Submissive Lola: The Resubmission LE/SE

[Hex Bolt]

11 minutes ago, shimemiya said:

I just updated to the newest version, and asking my Mistress to change my collar option seems to have disappeared.

It changed in the next-to-latest version:

Changed:  Replacing your equipped collar is now done on the Devices MCM page rather than by asking the owner.

Edited February 27, 2024 by HexBolt8

[SafyreStorme]

Back into Skyrim! (Again.) And am so glad to see my favorite mod is still being updated. ^__^ Thank you! ❤️

 

I was looking at this in the changelogs: 

Quote

New:  A new Roleplay setting, "Your enjoyment of rough sex".
- Your character's arousal will be reduced by this extra amount after rough sex with the owner or playmate (no one else).  A higher value might indicate greater enjoyment and lower final arousal, or greater trauma and less desire for sex afterwards.  Negative values indicate that the sex left your needs unfulfilled, possibly even needing sex more than before.
- The "Your satisfaction with sex with owner" setting now only applies to non-rough sex

And I was wondering if there might be a way to set it up so that a character might dislike rough sex in general, but greatly enjoy it exclusively when it's with their owner? (For the Lola who's totally in love and/or Stockholm syndrome with their master.)

[Hex Bolt]

2 hours ago, SafyreStorme said:

I was wondering if there might be a way to set it up so that a character might dislike rough sex in general, but greatly enjoy it exclusively when it's with their owner?

This mod only adjusts satisfaction with sex with the owner (or playmate), since that's clearly within the mod's realm.  I'll make a note to consider settings for all sex.  However, that might involve a lot of settings, since if general rough sex is covered then another setting for rape or non-rape would be needed, then there would probably be requests for a bound vs. non-bound setting and for handling different forms (oral, vaginal, anal).  Also, keep in mind that the "satisfaction" settings just add or subtract PC arousal at the end of sex.  That works well with SexLab (and fully compatible replacers), but others like OSLAroused seem to take commands to update arousal as mere suggestions that they're free to ignore, so player experience can vary.

[CaptainJ03]

After all this bug finding, a bit of positive feedback.

 

Just tried that Rune Collar - that looks really great!

Spoiler

 

With the new possibility to have Mistress unlock my devices, I tried to exploit that and have her take out the Inflatable Toy just moments after she gave it to me - but you anticipated that and the plug got another big squeeze! Love it!

 

Just installed the RohZima Poser for the whipping, deleted everything I deemed unnecessary - should've kept the behaviour file *sigh*

With the behavior file, unsurprisingly I still get a FNIS warning: "Warning: Inconsistent mod RZAZZ. Number of animations differs between FNIS List (3) and corresponding behavior file (105)" - is there any way for a noob to edit that file?

(It works, that would just be cosmetics)

 

 

Edited February 28, 2024 by CaptainJ03

[kingsglaive]

I wonder if HexBolt8 has Fill Her Up installed?
My idea is: when Lola is filled with semen, the master will put a plug on Lola to stop the semen from flowing out.

I wonder if HexBolt8 has Fill Her Up installed?
My idea is: when Lola is filled with semen, the master will put a plug on Lola to stop the semen from flowing out.

One more idea:
When the master whips Lola, Lola's health will decrease.
The owner thought that if Lola's Piercings vibration could provide healing magic
When the master whips Lola, he can heal Lola and whip Lola at the same time, and also let Lola enjoy the pleasure of Piercings vibration.

 

There is still one:
When the master stays in one city for too long and wants to go to another city, the master will mail Lola to the city where the master wants to go. Lola will be bound, blindfolded, and gagged before being mailed (fast travel).
Of course, Lola is also included in the postage costs.
After Lola has settled the postage fee, the delivery man will give Lola a signature note and the key to unlock the bond. Lola must find the master in the city where the master is located to report and request the master to unlock the bond (open the package).

Edited February 28, 2024 by kingsglaive

[Hex Bolt]

9 hours ago, CaptainJ03 said:

...but you anticipated that...

