Fredfish Posted December 29, 2012 Posted December 29, 2012 P6 I think is with User29s bighorner ranch. P7s you have to add to your character manually.
Guest user29 Posted December 29, 2012 Posted December 29, 2012 I am confused' date=' I've seen a few pictures of people who are at P6 and P7, how does someone get that high? during the breeder DC story with 3 eggs I only get to P4, is that what its supposed to be? [/quote'] Â 3 eggs did make you a p6, but halstrom sort of reduced it on accident I think. I think it's something he's planning on fixing soon.
zeroke107 Posted December 29, 2012 Posted December 29, 2012 P7 not official yet but if you get impregnate with multi-species monster, your belly may growth to P7 (due to Hal already connect P7 body to SCR, but Texture for P7 body for head, hands and feet seem not ready yet due to P7 still un-official to use it till future Breeder mod from User29 ). Â But after recently pregnancy mod update, Hal already cancel muti-species pregnancy, so we may get P6 body max from BH pregnent.
Guest jenny2011 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 Robot offspring would be awesome! And robot sex too!
seyal Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 but in the fallout universe, i think Robot could totally find a way to work like that, somehow...
paladuin Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 Well too bad, as far as i know, nanites were never mentioned in fallout, then you could use that as an excuse to randomly impregnate the population with say eyebots, securitrons , etc
zippy57 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 Not really. Robots by definition are mechanical. Mechanical things don't reproduce like that. Â EDIT: Nanites are specifically ruled out by lore: The Fallout world failed to develop technology miniaturization. And even if they weren't that wouldn't work, where would a nanite get the materials to build electronic circuits inside a person's body, and how would you build a full-size Securitron without killing the host?
paladuin Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 Not really. Robots by definition are mechanical. Mechanical things don't reproduce like that.  EDIT: Nanites are specifically ruled out by lore: The Fallout world failed to develop technology miniaturization. And even if they weren't that wouldn't work' date=' where would a nanite get the materials to build electronic circuits inside a person's body, and how would you build a full-size Securitron without killing the host? [/quote']  well the materials i proably wouldn't know, only metal mainly we have in our bodies is iron, take to much and your body wouldn't oxygenate properly(so proably out), and im not talking full size securitron, mini then once birthed would grow like an offspring due to nanomachines taking metal and materials from the area  i dont know proably at this point i think im talking too scifi, but i just think it would be better than robots randomly impregnating you with other species, whereas you could also have like an army of eyebots, securitrons , like you can with others
zippy57 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 If the nanites can take metal and materials from the area, why do they need a human?
paladuin Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 idk human body generates electricity, heat source like geothermal to power?
zippy57 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 That doesn't really answer the question, though. If the nanites can work on their own to build the robot after birth, why is the birth required at all? Why not just build the whole robot?
Elerneron Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 It's not that uncommon in science fiction to have the capability to produce offspring (often with humans) as the final stage of the anthropomorphism of robots. By definition that excludes the clunky, cumbersome bots of Fallout with the exception of the android from "The Replicated Man" quest in fallout 3. Â But my opinion is . . . in almost EVERY case . . . lore be damned! Use nanites! Make miniature robots that are constructed in the womb by those nanites (Robosperm!) Those same nanites alter the mother's body so that she feels compelled (and capable) to consume scrap metal and scrap electronics. The belly grows as the materials are consumed / the bot is formed. Once there is enough material give the little buggers a little more time and SHAZAM! miniature robot with growth nanites. Â All of this is pointless though as I do not believe there are any robot sex animations.
