Female members of Loverslab

[Asariphile]

I have also seen him pick up women sitting in a booth with 2 other men and mesmerize them.

 

Please don't tell me she was the girlfriend or wife of one of these guys. If so, what a dick.

 

Not to mention the whole mental manipulation gig he pulled on those strippers. Sure they are whores, sure the one whore went home with him, but the ends don't justify the means. He treated human beings like garbage for a whole night to win a bet. How can you stand to look at slime like that?

 

FYI the ability to mentally manipulate people with charm? That's one of the signs of a sociopath. Alongside compulsive lying, and several other traits he seems to exude.

 

I don't claim to know the guy, but your description of his actions does him no favors, despite his success rate.

[Guest kate the atomic uterus]

I have also seen him pick up women sitting in a booth with 2 other men and mesmerize them.

 

Please don't tell me she was the girlfriend or wife of one of these guys. If so' date=' what a dick.

[/quote']

 

Who, you or him?

 

Not to mention the whole mental manipulation gig he pulled on those strippers. Sure they are whores' date=' sure the one whore went home with him, but the ends don't justify the means. He treated human beings like garbage for a whole night to win a bet. How can you stand to look at slime like that?

[/quote']

 

The same way as I am able to answer slime like you who refer to women as whores in a derogatory fashion

 

FYI the ability to mentally manipulate people with charm? That's one of the signs of a sociopath. Alongside compulsive lying' date=' and several other traits he seems to exude.

[/quote']

 

Thank you Sigmund Freud for your clinical assessment even though the term sociopathic is void of definition in the school of Psychopathy. At best it could be used to describe some antisocial behaviours but no one today with a minimal understanding of the subject would embarrass themselves using the term.

 

Perhaps you meant to say he is a Psychopath or shows signs of Narcissism. If I took your expert behavioural diagnosis seriously then everybody on the planet would be as you define them as, "Dick, Whore, Slime, Sociopaths"

 

Here are some of the other traits found in people with antisocial personality disorder that you just happen to forget about;

 

Reacting to criticism with anger, shame, or humiliation

Taking advantage of others to reach their own goals

Exaggerating their own importance, achievements, and talents

Imagining unrealistic fantasies of success, beauty, power, intelligence, or romance

Requiring constant attention and positive reinforcement from others

Becoming jealous easily

Lacking empathy and disregarding the feelings of others

Being obsessed with oneself

Pursuing mainly selfish goals

Trouble keeping healthy relationships

Becoming easily hurt and rejected

Setting goals that are unrealistic

Wanting "the best" of everything

Appearing unemotional

And the list goes on... (If you recognize these behaviours in yourself don't worry about it. Everybody has these feelings and most likely you are perfectly normal ) *crossing fingers*

 

Sorry doctor; he was just your average young man in his early twenties who was brilliantly quick tongued and hilariously funny. Acting like idiots is perfectly normal at this age so if you fall into this age bracket then I'll excuse your obvious trollish attempt at flaming the thread

 

I don't claim to know the guy' date=' but your description of his actions does him no favors, despite his success rate.

[/quote']

 

You don't claim to know him because you don't. Duh You have made an outlandish inference while completely missing the point of the story.

 

So for you and all the rest of the trolls in this thread I will reiterate the point of the story: :D

 

The reason why the author of the thread is stuck playing with his micro penis in front of the computer screen and can't get laid is because he lacks "CONFIDENCE" and I will now add, "CHARACTER" (just because I'm bored )

 

Let the games begin

 

PS. I really have no intention to answer any post (but I look forward to laughing at them) so please mingle amongst yourselves

[Wadarkhu]

Simple things become rocket science in this thread.

 

Men have a bigger sexdrive. (I might have to murder myself if someone tries to argue this.) That's why women are a minority here and why generally it's men looking for "just sex".

 

Women can fantasize just like men. That's why there's also women here.

 

The End!

[Asylianna]

Why would a female ' date=' who has the ultimate power of getting Intercourse with almost no effort, get on a site for video games where Sex mods and other adult mods are created and shared ?

Why not having Real life sex all the time instead of using a game like this to only have virtual fun and using them to masturbate(in my case).

 

...

 

But i would immediatly abandon any kind of porn or sex mod activity , if i would be in the position of having sex all the time.

 

Please give me your thoughts and dont be offended, im just a horny man who is confused by all kinds of irrational behaviour of women.