 

 

9 hours ago, CaptainJ03 said:

Just tried that Rune Collar - that looks really great!

Yes, it makes collars really look capable of controlling a slave.

 

If players like the effect, please consider endorsing that mod as a thank you to the author.  Resource mods like that one don't get much love.

 

9 hours ago, CaptainJ03 said:

With the behavior file, unsurprisingly I still get a FNIS warning: "Warning: Inconsistent mod RZAZZ. Number of animations differs between FNIS List (3) and corresponding behavior file (105)" - is there any way for a noob to edit that file?

No, you'd have to rebuild the behavior file with GenerateFNIS_for_Modders.

 

1 hour ago, kingsglaive said:

I wonder if HexBolt8 has Fill Her Up installed?
My idea is: when Lola is filled with semen, the master will put a plug on Lola to stop the semen from flowing out.

I'm aware of it but I have not used it.  I probably will not do any integration with it.

[Greyzen]

So I've seen marriage brought up in this thread and that you don't think it would fit well in the idea of the mod, but I have not seen anyone discussing the idea of marriage pertaining to a DIFFERENT follower.  I wonder if it's possible to somehow expand on this idea similar to "playmate" but instead with the PC's marriage partner.  You could have some system in which the owner forces the pc to marry the playmate or something like that to keep it more inline with your current "playmate" system, but I would love it if the mod somehow incorporates your spouse as like a second "lola". 

 

Also, I'm being kind of lazy by not testing this right now and instead asking here, but does the playmate follow around the owner by default once assigned?  Or do they only follow the pc as a follower?  I would love to see the playmate following the owner without the player around or something similar.  Like being able to ask for some time "off" from being a lola, and just being able to see whenever you visit whichever hold the owner lives in walking around with the playmate (possibly treating the playmate the same way the owner treats the pc?)  Probably a bit too much AI scripting but just throwing some ideas out there.

[Hex Bolt]

59 minutes ago, Greyzen said:

I've seen marriage brought up in this thread and that you don't think it would fit well in the idea of the mod, but I have not seen anyone discussing the idea of marriage pertaining to a DIFFERENT follower.  I wonder if it's possible to somehow expand on this idea similar to "playmate" but instead with the PC's marriage partner.

Skyrim's implementation of marriage is underwhelming.  There isn't much to work with, and not much (if any) advantage for the owner.  However, players can certainly role play that the owner wants the PC to marry someone, and the playmate role would work with that.

 

1 hour ago, Greyzen said:

I'm being kind of lazy by not testing this right now and instead asking here, but does the playmate follow around the owner by default once assigned?

Playmate is just a role.  There are no AI changes, so that follower follows the PC.  Changing who follows whom could well conflict with follower frameworks.  It's not worth the risk.

[kingsglaive]

When Lola is caught committing a crime by the city guards, do you intend for the master to pay for Lola, and then the master punishes Lola?

[CaptainJ03]

Came across two little bugs in the new function where Mistress unlocks some of Lola's devices to have sex.

 

As happens way too often, Lola was in heavy bondage, wearing a rubber hood and crotch rope (plus some more DDs which are irrelevant here)

The hood seems to be a bit odd concerning keywords, this is the error message:

"SLTR: Could not find device for keyword [Keyword <zad_DeviousGag (0D007EB8)>]"

(0D is the loadorder of DD assets)

 

Aaand the crotch rope had this mistake: "This Crotch Rope has no lock. Struggle free on your own."

Yes, great idea, sometimes I do, sometimes I don't, but a) cannot do it while wearing shackles, and b) I'm not the one demanding sex. Silly Mistress!

 

BTW: I love the Notification Log for this kind of debugging

 

[Hex Bolt]

5 hours ago, kingsglaive said:

When Lola is caught committing a crime by the city guards, do you intend for the master to pay for Lola, and then the master punishes Lola?

No.  You'll have to pay the fine yourself or serve time in jail.

