Jump to content

Submissive Lola: The resubmission

MrEsturk

Recommended Posts

Hex Bolt

Hex Bolt

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, donttouchmethere said:

This can't have any ugly side effect right?

Subtype: Hello / RechargeExit

Unlikely, but I'll change it in the next update.  I missed USLEEP's change to the subtype and used vanilla Skyrim's.

swords and sandals

swords and sandals

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the latest update. This is probably going to sound very picky, but would there be any chance of having an MCM toggle to completely disable the horse sex dialogue from even appearing? I'd much rather be able to prevent it from happening there rather than in the game itself, as we can already with many other things, such as urination.

 

I know lots of people are really into bestiality in Skyrim - and I'm sure there are things I'm into that others wouldn't want to touch - but one of the things I loved about this mod was the fact that creature and animal content wasn't there, and - according to the opening post - never would be. Please don't take offence, anyone. Just a personal preference, and I'll completely understand if it's turned down. This is still my favourite mod. Thanks.

1
Hex Bolt

Hex Bolt

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, shiagwen said:

Isnt there any other possibility to name your simple slavery master ?

There is, on the Mod Integration page.  Have the intended SS buyer under the crosshair when you open the MCM.

3 hours ago, shiagwen said:

Same question about hairstyle.

There is, on the Rules page.

6 hours ago, merManc said:

would there be any chance of having an MCM toggle to completely disable the horse sex dialogue from even appearing?

I hear you.  Let me explain what has actually changed, and it might put your mind at rest.  Please pardon the lengthy explanation.

 

A creature content toggle could be useful if there's more of it, and if it were less well hidden.  MrEsturk really dislikes bestiality but he had told me it's okay to add it as long as it's not forced on the player.  For the record, I'm not a big fan of bestiality and my current character will definitely not choose that option, but I included it for completeness for those who want it and because I figured out an easy way to implement it.

 

To clarify, all that changed in the last update was to make the existing horse sex references actually potentially lead somewhere.  The surface presentation, the things you'd normally see, are unchanged.

 

Before the update, the owner already said "Present yourself to him [the stable master] for breeding, with my compliments.  Whether he wants you for himself or prefers to have a stallion mate with you, you will ensure that he is pleased."  Before the update, the "Glance at the stallion" option already existed.  If chosen, it wouldn't lead to bestiality but the stable master would comment on it as if that's what you wanted.  The references already existed, just as many things are hinted at but not done, such as the owner talking about selling you.

 

So what's new is that if you choose "Glance at the stallion" (which is vaguely worded and could just indicate your desire to buy the horse later) you then have two options:  sex with the horse (clearly labeled as such) or a return to the normal dialog and sex with the stable master.  In other words, you won't see anything different now than you would have before unless you deliberately opt in by choosing to glance at the stallion.  And if you get there by mistake (because it's intentionally worded to not scream "creature content") your choices are very clear, with a safe path back to sex with a human.

 

To see something you might not want, you'd have to deliberately open the box with plain brown wrapping and look inside.  To actually experience bestiality you'd have to opt in a second time by crashing through the warning sign.

 

Hopefully this explanation will ease your concerns.  It's certainly unkind for anyone to poke fun at you for politely expressing them.

swords and sandals

swords and sandals

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the fair and reasonable post, HexBolt8. I appreciate it.

 

I hadn't actually had a chance to try the pony content since it was first included, so I didn't realise there were already horse sex references that didn't lead to anything. Bestiality is one of those things that instantly dumps me out of a sexual mood at the very thought of it, but it's far from the end of the world. I'll just try to avoid that event. Plenty of other fun to be had in the mod in any case!

 

And by the way, it's great to see you continuing to provide updates and support. That's much appreciated too.

Lenore

Lenore

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, HexBolt8 said:
5 hours ago, shiagwen said:

Isnt there any other possibility to name your simple slavery master ?

There is, on the Mod Integration page.  Have the intended SS buyer under the crosshair when you open the MCM.

Would be neat if your settings (including masters) could be exported so you don't have to run and find the one you want to purchase you in SS++

donttouchmethere

donttouchmethere

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Lenore said:

Would be neat if your settings (including masters) could be exported so you don't have to run and find the one you want to purchase you in SS++

would be neat if we get a save function for all mcm settings someday ??

Hex Bolt

Hex Bolt

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, merManc said:

I hadn't actually had a chance to try the pony content since it was first included

If it comes up (assuming you don't mind pony girl gear) you might let the conversation play out and see what you get.  There are three possible tasks:  picking up a package from a merchant, delivering a letter to the steward, or visiting the stable master.  They're randomly selected but weighted toward the merchant quest.