[/quote']

 

 

No sex is better than bad sex, and trust me when I say there are a lot of people in this world that are not very good at playing off their partner's subtle cues and desires. My imagination alone can do a lot more for me than some random shmo off the street. Like most of my close friends, I have a rich (and rather perverse) fantasy life, and I really enjoy having games that allow me to play out those fantasies on screen.

 

On the topic of fantasies though, it's not just that it's hard to find someone who can play those out with you (which I am very fortunate to have), but also that some fantasies simply can't be played out at all. Lots of people fantasize about things that simply would not work well in the real world - rape, incest, loli/shota, beasts, monsters... the list goes on. In some cases (like monsters), it's simply not possible. In others (like rape or gang-rape), it would never play out in a way that was hot and string-free for you. I love the idea of rough sex with dozens of powerful men, but that is not something I would ever do in reality because there is no way it would be fun.

 

Fantasies allow us to cherry-pick out all the horrifying and damaging things out of a scenario and leave only the novelty and excitement. Forced sex fantasies are a wonderful example of this because the line between "pushing the line" and painful/abusive/traumatic is pretty damn thin. Even when someone doesn't maliciously cross that line, there are such a wide varieties of tastes on the matter that what might drive one person mindlessly wanton with lust is a complete, offensive, and utter turn-off to another. (I'm lookin at you E. L. James.)

 

I hope that helps to shed a little extra light on things.

 

(Also, sorry if somebody already said all this. Was in a rush but wanted to chip in here before I forgot that I wanted to come back and post here. )

[Asylianna]

Read back a few posts and had no idea where this thread eventually went... Oie.

 

Simple things become rocket science in this thread.

 

Men have a bigger sexdrive. (I might have to murder myself if someone tries to argue this.) That's why women are a minority here and why generally it's men looking for "just sex".

 

Might want to get out your tanto Wadarkhu' date=' it's sepuku time!

 

Seriously though, women often have just as much trouble with finding partners who can keep up with their sex drive as men do. (Also, if men had a bigger sex drive than women unilaterally, the popular stereotype of "roll over and go to sleep" wouldn't be popular, [i']or[/i] a stereotype.)

[GrimReaper]

Men have a bigger sexdrive. (I might have to murder myself if someone tries to argue this.) That's why women are a minority here and why generally it's men looking for "just sex".

 

 

Sorry, I am not so sure about that.

[srayesmanll]

Simple things become rocket science in this thread.

 

Men have a bigger sexdrive. (I might have to murder myself if someone tries to argue this.) That's why women are a minority here and why generally it's men looking for "just sex".

 

Women can fantasize just like men. That's why there's also women here.

 

The End!

 

OK, I'll take the rocket science out my response to the "men have a bigger sexdrive" statement and make it simple:

 

Bullshit.

[Wadarkhu]

Pfft! Fine, lets talk rocket science! I will be excited to hear your explanation on men being a majority in pretty much anything related to the topic of sex, including this forum.

 

Of course nobody can really prove anything since we aren't that good at probing brains yet, so we don't/can't get super serial about this debate. Much like you can say stuff like "bigger isn't better" and "boob size doesn't matter". Can't "prove" anything one way or the other.

 

My explanation to men being a majority in the sweaty-business boils down to this chain of thought: Evolution didn't really require females to have a big sex drive. Didn't even require women to have orgasms - maybe that's why it's so hard for some. It's the men that do the fucking in the end? Look at apes and shit, females in heat, alright, they have a sex drive. But the males FIGHT EACH OTHER to have sex with her! Now that's what I call a sex drive. Okay, okay, I'm getting seriously out of track here, but you get the picture.

 

I'll cut it short so we don't get 4x A4 posts. Nobody cba reading them.

 

(Also' date=' if men had a bigger sex drive than women unilaterally, the popular stereotype of "roll over and go to sleep" wouldn't be popular, [i']or[/i] a stereotype.)

Sorry, I'm not familiar with that stereotype. Or expression.

[srayesmanll]

"Sex drive" has absolutely nothing to do with why it appears more men are on this kind of site than woman.

 

1) Men tend to prefer visual stimulation where women tend to prefer mentally stimulation. Is this the rule? Hell no. But as a generality, it fits. And hey, these aren't text-based adventure games, are they?

 

2) I do believe there are a hell of a lot more women that are on this site than we know about. Why are they not more vocal? Because I think a lot believe that they would be set upon like a 3-legged cat surrounded by ravenous dogs. Not that they would be, but I would be curious to hear from some of the more adventurous females on this site if they tend to get more "unwanted attention" through PMs. Or wanted attention in some cases .

