[Outdated] Lovers with PK

[gregathit]

http://www.4shared.com/dir/Xn2AwNQU/Oblivion.html#dir=482519496

This files from Donkey has been disappear?

 

Donkey shut down his 4shared links and has retired from modding.

[chivaleroncross]

Yupz I heard that from you at other thread

So uh.. That's it then? I cannot have the file that required? If so I think I'll understand

[gregathit]

Yupz I heard that from you at other thread

So uh.. That's it then? I cannot have the file that required? If so I think I'll understand

 

You are going to have to give me a clue as to what file you are after. The link you had didn't specify anything.

[chivaleroncross]

It's actually the REV 96, I haven't tried it Lovers Base Plug REV 96.

[gregathit]

It's actually the REV 96' date=' I haven't tried it Lovers Base Plug REV 96.

[/quote']

 

Donkey never posted a rev96 lovers with pk esp. It that is what you are after then just head over to the normal lovers base pack thread as rev96 is there.

 

 

He DID post a revised edition of PK Extender for LPK rev 96 and he most generously allowed LoversLab to host it here: http://www.loverslab.com/showthread.php?tid=389

[galgat]

What is the big difference between rev 94 and 96 ?

 

 

I been reading a lot of Buggy things about 96, so I may just stay with 94, which is serving me very welll right now.

[gregathit]

Actually 96 is more stable than 94.

 

The two most stable revisions are 91 or 96. 96 contains some bug fixes and adds the ability to slide animations around to get you out of walls and other obstructions.

[chivaleroncross]

Yeah I heard the 96 was buggy, till you just clarivied its not buggy. I was planningto try one, But Donkey has been take all his links rite?

[gregathit]

Yeah I heard the 96 was buggy' date=' till you just clarivied its not buggy. I was planningto try one, But Donkey has been take all his links rite?

[/quote']

 

The version of 96 we have here at this site under the base package is NOT buggy. I and others tested the living crap out of it (for around two months) and make minor revisions to make sure it was stable.

 

Right now it (rev96) is as stable as 91 ever was and perhaps even more so.

 

Donkey did provide aid in troubleshooting and correcting some of the minor issues with rev96.

 

Donkey also was gracious enough to allow me to upload an updated copy of PK Extender that he made, that works with rev96 (you can find it in Donkey's PK Extended thread).

 

At this time there are only a couple of plugins that don't work with rev96. Most of the ones that didn't, have been updated so they do now, or they are so old that they have been abandoned.

[Shiloh2012]

For what it is worth, I will vouch for Rev96 being as stable as a brick. I thought 93 was good, but I was wrong. Since updating to Rev96 and doing a clean save (to include GragAtHits updates) my game has not crashed once due to a "Lover's" conflict. Only Immoral Sisters seems to break every now and then... Rev96 has "fixed" a number of plugins that I thught were obsolete - the "old" version of Lover's Bed to name one.

 

Galgat, that includes running Crowning Isles, GGBlackmail, Lover's Bitch, and Player Slave Encounters all at the same time. Obviously I have to dial down my Joburg and Raper's settings, but my game has not crashed once since I updated to Rev96.

 

This includes my original toon who has been through over 500 hours of wear and tear. Rev 96 is worth the effort if you are not using Rev 91.

 

My 2 cents. Grain of salt, my opinion. Rev96 is rock solid and borderline unbreakeable. I wish I could say the same about the new version of OBSE and the new CSE.

[chivaleroncross]

NOTE: If you use Donkey's PK Extender, then you will need to go grab Donkey's revised version for rev96 here: http://www.4shared.com/ dir/Xn2AwNQU/Obli...=482519496

 

I quoted on first page, but uhh The Link is dead and where can I find it again? Sorry for being noob Thanks

[gregathit]

NOTE: If you use Donkey's PK Extender' date=' then you will need to go grab Donkey's revised version for rev96 here: http://www.4shared.com/ dir/Xn2AwNQU/Obli...=482519496

 

I quoted on first page, but uhh The Link is dead and where can I find it again? Sorry for being noob Thanks

[/quote']

 

OP updated. Sorry that I had forgotten to do that. Donkey was kind enough to allow me to post the updated PK Extended to his original thread: http://www.loverslab.com/showthread.php?tid=389

[Fomebs]

Um, Lovers rev96 has no esm file, but 91 did. Should I keep the esm from 91, or delete it (does it interfere with 96's esp, or is it required for it to work)?

[Sarnaath]

Um, Lovers rev96 has no esm file, but 91 did. Should I keep the esm from 91, or delete it (does it interfere with 96's esp, or is it required for it to work)?

