Scent of Sex SE

[AlStack]

On 11/25/2018 at 11:28 AM, CPU said:

No, it is a known problem.

Usually it is better to install SSX after you start the game and not immediately (let SexLab complete its installation before installing SSX.)

Thanks! So far so good.?

[darchangel891]

I tried to use this mod in oldrim, but apparently I cant figure out how to make the rules work.
CPU, would you be willing to write some rules for me?  I will donate to your cause
Please please pretty please?

[Guest]

29 minutes ago, darchangel891 said:

I tried to use this mod in oldrim, but apparently I cant figure out how to make the rules work.
CPU, would you be willing to write some rules for me?  I will donate to your cause
Please please pretty please?

Best you can do is to post a request of what you want to be done by the rule in this thread: 

 

There are already a lot of rules available.

[darchangel891]

2 hours ago, CPU said:

Best you can do is to post a request of what you want to be done by the rule in this thread: 

 

There are already a lot of rules available.

Ok, I will check it out, thanks

[Pinute]

Hi CPU, and thanks for endorsing this port to SSE. It was the last 'essential' mod I wanted

 

I have one very simple rule set up for testing - it searches for females wearing zaz gear (hydra slavegirls are the test subjects), has a random male non-follower assault them, and the rule works perfectly. I'm using the alias scanning option. 

 

The problem is that when SSX is enabled all the characters around, and my pc, get a temporary green highlighting sometime during the scanning process. I've made sure that I've got highlighting set to none for target, subject, and collaborator. Am I missing a setting somewhere? I'm pretty sure I've examined every mcm page carefully and I can't find anything about highlighting on any of them but for the three npc pages listed above.

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Garolding said:

Hi CPU, and thanks for endorsing this port to SSE. It was the last 'essential' mod I wanted

 

I have one very simple rule set up for testing - it searches for females wearing zaz gear (hydra slavegirls are the test subjects), has a random male non-follower assault them, and the rule works perfectly. I'm using the alias scanning option. 

 

The problem is that when SSX is enabled all the characters around, and my pc, get a temporary green highlighting sometime during the scanning process. I've made sure that I've got highlighting set to none for target, subject, and collaborator. Am I missing a setting somewhere? I'm pretty sure I've examined every mcm page carefully and I can't find anything about highlighting on any of them but for the three npc pages listed above.

As you know, you can disable all highlighting of actors.

In case it does not work, try to set up one (maybe different color) and check if it is working or not.

 

Check also cell scan, that is fast in SSE, and let me know if the actors are still highlighted.

[Pinute]

On 11/28/2018 at 12:28 PM, CPU said:

As you know, you can disable all highlighting of actors.

In case it does not work, try to set up one (maybe different color) and check if it is working or not.

 

Check also cell scan, that is fast in SSE, and let me know if the actors are still highlighted.

Ok, tracked it down finally. I had green highlighting of all npcs near me using all 3 scan types, so I figured it was most likely a PEBKAC (my years on #ubuntu taught me that's the most likely issue ).

When I was looking for highlighting I somehow missed the scan highlighting under debug. After I disabled that all was good.

[AlStack]

FYI After restarting a new game all of your mods are working happily. I have not done excessive testing but so far all is well. ?

[Sally Sinamon]

Could you explain how the rule priorities work?

 

I have a simple rule active where, if my follower gets very aroused, she jumps on me. Works as expected.

 

But, the priority of the rule doesn't seem to make any difference. Whether I set it to low, high, very high, as soon as the condition is met, the rule triggers every time. If that is the intended behaviour (and it might be) is there a way to add a 'randomness' to the rule? eg rule triggers but only actually fires if you roll 16+ on your D20?

[Guest]

21 minutes ago, Sally Sinamon said:

Could you explain how the rule priorities work?

 

I have a simple rule active where, if my follower gets very aroused, she jumps on me. Works as expected.

 

But, the priority of the rule doesn't seem to make any difference. Whether I set it to low, high, very high, as soon as the condition is met, the rule triggers every time. If that is the intended behaviour (and it might be) is there a way to add a 'randomness' to the rule? eg rule triggers but only actually fires if you roll 16+ on your D20?

The rule priority is used when multiple rules can apply.

 

Let's say you do 3 rules:

For all target is player, for all source is a NPC, no special triggering conditions, but each rule have a specific animation to it.