 

3) One of the biggest selling books recently? 50 Shades of Grey. With 2 sequels already (maybe more to come, so to speak, plus a movie deal). Basically, literary porn for women. Lower sex drive my ass, they just don't always need to see cocks, tits, or pussy to satisfy it .

 

(I might have to murder myself if someone tries to argue this.)

 

Feeling suicidal yet ? I hope not. Now, are my arguments valid? Maybe, maybe not. Hell, I might have forgotten what I was arguing. Anyway, I'm going to go back to playing FONV and look at some tits...

[Wadarkhu]

1.) This is a good point. Maybe the female sex drive is so different that it doesn't manifest itself in the more visual (pun!) mediums. The problem here is, though, that we should be able to see it ELSEWHERE, which brings us to 3.) - as if men don't enjoy erotic literature! I happen to share my alone time with 50/50 visual/text based ero. 50 Shades of Grey is just marketed for women, because you can buy it from a bookstore and appear all daring-lady like instead of buying smutty mags from a newspaper stand. Even so, 50 Shades of Grey goes to whimper in a corner compared to the volume of an opposing, visual issue, that being, (goes thru 23241824 examples) say, Playboy.

 

So 1.) is reduced to an off chance that there exists a medium of sex that doesn't really fall into any category, like maybe intimacy or whatever, I don't know.

 

2.) This may be the case to a degree, but I doubt we'd get even close to 50/50.

 

So far, I think my logic is more sound.

[harlecerule]

Wadarkhu, most women these days know you can get better textual porn free on the Internet than you get by buying 50 Shades of Grey. That "book" was one out of hundreds of thousands of fanfics on the internet, only the author find-and-replaced names and details of the world it was based off of and then sold the edited version as "original." (And now tries to cry copyright foul when people base things off their work. Bitch, please!)

 

Do you want to know the big reason why it appears that men have bigger sex drives than women? Women are shamed for having sex drives. Men are just men if they're horny a lot, because that's what men ~do~, but women are nymphomaniacs and sluts. We're still influenced by fucked-up Victorian values and the virgin-whore dichotomy that claim women should be pure, and if they aren't, they're trash, while men can't help themselves, it's ~nature~.

 

Which is completely bullshit, all of it. We all* have nature telling us to screw, and we're all perfectly capable of making our own adult decisions about what to do with it, but that doesn't stop society from shaming female sexuality and glorifying male sexuality.

 

*edits because all except asexuals, sorry. Dunno if there's any on the boards here, but I don't want to erase them anyways.

[Wadarkhu]

As I said, I use half of my time on text ero, and the difference in volume between the visual and the text based ero is enormous. Feel free to provide examples though, I'd love to be wrong.

 

Culture. I almost talked about this in my first post, because I knew it'll come sooner or later. I simply don't believe that the western world is that stuck in old values anymore. Some people saying you're a slut, alright, maybe, but as many or more will say you're a strong, independent woman, who isn't afraid of her sexuality. I think the latter has been the case ever since Sex and the City.

 

Honestly, does anyone REALLY feel the pressure of family and friends if you switch partner once a month? So much, that you'd be willing to suppress yourself for it? God, I hope not, because that's too sad to even consider.

 

EDIT: Even so, I do not surrender to this logic! Most of the adult industry, this website for an example, is VERY private stuff. How many people know YOU browse this site? That sex drive has ALOT of venues to break thru from.

[GrimReaper]

My explanation to men being a majority in the sweaty-business boils down to this chain of thought: Evolution didn't really require females to have a big sex drive. Didn't even require women to have orgasms - maybe that's why it's so hard for some. It's the men that do the fucking in the end? Look at apes and shit' date=' females in heat, alright, they have a sex drive. But the males FIGHT EACH OTHER to have sex with her! Now that's what I call a sex drive. Okay, okay, I'm getting seriously out of track here, but you get the picture.

 

[/quote']

 

Evolution doesn't work like that.

[Asylianna]

Evolution doesn't work like that.

 

^-- Science

 

My explanation to men being a majority in the sweaty-business boils down to this chain of thought: Evolution didn't really require females to have a big sex drive. Didn't even require women to have orgasms - maybe that's why it's so hard for some. It's the men that do the fucking in the end? Look at apes and shit' date=' females in heat, alright, they have a sex drive. But the males FIGHT EACH OTHER to have sex with her! Now that's what I call a sex drive. Okay, okay, I'm getting seriously out of track here, but you get the picture.