 

The stable task has one direct mention and one veiled one to bestiality, but you'll find that the guy is pretty lonely out there and his fantasy is a woman decked out in pony gear.  Fulfilling his dreams is a humanitarian deed, and the gods smile on that sort of thing.

shiagwen

shiagwen

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Lenore said:

Would be neat if your settings (including masters) could be exported so you don't have to run and find the one you want to purchase you in SS++

Thats what i meant

Hex Bolt

Hex Bolt

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, donttouchmethere said:

DTMT stumbles thru the wonderful world of TES5edit without a clue AGAIN!

I'd noticed that.  It's been that way since the original mod.  I'm not sure that it matters.  I've had Sub Lola in my mod list for a long time and not noticed strange behavior that might be related.

donttouchmethere

donttouchmethere

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, HexBolt8 said:

I'd noticed that.  It's been that way since the original mod.  I'm not sure that it matters.  I've had Sub Lola in my mod list for a long time and not noticed strange behavior that might be related.

Thanks for easing my mind. I'm actually hunting of course the reason why my sLola owner thinks she is a part time Riften guard scammer.

Now that I write this... ? I have to modify SLS again ?

VolfDeMar

VolfDeMar

Posted
Posted
On 10/17/2020 at 3:16 AM, HexBolt8 said:

That's an interesting idea.  In my game I use gold sharing and the owner gets at least half of the loot, so opening a locked chest helps the owner more than the PC.  The owner wants to open the chest, and does not want the slave to do it and gain lockpicking skill.  However, without gold sharing, the owner might want something for opening that chest:  maybe just some humiliation (dancing or begging), maybe a share of whatever is inside, maybe a contract extension, or maybe you have to wear a device for a day.  Many possibilities.

It's the intent (though people can play it however they wish) that if you leave enslavement or dismiss the owner, the owner keeps the keys and lockpicks.  So here you are all nice and free, but with no keys and minimal skill in lockpicking (if the owner was unlocking things).  When you inevitably find yourself locked in devices, you tend to break your picks (assume you found any).  So you go crawling back.  "Of course, pet, I can help you.  But I'll have to use my keys, so in return I think a week's contract is in order.  Did I say a week?  Make that two.  Now before I help you out of this mess you got into, let's get your collar back on."

Will wait !

Hex Bolt

Hex Bolt

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, donttouchmethere said:

I blame MM1 and Corsec for forcing me to use TES5edit

Harmless and intended.  I see that RDO also limits that line, but in a different way.  Details with minor spoiler.

 

Spoiler

This greeting can be used by characters that use the voice of Belethor and Lucan.  It's the one about "you and me, we're the only ones around here who aren't complete fools".  It seemed particularly inappropriate to say to a sex slave, plus I gave a modified form of that line to the same characters for the Pony Express merchant task:  "Your owner and me, we're the only people around who aren't complete fools."  That doesn't work if he's just spoken the original line.

 

1
Hex Bolt

Hex Bolt

Posted
Posted

I'm considering a new event, more a prank really, While You Were Sleeping.  When you sleep in an inn or player home, there's a chance that the owner hides all your clothes in a randomly selected container (other than the innkeeper merchant chest, of course).  All your clothes are gone, everything in your inventory tagged as clothing or armor.

 

You're not required to steal them back, so the container would be marked as player-owned (I suppose you'll get to swipe a few free carrots if you wish).  As a failsafe, if you can't find them or just don't want to play along, you can ask your owner for the clothes back and lose one point of score. 

 

Any thoughts on this?

6
donttouchmethere

donttouchmethere

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, HexBolt8 said:

I'm considering a new event, more a prank really, While You Were Sleeping. 

I like it! Mainly because I banned all "something happens during sleep" from my Setup (not true, but at least sleeping is safe at the usual places). This in turn makes sleep the safest condition in my whole game and we can't have that can we?

And of course I miss DFC's "bind the player during sleep".

 

Btw, does anything happen if I say over and over "no" to my follower if they ask to make the PC a sLola slave?

I wonder if that could be spiced up too?

 

Or adding to the sleep prank: if player isn't lola enslaved yet, maybe a follower could equip the collar over night. To keep it a "prank" it could be lola enslavment for just a day. Could also be triggered if player says too often "no" but also never says "never" ?

 

 

EDIT:

In combo with "days for punishment" the prank can become more serious quickly ?

 

EDIT:

to keep it under control for users that don't like surprises like that it could be related to the MCM setting "follower know that PC is submissive". If that option is active it could cause followers to be more bold. ?

2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...