Rule 1 (high priority) -> Vaginal

Rule 2 (normal priority) -> Blowjob

Rule 3 (low priority) -> Anal

 

Because the rule can trigger in the same conditions one will be chosen based on priorities.

So the vaginal anim will play a lot more than blowjobs and anal will play very little.

[Sally Sinamon]

Cool - that's pretty much what I'd figured so no need for me to mess with it any more expecting different outcomes.

 

But, when you do come back to update this mod again (I know it's not a priority) maybe a 'randomness' slider could be a feature? So you're in a situation where a rule applies but there's a % chance of it triggering rather than it being guaranteed?

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Sally Sinamon said:

Cool - that's pretty much what I'd figured so no need for me to mess with it any more expecting different outcomes.

 

But, when you do come back to update this mod again (I know it's not a priority) maybe a 'randomness' slider could be a feature? So you're in a situation where a rule applies but there's a % chance of it triggering rather than it being guaranteed?

The priority it is actually a probability. I think only the top one will make the rule guaranteed. All others are some sort of probability.

Sadly I wrote this code more than 2 years ago, so I do not remember it perfectly. I also think there is an option somewhere (this is the mod of options) to alter how the rule priority works.

[Sally Sinamon]

There are a LOT of options in the mod - it's entirely possible that I missed something. I will try again. Thx for the replies CPU ^^

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Sally Sinamon said:

There are a LOT of options in the mod - it's entirely possible that I missed something. I will try again. Thx for the replies CPU ^^

You welcome.

[cppnnemo]

I have a problem where the mod is constantly stuck switching between scanning and scene manager, and the animation never plays.  Example: I have a rule set up with my follower as the target.  Everything seems to work great, the scan starts, finds actors, the actors stop what they're doing and come over to my follower, then the mod starts switching back and forth rapidly between "bypassing scanner, starting scene manager" and "scene manager completed, scanner starting", and everybody just stands around.  All relevant animations are present and tested, and all sexlab features work fine outside of this mod.  Has anybody run into this before?

[Guest]

7 hours ago, cppnnemo said:

I have a problem where the mod is constantly stuck switching between scanning and scene manager, and the animation never plays.  Example: I have a rule set up with my follower as the target.  Everything seems to work great, the scan starts, finds actors, the actors stop what they're doing and come over to my follower, then the mod starts switching back and forth rapidly between "bypassing scanner, starting scene manager" and "scene manager completed, scanner starting", and everybody just stands around.  All relevant animations are present and tested, and all sexlab features work fine outside of this mod.  Has anybody run into this before?

As usual, max out the debug logs play a while, and send me the papyrus.log

[cppnnemo]

On 12/3/2018 at 1:11 AM, CPU said:

As usual, max out the debug logs play a while, and send me the papyrus.log

Thanks for the reply, I actually solved this issue by turning off NPC to NPC dialogue, apparently that was the culprit preventing the scene from starting.

[axz2]

Can you use the rules in this thread

 or are LE rules incompatible with SE?

[Guest]

32 minutes ago, axz2 said:

Can you use the rules in this thread

 or are LE rules incompatible with SE?

Rules are the same for the two versions.

They can be exchanged.

[Next_To_Nothing]

On 11/26/2018 at 9:22 PM, Next_To_Nothing said:

I'm having issues with this version getting rules using the 'See Nudity' parameter to work. I've set the rule as such:

  Reveal hidden contents

{
    "animsAndTags" :
    {
        "addGenderTags" : 5,
        "andOrForTags" : 4,
        "avoid" : "",
        "avoidA" : "",
        "specificAnimAIDs" : "",
        "specificAnimIDs" : "",
        "tags" : "",
        "tagsA" : ""
    },
    "author" : "Kaileth",
    "clothing" :
    {
        "stripping" : 0,
        "wearAtEndColl" : "",
        "wearAtEndDst" : "",
        "wearAtEndSrc" : "",
        "wearAtStartColl" : "",
        "wearAtStartDst" : "",
        "wearAtStartSrc" : ""
    },
    "description" : "",
    "highlight" : 0,
    "id" : 32610,
    "inUse" : 2,
    "interactions" :
    {
        "aggressive" : 4,
        "askingSex" : 2265,
        "dialogues" : 2097156
    },
    "name" : "SexLab Approach",
    "participants" :
    {
        "coll" : 0,
        "collIDs" : "",
        "collMods" : "",
        "collNegFactIDs" : "",
        "collRaces" : "",
        "dst" : 127,
        "dstIDs" : "",
        "dstMods" : "",
        "dstNegFactIDs" : "",
        "dstRaces" : "",
        "partsProp" : 32,
        "passiveIs" : 0,
        "raceMode" : 0,
        "src" : 153,
        "srcIDs" : "",
        "srcMods" : "",
        "srcNegFactIDs" : "",
        "srcRaces" : ""
    },
    "properties" :
    {
        "beds" : 2,
        "enableOrgies" : 0,
        "probability" : 1,
        "scaleActors" : 0,
        "stopAllCombats" : 1,
        "timeBeforeReDo" : 0
    },
    "starting" :
    {
        "arousalLevel" : 60,
        "cells" : "",
        "filter1" : 98400,
        "filter2" : 0,
        "filter3" : 0,
        "hasToWearColl" : "",
        "hasToWearDst" : "",
        "hasToWearSrc" : "",
        "healthLevel" : -1,
        "interiorExterior" : 0,
        "locationTypes" : "",
        "locations" : "",
        "magickaLevel" : -1,
        "notToWearColl" : "",
        "notToWearDst" : "",
        "notToWearSrc" : "",
        "prevRule" : -1,
        "staminaLevel" : -1,
        "startsOn" : 0,
        "timeFilter" : -1
    },
    "version" : 10405
}

 

 

Basically that the source needs to see nudity, and be of a certain arousal before approaching the target. The problem is even when the MCM menu is saying the player character is naked, and is in full view of the aroused NPC, the rules fails to fire as it believes the NPC does not see nudity. In the log below, the PC is standing naked infront of the 'Escaped Prisoner' NPC:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

[11/26/2018 - 09:11:32PM] SSX: Saving Configuration
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:33PM] SSX: Saving Configuration completed
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:33PM] SSX: Elapsed time for Saving Configuration = 1.393005
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:37PM] SSX: scanner starts
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:37PM] SSX: Alias Scanner Maintenance of actors
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:47PM] SSX: All Actors from Alias Scan: Escaped Prisoner (MNH Nord), ghost (MNH Nord), ghost (MNH Nord), ghost (MNH Nord), 4 actors
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:47PM] SSX: Alias Scanner - Scan completed. Found 5 actors
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:47PM] SSX: scanner completed
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:47PM] SSX: Factions Cleaner START: cycles S:20 F: 0
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:48PM] SSX: Factions Cleaner: 0 SCANNED cleaned
[11/26/2018 - 09:11:48PM] SSX: Factions Cleaner DONE: cycles S:0 F: 0
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:16PM] SSX: scanner starts
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:16PM] SSX: Alias Scanner Maintenance of actors
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: All Actors from Alias Scan: test (FNH Nord), Escaped Prisoner (MNH Nord), ghost (MNH Nord), ghost (MNH Nord), ghost (MNH Nord), 5 actors
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: Alias Scanner - Scan completed. Found 5 actors
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: scanner completed, Rule Checker Update started
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: Factions Cleaner START: cycles S:20 F: 0
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: Rule Checker - Starting the checking
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: Factions Cleaner: 0 SCANNED cleaned
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: Factions Cleaner DONE: cycles S:0 F: 0
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:26PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:27PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:27PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:27PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:27PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:28PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:28PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:28PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:28PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:28PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:28PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:28PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:28PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Bad rule because 6 - Sources cannot not be found - SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:29PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Bad rule because 6 - Sources cannot not be found - SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:30PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:31PM] SSX: Bad rule because 6 - Sources cannot not be found - SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:32PM] SSX: Rule Checker Update completed
[11/26/2018 - 09:12:32PM] SSX: Rule Checker - Rules checking on update completed. Found 0 valid rules and 0 potential rules.
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:06PM] SSX: Scanning of items for MCM started
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:06PM] SSX: Elapsed time for MCM Opening = 0.272003
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:06PM] SSX: Scanning of items for MCM completed
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:06PM] SSX: Elapsed time for MCM Items scanning OnConfigOpen = 0.255981
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:14PM] SSX: Saving Configuration
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:14PM] SSX: Saving Configuration completed
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:14PM] SSX: Elapsed time for Saving Configuration = 0.319977
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:17PM] SSX: Rule Checker Update starts
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:17PM] SSX: Rule Checker - Starting the checking
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:17PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:18PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:18PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:18PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:19PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:19PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:22PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:22PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:22PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:22PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:22PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:22PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Bad rule because 6 - Sources cannot not be found - SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:23PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Bad rule because 6 - Sources cannot not be found - SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:25PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:26PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:26PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:26PM] SSX: Bad rule because 6 - Sources cannot not be found - SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:28PM] SSX: Rule Checker Update completed
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:28PM] SSX: Rule Checker - Rules checking on update completed. Found 0 valid rules and 0 potential rules.
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:31PM] SSX: scanner starts
[11/26/2018 - 09:13:31PM] SSX: Alias Scanner Maintenance of actors