 

[/quote']

 

^-- Pop-psych urban myth

 

 

The evolutionary pressures on humans necessitated inclusive fitness. Our young are born incredibly premature and have one of (if not the) longest period of dependency of any species on this planet. Additionally, many of our hominid ancestors previously credited as being savage hunters were actually tiny scavengers. (The original "great hunters and tool users" were only 3 ft tall and the bottom of the secondary consumer chain.)

 

This meant that membership in a cohesive group that could work well together to procure resources and provide safety-in-numbers from the predators of the time were vastly more useful than anti-social loners that were most likely to be forced out of the group and left to fend for themselves... without any natural weaponry against predators many times their size and strength. (Did I mention that weapons didn't start to be crafted until that last 5% of that period of human evolution?)

 

We are far more complicated creatures then apes, with about 2 million years of evolution separating us. Additionally, amongst our closest relatives, chimpanzees, females bear far fewer offspring from "alphas" than they do their preferred mates, who are often much better team players and lovers. (Not to mention that alphas that throw their weight around to much frequently get cast out of groups or killed if they can't get their act together.)

 

Furthermore, the assertion that females don't need to have orgasms to get pregnant is not entirely accurate. Strong orgasms do a number of things to facilitate both physical and hormonal readiness. As for the idea that this is what makes orgasm difficult to achieve for some is laughable. (Though as is often the case, the people who most often complain about encountering this problem are those who know little about it.)

[Wadarkhu]

Evolution doesn't work like that.

Evolution works like that.

 

Furthermore' date=' the assertion that females don't need to have orgasms to get pregnant is not entirely accurate. Strong orgasms do a number of things to facilitate both physical and hormonal readiness. As for the idea that this is what makes orgasm difficult to achieve for some is laughable.[/quote']

 

Thanks for all the evolutionary history, although I don't understand how making weapons has anything to do with the topic.

 

So you're saying females need to have an orgasm in order to be impregnated? I don't believe that's true.

 

So far there's alot of shaking heads and doubts, but nobody presenting an explanation of their own. Oh, sure, my evolution theory is pretty far fetched. But I can even drop the word "evolution". I can say we're just born that way. It will still sound infinitely more convincing than any excuse for female sexuality not manifesting itself as powerfully as it does for men. I can just take all statistics porn/sex related, set the genders apart and ask, "Why is this, if not because it's just how we are?".

 

Or can I?

[Symon]

You are confusing 'powerful sexuality' with 'lack of discrimination'.

Ever read portnoy's Complaint? The bit with the piece of liver?

 

THAT's what you are thinking of.

[Wadarkhu]

Okay. o_o' No, I don't believe I have.

[Wadarkhu]

Maybe' date=' I think, I don't think, I believe, I don't believe.

I haven't seen anything concrete supporting anything posted so far.

[/quote']

 

Of course nobody can really prove anything since we aren't that good at probing brains yet' date=' so we don't/can't get super serial about this debate. Much like you can say stuff like "bigger isn't better" and "boob size doesn't matter". Can't "prove" anything one way or the other.

[/quote']

 

[windpl]

Evolution doesn't work like that.

Evolution works like that.

 

Furthermore' date=' the assertion that females don't need to have orgasms to get pregnant is not entirely accurate. Strong orgasms do a number of things to facilitate both physical and hormonal readiness. As for the idea that this is what makes orgasm difficult to achieve for some is laughable.[/quote']

 

Thanks for all the evolutionary history, although I don't understand how making weapons has anything to do with the topic.

 

So you're saying females need to have an orgasm in order to be impregnated? I don't believe that's true.

 

So far there's alot of shaking heads and doubts, but nobody presenting an explanation of their own. Oh, sure, my evolution theory is pretty far fetched. But I can even drop the word "evolution". I can say we're just born that way. It will still sound infinitely more convincing than any excuse for female sexuality not manifesting itself as powerfully as it does for men. I can just take all statistics porn/sex related, set the genders apart and ask, "Why is this, if not because it's just how we are?".

 

Or can I?

 

Answer is simple, it manifest itself so strongly because males have high competition. Simple match. In animal world most of males are more colourful and have to prove that they are those who should be chosen. Most of time males are expendable, thus females are treated by nature as assets. So high sex drive, bigger risk, higher chance of breeding. It is simple biology stuff I wouldn't expected that someone had it to be explained. I do not want to be rude but more info about it you will find in biology books of elementary school.

