Jump to content

"Feminist" nightmare


nonusnomeni

Recommended Posts

Ahem:

 

How is the gender pay gap measured?

At EU level, the gender pay gap is defined as the relative difference in the average gross hourly earnings of women and men within the economy as a whole.

 

In 2012, the EU average is estimated at 16.4 %. This indicator has been defined as unadjusted (e.g. not adjusted according to differences in individual characteristics or other observable characteristics that may explain part of the earnings difference) because it gives an overall picture of gender discrimination and the inequalities in the labour market that explain gender differences in pay.

 

 

http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-pay-gap/situation-europe/index_en.htm

 

 

"so i wonder can anyone from europe (not USA because you don't have guaranteed minimum wage as i was heard) or from the rest of the world can show me a law which guarantee to males 30% bigger wage per hour"

 

This here is a strawman.... It is not a situation enshrined in law, it is a situation OUTSIDE the margins of the law, why a law SECURING equal pay is needed.

 

Also, the gender gap studies focus on the same level jobs. Basically 2 lawyers doing the same job, the woman will earn less. Happens as well between two janitors, 2 teachers etc.

 

Please, stop.

Link to comment

 

so why some cleaning lady don't became miner lady

and please don't tell me she don't have physical predispositions for that

because feminism teach us "female can do everything male can do even better"

 

Because feminism teaches WHAT?  In what universe is that seriously the dominant feminist philosophy?  Yes, that phrase is used to encourage people, but its not part of any serious feminism I've ever heard of.

 

But that's beside the point, I see very few people seriously arguing that there aren't differences in predispositions.  I would make a lousy miner, despite having male chromosomes.  I've seen quite a few women that would probably make good miners...at least better than me.

 

There's a number of reasons why people choose the jobs they do, some women who would be fine with more "masculine" professions don't go into them precisely because of how they're treated.  But that's entirely beside the point of the pay gap, if you think that the pay gap is about people with completely different jobs getting different pay rates...then you have no idea what you're talking about.

 

now lets see class 5 clerks elementary school 8y + high school 4y

minimum wage per hour for that class is 5$

bank clerks 99% females no health hazard

warehouse 99% males some of them work with highly flammable and toxic materials and they get 100% for health hazard so 10$/h

reason to not become warehouse clerk instead bank is not physically but purely sociological

or to quote my cousin when she was give quit after two months "i was lonely"

 

An anecdote is NOT the plural of data.

 

and for the end 12 class 50$/h

a true story

male and female  she is 6 days older went together in elementary school 8y high school 4y and get married and get together on medicine university

6y after that they split she was specialised bioengineering and he orthopedy

she work in research center with health hazard bonus 100% so 100$/h

he work in child hospital without health hazard bonus so he get 50$/h

 

I'd point out that these are, by definition, different jobs.  Additionally, this is an anecdote, still not the plural of data.

 

so i wonder can anyone from europe (not USA because you don't have guaranteed minimum wage as i was heard) or from the rest of the world can show me a law which guarantee to males 30% bigger wage per hour

because i personally know if i give bigger wage per hour to males only i can be fined by laws of my country up to 5y of profit my business make

an 1-5y in prison

will any normal person risk that 

 

Did ANYONE ever say there was a law that guaranteed higher pay for males?  Or a law that guaranteed lower pay for women?  Or did you make that bit up?

 

Oh, I can think of a few ways I could give higher pay to people I favored...more "merit" raises/bonuses, faster promotions, better contract negotiations.  This happens all the time (at least it appears to happen), its relatively difficult to prove without access to personnel records, therefore it continues to happen because proving it is time-consuming and you need to go through the court system and/or an arbitrator.  So, often people don't seek remedies due to the difficulty of it...even though anyone looking at an individual case can clearly see that one was treated unfairly.

 

so please make me wrong

because i really want to find country where i wont be obligated to pay females for they work

 

You don't want to be obligated to pay people for the work they do because of their chromosomes?  What the actual fuck?

 

Link to comment

Ahem:

 

How is the gender pay gap measured?

At EU level, the gender pay gap is defined as the relative difference in the average gross hourly earnings of women and men within the economy as a whole.

 

In 2012, the EU average is estimated at 16.4 %. This indicator has been defined as unadjusted (e.g. not adjusted according to differences in individual characteristics or other observable characteristics that may explain part of the earnings difference) because it gives an overall picture of gender discrimination and the inequalities in the labour market that explain gender differences in pay.

 

 

http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-pay-gap/situation-europe/index_en.htm

 

 

"so i wonder can anyone from europe (not USA because you don't have guaranteed minimum wage as i was heard) or from the rest of the world can show me a law which guarantee to males 30% bigger wage per hour"

 

This here is a strawman.... It is not a situation enshrined in law, it is a situation OUTSIDE the margins of the law, why a law SECURING equal pay is needed.

