Sexout Common Resources (SCR)

[ToeCutter23]

1 hour ago, ToeCutter23 said:

After upgrading to 20230226, I've got this issue with undressing body apparel (not happening when using the "use undress list" option (havn't tried other options yet)) during SO scenes. Also problems with gear added by SO (collars, toys ETC) being uneqiped during SO scenes. Did I bungle something during upgrade or is this something with the latest version?

Still in the process of more extensive tests.

Clarification, when using "use undress list", the equpped body apparel is not unequipped. Realised that my previous statement could be interpeted as "use undress list" mitigated the problem of apperel staying on during SO scenes.

[Neutron_rus]

12 hours ago, ToeCutter23 said:

Clarification, when using "use undress list", the equpped body apparel is not unequipped. Realised that my previous statement could be interpeted as "use undress list" mitigated the problem of apperel staying on during SO scenes.

i'll look into it

[not a BT shirt]

I'm also getting the same issue, also whenever i go to select a different body, its just invisible and cali is the only body that shows up nude however i get the undressing issue like ToeCutter23 has mentioned before

[dborg2]

11 hours ago, Neutron_rus said:

i'll look into it

I uploaded the change you made to Sexout Common Resources. Hopefully it will tackle this issue.

[ToeCutter23]

29 minutes ago, dborg2 said:

I uploaded the change you made to Sexout Common Resources. Hopefully it will tackle this issue.

Sorry if I sound whiny, but I did some preliminary tests with 20230228 and it seems the front-end problem persist. Still not undressing body apparel (tested with multiple vanilla pieces, and testing with "always undress"), and still unequipping SO-added accesories. Still not ruling out that part of the problem is a borked setup on my end.

[t3589]

I've managed to adjust my own mods around the body type numbering changes, but I'm still having issues.

 

Current Behavior: Undress swaps explicitly to the body type set in SCR MCM when sex starts (P0).  If the character manually undresses prior to sex start, mimics old behavior (no swap).

 

Desired/Old Behavior: Undress reveals the installed nude body when sex starts (EX: Nude T4).  No swap regardless of bopy type setting (P0).

 

As for P1 and above, it makes sense to swap because those are the only pregnant bodies we have available.  I think that's why the undress script was there to begin with, so that players could use their own P0 body types during sex (without manual undress).
 

Perhaps another body type setting that allows this (Custom)?

 

[dborg2]

11 hours ago, ToeCutter23 said:

Sorry if I sound whiny, but I did some preliminary tests with 20230228 and it seems the front-end problem persist. Still not undressing body apparel (tested with multiple vanilla pieces, and testing with "always undress"), and still unequipping SO-added accesories. Still not ruling out that part of the problem is a borked setup on my end.

 

2 hours ago, t3589 said:

I've managed to adjust my own mods around the body type numbering changes, but I'm still having issues.

 

Current Behavior: Undress swaps explicitly to the body type set in SCR MCM when sex starts (P0).  If the character manually undresses prior to sex start, mimics old behavior (no swap).

 

Desired/Old Behavior: Undress reveals the installed nude body when sex starts (EX: Nude T4).  No swap regardless of bopy type setting (P0).

 

As for P1 and above, it makes sense to swap because those are the only pregnant bodies we have available.  I think that's why the undress script was there to begin with, so that players could use their own P0 body types during sex (without manual undress).
 

Perhaps another body type setting that allows this (Custom)?

 

 

**Just to clarify. I have never looked into the undressing scripts, as the undressing is done by SexoutNG (Neutron looked at the few scripts in Sexout Common Resources)

 

This is purely from what I remember, but SexoutNG and Sexout Pregnancy only look at clothing/accessoiries/gloves with the upperbody-checkmark. As you can wear only one with that checkmark, the loose 'vanilla pieces' will not get undressed. ps. apart from hats/helmets, I don't think there are loose clothing items in the default game.

Also the nude P1+ bodies have the upperbody-checkmark and are considered outfits that will be unequiped.

 

From my understanding the undress-settings are there to tell SexoutNG to undress/not undress the current 'upperbody'-clothing, to equip a specific 'upperbody'-clothing item (ie the penis for the sissymods) or the unequip all upperbodies (and therefor get the installed nude body).

 

------------------

What we changed is that you can select which nudebody you want to appear during sex-animations, as that setting will also choose the pregnancy bodies and outfit conversions-if they exist.

 

 

[t3589]

2 hours ago, dborg2 said:

 

What we changed is that you can select which nudebody you want to appear during sex-animations, as that setting will also choose the pregnancy bodies and outfit conversions-if they exist.

