Devious Interests SE

[Taki17]

10 hours ago, RavnaRiikr said:

if you pass outcome of the prostitution event in the event params

Oh tracking the outcome after the sex has been done is clear to me, and event arguments can carry a lot of info, like if the customer payed the player or not.

 

What I'm curious about is that you said you'd like an event sent out when the NPC agress (or not) to have sex with the player. That would be before the payment and sex scene part, so I'm interested to hear what you want to hook into this, does it need to carry arguments? Or am I misunderstanding what you need?

[belegost]

8 minutes ago, Taki17 said:

payed

*paid

 

"Payed" is a nautical term.

 

Yes, I had to.

Edited June 25, 2025 by belegost

[Fraying9981]

Just now, belegost said:

*paid

 

"Payed" is a nautical term.

Commandeer. We're gonna commandeer that ship.

[belegost]

14 minutes ago, Fraying9981 said:

Commandeer. We're gonna commandeer that ship.

Jawohl, Herr Kaleun.

[RavnaRiikr]

14 hours ago, Taki17 said:

What I'm curious about is that you said you'd like an event sent out when the NPC agress (or not) to have sex with the player. That would be before the payment and sex scene part, so I'm interested to hear what you want to hook into this, does it need to carry arguments? Or am I misunderstanding what you need?

To implement my idea I only need the event at the end of transaction. The event before the sex scene is not necessary for my mod for now, but maybe someone else will need it.

[Danubinmage64]

I've been having an issue with the stripping, self bondage and masturbation addons. They seem to never be able to triggle. I always get the "you cannot do x no matter how much you want to" even though there shouldn't be anything stoppping me (my arms aren't bound)

 

[Taki17]

13 hours ago, Danubinmage64 said:

I always get the "you cannot do x no matter how much you want to" even though there shouldn't be anything stoppping me (my arms aren't bound)

Please install this script, this is from the upcoming version and contains a possible fix to the issue: din_Utility.7z

 

If the issue still persists, get me a log!

[DoroLL]

Hello. I want to sell off my unwanted DD, but merchants won't buy them. Reading the logs here, it seems that need to install Laura's Shop, is there any way to dispose of DD in Vanilla? If that function is not available, please add it.

[rjn]

44 minutes ago, DoroLL said:

Hello. I want to sell off my unwanted DD, but merchants won't buy them. Reading the logs here, it seems that need to install Laura's Shop, is there any way to dispose of DD in Vanilla? If that function is not available, please add it.

Unless you have some perk overhaul installed, the "Merchant" perk in the Speechcraft tree will allow you to sell them to any merchant.

[DoroLL]

57 minutes ago, rjn said:

Unless you have some perk overhaul installed, the "Merchant" perk in the Speechcraft tree will allow you to sell them to any merchant.

I see, it needs a perk. It's a little inconvenient. Thank you.

[DoroLL]

On 6/29/2025 at 5:59 PM, DoroLL said:

I see, it needs a perk. It's a little inconvenient. Thank you.

Hi. I decided to use this mod.

Bag of TRASH SE - A Simple and Configurable Trash Bag at Skyrim Special Edition Nexus - Mods and Community

[Nethertale]

I installed this mod and the MCM stuff were just too similar with Deviously Cursed Loot, how does this mod vary from DCL and to anyone who played, does it worth changing from DCL to this? I mean I disabled this mod since I already have DCL, but I'd like to listen to what you guys (and Taki) have to say

 

*I also sent this comment to LE thread too*

[marcus5839001]

After testing I figure out that AI Overhaul prevents the comment function of this mod working. AI Overhaul also breaks many things from DD so I just give up that mod.

I believe that the description of the disable fast travel gets it backwards. The "never" option actually always disable fast travel and the "always" option never disable fast travel.

The bondage offer has a chance that the NPC will equip devices on player anyway and take all the keys. I hope there is option to configure this, for sometimes forcing player to get equip by devices will break the quest.

[Taki17]

12 hours ago, Nethertale said:

does it worth changing from DCL to this?

Why would I say anything but yes 😅 

 

3 hours ago, marcus5839001 said:

 The "never" option actually always disable fast travel and the "always" option never disable fast travel.

Indeed, that was backwards. Fixed for the next version, thanks!

 

3 hours ago, marcus5839001 said:

The bondage offer has a chance that the NPC will equip devices on player anyway and take all the keys. I hope there is option to configure this, for sometimes forcing player to get equip by devices will break the quest.

You can configure the chance of this event happening, with the option to completely disabling it by setting its chance to zero. I don't plan to include any furter, more extensive configuration of this. The concept behind this feature is, that if you are not willing to risk the NPC tying you up randomly, go with the lightest bondage option available.

[Nethertale]

2 hours ago, Taki17 said:

Why would I say anything but yes 😅 

I normally use DCL features a lot, I fear if it may not have one or two features that DLC has but DIN doesn't, that is why I'm asking it... like Frigid Wash for arrousal ctrl & ... 

 

Specially as DCL is near 500MB and DIN is not even 1MB

Edited July 4, 2025 by Nethertale

[DoroLL]

Hi. I think Devious Interests is a great mod. It's such a small and simple mod, but it has everything I could ask for. You are amazing mod creator! Your fox girl picture is KAWAII too. I am translating this mod into japanese right now.  I'll upload it when done. My request is for race exclusion settings. I can allow to play with old men, but don't want to play with old women.