 

Also, the gender gap studies focus on the same level jobs. Basically 2 lawyers doing the same job, the woman will earn less. Happens as well between two janitors, 2 teachers etc.

how can that be if they must have same wage per hour

let see

i have some peoples who work for me 20+y

Anna is 43 have 4 children so she was have 4y (our law guarantee 1y of maternity leave) of maternity leave on 70% of her monthly wage in last 6 months before she was take maternity leave 

half pay i as her employer half pay state thru the taxes what pay every employed person so again me

plus somebody must fill that working place so i must take another worker on full paycheck for that year

her half-brother Joseph 44y old was on sick days in last 20y 3 months

so who was earn more money in last 20y

they both work on same place same education same qualification same health hazard (0%)

same minimum wage i must pay to them under threat of criminal prosecution

and yet somebody was earn less money in last 20y

so do we see a real reason for that "gender gap"

and don't get me wrong

only ones oppressed in my business are males 

80% of my workers are females even if males will cost me less on short term

why because customers males and females much better react being served by female than male

strictly business and i think every businessman thinking same

 

so yes we can say there is gender gap if we take all life of average male/female worker

but do we look for the reason for that

of course not

Link to comment

 

 

so why some cleaning lady don't became miner lady

and please don't tell me she don't have physical predispositions for that

because feminism teach us "female can do everything male can do even better"

 

Because feminism teaches WHAT?  In what universe is that seriously the dominant feminist philosophy?  Yes, that phrase is used to encourage people, but its not part of any serious feminism I've ever heard of.

 

But that's beside the point, I see very few people seriously arguing that there aren't differences in predispositions.  I would make a lousy miner, despite having male chromosomes.  I've seen quite a few women that would probably make good miners...at least better than me.

 

There's a number of reasons why people choose the jobs they do, some women who would be fine with more "masculine" professions don't go into them precisely because of how they're treated.  But that's entirely beside the point of the pay gap, if you think that the pay gap is about people with completely different jobs getting different pay rates...then you have no idea what you're talking about.

 

now lets see class 5 clerks elementary school 8y + high school 4y

minimum wage per hour for that class is 5$

bank clerks 99% females no health hazard

warehouse 99% males some of them work with highly flammable and toxic materials and they get 100% for health hazard so 10$/h

reason to not become warehouse clerk instead bank is not physically but purely sociological

or to quote my cousin when she was give quit after two months "i was lonely"

 

An anecdote is NOT the plural of data.

http://www.genderequality.ie/en/GE/Pages/WhatisGE

​there is plenty of research out there you won't see

 

and for the end 12 class 50$/h

a true story

male and female  she is 6 days older went together in elementary school 8y high school 4y and get married and get together on medicine university

6y after that they split she was specialised bioengineering and he orthopedy

she work in research center with health hazard bonus 100% so 100$/h

he work in child hospital without health hazard bonus so he get 50$/h

 

I'd point out that these are, by definition, different jobs.  Additionally, this is an anecdote, still not the plural of data.

really?!? so real life is just anecdote when don't confirm you agenda

 

so i wonder can anyone from europe (not USA because you don't have guaranteed minimum wage as i was heard) or from the rest of the world can show me a law which guarantee to males 30% bigger wage per hour

because i personally know if i give bigger wage per hour to males only i can be fined by laws of my country up to 5y of profit my business make

an 1-5y in prison

will any normal person risk that 

 

Did ANYONE ever say there was a law that guaranteed higher pay for males?  Or a law that guaranteed lower pay for women?  Or did you make that bit up?

 

Oh, I can think of a few ways I could give higher pay to people I favored...more "merit" raises/bonuses, faster promotions, better contract negotiations.  This happens all the time (at least it appears to happen), its relatively difficult to prove without access to personnel records, therefore it continues to happen because proving it is time-consuming and you need to go through the court system and/or an arbitrator.  So, often people don't seek remedies due to the difficulty of it...even though anyone looking at an individual case can clearly see that one was treated unfairly.

 

so please make me wrong

because i really want to find country where i wont be obligated to pay females for they work

 

You don't want to be obligated to pay people for the work they do because of their chromosomes?  What the actual fuck?

 

ever hear for sarcasm

 

 

Link to comment

 

so yes we can say there is gender gap if we take all life of average male/female worker

but do we look for the reason for that

of course not

As far as I know, nobody has found any reason other than their gender, and they actually do have social scientists that study this.  Try to find a peer reviewed article that shows a reason other than gender as the explanation.

Link to comment

 

 

so yes we can say there is gender gap if we take all life of average male/female worker

but do we look for the reason for that

of course not

As far as I know, nobody has found any reason other than their gender, and they actually do have social scientists that study this.  Try to find a peer reviewed article that shows a reason other than gender as the explanation.

