What's on your mind?

[Darkpig]

Just now, Dark Spectre said:

*takes a quick peek at the thread, then walks away*

Good call. Also you're welcome.

[Dark Spectre]

1 minute ago, Darkpig said:

Good call. Also you're welcome.

Yeah, need to get some sleep...

[Wandering_Mania]

21 minutes ago, Dark Spectre said:

*takes a quick peak at the thread, then walks away*

This is what happens when people try to argue with bad faith against me.

It don't end well.

[Darkpig]

I'm bored.

[porkybork]

1 hour ago, Darkpig said:

I'm bored.

Hi bored, I’m gay.

 

Wait, that’s not how that goes…

[Grey Cloud]

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

And I never said that was acceptable behavior either.

No you did not you chose to not mention white people at all. You instead chose to mention only Black Lives Matter. Similarly you chose to mention women but not men. Racism and misogyny were your first choices.

 

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

But the second we set the precedent, to allow the justification, of one the most heinous crimes, with a claim of "Mental Illness made me do it";

That is hysterical nonsense. One cannot just claim mental illness, the illness has to be proven.

 

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

L. Clancy committed pre-meditated triple homicide; She deserves death, or at very least, life imprisonment with no chance at parole. 

In your opinion which was formed from a combination of your prejudices and info picked up from the TV. 

 

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

Mental Illness DOES NOT justify anything!!!

No one is arguing that it does. It is an extenuating circumstance.

 

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

Murder is murder!!!

Not according to US law. There are several degrees of murder.

 

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

And if I was to destroy my laptop right now; Would you care? I'm not one to judge what others do with their own property, you shouldn't be either.

Your racism is showing again. We are not talking about inanimate objects, we are talking about human beings. 

 

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

I'm not one to judge what others do with their own property, you shouldn't be either.

By your logic you should not be concerned about the Clancy case. Her children were her property and what she chose to do with them is no concern of yours.

 

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

You are not looking at this objectively. You are putting today's fucked up "morals" of 'Rules for thee, but none for me', to the times of the past.

And you of course are entirely objective?

'Rules for thee, but none for me'? Nowhere have I suggested that. 

My morals/values come from reading philosophy not from social media nor do I apply modern values to the past.

 

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

Rules, should be applied to everyone EQUALLY! NO EXCEPTIONS! NO EXCUSES!

That is the most ridiculous statement I have read in quite a while. So the rules would apply equally to a quadriplegic and a healthy person or to a child and an adult?

[Gukahn]

[Grey Cloud]

3 hours ago, Wandering_Mania said:

This is what happens when people try to argue with bad faith against me.

It don't end well.

Who argued in bad faith and how did it not go well?