Jump to content

Sexlife

Dooge

Recommended Posts

y_sengaku

y_sengaku

Posted
Posted

Yes... the problem is I have no idea of the lore, I do not know if there are any races that consider themselves "as one" with other races. My point was that it can be easily coded if it is relevant, but I have no idea if it is relevant.

 

Thank you for your reply.

It's always good to hear such 'technical' possibility/ limitations of implementing lore. 

As for your suggestion, I assume that not so small number of all the 'human' races  alike,

regardless of their current political/ ideological affiliation, share more or less a similar

sense of 'human' solidarity against the beast races, and (may be to a lesser extent?) the elven races. 

 

Probably the description of the following lore book may be helpful to clarify the situations.

http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Notes_on_Racial_Phylogeny

Dooge

Dooge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Dooge is there anything atm you need tested?.

 

I have only found the one that I mentioned earlier.

 

Thanks for the offer. Not really no, at the moment I am pretty well aware of all the things that do not work, takes time to fix. Once I change something then its always good to have that tested. I can write down such wishes after each update.

 

Force different animals as A2 and see what happens. :D More for fun than testing.

Guest ffabris

Guest ffabris

Posted
Posted

Oh nice! Thanks for removing the tags! Will test tomorrow. May be ready to be permanently in my load, soon. :) Well done, and thank you!

Dooge

Dooge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think next I will play with my mod on (and others too) and see how it works in real play-through and then fix things from that perspective. Then maybe I will call it version 1.0 and move it out of WIP category,

y_sengaku

y_sengaku

Posted
Posted

Please Help! 13 version is not in the MSM. as well as other (serialstrip)

 

It takes some time for SLSL to be registered in MCM. 

Installed after Helgen (the quest 'unbound'), and just left the game for AT LEAST 2 minutes

until the notification of 'new 1 MCM ( of SLSL) registered' appeared. 

For my case (weak CPU and very weak GPU, plus script heavy environment),

it sometimes takes more than 3 minutes (confirmed in 0.13.0/ 0.14.1).

So it may be not enough for you to wait for only 2 minutes.

 

It is STRONGLY NOT ADVISABLE either to touch anything in MCM (especially for some hot-key re-allocation

function) or to quit the game itself during this registrating process.

It is highly likely that such actions would result in 'MCM-all-together-gone'. 

 

I afraid you just have to roll back to the save before your attempt to install SLSL...

Pcgeekri

Pcgeekri

Posted
Posted

Starting a fresh game.  Will disable the mod for the Prisoner portion then enable and setup everything.  Wish there was an import/export for everything in MCM especially SOS. 

 

Laterz,

Pcgeekri

 

y_sengaku

y_sengaku

Posted
Posted

Hello,

The following is just a trivial suggestion based on my (male testing PC's) personal experience:

Is it possible to bypass 'sizequeen (king)' check of NPCs in case of the flirting between
NPC (A1) and PC (A2) if SoSracemanu.esp, a plug-in of XPMSE as well as SoS, is installed,
or just to toggle on/off this feature entirely by MCM ?  

For a while, probably since 0.10.0, I've found that some supposedly 'horny' NPCs did not so often flirt with my male PC any more.  
Backgrounds of this issues are the combination of the following twofold elements:

  1.  In immersive preset .json file, the majority of 'hyper-sexual' NPCs share the 'size-queen (king)' trait.
  2.  If we install SOSracemenu.esp (from XPMSE), REGARDLESS OF ITS ACTUAL SCHONG SIZE (adjusted by Racemenu sliders), PC's schlong is always fixed at the size 1 internally. It's easy to confirm this information from MCM of SoS. No matter how big and menacing it looks, lol.
  3.  As a result, the more horny they are (at least regarded so in the game and lore), ironically, the less they take actions to my PC since they don't regard him as well-endowed and suitable sexual partner anymore by default setting (size-queen threshold=7). If we lower the size-queen minimum threshold from 7 (default) to 1, they began to flirt with PC again.

[Edit/ Added]: Camilla (whose traits are based on  immersive preset, then removing 'faithful' trait) is the best experimental subject as NPC-A1 concerning this matter. 

 

[Edit 2]: Thank you for your quick reply! If you are not so familiar with SoSRaceMenu sliders and its basic function (that enables the player to customize PC's schlong shape by 'bone' sliders , independent of its original size value), I'll also ask and explain the situation at SoS's supported topic, too.

sidfu

sidfu

Posted
Posted

well in v.15 found nothing wrong that i could find. its a good thing u have the setting to initiate what their sex prefernce off as that seems to have somewhat fixed the bug where when u have aroused use sexlab oreintation but where sexlife keep looking to aroused before sexlab for sexual oreintation.

 

i have 1 suggestion. is there anyway to move what they say outsitde into a file that we could edit. kinda like apros has that we can add what they say for differnt oreintations?

 

Dooge

Dooge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hello,

 

The following is just a trivial suggestion based on my (male testing PC's) personal experience:

 

Is it possible to bypass 'sizequeen (king)' check of NPCs in case of the flirting between

NPC (A1) and PC (A2) if SoSracemanu.esp, a plug-in of XPMSE as well as SoS, is installed,

or just to toggle on/off this feature entirely by MCM ?  

 

For a while, probably since 0.10.0, I've found that some supposedly 'horny' NPCs did not so often flirt with my male PC any more.  