[The Irreverend]

Evolution doesn't work like that.

Evolution works like that.

 

Furthermore' date=' the assertion that females don't need to have orgasms to get pregnant is not entirely accurate. Strong orgasms do a number of things to facilitate both physical and hormonal readiness. As for the idea that this is what makes orgasm difficult to achieve for some is laughable.[/quote']

 

Thanks for all the evolutionary history, although I don't understand how making weapons has anything to do with the topic.

 

So you're saying females need to have an orgasm in order to be impregnated? I don't believe that's true.

 

So far there's alot of shaking heads and doubts, but nobody presenting an explanation of their own. Oh, sure, my evolution theory is pretty far fetched. But I can even drop the word "evolution". I can say we're just born that way. It will still sound infinitely more convincing than any excuse for female sexuality not manifesting itself as powerfully as it does for men. I can just take all statistics porn/sex related, set the genders apart and ask, "Why is this, if not because it's just how we are?".

 

Or can I?

 

Answer is simple, it manifest itself so strongly because males have high competition. Simple match. In animal world most of males are more colourful and have to prove that they are those who should be chosen. Most of time males are expendable, thus females are treated by nature as assets. So high sex drive, bigger risk, higher chance of breeding. It is simple biology stuff I wouldn't expected that someone had it to be explained. I do not want to be rude but more info about it you will find in biology books of elementary school.

 

But to extrapolate to humans based on that is getting into evolutionary biology, which is a rather uncertain field.

[Guest seamus2008]

 

Do you want to know the big reason why it appears that men have bigger sex drives than women? Women are shamed for having sex drives. Men are just men if they're horny a lot' date=' because that's what men ~do~, but women are nymphomaniacs and sluts. We're still influenced by fucked-up Victorian values and the virgin-whore dichotomy that claim women should be pure, and if they aren't, they're trash, while men can't help themselves, it's ~nature~.

 

 

[/quote']

 

I think there are two contradicting aspects to this virgin-slut problem.

I'm gonna be completely honest here so if I offend anyone I apologise in advance.

The first aspect is the fact that men LOVE "sluts/nymphos". Men wish that all women would be easy, because it means so much less effort spent on trying to get laid. So why us men would discourage women from it, instead of encouraging women to be nymphos? Why would "slut-shaming" exist? That question brings us to the second aspect, that of power and control. In general, men like to have power over women, simply because that means we'd pick who we have sex with (and how), instead of the other way around. "Slut-shaming" along with all of the Victorian concepts are there to keep you down and help maintain men's power.

So, either men get a world of empowered nymphos, or submissive prudes, right now we're somewhere between the two. In the perfect world for men, all women would be "sluts" and men would still have power in a patriarch society, but that's impossible, so we get this contradicting, hypocritical society that we have now.

*Note that I use the word "slut" or "nympho" as short for "women who enjoy sex and who are not very hard to pick up". It is in no way derogative or a label.

EDIT: If you can't already tell I'm making sweeeeeping generalisations here.

[leddis3]

I like to think attitudes are changing, slowly but surely.

 

Anyway, I hate generalizations especially when it comes to gender.

What turns on one woman may not turn on another, just as with men.

 

Pointing to evolution and biological instincts ignores that we are thinking, sapient creatures and extremely varied individuals.

Saying that men must think a certain way and women must think a certain other way is pseudoscience. Yes, some do. But many don't.

It's like saying there are no female comic book/Star Trek/D&D fans, when there are, and are just as nerdy as their male counterparts.

 

Some women don't care for the adult mods here, some do. It's that simple.

[Happysparkles]

I think that it is gender is a non factor men, women anyone else. We all just want to have fun. Men are naturally pervs but women too are pervs too and also have no problem making and playing with female sexuality then men. This is one in many factors. Of course it depends on The individual, I am just greatful for both the male and female and other parts of the community that's contribute to survive great mods with a lovely and friendly and even fairly open minded community.

[Contessa]

It's a fun place to be. I enjoy adult oriented material just like anyone else. Why shouldn't I? Mods add so much to these games and make them very fun. It allows people to explore sides of their nature that would be unacceptable in real life. I am a very open person in all things so I find great joy in the various adult mods and non-adult mods here and elsewhere.

 

We're all humans. Well... maybe not all of us.

[sammythesquirrel]

this thread is still alive really? XD Is the op even a member here anymore?