 

1 hour ago, CaptainJ03 said:

Came across two little bugs in the new function where Mistress unlocks some of Lola's devices to have sex.

Yeah, there was a lot involved with adding the new unlocking features.  I expected a few little problems.  Thank you for reporting this.

 

1 hour ago, CaptainJ03 said:

As happens way too often, Lola was in heavy bondage, wearing a rubber hood and crotch rope (plus some more DDs which are irrelevant here)

The hood seems to be a bit odd concerning keywords, this is the error message:

"SLTR: Could not find device for keyword [Keyword <zad_DeviousGag (0D007EB8)>]"

I don't have much experience with DD hoods.  It seems that most hoods that are not gas masks also have the gag keyword.  That makes sense, but SLTR was trying to find the device using the gag keyword and the DD lookup failed because it only works for the "main" keyword (hood).  That's a DD limitation.  Fortunately, SLTR's error message for this situation helped identify the problem, so thanks for reporting that detail.  I'll have to add special logic for hoods that also function as gags.

 

1 hour ago, CaptainJ03 said:

Aaand the crotch rope had this mistake: "This Crotch Rope has no lock. Struggle free on your own."

Urg.  A chastity device with no key.  I hadn't considered that possibility.  I think I'll need to add an option to force removal even if there's no lock when the owner wants sex.

[The new guy1]

Hello is there a way to be enslaved by a non follower NPC?

[Talesien]

15 minutes ago, The new guy1 said:

Hello is there a way to be enslaved by a non follower NPC?

Not with this mod. Sanguine Debauchery might be more along those lines.

[CaptainJ03]

10 hours ago, The new guy1 said:

Hello is there a way to be enslaved by a non follower NPC?

 

Yes and no. Your owner must at least be a potential follower, Hexbolt added a few lines for hirelings and Uthgerd (and the guy in Morthal) where in vanilla Skyrim you'd need to beat them up first, which isn't a good start for choosing your Mistress.

 

For non followers, and non-potential followers, Talesien answered this already.

But: With a follower framework like NFF you can make 95% of the NPCs to be your follower, and then start SubLola with nearly everyone you like.

[Eric Cartmen]

On 3/3/2024 at 8:09 PM, The new guy1 said:

Hello is there a way to be enslaved by a non follower NPC?

On PC, you can with console commands. After selecting the character in the console, you can type "addfac 5c84d 1" but without parentheses. This adds them to the follower faction. You will need to increase their level ("setlevel 50") and also their confidence and aggression ("setav aggression 1" "setav confidence 3"). Otherwise your mistress will run away at the first sign of trouble.

This is how I add Haelga in Riften as my mistress. Always felt fitting.

 

Be warned, followers added this way don't always work with follower frameworks (Multiple Followers Framework comes to mind). That's because those mods also sometimes edit these values in other ways.

 

https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Skyrim:Console

[Eric Cartmen]

Could someone explain to me how the Tomb Raiding quest works? Are you supposed to find a specific "Boss Chest", or is it any Boss Chest from a radiant location? Or is a special boss chest created by the mod? I thought I had finally cracked it, when I found an additional boss chest in Angarvunde. However, it turned out to just be a mimic, which proceeded to eat poor Lola and her mistress to boot. (Thanks Mikael's Monsters.)

 

Anyway, I've never been able to complete this quest (turns out Lola's mistress was right when she said Lola was terrible at being an adventurer). So, for now, I've deactivated the quest, until I can find out more.

[Hex Bolt]

5 minutes ago, Eric Cartmen said:

Could someone explain to me how the Tomb Raiding quest works?

Details are explained a few pages back.

[Eric Cartmen]

20 minutes ago, HexBolt8 said:

Details are explained a few pages back.

Thanks for getting back to me so promptly. I did a quick test run. Angarvunde is NOT a boss chest, nor are the chests in the major forts. However, the boss chests that are found in caves (like Redoran's Retreat) DO seem to be (so long as they look like a boss chest and not a generic chest, obviously). It's weird how some are, and others aren't.

