Jump to content

[mod] [outdated] RJW Sexperience (Ideology update)


motd1233

Recommended Posts

Posted

20210801190833.png.6005cb58563531ec12ed394cf6bd6b9e.png

Animal gang rape ceremony can not mate

I guess so.....

The altar is an insurmountable terrain, so it will lead to the failure of animal gang rape ceremony, because animals can't go to the altar to mate with the target...

 

 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, amrolee said:

20210801190833.png.6005cb58563531ec12ed394cf6bd6b9e.png

Animal gang rape ceremony can not mate

I guess so.....

The altar is an insurmountable terrain, so it will lead to the failure of animal gang rape ceremony, because animals can't go to the altar to mate with the target...

 

 

it seems to only work for prisoners/slaves tested many different setups with colonists Non/moded-animals, altar, non-altar, ritual spot, indoor/outdoor but same result for colonists as in no action on the animals part just standing and look untill end, reason is that both gangbang rituals are using same victim role unless you have male/female suprem meme then colonists work just fine aslong as they are in the Submissive gender

Edited by Munken
Posted

 

20 hours ago, MadMusician said:

I had a similar issue, and I figured it out, except it was when I was testing the animal gangbang. It looks like it does not play nice with Pawnmorpher, and the ritual will outright not start if you have any morphed sapient pawns involved.

yes pawnmorpfer is currently incompatible the sentient animal pawn is counted as both animal and colonist i think is probably it

Posted
2 hours ago, Munken said:

it seems to only work for prisoners/slaves tested many different setups with colonists Non/moded-animals, altar, non-altar, ritual spot, indoor/outdoor but same result for colonists as in no action on the animals part just standing and look untill end, reason is that both gangbang rituals are using same victim role unless you have male/female suprem meme then colonists work just fine aslong as they are in the Submissive gender

Well that's annoying... but explains why the female prisoner's never get gangbanged with my female supremacy ideology. You'd think if the prisoner doesn't share the ideology that they could be used and abused. I guess I'll test it on the male prisoner I have. I mean it is a colony of futanari amazons...

Posted (edited)

Not just Human Gang Bang  but same thing with animal gang bang we should be able to choose animals freely and female or male Breede

Edited by aimless115
Posted

I would love to see more memes and precepts that are built specifically for female/female and male/male relationships. Currently most things that affect supremacy just make men better/weaker/more vulnerable than women and vice versa, when I'd personally rather have an all-female lesbian Amazon colony where men are only kept for breeding and aren't allowed to marry. 

Posted

well I tried to "snuu snuu" the male prisoner and the end result was the build up... and then event canceled. I can't not have female supremacy when my colony is about futanari amazons from space. XD

Posted
2 hours ago, oxBrandxo said:

I would love to see more memes and precepts that are built specifically for female/female and male/male relationships. Currently most things that affect supremacy just make men better/weaker/more vulnerable than women and vice versa, when I'd personally rather have an all-female lesbian Amazon colony where men are only kept for breeding and aren't allowed to marry. 

Ohhh, this is also a good idea, throw Bisexual in as well for the ultimate in free love.

Posted

Some ideas:

1. Marriage precept - allow/disallow/lovers only (no chance for marriage proposal).

2. Free love party. Colonists of the same ideology will have fun with each other. (good for my harem)

3. Precept for bastards - positive/negative/neutral opinion about them.

4. Group sex ritual - consensual alternative to rangbang.

5. Change sex precept form vaginal/anal/oral only to vaginal/anal/oral honorable/abhorrent with mood buff/debuff for certain type of sex.

6. Same-sex relationship precept (allowed, forbidden, male only, female only).

7. Slave/master relationships precept - allowed/forbidden and somewhat consensual. Slave which have a master becomes loyal and will never try to run away (while his or her master is alive). Opinion boost to each other. Master have small mood boost for each loyal slave around (same as for bonded animal). Consensual slave/master sex. Masochists have high chance to become loyal but Stockholm Syndrome should work for others too.

