Jump to content

Netflix's 'The Witcher' Cast


SilentWanderer

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, they backed down on the Ciri silliness but then they still picked a Yennefer who lacks much of a sense of presence at a glance and, of course, decided risk pushing willing suspension of disbelief too far by adding diversity that didn't exist at the time when the magical elements would already push things to the limit of audience acceptance with a different character this time.

Posted
47 minutes ago, FauxFurry said:

So, they backed down on the Ciri silliness but then they still picked a Yennefer who lacks much of a sense of presence at a glance and, of course, decided risk pushing willing suspension of disbelief too far by adding diversity that didn't exist at the time when the magical elements would already push things to the limit of audience acceptance with a different character this time.

I'm happy they backed down on Ciri though.  I was torn between my inclusive sensibilities and my understanding of what Ciri's character actually means, knowing how many plot distortions they were going to twist about just to fit her in as a person of color.  Like just explaining the lineage would have been a huge departure.  Plus just I wasn't looking forward to hearing all the racists come out and shriek about how mad it made them, then all the SJWs come out and say anybody who doesn't love this Ciri is racist... ugh... so tired of the identity war.  Can I just watch a fucking show without everybody having to plant political flags everywhere? Christ.


Fringilla is a good compromise.  Admittedly it doesn't jive with lore but this is infinitely better than Ciri.

 

Yen does look pretty soft in her headshot. Maybe the actress can deliver it.  

 

I'm still not hopeful.  I can't remember the last time I saw an adaptation of a video game (yes I ALSO read the books but lets realize the reason this is getting made is the games) that wasn't utter shit.  Also the writers and showrunners seem to be dying to insert their anachronistic ideals into the show instead of working with what makes Witcher great; ironic, sadly smiling fatalism. "Everybody's out to fuck you, the good guys and the bad guys both."

Posted

One of the greatest appeals of anthropomorphic animal stories lies in their ability to completely side-step most if not all Identity Politics related problems as well as the subject of historical/mythological accuracy.

They only circumvent all of them if the characters are all part of a mono-gender race with their own unique culture like Chakats, so that isn't going to happen to frequently even then.

Posted
16 hours ago, FauxFurry said:

One of the greatest appeals of anthropomorphic animal stories lies in their ability to completely side-step most if not all Identity Politics related problems as well as the subject of historical/mythological accuracy.

They only circumvent all of them if the characters are all part of a mono-gender race with their own unique culture like Chakats, so that isn't going to happen to frequently even then.

Unless the dragons aren't gay enough...

 

"studio mandated heterosexual dragons"

Posted

You know the Black Panther comics were a little lacking in diversity. The movie really should have featured some Asian and Latino citizens in Wakanda.

Posted
6 minutes ago, MrEsturk said:

You know the Black Panther comics were a little lacking in diversity. The movie really should have featured some Asian and Latino citizens in Wakanda.

Last time I saw Wakanda, guy named Doom was their king ?

Posted
12 hours ago, cleavagesweat said:

this blackwashing is actually racists. it conveys the message that they can't stand up for themselves and need to be coddled. so who's the real racists?

Without wading into what's proper and what's not, the actual studio purpose behind this sort of thing is to generate controversy which gets people talking which promotes the movie.  

 

"Traditionally Orange-race character from beloved cultural tale filled with Blue-Race actor.  Orange-race racists outraged.  Social media is exploding.  Twit or Instafam your opinion on the issue!  Will YOU see the movie with blue-race actor?"

 

It's not a 'progressive' reason they stir up racists and get them on the warpath.  See, if they wanted to write an original, admirable leading-role-hero character that was a person of color or under-represented minority they could write one.  They have that power.. they're Hollywood.   They're not being inclusive when they simply replace one race with another, instead they're monetizing race-baiting, and it's reprehensible.

 

The racists are the producers who push for it, because its a cynical ploy to gain money that raises racial tensions for profit, instead of for progress.  It's just blacksploitation 2.0

Posted
17 minutes ago, Hugh Reckum said:

A 22 year old playing Yennefer?

 

Hmmmmm...

 

Yennefer's an experienced, adult, badass sorceress, not some college frat girl...

my first pic would have been Eva Green (I wish she'd put on a few pounds and eat a cheeseburger though) as she looked so good in 300 Rise of an Empire.