 

Use the esm from the Lovers Resource Pack v3. 

[BlackBox]

Were some of the control keys altered?  On some of the animations, I can't move the male position closer and farther away; the keys that normally perform this function move the male position from side to side.  What are the control keys?

[BlackBox]

Were some of the control keys altered?  On some of the animations, I can't move the male position closer and farther away; the keys that normally perform this function move the male position from side to side.  What are the control keys?

[WappyOne]

Were some of the control keys altered?  On some of the animations, I can't move the male position closer and farther away; the keys that normally perform this function move the male position from side to side.  What are the control keys?

 

The control keys were not changed. That '90 degrees bug' is something that afflicts a lot of the animations; You can see discussions of it over in the animation workshop thread.

 

[torn]

I installed Lovers with PK rev 96 and all that it requires. Everything works, just do not have sex with zombies and minotaurs. How to solve this problem?

[KoboBear]

Initiating a sex intercourse with zombies or missing animation problems?

To initiate it, you need Lovers Rapers. The most recently is http://www.loverslab.com/topic/13079-162xloversrapers-shadowrunnerwappyone/

If you're lazy http://www.loverslab.com/topic/1747-galgatbeastrape-01-01/ would let your character mounted by every creatures.

[SamFisher001]

I got the resource pack and this one but I do I actually do the mod in the game? Do I still need another mod or what? Please any help would be appreciated.
 

[dragenx]

Had a odd problem sometime went my character having sex I hit the F key and nothing happen I have to hit the E key two or three time happen to me couple time so I loaded older save and it gone and I can get the F key woring again

[perfectioncat]

My LoversCustomLoop is AddOn Mod.

I checked a difference of Rev96 of LL and original Rev96 to translate my LoversCustomLoop.

Scripts which LoversCustomLoop overwrites are very few.

However, there was the part which took step that it was different from the original in the script which I checked.

 

The following is the part.

Function: xLoversMainScriptModuleKeyControl
The 111th line

LL code:
;if eval(ar["localFlag"] & 4)==0	; Disallow creature position change

Original code:
if eval(ar["localFlag"] & 4)==0	;体位変更禁止ビットが立っていない

It is written that creature validates a position change in the case of an object.

However, what a script commented out means is different from it.

It is all other than a basic motion (1-9) that the second bit of ar["localFlag"] is set.

This script is not a thing limited to creature.

If you want to work to have limited it to creature, you do not comment out this script and should process the distinction.

 

original japanese

私のLoversCustomLoopはAddOn Modです。

私は私のLoversCustomLoopを翻訳するためにLLのRev96とオリジナルのRev96の差異を調べた。

LoversCustomLoopが上書きするスクリプトはごく僅かです。

しかし調べたスクリプトの中でオリジナルとは異なる処理をしている部分がありました。

 

以下がその部分です。

Function: xLoversMainScriptModuleKeyControl
The 111th line

LL code:
;if eval(ar["localFlag"] & 4)==0	; Disallow creature position change

Original code:
if eval(ar["localFlag"] & 4)==0	;体位変更禁止ビットが立っていない

 

creatureが対象の際に位置変更を有効にするためと書かれている。

しかしコメントアウトされたスクリプトが意味しているのはそれとは異なります。

ar["localFlag"]の第2ビットが設定されるのは基本モーション(1-9)以外全てです。

このスクリプトはcreatureに限定されたものではありません。

あなたがもしcreatureに限定した処理をしたいのであればあなたはこのスクリプトをコメントアウトするのではなく別の処理をするべきです。

[gregathit]

So the proper translation is:

体位変更禁止ビットが立っていない   =   Positions change disable bit is not standing

 

What exactly is the function of and what does it have to do with creatures?

 

I don't know who commented it out....either Donkey or WappyOne or maybe even Ashal back with the original rev96 translation.  I will have to check on who did it and why they did so.

[perfectioncat]

So the proper translation is:

体位変更禁止ビットが立っていない   =   Positions change disable bit is not standing

 

What exactly is the function of and what does it have to do with creatures?

 

I don't know who commented it out....either Donkey or WappyOne.  I will have to check on why they did so.

He writes that he commented it out because he does not obstruct a position change of creature.

You should revise a script to remove creature if you treat creature as an exception.

 

The bit is set in the 104th line of xLoversMainScriptStepInitialize1.

It is set for all the motions except 9 from basic motion 1 that Lovers provides.

[gregathit]

Ok,  I think I understand.

 

I'll have to check now on who commented it out (Donkey, Ashal or Wappyone) and why they did so.