nutluck Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 I'm gonna try to get some logs with this happening, but during my reinstall I'm getting the messages appearing at strange times. The starting message either doesn't appear at all, or appears when the orgasm scene starts, while the orgasm message appears after the PC stands back up. Anyone else have this? Since I updated SexLab, everything just seems a bit slower... My skyrim launches slower than it use to now. But I don't know if that has anything to do with sexlab since I updated a few mods at the same time, including SKSE 1.7 Could SL 1.5x be more Papyrus spammy? have you noticed a big size increase in the logs? No the logs seem about the same doing testing of mods for about a hour and I end up between 300-500kbs Mine seems fine other than it just takes longer to launch the game now. I am wondering if it is SKSE with the cleaninvalid command in the ini file causing it.
pinky6225 Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 On the W&T system what determines how much/often it moves? since I've noticed that using RP i'm going from 1/2 straight to 9 after one client and is there a way of controlling it?
Guest Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 I haven't noticed Skyrim taking longer to load, but I've just done a fresh install and don't yet have all my mods back on. So far I've just been triggering sex scenes either via SexLab's new test mode, and the new Defeat, since no other triggers are yet installed. Once I have some other mods back on I'll be able to see if it's just these new additions causing problems. I'll get some FF logs once everything's working again, seems a bit unhelpful to supply logs with a problem present.
permidion Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 That's a symptom of having a bad descriptions file, usually a missing comma. Did you try adding anyone's descriptions or make your own edits? Most likely that's a problem in SexPart_Synonyms.txt -- try copying all of the text from the file into an online validator like JSONlint. tha file in Apropos_Beta_2014_04_24.7z is named Synonyms.txt, not SexPart_Synonyms.txt (as it was in the previous version Apropos_Beta_2014_03_07.7z) I got it to work correctly after hitting the "refresh" button in the MCM config. this may have to do with the fact I did not do a clean install when I updated it.
permidion Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 If you are upgrading at all from a previous release, you need to follow the upgrade instructions in the OP. it worked, thank you
Rdm Posted May 3, 2014 Posted May 3, 2014 Hey guys, I am having some trouble with this mod, the MCM show up but there are no sub categories, can anyone help me? Here is my Papyrus.0.log https://www.dropbox.com/s/u8iidjn8tlg3f51/Papyrus.0.log
Rdm Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 I also want to apologize if I am a pain in the ass for the senior members out there
permidion Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 Hey guys, I am having some trouble with this mod, the MCM show up but there are no sub categories, can anyone help me? Here is my Papyrus.0.log https://www.dropbox.com/s/u8iidjn8tlg3f51/Papyrus.0.log do you wait till you get the MCM notice that a new menu has been added (top-left of the screen) or do you try to access it before getting the notice? also, be sure you have skse 1.7a and that the jcontainer dll installed is the one that comes with the mod (all that is written on the mod front page btw)
Rdm Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 Hey guys, I am having some trouble with this mod, the MCM show up but there are no sub categories, can anyone help me? Here is my Papyrus.0.log https://www.dropbox.com/s/u8iidjn8tlg3f51/Papyrus.0.log do you wait till you get the MCM notice that a new menu has been added (top-left of the screen) or do you try to access it before getting the notice? also, be sure you have skse 1.7a and that the jcontainer dll installed is the one that comes with the mod (all that is written on the mod front page btw) Yep, I wait and I got both of what you said and still, nothing D:
permidion Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 Yep, I wait and I got both of what you said and still, nothing D: mmm, try putting it last in your load order ? also, you have the 2014_04_24 version?
gooser Posted May 4, 2014 Author Posted May 4, 2014 What version did you actually install? The log file shows some errors from an older version of Apropos.
Guest Posted May 4, 2014 Posted May 4, 2014 New version of SexLab apparently fixes the creature tags issue.
gooser Posted May 5, 2014 Author Posted May 5, 2014 New version of SexLab apparently fixes the creature tags issue. What issue is that?