Posted
32 minutes ago, shencereys said:

Without wading into what's proper and what's not, the actual studio purpose behind this sort of thing is to generate controversy which gets people talking which promotes the movie.  

 

"Traditionally Orange-race character from beloved cultural tale filled with Blue-Race actor.  Orange-race racists outraged.  Social media is exploding.  Twit or Instafam your opinion on the issue!  Will YOU see the movie with blue-race actor?"

 

It's not a 'progressive' reason they stir up racists and get them on the warpath.  See, if they wanted to write an original, admirable leading-role-hero character that was a person of color or under-represented minority they could write one.  They have that power.. they're Hollywood.   They're not being inclusive when they simply replace one race with another, instead they're monetizing race-baiting, and it's reprehensible.

 

The racists are the producers who push for it, because its a cynical ploy to gain money that raises racial tensions for profit, instead of for progress.  It's just blacksploitation 2.0

concur. I agree with your assessment that they shud just write in a new character for diversity instead of making Fringilla VIGO a black woman.

Posted

Kate had some plastic surgery done (mouth area) and now she kinda looks weird.

 

btw, there is backlash on Anya Chalotra as she Indian and Yen is supposed to be a pale, ivory-skinned blue/purple eyed beauty. 

Posted

It’s Netflix, nothing new. Netflix is a full-blown PC/CJW's propaganda platform.
They not care about public profit, because they are already take profit, for brainwashing.

 

This cast has common with Witcher's universe how much wagon is common with Bugatti Veyron. Both have wheels.
Or Jackie Chan has common with William Wallace. Both are men.
Not be surprised if William Wallace will be "rebooted" from  Netflix some day as Chinese. All for "diversity"...

 

Yennefer - some Pandjabi MC.
Ciri - Disney Junior actress.

Fringilla = ...

 

Quote:
Nationality: Toussaint
Eye color: Green
She was a woman with natural grace, green eyes and close-cropped black hair.
Endquote:

 

For "diversity" in braindead universe of Netflix everything is allowed.
In most worst and degeneracy form.

 

I bet, Rocco Siffredi will made more close to Witcher's universe cast. Even in this cast has very good match for Ciri.
Hardworking Gina Gerson. She even is a Slavic.

 

 

 

awX6B68_700b.jpg

 

Spoiler not safe for mental health...

 

Spoiler

1539280498114.jpg

 

Posted

I dumped Netflix well before any of this happened because I didn't like their political posturing.

That idiot wanker Bill Nye was the last straw; if he's a 'scientist' then I'm the King of Fucking Siam.

Posted
On 10/10/2018 at 10:58 PM, SilentWanderer said:

Cast

It targets underage audience. Same crap as the latest starwars junk. Have fun. Leave me a note, as soon as they start to create mature content.

 

So long and thanks for the fish.

Posted

Im disappointed..There is my Yennefer and Geralt cast..

 

Yennefer

(Eva Green)

Spoiler

thewithcer1-750x380.jpg

 

 

Geralt

(Mads mikkelsen)

Spoiler

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTjAaO_ohsXdm7gquJ1v_N

 

Posted
1 hour ago, winny257 said:

?

Spoiler

 

 

Even THAT cast was better ...

 

They shoud use the dragon from that one ^ to replace their casting list and it would be better .... ?

Posted
12 minutes ago, worik said:

Even THAT cast was better ...

 

They shoud use the dragon from that one ^ to replace their casting list and it would be better .... ?

Yeah right.
but this movie was filmed by a very small Polish company, they did not have the financial means to do it better.
Something like that is called improvising. :classic_laugh:

latest?cb=20070720023442

Posted
24 minutes ago, winny257 said:

but this movie was filmed by a very small Polish company, they did not have the financial means to do it better.

and considering that limitation, they did a good job in 2001.

And even if that film isn't convincing today, not everything was bad. I did like the roles of Ciri, Calanthe and Borch was exactly as I had imagined him from the books.

 

Now, in the year 2018 I must say that I've seen better works from hobbyists or student directors when they create their final piece in their university studies.

 

?Maybe we should hope for a student film club to get done right?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...