 

how about not be on job all 12775 days :dodgy:

Link to comment

 

 

 

so yes we can say there is gender gap if we take all life of average male/female worker

but do we look for the reason for that

of course not

As far as I know, nobody has found any reason other than their gender, and they actually do have social scientists that study this.  Try to find a peer reviewed article that shows a reason other than gender as the explanation.

 

how about not be on job all 12775 days :dodgy:

You realize they have scientists that study things like this?  Do you think that, possibly...sometime in the decades of studying the wage gap, someone, somewhere might have said "Hey, maybe we need to control for how many days they work?".

 

Seriously, I would think the first thing they would control for is to compare similar jobs, second would be similar work histories, including time on the job.

Link to comment

I actually want to see employer that makes females employees wages lower than males. Then I would see how his ass is handled by unions and other god know what institutions.

 

Oh and If you even one more time mention lawyers or teachers I will laugh straight to your face.

Link to comment

no

i am idiot

no explanations

no data

no real live examples

can reason feminist

i was learn that long time ago

and yet i was try to play on reasonable discussion

nope

not anymore

Oh, I'm quite happy with good data, the page you linked about Ireland is interesting, and it does show that Ireland on its own is doing fairly well.  It does not, however, seem to help or hinder either of our sides in this debate, its a complete non-sequitur to the debate.

 

You note that Baronesa uses studies from the World Economic Forum, I've been pointing out how scientists would control a study of wages to discover if there was a wage gap.

 

And no, I'm not discarding your personal experience, or that you are passing on the experiences of people you know as completely as possible just because it doesn't hold to my view.  I'm discounting it, because your cousin and two doctors that you know is not sufficiently representative of the entire workforce.

 

That doesn't mean I'd demand a survey of everyone in the workforce, just that those two cases you mention are too small of a sample size to be a valid study, nor would those two cases be considered properly controlled for.

Link to comment

And now regarding Christina Hoff Summers [sic], I'll let Mumei do a brief rundown:

Who is this and why are you quoting them as if they hold some sort of authority?

 

Christina Hoff Sommers is a professional anti-feminist

You'll disprove yourself in a few sentences, but continue.

 

she is hostile to the espoused concerns of feminism

Again, this will be disproven momentarily. Moving on.

 

claims that feminists routinely lie

Feminists are humans. Humans routinely lie. The statement is correct. Next?

 

[says] information offered by feminism is largely false.

This is the first true statement in this quote! Hooray! :)

 

her brand of feminism

I myself prefer store brand. Much cheaper to buy in bulk.

 

feminist only in the nominal sense that they agree that there should be equal rights.

...okay, anyone with a brain should see the issue with this but I'll cover it anyway in a bit.

 

Power feminism is notable for contributing to the denial of research into the prevalence of rape

That's a rather damning claim. Source?

 

power feminists felt that rape was being misused to describe ordinary sexual relations, and set about misrepresenting respected research in the field into order to argue that point.

Again, source?

 

she's not feminist in the sense that most people use the term

All right, here we go. Remember all those claims I said I'd get to? Most importantly, this one?

 

feminist only in the nominal sense that they agree that there should be equal rights.

Yeah, that. So tell me... What does feminism mean?

 

the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities

The advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.

Ah, yes. So you're saying that she's not a feminist because she wants equal rights?

 

Sounds like you're incredibly confused, but let's continue to see you dig yourself a deeper hole:

 

always keep in mind she works for: American Enterprise Institute

Irrelevant. Her employer does not make her position any more or less valid. It is not the source that is important, but the information itself.

 

Can check her here arguing that THE WAGE GAP does not exist Please tell me how she is so reasonable after that.

Being wrong on one point does not magically make her wrong on another.

 

Here you have a lovely parting gift:

 

Check this tweet

 

Let's begin shall we?

No, let's not. Let's instead address whether or not you are actually so unbelievably stupid that you see ONE person say something like that and immediately say the entire movement is "aligning themselves openly". I hope you're not, because there are no words to describe just how stupid you would be for-

 

Oh, right. You're doing that.

 

I'm not going to even entertain the idea

Being closed-minded, good start.

 

a "movement" praising the same people who dehumanize me

The whole movement is not doing that.

 

deny me my right to exists

The whole movement is not doing that.

 

deny my identity

The whole movement is not doing that.

 

tries to put legislation in place so I am unable to seek transition

The whole movement is not doing that.

 

that I do net get protection due to my gender status

The whole movement is not doing that.

 

is in any way shape or form reasonable.

The only one being unreasonable here is you.

 

Nor am I inclined to believe for a fraction of a second that this is in any way anything other than a big attack on feminism.

Then you are a moron.

 

How can any of you explain that by praising the TERF, the same ones that are so staunchly anti sex work that are trying to impose the horrible Swedish Model, criminalizing Sex Work, and putting sex workers lives at risk, that are of the believe that ALL penetrative sex is rape, and of course that we trans women are not real women and put us in places like the many sites created by Cathy Brennan?

