIf EndIf EndIf If you have sex with a lover 5 or more times then a d25 is rolled. If it rolls less than the number of times sex was had, then... - Vanilla relationship rank cheesed to 3 - NPC added as a Potential Follower And this is how you can end up arming lovers like Ysolda or Camilla with a sword and taking them on adventures Vanilla style via this Mod. This is how it's always been. So, big cheese - up to Vanilla rank 3. Which leads us to the final rank: 4. Why not rank 4? For one, there's only one place in the Skyrim code that sets rank 4 - the marriage ceremony. My general philosophy is to do no harm as a modder to someones game or to create a situation that interferes with other Mods. That rank is special in the base game for a reason. For two, philosophically I consider this a Romance Mod. And I know for a fact that a lot of players find their special someone, marry them and decline further romances that are offered in the Mod. So, rank 4 retains its "Special-ness". Whatever bit of Special it may or may not have, doesn't matter - that is between you and whoever your RP Character fell in love with - gamewise, right? It's not for me to judge or interfere with by setting everyone you banged in Skyrim to Rank 4. And that is why this Mod doesn't turn up to 4. Thanks! i have to try that with elisif.^^
LostHere Posted May 2, 2016 Posted May 2, 2016 I've seen some discussion elsewhere recently about this Mod in regards to the Vanilla Bethesda relationship ranks. That is - why don't I cheese up Bethesda's relationship ranks. Interesting. I was just thinking about this, though I can't find the discussion you mentioned. The only issue I can think of about relationship rank is that I am also using the DFD mod, and as far as I know DFD has separate dialogues for relationship rank 4 (one set for lover, one set for married couple). Keeping at rank 3 means the DFD lover dialogues will not be triggered. Maybe this is just a minor problem, since I don't know to which extend DFD add lovers dialogue. I have only heard the greeting ones.
FoxFingers Posted May 2, 2016 Author Posted May 2, 2016 I've seen some discussion elsewhere recently about this Mod in regards to the Vanilla Bethesda relationship ranks. That is - why don't I cheese up Bethesda's relationship ranks. Interesting. I was just thinking about this, though I can't find the discussion you mentioned. The only issue I can think of about relationship rank is that I am also using the DFD mod, and as far as I know DFD has separate dialogues for relationship rank 4 (one set for lover, one set for married couple). Keeping at rank 3 means the DFD lover dialogues will not be triggered. Maybe this is just a minor problem, since I don't know to which extend DFD add lovers dialogue. I have only heard the greeting ones. If you marry someone you're guaranteed to get Rank 4. You can always console that rank also to see what the dialogue Swiss put into DFD. Thanks!
MoonSpot Posted May 2, 2016 Posted May 2, 2016 Kay, wrapped up the latest Serana addition. Thank you for not actually making me go all the way through Ansilvund again! I was quite relieved when i just so happened to speak to her just outside of it, that you furnished a little sump'n-sumth'n to forgo having to transverse the dungeon again only to find a bunch of dead people and a closed script event. The whole time en route to Ansilvund I kept thinking "Is it even realistically possible for someone to get to this point in DG without having already completed this dungeon?". Anyways now that I've completed the 2.11 additions, I've now read the DOC for Serana's Mark. Did not notice a dibella Statue there or a phantasm/apparition/dibella's stature, certainly don't recall seeing one. I did get that glowing effect which did seem like it wasn't particularly keen on being centered on Serana during sex, but I also had one of those fucking surprise bears materialize while SexLabs was aligning actors as well as a particularly unwelcome thunder dragon, so I was a little distracted. ; After completing Seranas mission in whiterun, I was left wondering if there's multiple ending on that quest. Nazeem yet lives in my game, and reflecting upon the events with Arien in Riften I couldn't help but wonder why. Gotta say I liked Serana's first game plan for Nazeem and was somewhat anticipating a bit of divine intervention to make it clear that murder was suddenly AOK this time, cause I gotta say I was feelin up for it a bit more than usual after hearing your dialogue for him. But I guess the divines want to put off nazeems arrival to their domain for as long cause they don't want to have him around either . Upon returning to Markarth the dragonborn opted for going one on one rather than the somewhat preferred team battle royals cause Serana has stated a few times her preference and I'm not a pushy pervert, or a picky one. Concluded events at the lovers stone, cause it seemed a bit more fitting even though its not as scenic, in my game, as sky haven temples escarpment. Was good, another very welcome addition. Seemed a bit short somehow even though it really wasn't(literally one end of skyrim to the other), probably cause I had already completed Ansilvund. Or maybe trials just feels more appropriate than a trial for a champion of dibella? Or maybe a uniquely named clutter/trophy for Serana felt due for acquiring her new title/religion. A "you bang fer gud" ring or a limited edition lusty argonian priestess of dibella Vol 0 (a notably holey book ;p ) Or more likely I'm just sad that its done now T_T (Truth revealed!) and am probably going to part ways with Serana to go fornicate in solstheim. Been one hella of a ride. Thanks Fox!
