winny257 Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 This thread got spicy EXACTLY. allowed by the moderators. As long as everything remains factual and does not become offensive, this will be the longest thread of all time. Having spent my summer reading all kinds of threads and discussions about FO4 here and elsewhere online I don't think this thread here qualifies as more than "mildly negative" and quite friendly It actually makes me happy that it seems it is impossible to make such toxic threads and statements for Skyrim as those about FO4. I was really worried in the past months if the toxicity will penetrate the Skyrim space. many people lie some things difficult in the stomach, Also about Skyrim! It is not all gold what shines And Skyrim shines quite and not at all! so many bugs had to be resolved with 9 patches and there are still some available. the story of Skyrim, well straight so middle class, not exhilarating. And therefore it is good That there is a forum where you can say anything, without the fear of banishment.
yatol Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 As for other games I cannot think of too many other then Bethesda's that has let the community change so much so easily with mods! neverwinter nights half life colonisation, civilisation... and for the blabla about high end pc above... skyrim is old... before my alim burned, i was playing with a gtx 570 1280 mo of course i didn't had 60 fps, don't have them either with a radeon 480 8 go maybe without mods, as if i would play vanilla skyrim complicated to find the stuff that waste fps anyway who think that low poly outfit with small textures is performance friendly? euh....there is better than that to check? (disabling stuff until fps go up, then tesedit to check id of last disabled thing) medusa is wasting 6 fps, have to delete snake shoulder and other parts to check what i have to fix in blender that one is nothing and waste even more fps an high poly outfit still waiting for the fps cost of high poly i heard about the fps difference is because i have convert that outfit in outfitter (not much difference between the v4 and v6 conversions) and of course, that's no good (but it take hours to import a 20 mo nif in blender) still have my gtx 570, if i had sse, it would run it without problem
winny257 Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 and the real thing all time skyrim is ported from console to pc 2011 -xbox 360 to pc 2016 xbox one to pc ???? no real pc version ( am not happy with enbale mod in main menu just like console) if they make skyim for pc with all thing (enb ...mods ) the console will be wierd and no one will buy this thing why not include all fix make it by modder from 2011-2016 ? is only and still for money ............... the player go to the hell and take you money ( like iphone , ) if you play the witcher 3 you just "wowww ...." but in other side skyrim se 64 bits ( more stable ) ( if you search "crash skyrim se" in steam long list for your eyes in 5 years of work only old engine ported from fallout 4, is joke ,and few exe and dll ; they know the modder will do her job but how time will past to make skyrim se like heavy modded skyrim and with time microsoft : skyrim se , skyrim xp ....skyrim 10 pack x I assume English isn't your native language, Because I cant make sense of this post I'm sorry. I speak at all no English, But I've understood everything! In the first place is it about that, Skyrim original is actually a console game and it was only ported to the PC.
Green Tryst Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 For those having issues getting SSE to run on their machines, would it be possible for you to include your rig specs? Just curious and want to compare, as I have trouble running FO4 as well.
prinyo Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 For those having issues getting SSE to run on their machines, would it be possible for you to include your rig specs? Just curious and want to compare, as I have trouble running FO4 as well. Check this thread: http://www.loverslab.com/topic/68700-hardware-compatiblityperformance-reports/ The trick that seems to work for everybody in order to fix fps issues is to turn off the vsync of the game (via ini change) and cap the fps via 3rd party tools (like Nvidia Inspector). Quite ironic it takes ini changes and 3rd party tools in order to make the "modern edition" stable.... By the way I guess this is what Gopher did in order to achieve the fps he is showing in his video, but I didn't hear him talk about it, so I stopped watching it after the first minutes as it is pure propaganda.
winny257 Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 For those having issues getting SSE to run on their machines, would it be possible for you to include your rig specs? Just curious and want to compare, as I have trouble running FO4 as well. Here I can not have a say! The Fallout series was the first series of Bethesda, which I have boycotted. For me this is not an RPG, rather an ego shooter.
