LaEspada Posted January 3, 2014 Posted January 3, 2014 I've always like the gauntlet idea too XD But I'm waiting for some traps that involve estrus with animations of a chest opening and tentacles or a monster coming out. >.< I think there was some of those for Oblivion I think. I could look into Estrus integration... but a fluid mimic type creature, well, I'm not an animator You can register the Estrus Animations with SexLab like jbezorg does for the Estrus Chaurus mod (check the see if they are present first so you don't double register them). Then you can use them in one or more traps. Another great set of animations I would love to see used in a mod are hiding in the Zaz Animation pack mod (ZAZAPFS001 through ZAZAPFS008 plus ZAZAPFS008_Done, try them from the console: player.playidle zazapfs001). Dang! I'm really liking them! These are the ones I was talking about that were in Oblivion! Perfect for traps.
BattenK Posted January 3, 2014 Author Posted January 3, 2014 Updated main post to reflect what I'm up to
xboronx Posted January 3, 2014 Posted January 3, 2014 The romans occasionally flooded the colliseum and let the gladiators "replay" historic seabattles. A great unexpected trap would be if you add a very unexpected flooding: You search for a huge enemy monster which you fight in a rather small room. If you manage to kil this monster you are probably reliefed and happy, just to recognize then that it blocks the obvious exit and bloods so much that you drown in blood if not finding another exit quick enough. Or if it is a daedric or vampire colliseum they might suddenly start a bloodbath to flood the colliseum maze with blood.
azmodan22 Posted January 3, 2014 Posted January 3, 2014 I dont know anything about scripting but as far as level deisgn and static archtecture is conserned I can provide you with shit loads of stuff. For statues to chains hanging from the roof, torture tools etc.
BattenK Posted January 29, 2014 Author Posted January 29, 2014 The romans occasionally flooded the colliseum and let the gladiators "replay" historic seabattles. A great unexpected trap would be if you add a very unexpected flooding: You search for a huge enemy monster which you fight in a rather small room. If you manage to kil this monster you are probably reliefed and happy, just to recognize then that it blocks the obvious exit and bloods so much that you drown in blood if not finding another exit quick enough. Or if it is a daedric or vampire colliseum they might suddenly start a bloodbath to flood the colliseum maze with blood. Is there a blood fluid I could add to a room? I want to try to put in what the community wants after all... Just what I'm up to: I got the bare bones of a level designed, decided I didn't like it, and have started on a new setup, wherein I try to make things a little more linear. I want players, at first, to experience all stages However, I'm stuck with playing Albert Einstein in a play, and that's eating up most of my time. You can't make that kind of thing up, folks.
gaggedgirl123 Posted January 29, 2014 Posted January 29, 2014 I'm pretty sure if you just modify the water texture to be blood-red, you could flood the arena with your custom water
Grimbold the unlovely Posted January 29, 2014 Posted January 29, 2014 So I'm kinda a fan of a couple flash games in which you play as a women . . . . Aaaarrggghhh!! Why does everyone Do this? I mean everyone. Polticians. Journalists. Students. Professors. Lawyers. Wankers. Feminists. And now even Loverslabbers. You know what I mean: "a women". No, no, no, no, no, NO!!! One woman is "a womAn" Plural women are "womEn" woman = singular women = plural What is the problem, people? Why is this so fucking difficult? (No one confuses "man" with "men"). And why does the error cut right across the political spectrum?? (It is found in the published papers of eminent feminists and anti-feminists??) Get it right. One cunt = woman Two or more cunts = women a is not e. Same hand on keyboard, but not same finger. (Women are very sensitive as to where men put their fingers.) This is not rocket science. Sexlabbers should get this right. We should not be like the brain-dead academics who spread this BS. We know the difference. Think threesomes (Arrok's tricycle). That is womEN (unless it's men). Now think regular sex. That is womAn (unless it's gay or lesbian). Oh, I give up. "A women" it is then. Lots of woman say that. What do I care? So long as they have cunt(s). But when will people get brains??