Vanus Posted May 2, 2016 Posted May 2, 2016 Good to know with coding no less the change in dynamic with the d25. For the purpose of silly, if you want Ingun to be able to go on that adventure with you then it's going to require quite a bit of sack time but you're asking someone to risk life and limb so I agree there. This does tie into what I actually wanted to ask, basically more detail on the Amorous Married faction - have only seen it in TESVEdit and not wanting to risk breaking something with the CK for more information I thought I'd ask for details on how it works and would it cause any interruptions in the ceremony such as uninvited hostile encounter probably smaller than random bandit attacks that have been known to happen at the temple on one's special day. Fortunately with AA you can prevent most corpse fall interruptions viz. "Skyrim is a dangerous place..." Since I haven't gotten to play some of the new content I won't jump to conclusions but, of the stories so far Jenassa has been the real temptation to bother with the amulet.
MoonSpot Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 --snip-- AP Skyrim.esm<----ap like animated prostetution? if yes, remove it sexlab has everything and more build in. I remembered why I had that back in now! Gave the ability to trade items with rank 4 lovers without having to recruit them or addfac <potencialFollowers>. Though its inclusion was also a source of potential consistency issues that FNIS was not overly keen on. Dynamic Dialogue Followers.esp<------much lower in load order, if you ask me. basicly you want that one to overwrite every edit that is made to npc dialog, you could check in tesedit if and what mods overwriting the dialogs made by that one. for exemple by npc replacers, or sometimes custom npcs edit the dialog to and can mess up things like dissmissing followers. That's what did the trick, in addition to going into UFO MCM to reset, and dismiss Bre via dialogue a few times as her enrollment into UFO was duplicated a few times (four to be precise). Would have thought that execute command would have been more directly linked to user input rater than attached the audible file. Was getting the right subtitles the entire time :shrugs: See pretty colours. @Sacremas Then I was using immersive AFT, cause it was gods awful and absolutely DID have a cap on the amount of total followers that could be registered with it for the entire game. In order to get rid of the popup alerts I would have have to reset the followers currently logged and break their outfits and whatever else. Honestly it probably was iAFT cause I used to use a bunch of immersive/survival mods til I got smart and realized shit wasn't fun anymore and canned the lot of them.
parkminsick Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 This mode is really interesting and fun too perfect There is also almost no bugs may ctd But the problem is too many sex scenes that ㅎㅎ
Old Book Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 This mode is really interesting and fun too perfect There is also almost no bugs may ctd But the problem is too many sex scenes that ㅎㅎ You can use The Nexus Version, which has no explicit sex scenes.
WindWaker4D Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 Hi I'd love to have this mod but no idea as how I can get an earlier version that doesn't require dawnguard? Any help is appreciated~
Kriegera Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 Is it true Dynamic follower dialogue can conflict with this mod?
Gulfwulf Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 Is it true Dynamic follower dialogue can conflict with this mod? I run it with DFD and haven't had any issues with either one.
LaEspada Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 Is it true Dynamic follower dialogue can conflict with this mod? Is it true Dynamic follower dialogue can conflict with this mod? I run it with DFD and haven't had any issues with either one. It goes very nicely alongside AA.
Sacremas Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 Is it true Dynamic follower dialogue can conflict with this mod? Is it true Dynamic follower dialogue can conflict with this mod? I run it with DFD and haven't had any issues with either one. It goes very nicely alongside AA. DFD is made by Swiss, a contributor to Amorous Adventures, who guaranteed uses it in his own games, so you can view them as complimentary actually.
wurstslash Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 Hey At first nice work!But i have a Problem. Every time I ask the NPCs to have Sex with my character, nothing happened. I have the adult Version of this mod and i can choose between V, A and BJ. Other SexLab mods are working, but not this one. So do you know how to fix it?
MoonSpot Posted May 3, 2016 Posted May 3, 2016 Is it true Dynamic follower dialogue can conflict with this mod? No it doesn't conflict. The only thing that was being talked about was relationshiprank increases potentially muddling things up for a particular NPC in general, and that doesn't quite appear to be the case. The only reason it was brought up here, is that if there is any thread full of peeps out there that encounters relationshiprank increases(not b/c of this mod, but others that complement it...kinda...anyways), it the good folk here. Truth be told, it is probably because of DFD that my "problem" ultimately got sorted, and not the other way around.