ylenard Posted May 5, 2014 Posted May 5, 2014 Is it normal that I usually get more than one description of the orgasm? Sometimes I get only one, but most of the time ~5. Thanks for the great mod. No idea. That's a new one. Can you provide a log? I can, but the logs are empty - contain no mention of apropos whatsoever (when I isolate the bug). I found out that it only happens with the "3rd person" option though. -edit- it happens with SL 1.39b if it matter Bah, I just noticed apropos logs I'll upload it in a second And since I'm already here, might as well ask. I remember reading, that you had a problem whether to treat NPCs as virgin or not, and that you decided to make only NPCs able to deflower other NPCs as a solution. Have you thought about simply checking the 'vaginal'/'oral'/'anal' skill of an npc from sexlab and treating the NPC as a virgin only if the skill = 0 ? The skill functions as a count of sexual encounters of the corresponding type, so I believe it should fit. Apropos.0.log.7z
gooser Posted May 5, 2014 Author Posted May 5, 2014 Is it normal that I usually get more than one description of the orgasm? Sometimes I get only one, but most of the time ~5. Thanks for the great mod. No idea. That's a new one. Can you provide a log? I can, but the logs are empty - contain no mention of apropos whatsoever (when I isolate the bug). I found out that it only happens with the "3rd person" option though. -edit- it happens with SL 1.39b if it matter Bah, I just noticed apropos logs I'll upload it in a second And since I'm already here, might as well ask. I remember reading, that you had a problem whether to treat NPCs as virgin or not, and that you decided to make only NPCs able to deflower other NPCs as a solution. Have you thought about simply checking the 'vaginal'/'oral'/'anal' skill of an npc from sexlab and treating the NPC as a virgin only if the skill = 0 ? The skill functions as a count of sexual encounters of the corresponding type, so I believe it should fit. Your log shows some very strange activity. Normally, you would see a linear progression of AnimationStart -> Apropos message Stage Start/End Stage Start/End Stage Start/End Stage Start/End Stage Start/End OrgasmStart -> Apropos message But your log is a jumbled mess. As far as I can tell there is only one sex act going on, between Natalie and Wandering Knight. Why do I see things like: [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Actors >> [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Actors >> [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] [0]: Natalie, female (Victim) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] [0]: Natalie, female (Victim) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] [1]: Wandering Knight, male [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Animation: '$ZazAP_SexLabRoughMissionary' (Zaz,sex,bound,Aggressive,AggressiveDefault,FM,Missionary,Laying,vaginal,MF) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Stage: 5 [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] ---- OrgasmStart ---- [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Actors >> [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] [1]: Wandering Knight, male [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Animation: '$ZazAP_SexLabRoughMissionary' (Zaz,sex,bound,Aggressive,AggressiveDefault,FM,Missionary,Laying,vaginal,MF) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Stage: 5 [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] [0]: Natalie, female (Victim) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] ---- OrgasmStart ---- [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] TokenNames : {CUM},{PRIMARY_NAME},{PUSSY} [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] TokenValues : cream,Natalie,Cunt [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] Natalie lets out a sob as cream fills her Cunt for the first time. [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] [1]: Wandering Knight, male [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] Actors >> [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] Animation: '$ZazAP_SexLabRoughMissionary' (Zaz,sex,bound,Aggressive,AggressiveDefault,FM,Missionary,Laying,vaginal,MF) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] Stage: 5 [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] [0]: Natalie, female (Victim) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] TokenNames : {CUM},{PRIMARY_NAME},{PUSSY} [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] TokenValues : cum,Natalie,Pussy [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] Natalie lets out a sob as cum fills her Pussy for the first time. [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] [1]: Wandering Knight, male [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] Animation: '$ZazAP_SexLabRoughMissionary' (Zaz,sex,bound,Aggressive,AggressiveDefault,FM,Missionary,Laying,vaginal,MF) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:55PM] Stage: 5 Notice the repeated lines, and repeated sections. It's almost as if SL is spitting out spurious events. I personally have never seen things like: [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Actors >> [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] Actors >> [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] [0]: Natalie, female (Victim) [05/05/2014 - 01:19:54PM] [0]: Natalie, female (Victim) before. I have no idea what is going on here.
Guest Posted May 5, 2014 Posted May 5, 2014 New version of SexLab apparently fixes the creature tags issue. What issue is that? Lack of oral, vaginal or anal tags.
gooser Posted May 5, 2014 Author Posted May 5, 2014 New version of SexLab apparently fixes the creature tags issue. What issue is that? Lack of oral, vaginal or anal tags. Well, hot damn! It's about time! Now I can separate the text files! Thanks for the info.
nutluck Posted May 5, 2014 Posted May 5, 2014 Just checking in to see how things are coming along. Not having time to play or do much of anything with Skyrim at the moment. Giving MO a try to see how it works in my spare time. Glad that it looks like the tags issue was resolved hopefully the rest of the bugs can be stepped on as well. Looking forward to when you add in the actually wear and tear penalties.
gooser Posted May 5, 2014 Author Posted May 5, 2014 Just checking in to see how things are coming along. Not having time to play or do much of anything with Skyrim at the moment. Giving MO a try to see how it works in my spare time. Glad that it looks like the tags issue was resolved hopefully the rest of the bugs can be stepped on as well. Looking forward to when you add in the actually wear and tear penalties. Hi Nutluck! Well, hopefully the next release will have some form of effects for W&T. I'm currently rewriting that whole section because the previous implementation was not very reliable.
nutluck Posted May 5, 2014 Posted May 5, 2014 Just checking in to see how things are coming along. Not having time to play or do much of anything with Skyrim at the moment. Giving MO a try to see how it works in my spare time. Glad that it looks like the tags issue was resolved hopefully the rest of the bugs can be stepped on as well. Looking forward to when you add in the actually wear and tear penalties. Hi Nutluck! Well, hopefully the next release will have some form of effects for W&T. I'm currently rewriting that whole section because the previous implementation was not very reliable. Very cool and looking forward to it. Hopefully by then I will have time to set aside to help with beta testing to help find bugs again. Great work and keep it up.