 

But curiously enough when I make the source naked (aka, Escape Prisoner), then the source "sees nudity" and will approach the fully clothed target, as per this log:

  Reveal hidden contents

[11/26/2018 - 09:19:20PM] SSX: Rule Checker Update starts
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:20PM] SSX: Rule Checker - Starting the checking
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:20PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:21PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:21PM] SSX: Actor is GOOD for effective actions: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:21PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner added as source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:22PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:22PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:22PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:22PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:22PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:22PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:22PM] SSX: Actor is GOOD for effective actions: Escaped Prisoner pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:22PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner added as collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: GOOD rule - SexLab Approach - 5 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:23PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor is GOOD for effective actions: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner added as source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor is GOOD for effective actions: Escaped Prisoner pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner added as collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:24PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=2
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for collaborator in SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: GOOD rule - SexLab Approach - 3 Way
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: Rule Checker: Trying to fill the rule: SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: Actor test added as Target in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: Actor is GOOD for effective actions: Escaped Prisoner pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:25PM] SSX: Actor Escaped Prisoner added as source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:26PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:26PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:26PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:26PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:26PM] SSX: Actor is bad because seeing naked: ghost pos=1
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:26PM] SSX: Actor ghost is not good for source in SexLab Approach
[11/26/2018 - 09:19:26PM] SSX: GOOD rule - SexLab Approach

 

I'm not entirely certain what's going on but it almost appears as though the rules checker is using 'Is Naked' when it should be using the 'Sees Nudity'. I can confirm these rules worked back in 1.4f. I ran this test on a test profile using on only the following mods:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

Skyrim.esm
Update.esm
Dawnguard.esm
HearthFires.esm
Dragonborn.esm
SexLab.esm
SexLabAroused.esm
SkyUI_SE.esp
UIExtensions.esp
SexLabTools.esp
Scent of Sex.esp
Alternate Start - Live Another Life.esp

 

I tried looking through the scripts myself but I can't make heads or tails of it, hopefully someone here can!

 

I don't suppose anyone can even confirm that they get the same results on their install?

[Guest]

I started a game with the mod installed and I have a missing_translation_xxx errors for all options.

Can anyone tell me why this is happening and how to fix it?

 

Thanks a lot for the mod!

[Guest]

1 hour ago, King of the Losers said:

I started a game with the mod installed and I have a missing_translation_xxx errors for all options.

Can anyone tell me why this is happening and how to fix it?

 

Thanks a lot for the mod!

This mod should not be installed before the character is created and the game is started.

I recommend uninstall it, play just a little while, then reinstall it.

Just ignore the errors you may have for it until you reinstall it.

[Guest]

1 minute ago, CPU said:

This mod should not be installed before the character is created and the game is started.

I recommend uninstall it, play just a little while, then reinstall it.

Just ignore the errors you may have for it until you reinstall it.

 

I will do what you suggested. Thanks a lot.

 

PS: Will that create orphaned scripts?

PPS: What actually happens when you start it before hand? Just curious.

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, King of the Losers said:

 

I will do what you suggested. Thanks a lot.

 

PS: Will that create orphaned scripts?

PPS: What actually happens when you start it before hand? Just curious.

When you start if too early some init phases get stuck.

And the mod never completes its initialization.

 

Removing it will, of course, create orphan scripts. But they will get a parent again when you will reinstall it.

Save and load a couple of times to remove the orphan scripts.

[Guest]

Just now, CPU said:

When you start if too early some init phases get stuck.

And the mod never completes its initialization.

 

Removing it will, of course, create orphan scripts. But they will get a parent again when you will reinstall it.

Save and load a couple of times to remove the orphan scripts.

Cool stuff!