Juggled Posted May 4, 2016 Posted May 4, 2016 That's a nice idea about wanting attention after some time goes by one thing I noticed about my gameplay is after certain npcs like Camilla I never go back around them again because so much to do in Skyrim but it'd be nice if they remarked on how you've been gone awhile. I realize you aren't doing quests for awhile with your current works but for whenever you do I thought I might share an idea. Vex of the thieves guild had a "face lift" much like Brylina in the mages guild. I think Vex is a very unique character and much like Aela being a guild boss you have reasons to do the thieves storyline now and possibly add Karliah to the mix since her existence after the thieves quest is currently pointless. Anyways that's my piece, drive safe!
doan77 Posted May 4, 2016 Posted May 4, 2016 So, I've been working on these new lovers options. Finished Lydia - my perennial test subject. It's pretty nice. Lydia talks like Lydia does in the options. Not using the generic one liners every lover that has her voice type uses. And there's some randomization to mix up what she says a little. If the raison d'être of this Mod is to Go Deep on specific characters because the player loooves them, then it adds immersion and is pretty great I guess. On the other hand... what a pain in the ass. I've got near 30 characters on my sheet to personalize lovers options for. If I did one a day, that would be a month. And I ain't doing one a day. Still, it's nice. Makes it all a bit more immersive and adds a certain luxury value to lovers with the personalized voiced dialogue. Some new features I'm testing on Lydia: - She wants attention after a few days without. Who wouldn't? - You can ask two of your Lovers to make out together - You can Break Up - ... and all the other stuff you could already do, just voiced In-Character and randomized a bit so Lydia always feels like your Lydia saying something. So, it's nice in the way leather bucket seats are, I guess. But will take awhile to do a lot of characters and kind of a pain in the butt. I suggest you only do like the "top 10" more popular NPCs this way. Lydia, Serana, Mjoll and Aela for sure, then ask who has favorite characters and do the ones who have multiple people that really love that character. That way you can do this in a manner that will be felt in the mod by most people, without tiring yourself out utterly. I suggest to work as you always do, one girl by one. If Lydia had some features other lovers don't have, it's a good thing. - Less work on the voice, less burn out - One of the best thing in this mod. Is that, this is not a framework, every lover is hand crafted. In fact if some lover could had a unique thing, it will be better - for me - Ysolda could show you how she use that mammoth tusk. Aela could ask you to turn into a werwolf for some fun. Serana could have a thing for vampirelord - havn't done the serana quest yet - Ingunn could give you new gathering quest, via letters. A good way to make her lover come home. Carlotta could be jealous if you date Ysolda. Carlotta could ask you for children stuff, even mila could ask you for a new dress from solitude. Some could ask for gold, clothes, present, food. -radiant quest- Mjoll could be in the need of be rescued in some dungeon. Elisif could send you romantic letter. Idgord the younger, could speak to you into your sleep "http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/73550/?" -i just wanted to writte down my idea , don't mind me -
SkyBarbie Posted May 4, 2016 Posted May 4, 2016 Great job on this mod! I've been using it since the beginning and it is one of my must have mods. This mod is so much fun and offers so much depth to the game! Thank you for your hard work and efforts!
mcdyn Posted May 4, 2016 Posted May 4, 2016 hi, the quest Threading_The_Needle (solitude blue palace) dont start, i'm talking with Sybille, but dialogue is locked, dont proceed Lydia is no longer housecarl now is soldier blade (i'm forget this) have any other solution to start the quest ??? try the console, but not start too
cloudlloyd Posted May 5, 2016 Posted May 5, 2016 ok now i want a amorouse advanture with cicero: 20160430000849_1.jpg this mod is fucking amazing.^^ That is some seriously funny shit, man. What would be really great would be if new dialog was either recorded in a female voice or the existing ones changed in pitch to be more effeminate. Hello bros ! I'm here because I got a problem : When dialogues are supposed to run an animation the two characters just stand and they are stucked in the same place, without doing the animation but the sounds. Do you have any solution pls ? What the others have said: if Sexlab doesn't work, then this mod won't work. Anyway, your issue is with Sexlab and not AA. Go check the main SL thread for troubleshooting suggestions. In fact I have all the requirements installed and everything should work fine but my real problem is that the two character do some kind of fusion, getting stuck in each other, like a four-armed monster.. Those are my mods and priority so if you have any idea, I take it
FoxFingers Posted May 6, 2016 Author Posted May 6, 2016 Real Life, that odd little place that exists outside of Skyrim, has gotten busy for me lately. It happens occasionally. Anyways, saw Shinji posted a new episode of Alya's adventures which always brightens a long and weary day for me. http://youtu.be/TCUggVgSSOU
Cock Sucker Posted May 6, 2016 Posted May 6, 2016 Real Life, that odd little place that exists outside of Skyrim, has gotten busy for me lately. It happens occasionally. Anyways, saw Shinji posted a new episode of Alya's adventures which always brightens a long and weary day for me. http://youtu.be/TCUggVgSSOU His accent Is awesome lol
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now