Jump to content

{REDUNDANT} Non SexLab Animation Pack

rydin

By rydin,
in Downloads - SexLab Framework LE

Recommended Posts

Hollerboller1970

Hollerboller1970

Posted
Posted

After a long time using your mod, i have to express my deepest thank's to you and your work. Giving us the possibility to integrate this cool and awesome animations into sexlab by simply install your mod is such a relief for all people with no intrest or lack of talent to rename the files.

Not to forget a big thank's to all modders of these awesome animations. Sadly most of the animations integratet into sexlab are very old and wierd to look at. I want to not diminish the work of those modders, these where all good animations at the time, but today when you see the work from people like leito and all the others, the old animations look meeehhhh....^^

Again, thank you Rydin and all modders of these awesome animations for your hard work and support. Love you all.

 

 

P.S.: Sorry for my bad english

rydin

rydin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Rydiiin.

 

Any update on the update?

I'm doing testing as I've added Lieto's now work and I'm finishing up some touches on scripts Ashal gave me to integrate NSAPs registrations into Sexlab.

rydin

rydin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Slight delay on upgating due to scripts not compliling. Will have another look tomorrow to find the issue.

Fitness Bunny

Fitness Bunny

Posted
Posted

Slight delay on upgating due to scripts not compliling. Will have another look tomorrow to find the issue.

Take your time, man, no one's pushing you. Just don't go all EA on this update. :)

Fitness Bunny

Fitness Bunny

Posted
Posted

I'm posting to inform about my testing for "strap-on's missing issue". Sorry for the delay, I just couldn't find the time for testing.

 

The strap-on shows in my game now, just fine. I don't know what caused it to appear again, I haven't been reinstalling any skeletons, SOS, or SL mods. All I did, was reset animations registry and audio registry in Rebuild section of SL (I think they're called like that).

 

Because I'm on another PC right now, I can't post my whole mod list, but I can recall having latest SL 1.59, ZazAnimations 600 and 604, NSLA 2.2, SOS Full with standard settings, Nusbie's Audio and SL Audio Overhaul, and Match Maker.

 

My bodies use 7B files, Stevie's 1.43b pussy, and xml's from CBBE's HDT Vag (2.50 XPMSE version). Try using those xml's as well (hdtm and hdtvagina.xml). I think those could help resolving the issue, too. 

rydin

rydin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'm posting to inform about my testing for "strap-on's missing issue". Sorry for the delay, I just couldn't find the time for testing.

 

The strap-on shows in my game now, just fine. I don't know what caused it to appear again, I haven't been reinstalling any skeletons, SOS, or SL mods. All I did, was reset animations registry and audio registry in Rebuild section of SL (I think they're called like that).

 

Because I'm on another PC right now, I can't post my whole mod list, but I can recall having latest SL 1.59, ZazAnimations 600 and 604, NSLA 2.2, SOS Full with standard settings, Nusbie's Audio and SL Audio Overhaul, and Match Maker.

 

My bodies use 7B files, Stevie's 1.43b pussy, and xml's from CBBE's HDT Vag (2.50 XPMSE version). Try using those xml's as well (hdtm and hdtvagina.xml). I think those could help resolving the issue, too. 

 

Thanks for letting me know! :D

Ixum

Ixum

Posted
Posted

I just want to report I have no strap-on issues what so ever  :D Anyway, hows that update coming along? You know I wouldn't ask but my filthy slut characters are bugging me about wanting to test those dildos, they are such whores >:[

rydin

rydin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I just want to report I have no strap-on issues what so ever  :D Anyway, hows that update coming along? You know I wouldn't ask but my filthy slut characters are bugging me about wanting to test those dildos, they are such whores >:[

 

The animations are all added and could be released in the current state of the mod. However right now I am trying to impliment script clean ups suggested by Ashal before I release the compatible 1.59c and 1.60 versions.

 

Fitness Bunny

Fitness Bunny

Posted
Posted

 

I just want to report I have no strap-on issues what so ever  :D Anyway, hows that update coming along? You know I wouldn't ask but my filthy slut characters are bugging me about wanting to test those dildos, they are such whores >:[

 

The animations are all added and could be released in the current state of the mod. However right now I am trying to impliment script clean ups suggested by Ashal before I release the compatible 1.59c and 1.60 versions.