paladuin Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 This conversation reminds me of a film I saw last week' date=' I think it was Cyborg 3. It basically deals with a robot chick getting knocked up, then trying to abort the pregnancy only to be told it isn't possible. It then has to start running from a bounty hunter, and ends up teaming with other cyborgs. It had to be one of the lamest sci fi films ever. I mean whats next? Terminator 5: Rise of the Pregnant Machines? Â But with that being said, I'd have preferred it if the FO series hadn't used robots since the war happened when there were still black and white tv's, and computers were the size of rooms. It would have been a much better series if leaned more on Mad Max or Doomsday and there'd be vehicles and guns and a more wild west like world. And yeah, I'm still kind of upset with Bethesda since they gave players horses to ride in Oblivion, but squat to ride in Fallout 3 and New Vegas. I wasn't expecting GTA or anything but a few working vehicles or even a horse would have been nice. Â I realize there are mods for Fallout 3 that open the door to operational vehicles but I haven't checked to see if there are any for NV, yet. [/quote'] Â http://newvegas.nexusmods.com/mods/48515 car http://newvegas.nexusmods.com/mods/45809 vertibird
nekojack13 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 What if the robots reproduced, not by planting nanites inside the human in order to form a "baby robot", but by planting nanites inside the human that slowly transforms the human into a robot. This way it could work for both males and females. It could be treated as a disease that makes you stronger, more intelligent, and resistant to radiation, but reduces your ability to interact with humans. By the time the disease reaches the end you will be quite a formidable foe, but have no personality (just like a robot). I do realize that this is more of an idea for an STD rather that Pregnancy, but I felt that I should just throw the idea out there.
zippy57 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 The car one doesn't actually exist yet. Â You can't transform a human into a robot. You can transform a human into a part-robot, otherwise known as a cyborg. Being overly nitpicky is fun! Anyway, it seems like the only down-side to this would be the player's Speech being set to 0?
Elerneron Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 That doesn't really answer the question' date=' though. If the nanites can work on their own to build the robot after birth, why is the birth required at all? Why not just build the whole robot? [/quote'] Â Missed this. My excuses: Â 1) Protection and concealment for the robot during the vulnerable construction phase without distracting the parent bot from its primary mission. Â 2) Mobility of the "factory" to find and collect the material needed; again without the need for the parent bot to alter its actions. Â 3) Parasitism of energy from the host in the form of heat and electrochemical energy to power the construction. Â 4) Some people find the concept of women bearing robotic offspring to be arousing/interesting (I lean toward the later . . . don't find it erotic, but velly velly interesting).
zippy57 Posted December 30, 2012 Posted December 30, 2012 1 and 2 work. 3 still asks the question of where the nanites get the energy from after the birth. And 4 isn't really a reason at all.
KainsChylde Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 How about making robot sexytime without reproduction? There are plenty of options already in existence for robot manufacture (House Tools, the caverns under Fortification Hill, Big MT, Cerulean Robotics, etc.). If robots want to "reproduce", retrofitting existing facilities makes more sense logistically than trying to turn organisms into factories. Â Remember, robots are essentially mobile computers. Computers prefer simple solutions. And all else aside, using facilities designed for manufacturing "young" would be faster than waiting out a "pregnancy" anyway.
zippy57 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Computers are only as efficient as their programmers...
Elerneron Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Why are we talking about logic and realism in a mod that allows for cross-species fertilization? Just put another notch on the pregnancy type slider, change everything to biological beings and everything could then include the bots.
zippy57 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Cross-species fertilization "works" because 50s sci-fi (and therefore Fallout) rules allow for radiation to bend realism when dealing with people. Key term being "bend"; you can bend the rules so biological creatures with existing reproductive systems can impregnate other biological creatures with existing reproductive systems, but you can't bend all the way to allowing inanimate objects that do not have any reproductive system nor sex drive nor biological material whatsoever to pass on to a mate to suddenly gain them. You have to meet realism halfway. Â Granted, this is my personal opinion only. But robots don't even have sex animations, so this whole conversation is practically meaningless for the moment.
ChancellorKremlin Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 Having said that, I wouldn't mind a more "lore" oriented approach as to how all this cross pregnancy fertilisation phenomena is going on. Â Some type of explanation of some kind. I was even working on a small plugin to run alongside Breeder/Pregnancy to that effect, but I'm not sure if people would even want it. Â It wouldn't change anything, but basically make sense as to why it is possible in the first place.
KainsChylde Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 I always RPd it as another escaped Big MT experiment, like cazadores and nightstalkers.
Guest user29 Posted December 31, 2012 Posted December 31, 2012 I treat is as just a mutation everyone's acquired. Then there's different levels of the mutation.
Recommended Posts