WaxenFigure Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 So I'm kinda a fan of a couple flash games in which you play as a women . . . .Aaaarrggghhh!! Why does everyone Do this? I mean everyone. Polticians. Journalists. Students. Professors. Lawyers. Wankers. Feminists. And now even Loverslabbers. You know what I mean: "a women". No, no, no, no, no, NO!!! One woman is "a womAn" Plural women are "womEn" woman = singular women = plural What is the problem, people? Why is this so fucking difficult? (No one confuses "man" with "men"). And why does the error cut right across the political spectrum?? (It is found in the published papers of eminent feminists and anti-feminists??) Get it right. One cunt = woman Two or more cunts = women a is not e. Same hand on keyboard, but not same finger. (Women are very sensitive as to where men put their fingers.) This is not rocket science. Sexlabbers should get this right. We should not be like the brain-dead academics who spread this BS. We know the difference. Think threesomes (Arrok's tricycle). That is womEN (unless it's men). Now think regular sex. That is womAn (unless it's gay or lesbian). Oh, I give up. "A women" it is then. Lots of woman say that. What do I care? So long as they have cunt(s). But when will people get brains?? LOL - you just have to "bare" with them and give them a "brake" . (Note for those who don't get it, wrong words "bare" and "brake" used instead of the correct words "bear" and "break" used deliberately because I'm always seeing the wrong ones used). Edit: I would like to remind everyone though that we have an international group here and while english is the language of this forum it is not necessarily the language of the author of a comment and little things like this are why english is such a bitch to learn. Nevertheless, he's right that anyone teaching or making a living by the written word should not be making such mistakes.
gaggedgirl123 Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 It's still not as bad as "Should of". But anyways, back on topic guys!
Zitanna Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 It's still not as bad as "Should of". But anyways, back on topic guys! I have never seen that before, but let's all be sensible man and woman and get back on topic. SeewhatIdidthar I'm really pumped for this mod though. Hoping to see this colab with some other mods.
BattenK Posted January 31, 2014 Author Posted January 31, 2014 So I'm kinda a fan of a couple flash games in which you play as a women . . . . Aaaarrggghhh!! Why does everyone Do this? I mean everyone. Polticians. Journalists. Students. Professors. Lawyers. Wankers. Feminists. And now even Loverslabbers. You know what I mean: "a women". No, no, no, no, no, NO!!! One woman is "a womAn" Plural women are "womEn" woman = singular women = plural What is the problem, people? Why is this so fucking difficult? (No one confuses "man" with "men"). And why does the error cut right across the political spectrum?? (It is found in the published papers of eminent feminists and anti-feminists??) Get it right. One cunt = woman Two or more cunts = women a is not e. Same hand on keyboard, but not same finger. (Women are very sensitive as to where men put their fingers.) This is not rocket science. Sexlabbers should get this right. We should not be like the brain-dead academics who spread this BS. We know the difference. Think threesomes (Arrok's tricycle). That is womEN (unless it's men). Now think regular sex. That is womAn (unless it's gay or lesbian). Oh, I give up. "A women" it is then. Lots of woman say that. What do I care? So long as they have cunt(s). But when will people get brains?? Fixed first post to reflect genius insight. I'll not stand idly by when a breakthrough of this magnitude graces my own topic; in fact, I sprung out of my chair. My cigarette fell out of my mouth, I dropped the cup of coffee I was holding and, in the world's greatest spit take ever, spat coffee and saliva all over my friends and family. It wasn't easy, poring over the architecture of your subtle, poignant, and succinct post, all the while extracting every ounce of nigh-divine judgment here to rid the world of my terrible mistakes. No, this was worse than a mistake, it was a sin and you've shown me the light. I slaved over my newly found purpose. I lost sleep, alienated the same people as I covered in the remains of my hot beverage, but I've done it. Just for you. Love you, baby. Edit: I'm a chemist. Posting on a forum that has to do with lewd and depraved content not fit for viewing by anyone. Hardly the front page of the New York Times.
gaggedgirl123 Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 That is the most epic sarcasm I have ever experienced. Marry me! In all seriousness though, I'm really eager to try this out
nordwhore Posted February 1, 2014 Posted February 1, 2014 I liked the bit where he goes on to refer to women as cunts. Nothing backs up the intellectual rigor of using the appropriate singular and plurals for women like using a misogynist slur.
Aliris Posted February 1, 2014 Posted February 1, 2014 One suggestion I might make is to break it up into sections, possibly themed. If the original captor is someone particularly warped, they might even be watching the entire time, making comments along the way. This might be a little easier than having large crowds of NPCs, as well, yet still provide that voyeuristic element perhaps.
judge0 Posted February 1, 2014 Posted February 1, 2014 There is mod out which adds Estrus traps to chests, could you use that to store the hapless heroines armor & weapons in? http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/49566/?
judge0 Posted February 1, 2014 Posted February 1, 2014 Brilliant! Thanks judge! NP, but it's easy to make the suggestion. The real admiration should be for the ones who make these mods . . . a skill I SUCK at.