 

I suppose I'll have to write it up to the arbitrary nature of the mistress ("No Lola! Not that chest of loot! It looks all wrong! I'm looking for a particularly special item. I don't care how much effort it took for you to get here. Your whining just shows how much you aren't devoted to me. Clearly you need more breeding or punishment to settle your mood swings.").

[kingsglaive]

15 hours ago, Eric Cartmen said:

感谢您如此及时地回复我。我做了一个快速测试。安加文德不是 Boss 宝箱，主要堡垒中的宝箱也不是。然而，在洞穴中发现的 Boss 宝箱（例如 Redoran's Retreat）似乎确实如此（显然，只要它们看起来像 Boss 宝箱而不是普通宝箱）。很奇怪，有些人是这样，有些人则不是。

 

我想我必须把它写成情妇的任意性质（“不，萝拉！不是那箱战利品！看起来完全不对！我正在寻找一个特别特别的物品。我不在乎有多少你花了多少努力才到达这里。你的抱怨只是表明你对我有多不忠诚。显然你需要更多的教养或惩罚来解决你的情绪波动。”）。

Just find a cave or stronghold in Skyrim and kill the leader.

[kingsglaive]

Are there any plans to add a content similar to rape tattoos to the mission (Temple of Love)?
After the owner has sex with Lola at the Temple of Dibella, a Dibella Tattoos mark will appear on Lola's body.

The priestesse of the Temple of Dibella will propose using Dibella's miracle to bless the owner.
After Dibella's master's semen enters Lola's body, a Dibella tattoo will be formed, which means that Lola and her master once had wonderful sex in the Temple of Dibella.
Tattoos will slowly disappear after a while

Edited March 5, 2024 by kingsglaive

[Hex Bolt]

2 hours ago, kingsglaive said:

Are there any plans to add a content similar to rape tattoos to the mission (Temple of Love)?

It's not something that I plan to add.

[DrunkPancake]

Is it possible to allow the player to exclude certain items from the Parade event. Im getting issues with devices from DD, that trigger the punishment.

[Reticent111]

I use Improved Camera SE mod.

When in first person and Lola is kneeling, camera don't move down in the same height of head when kneeling. The camera always stays in the same height when Lola is standing.

 

There only one time that the camera moves down. (After Lola is bought from simple slavery scene 1 time)

 

Is there a way to lower the camera when kneeling?

 

[CaptainJ03]

2 hours ago, DrunkPancake said:

Is it possible to allow the player to exclude certain items from the Parade event. Im getting issues with devices from DD, that trigger the punishment.

If you get punished for wearing DD items, something in your DD setup isn't right. There may be mods that re-configure them as clothing or armour, which conflicts with... well, with everything. My Lola can wear as many DDs as she likes and never in all the years I've been playing this mod had any issues.

 

I could imagine, that you get zapped for being too slow because you're wearing a hobble skirt or pet suit, but I don't think that Hexbolt didn't add a catch for those occasions. Nowadays Mistress could even use the new function to get you out of those for a proper parade.

[Hex Bolt]

2 hours ago, DrunkPancake said:

Is it possible to allow the player to exclude certain items from the Parade event. Im getting issues with devices from DD, that trigger the punishment.

Equipped devices will not cause punishment unless they have been modified to function as clothing or armor by another mod, such as a mod that adds armor rating to devices or one that allows them to be enchanted.  Those mods are not compatible with this one.

 

2 hours ago, Reticent111 said:

I use Improved Camera SE mod.

When in first person and Lola is kneeling, camera don't move down in the same height of head when kneeling. The camera always stays in the same height when Lola is standing.

 

There only one time that the camera moves down. (After Lola is bought from simple slavery scene 1 time)

 

Is there a way to lower the camera when kneeling?

The scene is just having the PC perform a pose.  Other mods are going to do that too.  Unfortunately, camera mods have their limitations, but it's up to that mod to detect poses and position the camera where it thinks it should be.