Backgrounds of this issues are the combination of the following twofold elements:

  1.  In immersive preset .json file, the majority of 'hyper-sexual' NPCs share the 'size-queen (king)' trait.
  2.  If we install SOSracemenu.esp (from XPMSE), REGARDLESS OF ITS ACTUAL SCHONG SIZE (adjusted by Racemenu sliders), PC's schlong is always fixed at the size 1 internally. It's easy to confirm this information from MCM of SoS. No matter how big and menacing it looks, lol.
  3.  As a result, the more horny they are (at least regarded so in the game and lore), ironically, the less they take actions to my PC since they don't regard him as well-endowed and suitable sexual partner anymore by default setting (size-queen threshold=7). If we lower the size-queen minimum threshold from 7 (default) to 1, they began to flirt with PC again.

[Edit/ Added]: Camilla (whose traits are based on  immersive preset, then removing 'faithful' trait) is the best experimental subject as NPC-A1 concerning this matter.

 

I can look into this and upload an update and you then test if it works. Better yet if I have SOS function that would convert slider value to 0-20 size. Will ask author about that.

Skippe

Skippe

Posted
Posted

i dont use schlongs of skyrim in my game but i have setted schlong size just in case to 1 :) no pockets and beastiality off caused me to blink couple times and laugh hard in yeastarday XD  when i saw it at upper left screen. conversations with npc are well done did you see how her hips rocked or i would want to sample her or about shop keeper you mentioned she is hot XD good work :).

 

fetishis section i have rape and prostitution chekked my poor dragon born pc has submissive attribute and i have used sexlife to set female npc:s to dominate  and added some my favorites rapist attribute XD .its skyrim where females dominate at beddroom and wildernes how ever they want ;). cheating attribute is bit what i am unsure how it works umm does someone know ?i dont use beastiality my self or incest .

 

sexlife has become mod that i have always in my mod list with amorous adventures and further lovers comfort dooge and all others that have helped him has made excelent mod in my opinion that adds immersive ways spice and fun to skyrim :) thank you very much and good work with  this mod.

iacex111

iacex111

Posted
Posted

 

sexlife has become mod that i have always in my mod list with amorous adventures and further lovers comfort dooge and all others that have helped him has made excelent mod in my opinion that adds immersive ways spice and fun to skyrim :) thank you very much and good work with  this mod.

 

On behalf of "all others" ;) thank you for your appreciation.  :D

 

I can't imagine playing Skyrim without Sexlife now. All hail Dooge! :)

1
Pcgeekri

Pcgeekri

Posted
Posted

Oh thank you very much b3lisario!  I'll be patient and wait for the release.  That is awesome!  I take the full version of SOS by the way.  heh  I like the shop. 

 

Guest ffabris

Guest ffabris

Posted
Posted

Dooge, you have incest as a fetish - is there code to support that? Because when making a patch for my player home, I specifically made some NPCs siblings, for testing. Except that I'm not sure how to test.

Dooge

Dooge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Dooge, you have incest as a fetish - is there code to support that? Because when making a patch for my player home, I specifically made some NPCs siblings, for testing. Except that I'm not sure how to test.

 

Siblings or Parent/Child (adult) have one comment only so far. You can test it in Riverwood trader. Force camilla and the guy as A1 and A2 etc and you'll see the line.

Dooge

Dooge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So far Dooge everthing seems to work, not sure if you want to implement that all R4 NPCs can have sex with a faithful player or not other than that all seems okay.

 

It's on open issue with that... some functions of the game do not work as supposed so I do not know what to do with the issue... yet.

 

Dooge

Dooge

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hello,

 

The following is just a trivial suggestion based on my (male testing PC's) personal experience:

 

Is it possible to bypass 'sizequeen (king)' check of NPCs in case of the flirting between

NPC (A1) and PC (A2) if SoSracemanu.esp, a plug-in of XPMSE as well as SoS, is installed,

or just to toggle on/off this feature entirely by MCM ?  

 

For a while, probably since 0.10.0, I've found that some supposedly 'horny' NPCs did not so often flirt with my male PC any more.  

Backgrounds of this issues are the combination of the following twofold elements:

  1.  In immersive preset .json file, the majority of 'hyper-sexual' NPCs share the 'size-queen (king)' trait.
  2.  If we install SOSracemenu.esp (from XPMSE), REGARDLESS OF ITS ACTUAL SCHONG SIZE (adjusted by Racemenu sliders), PC's schlong is always fixed at the size 1 internally. It's easy to confirm this information from MCM of SoS. No matter how big and menacing it looks, lol.
  3.  As a result, the more horny they are (at least regarded so in the game and lore), ironically, the less they take actions to my PC since they don't regard him as well-endowed and suitable sexual partner anymore by default setting (size-queen threshold=7). If we lower the size-queen minimum threshold from 7 (default) to 1, they began to flirt with PC again.

[Edit/ Added]: Camilla (whose traits are based on  immersive preset, then removing 'faithful' trait) is the best experimental subject as NPC-A1 concerning this matter. 

 

[Edit 2]: Thank you for your quick reply! If you are not so familiar with SoSRaceMenu sliders and its basic function (that enables the player to customize PC's schlong shape by 'bone' sliders , independent of its original size value), I'll also ask and explain the situation at SoS's supported topic, too.

 

Apparently one would need to test for individual bone sizes on the schlong. Something I do not know how to do, and even if it was done, no very reliable way to transform that info into 1-20 scale. Eventually would be nice feature but I cannot give it high priority. I will however try to add that SOS plugin to racemenu and play around with it. Maybe I get inspired.

 

Anyway, I suggest you leave the threshold to 1, It acts same as turning off whole feature.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...