8. Virginity mechanic. Pawns below certain age (15-16 or so) have no sexual experience and counts as virgins (mod settings for age range mb). Older - less chance. Traits/backstories should matter too (ascetic/asexual - almost always, body purists - higher chance). May be precept for virgins (honorable/etc). Anal and vaginal virginity hediff. Thoughts for keep/lose virginity. Opinion offset for virgins (precept-based). New "my first" type of relations with permanent one-sided opinion boost or debuff if virgin was raped.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, id89123 said:

Some ideas:

1. Marriage precept - allow/disallow/lovers only (no chance for marriage proposal).

2. Free love party. Colonists of the same ideology will have fun with each other. (good for my harem)

3. Precept for bastards - positive/negative/neutral opinion about them.

4. Group sex ritual - consensual alternative to rangbang.

5. Change sex precept form vaginal/anal/oral only to vaginal/anal/oral honorable/abhorrent with mood buff/debuff for certain type of sex.

6. Same-sex relationship precept (allowed, forbidden, male only, female only).

7. Slave/master relationships precept - allowed/forbidden and somewhat consensual. Slave which have a master becomes loyal and will never try to run away (while his or her master is alive). Opinion boost to each other. Master have small mood boost for each loyal slave around (same as for bonded animal). Consensual slave/master sex. Masochists have high chance to become loyal but Stockholm Syndrome should work for others too.

8. Virginity mechanic. Pawns below certain age (15-16 or so) have no sexual experience and counts as virgins (mod settings for age range mb). Older - less chance. Traits/backstories should matter too (ascetic/asexual - almost always, body purists - higher chance). May be precept for virgins (honorable/etc). Anal and vaginal virginity hediff. Thoughts for keep/lose virginity. Opinion offset for virgins (precept-based). New "my first" type of relations with permanent one-sided opinion boost or debuff if virgin was raped.

 

Good ideas. I especially like 1, 3, and 7

Posted

Nice mod!

Only thing that irritates me is that when choosing "submissive" precept, the pawns of that gender will not agree to be used (you can't click the button, it says "must have masochist trait"), and rapist pawn will still be marked guilty (why guilty if it is acceptable?). Similar for bestiality - pawns should accept that (button clickable) when the precept is used, not just with the trait (otherwise precept is pretty useless).

Posted

ideas
1 genital mutilation, male / female (revered / hated)
2 use of contraceptives (revered / hated)
3 prostitution (revered / hated)
4 masturbation ritual (all the men gather next to a bucket and fill it with "love juice" for someone to drink)
5 people marry animals
6 changing gangbang genders for female supremacy
7 tying up a naked prisoner or slave to humiliate and torture him to "save his soul"

 

I realized that the submissive feature never appears unless you look for it and put it
is it a mistake or so is it supposed to be

Posted

I noted that anal plug, armbinder, legbinder, and chains all count as cloth for the total nude setting and nudist. 

 

New idea option for clothing. Bondage only: fully nude expect for Chasity belt/cage, anal plug, armbinder, legbinder, blindfold, ring/ball gag, anal plugs. 

Posted
On 8/2/2021 at 1:27 AM, id89123 said:

Some ideas:

1. Marriage precept - allow/disallow/lovers only (no chance for marriage proposal).

2. Free love party. Colonists of the same ideology will have fun with each other. (good for my harem)

3. Precept for bastards - positive/negative/neutral opinion about them.

4. Group sex ritual - consensual alternative to rangbang.

5. Change sex precept form vaginal/anal/oral only to vaginal/anal/oral honorable/abhorrent with mood buff/debuff for certain type of sex.

6. Same-sex relationship precept (allowed, forbidden, male only, female only).

7. Slave/master relationships precept - allowed/forbidden and somewhat consensual. Slave which have a master becomes loyal and will never try to run away (while his or her master is alive). Opinion boost to each other. Master have small mood boost for each loyal slave around (same as for bonded animal). Consensual slave/master sex. Masochists have high chance to become loyal but Stockholm Syndrome should work for others too.

8. Virginity mechanic. Pawns below certain age (15-16 or so) have no sexual experience and counts as virgins (mod settings for age range mb). Older - less chance. Traits/backstories should matter too (ascetic/asexual - almost always, body purists - higher chance). May be precept for virgins (honorable/etc). Anal and vaginal virginity hediff. Thoughts for keep/lose virginity. Opinion offset for virgins (precept-based). New "my first" type of relations with permanent one-sided opinion boost or debuff if virgin was raped.