BattenK Posted February 3, 2014 Author Posted February 3, 2014 One suggestion I might make is to break it up into sections, possibly themed. If the original captor is someone particularly warped, they might even be watching the entire time, making comments along the way. This might be a little easier than having large crowds of NPCs, as well, yet still provide that voyeuristic element perhaps. I agree with sections. This makes it easier to create a more intimate environment per section, rather than trying to keep a sprawling challenge-palace coherent. I also appreciate your sensitivity to the difficulty involving crowds. I plan on involving npc crowds at some point, but now I'm getting the skeleton up, sans audience regions. Brilliant! Thanks judge! NP, but it's easy to make the suggestion. The real admiration should be for the ones who make these mods . . . a skill I SUCK at. Don't worry I'll pass a thanks to the mod's maker as well. I've updated the first post with pictures of my first couple cells. I know it's not much, but I wanted to prove that yes, indeed, something's happening!
BattenK Posted February 4, 2014 Author Posted February 4, 2014 Updated with a third cell. My imagination isn't the most robust. I'd love people to chime in with "Hey BattenK, I want ___________ to happen." Worst case is I can't do it, right? Please? Anyway, three cells will do more than contain what I have in mind, for the time being. I'm moving on to putting in traps, which looks harder than I thought. Then I'll clutter the rooms and add NPCs.
judge0 Posted February 4, 2014 Posted February 4, 2014 Personally, I was looking for a mod along the line of Galgats Blackmail for Oblivion, where the plucky heroine was forced into many scenes of degradation to try to save the lives of some young ladies from the leaders of a bandit cult she had pissed off. One section had our heroine escorted to one of the inns and forced to perform orally for any comers. Skyrim being as flaky as it is, you are providing an area where someone can write a mod for something like that without accidentally killing off any quests.
BattenK Posted February 4, 2014 Author Posted February 4, 2014 Personally, I was looking for a mod along the line of Galgats Blackmail for Oblivion, where the plucky heroine was forced into many scenes of degradation to try to save the lives of some young ladies from the leaders of a bandit cult she had pissed off. One section had our heroine escorted to one of the inns and forced to perform orally for any comers. Skyrim being as flaky as it is, you are providing an area where someone can write a mod for something like that without accidentally killing off any quests. I knew at some point I wanted to connect this to the "real world" but wasn't sure how. This is pretty good. Treasure is one thing, but blackmail as motivation? How devious...
gaggedgirl123 Posted February 4, 2014 Posted February 4, 2014 Well Galgat's Blackmail can be ignored ifyou choose so, I think, but there's definitely a lot of potential with blackmailing. Hell, even I plan on using it, and our mods are really different
pinky6225 Posted February 4, 2014 Posted February 4, 2014 I like the original concept of puzzles and gauntlets to be run. Somehow you start this naked and unarmed and wander through until you come to a blind choice where three levers each open a door: One door will open to a creature who will rape you until you are unconscious (once basically, then it goes blank) and then you find yourself at the beginning again (with whatever you collected so far good or bad) One door opens to bandits or foresworn who will also rape you and add a restraint (leg chains so you can't run, armbinders so you can't use weapons and can only shout, a gag to prevent shouting or a ring, circlet or amulet that reduces your speed, health, stamina, skill level or magicka) but you are then allowed to progress to the next puzzle. One door though gives you get a choice of a bit of armor, a weapon or the removal of some detrimental object from your person and then allows you to continue to the next puzzle. Each further puzzle represents an opportunity to get yet another weapon or some armor making the consequences of bad choices less likely (improving your odds of fighting off bandits or creatures) or adds additional consequences making each additional bad choice more likely to increase your burden. Simply lock the controls if combat is in progress so you must conquer or be defeated by each bad choice before being allowed to make the next choice. Additional debilitating items (all must be non-removable by the player) can be made by using dildos, anal plugs, ear, nose, nipple, labia or penis piercings as well as cursed wearable items. Upon reaching the end of all the gauntlets and solving all the puzzles you are allowed to recover your original gear but must pay to have any cursed item removed, without sufficient funds you may have to live with the cursed item(s) until you can afford their removal. As for puzzles you can use the various types of puzzles already included in the game but in a twist at least once make a puzzle with a "shown" solution that definitely leads to a very bad result (maybe several cursed items at once) so you catch all the people who blindly trust in those. Ideally, each puzzle could be set up so that the correct way to play each one changes each time you play the game and only pure dumb luck is going to get you to the end without getting raped, sodomized, whipped, beaten and/or used by a giant as a masturbation aid. Sounds good could you add something starting behind you that will follow/catch up if you stop for to long to add a element of urgency to your escape.
gaggedgirl123 Posted February 4, 2014 Posted February 4, 2014 That would actually be extremely rtough to do in Skyrim's engine, given the "awesome" following behavior. I swear games in 1995 had better following mechanics
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.