Rubbermatt Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 This thread got spicy EXACTLY. allowed by the moderators. As long as everything remains factual and does not become offensive, this will be the longest thread of all time. Having spent my summer reading all kinds of threads and discussions about FO4 here and elsewhere online I don't think this thread here qualifies as more than "mildly negative" and quite friendly It actually makes me happy that it seems it is impossible to make such toxic threads and statements for Skyrim as those about FO4. I was really worried in the past months if the toxicity will penetrate the Skyrim space. many people lie some things difficult in the stomach, Also about Skyrim! It is not all gold what shines And Skyrim shines quite and not at all! so many bugs had to be resolved with 9 patches and there are still some available. the story of Skyrim, well straight so middle class, not exhilarating. And therefore it is good That there is a forum where you can say anything, without the fear of banishment. Whisky Tango Foxtrot? Earth to whiny we couldn't understand a word you said, could you repeat? Over. For those having issues getting SSE to run on their machines, would it be possible for you to include your rig specs? Just curious and want to compare, as I have trouble running FO4 as well. The only issue I've had is that my crappy old GT630 simply can't handle it, even on low settings. I can play for a bit before the screen blacks out for about ten seconds then the picture returns. Increasingly juddery performance before it blacks out again, picture returns, rinse and repeat. When I quit the game there's a helpful windows pop-up box telling me that I've exceeded the capabilities of my GPU. I could switch to Win 7 basic mode but that would only be enough to get the vanilla game working, no use at all for when I start modding it. Rest of system (built out of spare parts) - 1st gen i7 920, 12 gigs DDR3 RAM, 1 tb HD. Just waiting on the 4gig GTX 960 to arrive, it's all I can afford right now.
sativa Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 I have a good rig and a stable Skyrim with 150 mods and play in 4k with ugrids 7 and good lod's.Why should i wait the next years to become my mods for SSE and the same game?No one make big mods for this game anymore which would be worth waiting for. Good Modders have left the game and do you guys realy think they went back for a 64bit Skyrim or the comunity rise again? It's only for consol Players,i'm not crazy enough to fiddle the SSE Edition over the next years to the point where i am with my good old Skyrim. New CK,Nifskope,*.bsa's,bodysliders and much more?!Realy,cmon?!
peculiaris Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 For those having issues getting SSE to run on their machines, would it be possible for you to include your rig specs? Just curious and want to compare, as I have trouble running FO4 as well. Check this thread: http://www.loverslab.com/topic/68700-hardware-compatiblityperformance-reports/ The trick that seems to work for everybody in order to fix fps issues is to turn off the vsync of the game (via ini change) and cap the fps via 3rd party tools (like Nvidia Inspector). Quite ironic it takes ini changes and 3rd party tools in order to make the "modern edition" stable.... By the way I guess this is what Gopher did in order to achieve the fps he is showing in his video, but I didn't hear him talk about it, so I stopped watching it after the first minutes as it is pure propaganda. Oh wow that is pretty weird to make a video like that... ah well i cant listen to Gopher anyways... His voice drives me crazy.
winny257 Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 ---snip--- Whisky Tango Foxtrot? Earth to whiny we couldn't understand a word you said, could you repeat? Over. ---snip--- I already said, I do not speak ENGLISH! I try at least everything with the translator to translate. But when it thee maybe is better then I post in future in German, I think then you understand even less! Because you do not speak German. Edit: but I guess you understood it, and you did not like what was written there.
garg Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 This thread got spicy EXACTLY. allowed by the moderators. As long as everything remains factual and does not become offensive, this will be the longest thread of all time. Until Sexlab is up and running on SE !
winny257 Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 This thread got spicy EXACTLY. allowed by the moderators. As long as everything remains factual and does not become offensive, this will be the longest thread of all time. Until Sexlab is up and running on SE ! Why sexlab ??? have You no real girl?? believe me real sex is more intense and far more beautiful. Is still better, or?
garg Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 This thread got spicy EXACTLY. allowed by the moderators. As long as everything remains factual and does not become offensive, this will be the longest thread of all time. Until Sexlab is up and running on SE ! Why sexlab ??? have You no real girl?? believe me real sex is more intense and far more beautiful. Is still better, or? You do realise this is the LL forums don't you! Anyway your post cracked me up! EDIT: OH sorry just saw your post count, guess we all get off on something!
winny257 Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 ---snip--- You do realise this is the LL forums don't you! Anyway your post cracked me up! EDIT: OH sorry just saw your post count, guess we all get off on something! Damn, that's all just fun, I am a fun person and sometimes it breaks out with me. from me out You can install 20 sexlab, is me everything no matter and especially your thing. Edit: not just many posts also very many appreciation. And many friends. And above all, a little bit older than you. We are old hares.
winny257 Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 I think you just killed the thread. Why? I do not think so. No insult, only the truth. but some do not tolerate truth.