 

I love ideas 4,6 and 7.

Posted

The default lust values seem to spiral a bit out of control. I've had some pawns reach as high as 3000% sex drive. Putting it at 0.002 makes it about decent without pawns fucking themselves to death.

On topic of the mod settings, I've noticed that on rimworld reboot they always reset themselves to default for sexperience. My colony usually starts to go on the brink of mental breakdowns until I lower it back down again. For the time being I've decided to flat out disable the lust mechanic. I like the feature and concept of it but the balance seems a bit whack.
Am I supposed to tweak other RJW values to make it more reasonable?

I do really like all the other features this mod provides, keep up the good work!

Posted

Is there something I'm missing? What is considered a breedable animal? 

 

I have pigs/horses/wolves tamed and marked as breedable, but the act still shows up as being disabled. 

 

sad.png

Posted (edited)

How does the sex ritual acts in this mod interact with lust values and social interaction?  Do sex rituals automatically trigger a lust bonus or multiplier (though possibly irrelevant currently, seems to be some issue with lust stat in general)?  Trying to determine whether pawns lacking the required trait to engage in the weirder sex stuff (beast, necro, etc.) will still do it during gangbang rituals if some other pawn with trait is doing it.  Normally this wouldn't be an issue, but I also run the People Can Change mod, and am curious whether this mod would result in a positive cross mod interaction (ie, pawn without freaky trait tries something new during gangbang, turns out they like it?!).  Would be nice to have another method for adding such traits besides serums from Licentia labs (which don't work right now), or just doing it the long hard rapey way.

 

I had originally thought that C0ffeee's orgy mod handled this, but since his orgy code basically just randomly overlays onto party events (and I guess randomly onto rituals now), it doesn't technically create the rituals.  So dunno how these two specific mods will interact, but someone may want to figure it out eventually.

Edited by ghostfalll
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, tybasedlawd said:

Is there something I'm missing? What is considered a breedable animal? 

 

I have pigs/horses/wolves tamed and marked as breedable, but the act still shows up as being disabled. 

 

sad.png

are you useing the Venerated animals only perecept? haveing that one will prevent any animal not venerated to be used in the ritual.

Edited by Munken
Posted

Not sure if it is only me, but when starting an gangbang ritual (prisoner or animal), I don't receive the 10% bonus for moral guide even with the right pawn present in the Initiator role.

Posted

My pawns are starting to incurre insane lust values of thousands of percents... which causes there sex need to drain as fast as it fills....

Posted

An ideology based around marriage could have "Arranged Marriages" too which would be super neat. You could force pawns to marry and there might be mood debuffs if they don't like the other person, or with an Ideology people might think much better of arranged marriages as being "for the greater good of all" and respect people in arranged marriages and not like "free marriages" as being reckless

Posted
12 hours ago, NoppaiKohai said:

An ideology based around marriage could have "Arranged Marriages" too which would be super neat. You could force pawns to marry and there might be mood debuffs if they don't like the other person, or with an Ideology people might think much better of arranged marriages as being "for the greater good of all" and respect people in arranged marriages and not like "free marriages" as being reckless


I support this idea, especially since it would make harem playthroughs easier xD

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Munken said:

are you useing the Venerated animals only perecept? haveing that one will prevent any animal not venerated to be used in the ritual.

uff. And here I thought I can use the thing as Punishment.

@motd1233 Isn't this the entire stick of it and the rape ritual? Wouldn't it make sense to allow all Animals? Aswell as all pawns? With a mood debuff if it goes against traits or precepts.

 

Edit:

21 minutes ago, Screws said:
13 hours ago, NoppaiKohai said:

An ideology based around marriage could have "Arranged Marriages" too which would be super neat. You could force pawns to marry and there might be mood debuffs if they don't like the other person, or with an Ideology people might think much better of arranged marriages as being "for the greater good of all" and respect people in arranged marriages and not like "free marriages" as being reckless


I support this idea, especially since it would make harem playthroughs easier xD

Like. But would only make sense in a "collective" ideology, doesn't it?

 

Edited by V3rius

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...