Arousal Based Match Maker [ABMM] LE

[jpee1965]

3 hours ago, WinglessEvilAngel said:

I tried what you said and it gave me the desired effect that i was looking for. Thanks for the help.

Is this mod great OR WHAT!?!?!

[Yinkle]

3 hours ago, jpee1965 said:

Is this mod great OR WHAT!?!?!

Thanks! It's good to know folk appreciate my efforts

[gender65]

On 8/8/2020 at 3:13 PM, jpee1965 said:

Is this mod great OR WHAT!?!?!

This is an amazing mod ! Simple and at the same time effective and very high quality in performance

[xyzxyz]

The creature section on the second mcm page is greyed out. I can't activate it. Is it not finished yet?

[Yinkle]

5 minutes ago, xyzxyz said:

The creature section on the second mcm page is greyed out. I can't activate it. Is it not finished yet?

There's an issue if you have aroused creatures installed, working on a fix just now. If you don't have aroused creatures installed then it should work fine if you have creatures and creature genders enabled in sexlab MCM (animation settings).

[Yuni]

Well I have creatures enabled, and Enemies Allowed checked, but it still says my character "feels less aroused while fighting" or "it will have to wait", didn't this mod have the ability to interrupt combat? I could have sword I've had draugr do that before. Didn't it involve someone calling for peace or something? Maybe animals (I'm testing on a wolf) don't work for that.

Edit: Tested, works on Draugr, it appears that it doesn't work for "animals" (wolves, sabercats, etc), but works on "creatures" (falmer, draugr, etc)

Thank you for the fun mod either way!

[Wolfram..]

7 hours ago, Yuni said:

Well I have creatures enabled, and Enemies Allowed checked, but it still says my character "feels less aroused while fighting" or "it will have to wait", didn't this mod have the ability to interrupt combat? I could have sword I've had draugr do that before. Didn't it involve someone calling for peace or something? Maybe animals (I'm testing on a wolf) don't work for that.

Edit: Tested, works on Draugr, it appears that it doesn't work for "animals" (wolves, sabercats, etc), but works on "creatures" (falmer, draugr, etc)

Thank you for the fun mod either way!

Would you rather have the mod break you off in middle of combat to start a animation?? If someone calls for peace ,then you are not in combat anymore.. Well ,that's the way it works at my end anyway.. Have a good one.

[Yinkle]

9 hours ago, Yuni said:

Tested, works on Draugr, it appears that it doesn't work for "animals" (wolves, sabercats, etc), but works on "creatures" (falmer, draugr, etc)

It checks isActorHostile() which returns true for any hostile npc/creature/animal, at least it does in my game. Bear in mind that the hostile animal/creature has to be above the arousal theshold  set in the MCM (or creature framework MCM if you have that installed).

 

There is an alternative (GetFactionReaction which returns 0 neutral, 1 enemy, 2 ally, 3 friend) but that wouldn't help unless we included neutral which would end up firing all over the place where not needed.

[Yuni]

10 hours ago, Wolfram64 said:

Would you rather have the mod break you off in middle of combat to start a animation?? If someone calls for peace ,then you are not in combat anymore.. Well ,that's the way it works at my end anyway.. Have a good one.

I mean that's the idea, yes, that's what I was looking for. It adds more difficulty to fighting if you wind up naked because clothing is stolen, if your character is an exhibitionist... gotta worry about turning on enemies too much and just being grabbed. But I also have Succubus Heart installed so it fits my character's personality, AND SL Defeat Skill Loss so getting humped causes skill damage.
... my Skyrim is a giant rube-goldberg machine of various interacting effects. :3

 

But yeah, my testing, making both creatures max out arousal, is the wolves wouldn't work but when I COC'd over to Bleak Falls Barrow, the draugr worked fine. Now maybe there were too many NPCs around during the fight with the wolf, as I was near a giant camp, and the mod did say it already wanted to use my companion creature that was nearby (but not in combat), so maybe I just need to isolate my test cases more.

[xyzxyz]

Is it possible to block male NPCs from sex with creatures? Without blocking them from every interaction at all.

[Yinkle]

45 minutes ago, xyzxyz said:

Is it possible to block male NPCs from sex with creatures? Without blocking them from every interaction at all.

This is not possible in the current version, possible in the future, buying me a coffee is always good for motivation

[Yinkle]

New in Version 2.2.0

Improved: Notifications when more than 2 characters are in a scene: For example, "Elda is going to fuck Emma, Catherine & Xana"
This should reduce notification spam and confusion considerably when lots of characters are getting busy.
Streamlined: The process of choosing characters for scenes has been improved.
Chance to initiate sex will now be the same for all characters that meet the criteria each time the script polls, driven Crazy chance will be generated separately.
Actors will always try to find a valid partner before being driven crazy.
Fixed: Creatures will not have names shortened in certain circumstances. I plan to fix this for all situations in a future release.