Guest Katherlne Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 Is still better, or? She in too dominant position... Submissive better, for my taste...
SamTT Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 Runs 10x better as with the old 32Bit engine and mods from 2009 onwards. A good opportunity to get rid of all those never updated mods.
nosdregamon Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 At first I was kinda "WTF? Why didn't they fix Skyrim while working on SE (and include the SKSE-Functions themselves)", but I guess it isn't a worst case scenario. Worst case would be something akin to, they'd fix half of the errors fixed by the USLEEP-Patch, and the modders would have to trash USLEEP and begin from scratch, because the whole patch would be incompatible with the current state of fixing. Or something like "SKSE implemented halfhearted by Bethtesda" with no option to fix errors or override the functions with contributions by the SKSE-Team. Still, the minimum for me to play SE is an implementation of SkyUI. I just can't stand the vanilla Inventory. Is by any chance the limit of 255 mods gone?
SamTT Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 At first I was kinda "WTF? Why didn't they fix Skyrim while working on SE (and include the SKSE-Functions themselves)", but I guess it isn't a worst case scenario. Worst case would be something akin to, they'd fix half of the errors fixed by the USLEEP-Patch, and the modders would have to trash USLEEP and begin from scratch, because the whole patch would be incompatible with the current state of fixing. Or something like "SKSE implemented halfhearted by Bethtesda" with no option to fix errors or override the functions with contributions by the SKSE-Team. Still, the minimum for me to play SE is an implementation of SkyUI. I just can't stand the vanilla Inventory. Is by any chance the limit of 255 mods gone? SkyUI v2.2 works. Better as nothing.
garg Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 ---snip--- --not me again--- Damn, that's all just fun, I am a fun person and sometimes it breaks out with me. from me out You can install 20 sexlab, is me everything no matter and especially your thing. Edit: not just many posts also very many appreciation. And many friends. And above all, a little bit older than you. We are old hares. Older then 55 ales! Damn you should have told me you old fart! Anyhow I don't want Sexlab I want Sextec FO4 > Skyrim well so says Deezer and Deezer wants to ... !
chevalierx Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 the real truth is skyrim is ported from console xbox 360 2011 xbox one 2016 xbox twice pro 20xx xbox cosmos mega extra xxxx and only skyrim 2016 is made for earn lot of money from ( xbox /ps4)
nosdregamon Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 Still, the minimum for me to play SE is an implementation of SkyUI. I just can't stand the vanilla Inventory. Is by any chance the limit of 255 mods gone? SkyUI v2.2 works. Better as nothing. That's nice to hear. Thank you.
slutofshades Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 the real truth is skyrim is ported from console xbox 360 2011 xbox one 2016 xbox twice pro 20xx xbox cosmos mega extra xxxx and only skyrim 2016 is made for earn lot of money from ( xbox /ps4) Technically Skyrim 2016 was built on the PS4's environment.... ironic really since thats difinitively going to be the worst version due to modding restrictions. Skyrim 2011 was built on the 360 though, that part is correct.
WarsunGames Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 Its not a Bethesda game.People keep making that mistake.Bethesda already have their own game.The game that is remastered was done by nVidia Gameworks for Graphics and performance.An you see how that came out.An Sony for their consoles.Microsoft for their console.This was not Bethesda's game.Bethesda only fixed the bugs with the game.Over 1000+ fixes.The game should work fine.But nVidia Gameworks made it so if you have a AMD graphics card it would system lock.Where if you have a GTX 980 or 1070 or even a higher GTX graphics card.It will not drop down in frame rates. An that is the problem here.People are complaining about bugs with the game.Yeap their are there.But they are not the Bethesda bugs.These come from new PhysX design.Not Havoc physics.It`s as though someone took a box covered over the Game design an rewrote the code.An when they took this cover off. You had a broken game that no one had the intent to fix.The game Look great in many areas.However.In others ( in which i had to delete some of my post due to reports ) Some areas were so poorly done you had to complain.Over saturated lights,Heavy abuse of fog pixels, God rays are way over done,1K textures that perform like 8K textures hindering performance if you turn left of right. Sound quality seems a bit low on objects being hit.As if mono.An night skies are too bright.( as normal).The complaint is many of the people are praising this game.From what i can tell.They are console users.Not the PC users.They hate it.An for good reason.Unfair practices.An no Optimization.But not what the game can look like. This can be identified on this page. http://steamcommunity.com/app/489830/discussions/0/312265672105271128/
Recommended Posts