Submissive Lola: The Resubmission LE/SE

[Hex Bolt]

6 hours ago, lovalter said:

I was wondering if it could be possible to choose a permanent brand/tattoo instead of a collar, to free up that slot and have max compatibility with everything (some mods have features that are only available if you have no DDs equipped, and the collar counts).

The slave collar is integral to the mod, not just its functionality but the dialog, lore, and other built-in assumptions.  A person can go in and out of slavery.  A slave that's sold will probably wear the new owner's collar.  The collar signifies your status (some mods check that if you have a collar equipped, someone might assume you're a runaway slave and take advantage).

 

Accessories that use the collar slot can be modified in just a couple of minutes to use a different slot (or merged with another item to form an outfit and free up a slot).  If it's a popular mod, you might find that someone has already posted a version that does that.  Not many mods specifically won't work with devices equipped.  Most work with any devices that are already equipped or they temporarily replace them.  SLTR doesn't care which collar is worn.  Even a unique collar from another mod is okay as long as it's a bondage collar.

 

I have seen some mods that warn about possible slot conflicts (that might be handled by toggling off their conflicting features).  Angrim's Apprentice won't let you get far wearing your own devices, but SLTR's suspend function will let you temporarily remove the collar for the brief scenes with Angrim.  So, usually there are ways to work through things like that.

[Dreamer1986]

On 9/22/2025 at 9:07 AM, Hex Bolt said:

The next update is going to be a big one.

Awesome news, thank you! Any teasers of what will be included? 

[Hex Bolt]

11 minutes ago, Dreamer1986 said:

Any teasers of what will be included? 

A Tale of Scope Creep

[Dieseldude88]

I followed the req, game loads up, no issues not seeing it in the mcm which I guess means I messed up somewhere, just for shits and giggles how it exactly labeled in the MCM? I am running a huge modlist so maybe I am missing it.

[Hex Bolt]

59 minutes ago, Dieseldude88 said:

how it exactly labeled in the MCM?

Submissive Lola.  You can test whether the mod actually loaded into your game by entering "help vkjmq 4" in the console.  If that finds something, the mod is installed. 

A non-appearing MCM is a generic problem, but I can suggest general remedies:

- If you use a mod that reorders the list of mods in the MCM, recently-added mods might appear at the bottom.

- Be sure that you have installed all of the prerequisites and that they are working.

- Check that it is enabled in your mod manager.

- Save and reload your game.

- Try "setstage SKI_ConfigManagerInstance 1" in the console and wait a minute or two.

- Enter any other mod's MCM menu, then exit and wait a minute.

- Reinstall the mod.  That sometimes works for people.

- If you have many mods, you might have exceeded the MCM limit.

[Dieseldude88]

1 hour ago, Hex Bolt said:

Submissive Lola.  You can test whether the mod actually loaded into your game by entering "help vkjmq 4" in the console.  If that finds something, the mod is installed. 

A non-appearing MCM is a generic problem, but I can suggest general remedies:

- If you use a mod that reorders the list of mods in the MCM, recently-added mods might appear at the bottom.

- Be sure that you have installed all of the prerequisites and that they are working.

- Check that it is enabled in your mod manager.

- Save and reload your game.

- Try "setstage SKI_ConfigManagerInstance 1" in the console and wait a minute or two.

- Enter any other mod's MCM menu, then exit and wait a minute.

- Reinstall the mod.  That sometimes works for people.

- If you have many mods, you might have exceeded the MCM limit.

 

Thank you! Ill try the help command and see what I got.

 

I am running novus ascension and they were close to the cap but I added some more mods and im right at 254 with yours installed lol.

[SkyAddiction]

@Hex Bolt

 

I was messing around with my old Hearthfire DD contraptions mod to see if it was worth salvaging, and I think I found a way to use them in SLTR.

 

Contraptions have no struggle cooldown, so you could have the master demand the PC lock themselves in one, then taunt and mock them while they try to get out. I'm pretty sure the only thing you'd actually have to do is place a device, make sure the master doesn't sandbox, and have them make a few comments about how helpless Lola is and how much she enjoys it. Even when set to Born Slave in DD difficulty, it takes less than a minute to get out with a key, and one to two minutes without one.