 

 

 

I get that part, but what if you want to use a body that is not represented in the settings?

 

EDIT: nvm.  I think get it now.  It works differently because it didn't work properly before, but is now fixed?  It should have been swapping according to those settings all along, but it wasn't for P0.  Now it works as intended.

 

Edited March 1, 2023 by t3589

[t3589]

Confirmed 2023028 breaks undress.  Rolling back to 2023021 works.

 

EDIT:  Also noticed.  When DoNotUndress flag = 0, combined with DoNotRedress flag = 1.  Does not undress on scene start, but does undress on scene end.  As posted above NG settings are ignored (List/Always/Never).

 

EDIT EDIT: Confirmed reverting the edits to SexoutNGUndressSpellSCRIPT from 2023028  to 2023021  fixes the undress issue.

 

Edited March 11, 2023 by t3589

[t3589]

In 2023028 the new undress script relies upon a successful body swap to undress.  If body type is set to Cali, the script uses SexoutSNudeToken.  If the actor is already naked, this isn't a problem.

 

However if the actor is wearing clothes that need to be undressed, it will never happen because SexoutSNudeToken has no body slots set and points to nothing.

 

When SexoutSNudeToken is equipped, getequipped will return nude (it's in the list).  This leaves the actors clothes equipped, because nothing has pushed its body slot out of the way.

 

I've fixed it by replacing SexoutSNudeToken with SexoutSNude on line 184 in the undress script (could also use SexoutSNudeT3P0B3/4, but I'm not sure which is better?).

 

EDIT:

 

Set body type to BnB.

Script equips BnB P0 body on slot upperbody, replacing whatever was equipped on slot upperbody.

 

Set body type to Cali (installed body).

Script equips Nude Token on slot null, slot upperbody is not replaced.  You end up with Outfit(Worn), Nude Token (Worn).

Script determines that GetEquipped SexoutSLOutfitNaked = true (Nude token) and proceeds normally.
 

Edited March 16, 2023 by t3589

[Neutron_rus]

1 hour ago, t3589 said:

In 2023028 the new undress script relies upon a successful body swap to undress.  If body type is set to Cali, the script uses SexoutSNudeToken.  If the actor is already naked, this isn't a problem.

 

However if the actor is wearing clothes that need to be undressed, it will never happen because SexoutSNudeToken has no body slots set and points to nothing.

 

When SexoutSNudeToken is equipped, getequipped will return nude (it's in the list).  This leaves the actors clothes equipped, because nothing has pushed its body slot out of the way.

 

I've fixed it by replacing SexoutSNudeToken with SexoutSNude on line 184 in the undress script (could also use SexoutSNudeT3P0B3/4, but I'm not sure which is better?).
 

In 2023028 I removed the undress script entirely to solve all this problems for now, until i find a better solution to work with it. So there's should be no problems with it, as it rely on default sexoutng undress script

Edit:
I have recheked it in fnvedit, and looks like the script is still here, my bad. It can be freely removed to not worry about any problems

Edited March 16, 2023 by Neutron_rus

[t3589]

17 minutes ago, Neutron_rus said:

In 2023028 I removed the undress script entirely to solve all this problems for now, until i find a better solution to work with it. So there's should be no problems with it, as it rely on default sexoutng undress script

 

I'm using the latest.  The edits are still there.  Will try downloading it again just to make sure.

 

What was wrong with those edits if I may ask?  I think I see what you're trying to do.  If undress can manage pregnant bodies that would be sweet.  It looked like it would work other than the token change.

 

EDIT: The edits are still there in the upload (SexoutCommonResources 20230228.rar).

 

EDITx2: To get pregnant bodies working in my scripts I had to: 1. Equip them prior to running the SexoutNG call, and 2. restrict the call from running until pregnant bodies were confirmed in place.

 

Edited March 16, 2023 by t3589

[Neutron_rus]

1 minute ago, t3589 said:

 

I'm using the latest.  The edits are still there.  Will try downloading it again just to make sure.

 

What was wrong with those edits if I may ask?  I think I see what you're trying to do.  If undress can manage pregnant bodies that would be sweet.  It looked like it would work other than the token change.