[jpee1965]

Hey YINKLE!  Nice job on the new release!  Hey I seem to have a bit of a problem. The ABMM immune function is not working in 2.2.0?  That is I hit the hotkey, I see the ABMM Immune message for the selected person, but less than a minute later she is shagging! Damn she must really need a shag I guess, but yeah is anybody else seeing this??

[Yinkle]

8 hours ago, jpee1965 said:

Hey YINKLE!  Nice job on the new release!  Hey I seem to have a bit of a problem. The ABMM immune function is not working in 2.2.0?  That is I hit the hotkey, I see the ABMM Immune message for the selected person, but less than a minute later she is shagging! Damn she must really need a shag I guess, but yeah is anybody else seeing this??

It takes a little while to kick in, if they have already filled an alias in the scan quest then they might end up shagging. The next time the script polls and the aliases are reset then they won't be allowed. I could add a check in the main script to counter this.

[Yinkle]

@xyzxyz

 

New in Version 2.2.1

Added: Additional check for "ABMMExcluded" faction (recently excluded characters won't have sex even if they've already filled an alias unless they are already in a thread slot).

Added: Toggle to allow creature on creature - default off. This requires Horny Creatures of Skyrim (HCoS) because otherwise you'll likely have no/few suitable animations.

Added: Toggle to stop creatures from having sex with male characters (sexlab gender) - default on.

Fixed: Creatures will not be driven crazy/masturbate unless "creature on creature" is toggled on (HCoS includes some creature solo anims).

[Wolfram..]

Tetsted a bit.. The creature-creature feature works ,but it messes up the tags.. For example a horse-horse ,also play horse human anims.. So make the creature on creature only use anims tagged CC ,would work :).

[Yinkle]

57 minutes ago, Wolfram64 said:

Tetsted a bit.. The creature-creature feature works ,but it messes up the tags.. For example a horse-horse ,also play horse human anims.. So make the creature on creature only use anims tagged CC ,would work :).

Yup I didn't bother setting tags for that yet, was hoping that sexlab would handle it!

[Wolfram..]

Played some more ,decided to remove hcos and just use creature-human.. that didn't happen... when the creature get aroused it looks for another creature.. don't find one.. and then nothing.. This happens even with creature-creature disabled.. Bot complain ,just info.

[Yinkle]

11 minutes ago, Wolfram64 said:

Played some more ,decided to remove hcos and just use creature-human.. that didn't happen... when the creature get aroused it looks for another creature.. don't find one.. and then nothing.. This happens even with creature-creature disabled.. Bot complain ,just info.

Removing mods mid game is not a good idea and can cause all sorts of problems.

[Wolfram..]

If one knows how to clean the saves ,it usually goes well..i reverted to Abmm 2.1.3.1.. issue gone.

[gender65]

Played with Hcos-unplayable ! For the necessary tags, there is no animation or they will stand together at all, I checked on horses .I have already installed Hcos for a long time , then removed it ,it does not function well ,it turns out to be a mess,and not the necessary ,correct animations with all the animals .

"Creature on creature" has never worked as it should.  I installed version 2.2.0 again.

[Wolfram..]

The problem with the hcos horse on horse animation ,is that it is designed for 2 male horses.. one can see that in the ending when both horses has a cum stream...And male on male anims i can only make happen using spell manually.. (in my system anyway) They do work somehow ,but to make them work in a automated system ,may be alot of work..

[gender65]

3 hours ago, Wolfram64 said:

The problem with the hcos horse on horse animation ,is that it is designed for 2 male horses.. one can see that in the ending when both horses has a cum stream...And male on male anims i can only make happen using spell manually.. (in my system anyway) They do work somehow ,but to make them work in a automated system ,may be alot of work..

Do you have animals making cumshots ? Is there such a mod ? Share it ?

[Wolfram..]

1 hour ago, gender65 said:

Do you have animals making cumshots ? Is there such a mod ? Share it ?

Well ,i installed hcos v 1_17b that's it.. If you download that and look in the meshes/animobjects folder..youll see.

 

[gender65]

28 minutes ago, Wolfram64 said:

Well ,i installed hcos v 1_17b that's it.. If you download that and look in the meshes/animobjects folder..youll see.

 

Understood. I put this mod once and deleted it almost immediately .Yesterday I installed HCOS again due to the ABMM update, saw that nothing has changed for the better, and deleted HCOS again . A clueless and unrealized mod ,it is unplayable (HCOS)!