 

The biggest issue is space, because the PC needs room to dismount, which is why I was trying to add them to Hearthfire homes. But you don't need them. The minor hold halls have plenty of space NPCs don't use, and so do locations like the back, right-side area outside of Jorrvaskr, Dragonsreach porch, Castle Dour, the Windhelm jail, etc. Even Raven Rock has unused space behind the homes. All of that might not even matter if you disable the device after the event, because the player can spawn them by dropping them from their inventory. You'd have to use dialogue to tell them to place it in a location with adequate space. That's not exactly immersive, but it keeps them out of cell edits.

 

Not sure it interests you - I just think it would be fun to finally use contraptions in something other than a device-spawning mod.

Edited October 12, 2025 by SkyAddiction

[Hex Bolt]

1 hour ago, SkyAddiction said:

I was messing around with my old Hearthfire DD contraptions mod to see if it was worth salvaging, and I think I found a way to use them in SLTR.

Interesting, thanks.

[tesenfeu]

Hey, i was thinking about some different approach of the " Punishment " tasks who actually results in some repetitive loop : spank, whip etc ... 

 Why not adding some variant like :

 

- " Ok, you don't want to do     [ task ]     , let make you beg for it. You will need to wear this belt    [ open back for compatibility issue > sex still possible ]   with this plug until you change your mind.

- [ after x days ]   " Have you change your mind ?  >>> No ? Ok, let me upgrade your stuff, let me put this chastity bra.

- " Still no ? don't worry, let me adjust this plug [ change plug for something more powerful ]

- [ When player finaly Accept ] >>> Great you finaly accept your place, but that was quite too long, lets keep you on those few days more

 

The idea is to don't push the player but " convince " him that orders are the only way to go in a more " convincing and seductive way ".

 

Another idea is to add some " catsuit " option when sub rank increase.

 

What do you think ?

 

[Hex Bolt]

1 hour ago, tesenfeu said:

The idea is to don't push the player but " convince " him that orders are the only way to go in a more " convincing and seductive way ".

Thank you for the suggestions.  With regard to obedience, this mod's approach is that it's never optional, so therefore there's no reason to convince Lola to obey.  A slave doesn't get a choice.  The role of convincing is helping Lola to understand (or brainwashing her, depending on the situation) that she likes doing these things and that it's all for the best.

 

48 minutes ago, tesenfeu said:

You will need to wear this belt

I don't actually like chastity devices.  They limit options, even with an "open" design, and the master is basically locking away his own plaything, which is inconvenient for the master.  If the masturbation denial feature is enabled, Lola can't have an orgasm anyway unless the owner allows it (sex with the owner, with the playmate, or with prostitution clients).  A belt seems like an unnecessary complication.

 

54 minutes ago, tesenfeu said:

Another idea is to add some " catsuit " option when sub rank increase.

Some players really like catsuits.  Others don't.  I'm one of those who don't.  A revealing outfit (or nudity) just seems more sexy.  Catsuits are kind of weird in that they block the body clothing slot but don't have clothing keywords, potentially causing the wearer to be identified as naked by mods that check for nudity by keyword even though the body is covered.  It's another device that feels like an unnecessary complication.

[Rebecca.Dova]

Is there already a patch for ostim standalone?

[Hex Bolt]

7 hours ago, jerryrhp said:

Is there already a patch for ostim standalone?

Do keep in mind that this mod is developed specifically for SexLab and SexLab Aroused and that it uses quite a few of their functions and callback hooks (much more than just checking arousal level and starting a sex scene).  I can't comment on its compatibility with other sex and arousal frameworks other than to say that I really recommend that players use SexLab for this mod.

Edited October 16, 2025 by Hex Bolt

[kingsglaive]

I have a new mission idea involving vibrations.
The Master asks Lola to buy something from a merchant or chat with someone. The Master then activates Lola's vibrations. The vibrations are subtle, but the Master requires Lola to ensure they don't let the person she's talking to notice anything unusual.
When the person notices Lola's unusual behavior and asks about her condition, such as "I think I heard something strange," or "Are you okay? You don't look well," Lola must reassure them that her suspicions are not correct, with words like "You must have misheard" or "Thank you for your help. I'm fine. Let's move on."
Of course, Lola must be wearing clothes.