 

 

There's a 1.60 version? If so, is it stable?

chajapa

chajapa

Posted
Posted

 

 

I just want to report I have no strap-on issues what so ever  :D Anyway, hows that update coming along? You know I wouldn't ask but my filthy slut characters are bugging me about wanting to test those dildos, they are such whores >:[

 

The animations are all added and could be released in the current state of the mod. However right now I am trying to impliment script clean ups suggested by Ashal before I release the compatible 1.59c and 1.60 versions.

 

 

There's a 1.60 version? If so, is it stable?

 

 

Not released yet. The alpha is up for testing

rydin

rydin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No still the alpha right now. Just Ashal shared an idea and some code with me on who to get NSAP to register into Sexlab using Sexlab's current sorting forms, ie group all missionary animations together instead of registering everything at the bottom.

 

Also, for anyone who wants to discuss a better tagging system, CPU has created a thread here. Worth giving your input guys!

AlericoftheNords

AlericoftheNords

Posted
Posted

But at the same time alot of them have atleast one stage with penetration in it, so the tag is not wrong in the end.

 

Yes, but at the same time it's pretty bad for sorting purposes, for example in Sexlab Romance I suggest Vaginal intercourse, and there's a bunch of foot animations, or I suggest playing with my character's feet, and it still counts towards vaginal intercourse in the diary and a risked pregnancy.

rydin

rydin

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

But at the same time alot of them have atleast one stage with penetration in it, so the tag is not wrong in the end.

 

Yes, but at the same time it's pretty bad for sorting purposes, for example in Sexlab Romance I suggest Vaginal intercourse, and there's a bunch of foot animations, or I suggest playing with my character's feet, and it still counts towards vaginal intercourse in the diary and a risked pregnancy.

 

 

And this is a classic example of the arguement. What works for some people may not work for others. This is why the tagging system is being discussed on what is approiate to tag and then what modders have to do to ensure the correct content is used, ie play "Vaginal" aniamtions but explude any featuring "Foot". I can look at removing Vaginal from any that do not feature Vaginal penetration, but if one scene does feature Vaginal penetration, it is not wrong to feature it.

 

Until the tagging system is rethought out I'm will take suggestions but offer no promises. These type of things can happen when you play multiple mods in an envoirment where different people have different tastes and opinions. Its the unfortunate side affect we have to work around. ^^

chajapa

chajapa

Posted
Posted

Gooser's next version of Apropos may have the ability for the user to make tag changes to suit their own tastes. 

 

Just sayin'...

 

Rydin, I think that your thinking is correct. If one scene has some foot play and another has vaginal penetration and then she flips over and takes it in the pooper.... then it should have feet, vaginal, and anal, regardless of where the orgasm takes place. 

 

The tagging system is not perfect, but right now it's what is available. And.... for the most part... it works. Who knew we'd have such talented animators coming up with all of these awesome sex scenes with multiple stages?

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Hello @chajapa, the tags system (functionality from SexLab) is close to perfection.
What is not really good is the way tags are assigned.
 
For this reason I did a post to propose a new way to categorize animations. Still using tags, but in a more controlled way.
 
Check this out: Proposition for better animation selection

 

An example for your mod: you can do something like:

SexLab.getAnimationsByTags(2, "breastfeeding", "sexual")

 

And get only the breastfeeding animation that have no sexual component (think about an animation that starts with breastfeeding and then turns in a real sexual act.)

 

 

It is only matter of assigning correctly the tags.

 

AlericoftheNords

AlericoftheNords

Posted
Posted

Gooser's next version of Apropos may have the ability for the user to make tag changes to suit their own tastes. 

 

Just sayin'...

 

Rydin, I think that your thinking is correct. If one scene has some foot play and another has vaginal penetration and then she flips over and takes it in the pooper.... then it should have feet, vaginal, and anal, regardless of where the orgasm takes place. 

 

The tagging system is not perfect, but right now it's what is available. And.... for the most part... it works. Who knew we'd have such talented animators coming up with all of these awesome sex scenes with multiple stages?

 

Very cool news!

 

And I do agree, better to be talking about how to tag all of these awesome animations than wishing we had them!  ^_^

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...