 

I just noticed that version is also wrong, so i might have mistakenly sent the wrong one to dborg, as in code current one says 2023027.0, i'll send dborg the right one asap

It doesn't work properly with non-undress lists or something like this, if  i remember correctly, full undress was fine, but partial is not, at least this is what some users said. But yes, it will be good to make it work for SOPreg and upcoming MPO reworking update

 

[t3589]

59 minutes ago, Neutron_rus said:

I just noticed that version is also wrong, so i might have mistakenly sent the wrong one to dborg, as in code current one says 2023027.0, i'll send dborg the right one asap

It doesn't work properly with non-undress lists or something like this, if  i remember correctly, full undress was fine, but partial is not, at least this is what some users said. But yes, it will be good to make it work for SOPreg and upcoming MPO reworking update

 

 

Using the edits does not undress any item I add to the SafeClothes lists so far.  The only problem I see is the nudetoken I mentioned before.

 

EDIT: In other words, partial undress seems to be working fine for me with the edits in place

 

Edited March 16, 2023 by t3589

[Neutron_rus]

50 minutes ago, t3589 said:

 

Using the edits does not undress any item I add to the SafeClothes lists so far.  The only problem I see is the nudetoken I mentioned before.

 

EDIT: In other words, partial undress seems to be working fine for me with the edits in place

 

Good to know, i'm looking into it right now, and adding placeholders for T4 and custom body presets. Also I think I found out why my geck keeps loading old broken edits over the fixed code, the problem was in plugin Hot Reload, that lets to work with scripts separately

[t3589]

1 hour ago, Neutron_rus said:

Good to know, i'm looking into it right now, and adding placeholders for T4 and custom body presets. Also I think I found out why my geck keeps loading old broken edits over the fixed code, the problem was in plugin Hot Reload, that lets to work with scripts separately

 

Its been so long that I've had to dig into SCR, I had forgotten that Cali (SCR:fBodyType 1) points to the installed body assets.  The others point to pregnancy body assets.  I mistakenly thought Cali pointed to pregnancy assets, which it only does for P1-P7.

 

The only reason we need those body settings is for pregnancy.  If the assets don't have a pregnant body I wouldn't fuss over it.

 

 

Edited March 16, 2023 by t3589

[Neutron_rus]

52 minutes ago, t3589 said:

 

Its been so long that I've had to dig into SCR, I had forgotten that Cali (SCR:fBodyType 1) points to the installed body assets.  The others point to pregnancy body assets.  I mistakenly thought Cali pointed to pregnancy assets, which it only does for P1-P7.

 

The only reason we need those body settings is for pregnancy.  If the assets don't have a pregnant body I wouldn't fuss over it.

 

 

Okay, I think I fixed everything now, all body types seems to undresses correctly, plus fixed and adjusted pregnancy scripts to support new changes. Sending the update to dborg

[quaan16]

i downloaded the newest version and the file seems to be corrupted. Does anyone encounter the same problem? I got sexlite to work and sexout NG is fine but the rar file of common resources is corrupted no matter how many times or ways i tried to download it.

 

Edited March 26, 2023 by quaan16

[dborg2]

21 hours ago, quaan16 said:

i downloaded the newest version and the file seems to be corrupted. Does anyone encounter the same problem? I got sexlite to work and sexout NG is fine but the rar file of common resources is corrupted no matter how many times or ways i tried to download it.

 

I don't seem to have this issue. Try this one (is the same as the download)

SexoutCommonResources 20230317.rar

[quaan16]

9 hours ago, dborg2 said:

I don't seem to have this issue. Try this one (is the same as the download)

SexoutCommonResources 20230317.rar 189.24 kB · 2 downloads

Sadly, it keeps appearing like this

[quaan16]

9 hours ago, dborg2 said:

I don't seem to have this issue. Try this one (is the same as the download)

SexoutCommonResources 20230317.rar 189.24 kB · 3 downloads

Wait...i just found out that anything i downloaded on the site got the same problem. NX 19, SOFA, SCR,... all of them are all corrupted in the same manner. I downloaded countless files on this site fine a few months ago but now none of them work

 

[dborg2]

2 hours ago, quaan16 said:

Wait...i just found out that anything i downloaded on the site got the same problem. NX 19, SOFA, SCR,... all of them are all corrupted in the same manner. I downloaded countless files on this site fine a few months ago but now none of them work

 

do you have winrar or 7zip?

[quaan16]

10 hours ago, dborg2 said:

do you have winrar or 7zip?

i have both, i also use the custom Fomm from this site

 

[dborg2]

58 minutes ago, quaan16 said:

i have both, i also use the custom Fomm from this site

 

I know people will hate me for it, but you could try mod Organizer 2 instead of FOMM.

[t3589]

4 hours ago, dborg2 said:

I know people will hate me for it, but you could try mod Organizer 2 instead of FOMM.

 

There's a damn good reason all of the guides that are still maintained recommend MO2.  While FOMM may work, it won't help you identify problems like MO2 will.