[DonQuiWho]

On 7/4/2025 at 6:18 AM, marcus5839001 said:

After testing I figure out that AI Overhaul prevents the comment function of this mod working. AI Overhaul also breaks many things from DD so I just give up that mod.
 

 

Thanks for that!  I can't get comments to work reliably at all and I'll try removing AI Overhaul and see if it's any better

 

DQW

[DoroLL]

Devious Interests SE 0.932の日本語化ファイルです。上書きして使ってください。
MCMは英語表記ですが、各項目にカーソルを合わせると下部に日本語説明が表示されます。
一部名称は英語音声に合わせてあります。誤訳名称に戻したい場合はPEXファイルを書き換えてください。
din_Utility.pexパッチは上書き済みです。
 

追記。セックス後にプレイヤーキャラクターが動けなくバグが発生するため公開停止。

 

Edited July 8, 2025 by DoroLL

[marcus5839001]

On 7/4/2025 at 5:19 PM, Taki17 said:

You can configure the chance of this event happening, with the option to completely disabling it by setting its chance to zero. I don't plan to include any furter, more extensive configuration of this. The concept behind this feature is, that if you are not willing to risk the NPC tying you up randomly, go with the lightest bondage option available.

The event itself is fine, but your mod also disables dialogues with NPCs in college when PC is in bondage. And this combo could be a disaster when doing the college quest. Lately I was trying to do college quest and after I defeated Ancano in the end. Dialogue with Tolfdir triggered the bondage offer event, although my PC got 80 speech skill, still didn't pass the intimidate speech check, which was quiet ridiculous. So my PC was bound and couldn't progress the quest because Tolfdir refused to talk to a bound slave. I had to load previous save to do the fighting with Ancano again. That's why I was saying this feature might break the quest. I could have disabled the event in advance for sure, but it wasn't player-friendly that I had to remember to tweak the settings from time to time to make everything work smoothly.

I was making a non-intrusive DD modlist for my personal playthrough. And I thought some of your mod's features make it a must-have. Unfortunately some of the other features are also quiet annoying and there is no mcm option to tweak those settings. I just hope your mod could offer better experience instead of making player feel frustrated because of the unexpected features.

Edited July 5, 2025 by marcus5839001

[UncontrolledShadowComment]

It doesn't appear that DIN supports Sexlab Separate Orgasms when it comes to the cum inflation functionality; I think DIN is still looking for base Sexlab orgasm events. Do you have any plans to support SLSO? 

 

On the contrary, if anyone is familiar with these mods, is there an easy fix?

[DoroLL]

I know several mods that became buggy due to SLSO and were abandoned. The more complex mod it becomes, more likely it will be abandoned. I think managing events by arousal only is more simple and reliable.

 

PS. Wearing the device beforehand and prostitution does not increase the reward. I want the reward to increase with the device count, not with customer requests.

Edited July 6, 2025 by DoroLL

[Taki17]

20 hours ago, marcus5839001 said:

The event itself is fine, but your mod also disables dialogues with NPCs in college when PC is in bondage.

The intent behind that is to prevent starting quests that you might be unable to finish due to the restraints, however I guess further safeguards are needed. Either that, or remove them entirely and leave it up to the player to start said quests if they are bound, and if you are stuck, then you are stuck, tough titties? We'll see what I end up going with.

 

21 hours ago, marcus5839001 said:

I was making a non-intrusive DD modlist

That kinda sounds like an oxymoron, doesn't it? 😅

 

19 hours ago, UncontrolledShadowComment said:

It doesn't appear that DIN supports Sexlab Separate Orgasms when it comes to the cum inflation functionality

It does not and I don't really have an interest in supporting it either, since I'm aiming for supporting the SexLab P+ functionality once DDNG is fully supporting it, and that'll superseed both classic SL and SLSO as well.

[marcus5839001]

3 hours ago, Taki17 said:

The intent behind that is to prevent starting quests that you might be unable to finish due to the restraints, however I guess further safeguards are needed. Either that, or remove them entirely and leave it up to the player to start said quests if they are bound, and if you are stuck, then you are stuck, tough titties? We'll see what I end up going with.

The current status of this feature doesn't make any sense when it comes my PC only wearing chastity belt from Laura's daily quest. It's unnecessary and will cause more potential issues with other features as I mentioned earlier. For now just deleting excluded dialog branch in xEdit works smoothly for me though.

[UncontrolledShadowComment]

13 hours ago, Taki17 said:

It does not and I don't really have an interest in supporting it either, since I'm aiming for supporting the SexLab P+ functionality once DDNG is fully supporting it, and that'll superseed both classic SL and SLSO as well.

Appreciate the response! That is understandable. Will try to switch over to P+ at some point: did not want to mess with converting the animation packs over when I was considering it.

[DoroLL]

Hi. It would be useful to have key bindings to switch between the mod enable/disable. and, I hope the prostitution function will be enhanced. e.g. Group-sex extra pay, Requests for bestiality-show, etc.