Guest Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Hello all I am back, I am currently testing for Female to Female integration. I need a few people to help me out with tests, if you have Apropos installed it will give you a log file. I am trying to see which actor is giving oral in animations, so far my tests have concluded it is actor[0] examples: Kneeling BJ - Jonna was giving oral. [0]: Jonna, female [1]: Player, female Arrok Lesbian - player was giving oral. [0]: Player, female [1]: Jonna, female I think the only exception is the Arrok 69 where Jonna was on top for the first part. [0]: Jonna, female [1]: Player, female I need people to test this in multiple ways and situations to see if this is true. If anyone is interested I need to know : * Female to female animations * Which actor is giving oral (actor[0] or actor[1]) * Which animation it was * If it was consensual If you have Apropos installed the log file will give you all the information you need. In game you can press ~ to see what the animation was called and which actor was [0] and [1]. Sorry this took so long, I encountered some problems making everything work with the new SL. Anyway, here's a bunch of FF acts initiated via SL's new animation editor. In each act, the giver was Sigrid [0] and the receiver was the PC [1]. EDIT: Also added a log for FF acts with a strapon. As above, receiver is always PC [1] and the one wearing the strapon ins Sigrid [0]. Apropos.FF.7z Apropos.FF Strapon.7z
gooser Posted May 6, 2014 Author Posted May 6, 2014 Hello all I am back, I am currently testing for Female to Female integration. I need a few people to help me out with tests, if you have Apropos installed it will give you a log file. I am trying to see which actor is giving oral in animations, so far my tests have concluded it is actor[0] examples: Kneeling BJ - Jonna was giving oral. [0]: Jonna, female [1]: Player, female Arrok Lesbian - player was giving oral. [0]: Player, female [1]: Jonna, female I think the only exception is the Arrok 69 where Jonna was on top for the first part. [0]: Jonna, female [1]: Player, female I need people to test this in multiple ways and situations to see if this is true. If anyone is interested I need to know : * Female to female animations * Which actor is giving oral (actor[0] or actor[1]) * Which animation it was * If it was consensual If you have Apropos installed the log file will give you all the information you need. In game you can press ~ to see what the animation was called and which actor was [0] and [1]. Sorry this took so long, I encountered some problems making everything work with the new SL. Anyway, here's a bunch of FF acts initiated via SL's new animation editor. In each act, the giver was Sigrid [0] and the receiver was the PC [1]. EDIT: Also added a log for FF acts with a strapon. As above, receiver is always PC [1] and the one wearing the strapon ins Sigrid [0]. "In each act, the giver was Sigrid [0] and the receiver was the PC [1]." Thanks I think that is really what we were looking for. What about two female NPCs? Did you try that?
gooser Posted May 6, 2014 Author Posted May 6, 2014 On the W&T system what determines how much/often it moves? since I've noticed that using RP i'm going from 1/2 straight to 9 after one client and is there a way of controlling it? Hi pinky, sorry about that... I am rewriting W&T from scratch currently.
WizzyD Posted May 6, 2014 Posted May 6, 2014 Hello all I am back, I am currently testing for Female to Female integration. I need a few people to help me out with tests, if you have Apropos installed it will give you a log file. I am trying to see which actor is giving oral in animations, so far my tests have concluded it is actor[0] examples: Kneeling BJ - Jonna was giving oral. [0]: Jonna, female [1]: Player, female Arrok Lesbian - player was giving oral. [0]: Player, female [1]: Jonna, female I think the only exception is the Arrok 69 where Jonna was on top for the first part. [0]: Jonna, female [1]: Player, female I need people to test this in multiple ways and situations to see if this is true. If anyone is interested I need to know : * Female to female animations * Which actor is giving oral (actor[0] or actor[1]) * Which animation it was * If it was consensual If you have Apropos installed the log file will give you all the information you need. In game you can press ~ to see what the animation was called and which actor was [0] and [1]. Sorry this took so long, I encountered some problems making everything work with the new SL. Anyway, here's a bunch of FF acts initiated via SL's new animation editor. In each act, the giver was Sigrid [0] and the receiver was the PC [1]. EDIT: Also added a log for FF acts with a strapon. As above, receiver is always PC [1] and the one wearing the strapon ins Sigrid [0]. "In each act, the giver was Sigrid [0] and the receiver was the PC [1]." Thanks I think that is really what we were looking for. What about two female NPCs? Did you try that? or um... sos futa... with FF cum effects enabled?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now