[Hex Bolt]

4 hours ago, kingsglaive said:

I have a new mission idea involving vibrations.

It's similar to the existing random vibration conversation event, but I'll keep it in mind.

[kingsglaive]

20 hours ago, Hex Bolt said:

It's similar to the existing random vibration conversation event, but I'll keep it in mind.

The vibration power must be light so that Lola will not be unable to resist touching herself. When the Master wants to make Lola lose control, he will suddenly increase the power.

[kingsglaive]

I remember a friend previously requested a bondage horseback riding setup, where the Master would ride the horse and Lola would be restrained underneath. At the time, it seemed technically impossible to implement. Here's the mod: https://www.loverslab.com/files/file/1276-horgasm-riding-horseorgasm-mod-v11-062215/

Since it seemed technically impossible, I wondered if the Master could give Lola a horse like this? Or perhaps install a restraint device on Lola's horse that would tie her down?

The naughty mare should be securely restrained under the stallion.

https://www.loverslab.com/files/file/1276-horgasm-riding-horseorgasm-mod-v11-062215/

Also, this one allows Lola to bask in the stimulation of the stallion's enormous penis while also producing pleasant moans.

 

Edited October 21, 2025 by kingsglaive

[Roggvir]

A little thing to nitpick...

When the main Lola quest starts, it resets the UseEFF property value to False.
So the player has to open the MCM and click the "Refresh installed mods list" in "Mod Integration" to fix that.

I think it happens because the property gets reset when the quest starts, but the recheck_softmods() is not called again.
It is automatically called only when the MCM initializes (only the first time you open it), but never again (apart from special situation in vkjRoadTrip).

I guess there aren't many players who would be using EFF like i do, and run into the issue.
But the same problem MAY be happening with other variables too, so it could be something to keep an eye on.

Edited October 24, 2025 by Roggvir

[Hex Bolt]

7 minutes ago, Roggvir said:

A little thing to nitpick...

Okay, I'll look into it.

[yourstory]

Thank you for creating such an interesting mod. Can you add an option for Lola to wear a chastity belt please? Perhaps the owner does not want their pet to cheat without their permission?

[CaptainJ03]

2 hours ago, yourstory said:

Can you add an option for Lola to wear a chastity belt please? Perhaps the owner does not want their pet to cheat without their permission?

I haven't counted how often Hexbolt answered this question, the answer was always "no"

Would you lock away your favourite toy? The owner whores Lola out, she has to show people what a slut she is - none of this makes me think that the owner is even a tad jealous if she practises her art with someone else without being told so.

[yourstory]

4 hours ago, CaptainJ03 said:

I haven't counted how often Hexbolt answered this question, the answer was always "no"

Would you lock away your favourite toy? The owner whores Lola out, she has to show people what a slut she is - none of this makes me think that the owner is even a tad jealous if she practises her art with someone else without being told so.

Haha, I got it. Just because I saw the owner controlling Lola's orgasm in the original mod, which triggered the association.This reflects the master's more extreme desire for control

[Gräfin Zeppelin]

4 hours ago, CaptainJ03 said:

I haven't counted how often Hexbolt answered this question, the answer was always "no"

Would you lock away your favourite toy? The owner whores Lola out, she has to show people what a slut she is - none of this makes me think that the owner is even a tad jealous if she practises her art with someone else without being told so.

Saying Hexbolt does not want it is one thing and legit but dont try to make an ingame argument out of it. That falls flat and leads to nowhere.

[CaptainJ03]

2 minutes ago, Gräfin Zeppelin said:

Saying Hexbolt does not want it is one thing and legit but dont try to make an ingame argument out of it. That falls flat and leads to nowhere.

I was just quoting what Hex gave as explanation, although in my own words bc I'm lazy.

[Gräfin Zeppelin]

Btw you can lock on a chastity belt by yourself and the owner will react to it in several ways.

[Gräfin Zeppelin]

2 minutes ago, CaptainJ03 said:

I was just quoting what Hex gave as explanation, although in my own words bc I'm lazy.

Fair