You didn't finish the question, so no one will be able to answer it.

 

IF these are the "feminist" voices that you support...

One person who "only" seeks equal rights and one random person you found on Twitter. Yep, definitely deserving of that tone.

 

the ones that deny the existence of the wage gap

I'm highlighting this because it may very well be the one and only valid point in this entire rant of yours.

 

that date rape is not only real but a big problem

She cites a source for that claim. What about the information from that source are you disagreeing with?

 

the ones who want to criminalize Sex Work on EVERY level

This again? What was the series of thoughts going through your head when you decided to force this upon this thread? No one is this thread has taken that stance and yet, after finding ONE person that is completely unrelated with this thread make ONE post about it on Twitter, you are conflating the two as if there is some connection other than the one you have dreamed up.

 

Then all I can tell you is, please kindly go fuck yourself, because you deserve NO regards and respect by denying MY humanity and that of MY trans sisters.

No one here is doing that. If you think they are, you are delusional.
Link to comment

 

no

i am idiot

no explanations

no data

no real live examples

can reason feminist

i was learn that long time ago

and yet i was try to play on reasonable discussion

nope

not anymore

Oh, I'm quite happy with good data, the page you linked about Ireland is interesting, and it does show that Ireland on its own is doing fairly well.  It does not, however, seem to help or hinder either of our sides in this debate, its a complete non-sequitur to the debate.

 

You note that Baronesa uses studies from the World Economic Forum, I've been pointing out how scientists would control a study of wages to discover if there was a wage gap.

 

And no, I'm not discarding your personal experience, or that you are passing on the experiences of people you know as completely as possible just because it doesn't hold to my view.  I'm discounting it, because your cousin and two doctors that you know is not sufficiently representative of the entire workforce. obviously you are missing point why i was do that ever heard how by statistic we all eat sandwich two slices of bread and one slice of ham and reality say of three peoples two eat one slice of bread and third one slice of ham or to simplified  "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."

 

That doesn't mean I'd demand a survey of everyone in the workforce, just that those two cases you mention are too small of a sample size to be a valid study, nor would those two cases be considered properly controlled for.

 

well here is two opposite studies

http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf

http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2011.pdf

and original of Christina Hoff Sommers   http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/

also this http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/01/no-women-don-t-make-less-money-than-men.html

Link to comment

And now regarding Christina Hoff Summers, I'll let Mumei do a brief rundown:

 

"Christina Hoff Sommers is a professional anti-feminist, in the sense that she is hostile to the espoused concerns of feminism, claims that feminists routinely lie, and that information offered by feminism is largely false. While she calls herself a feminist, her brand of feminism, power feminism is notable for its hostility to traditional feminist concerns (e.g. domestic, violence, sexual assault, education, gap in wage earnings, etc.), and is feminist only in the nominal sense that they agree that there should be equal rights. Power feminism is notable for contributing to the denial of research into the prevalence of rape, because power feminists felt that rape was being misused to describe ordinary sexual relations, and set about misrepresenting respected research in the field into order to argue that point. Their opposition to this, as well as research into domestic violence, also stems from the fact that they feel that the problem with women is that they are thinking of themselves as victims; that the only thing holding women back from equality is their failure to grab what is already available to them.

 

So, no, she's not feminist in the sense that most people use the term, and self-identified feminists would not recognize Christina Hoff Sommers' as their own."

You know feminism has gone down the gutter when Christina Hoff Sommers, who comes close to being the embodiment of the dictonary version of feminism (equality for BOTH sexes, helping BOTH sexes, and fighting issues of BOTH sexes) is labeled "anti-feminist" by mainstream feminists.

However she is indeed not a feminist "in the sense that most people use the term" as she uses facts, logical thinking and reasoning in her arguments.

 

Also, Sommers calls herself an equity feminist. To learn more about equity feminism and its counterpart gender feminism you may want to read the following article:

Giving Feminism a Bad Name

 

<>

 

Before you talk about gender pay gap you should know that there are two types of gender pay gap: The uncleaned one and the cleaned one.

 

In the uncleaned gender pay gap you simply calculate the average value or more commonly the median of the income of all women and the income of all men. If you use this method you usually come up with a pay gap of 20-25%. Feminists usually refer to this figure when they talk about the gender pay gap.

However this method is often criticized for comparing apples and oranges, as it compares the income of occupations such as construction worker and computer scientist (male-dominated) to occupations such as cleaners and teachers (female-dominated).

 

The cleaned gender pay gap subtract out statistically ascertainable factors that might lead to a different payment, most importantly occupation, hours worked each week, education, work experience and continous employment. Depeding on the data and methodology used the cleaned pay gap usually ranges from 0-4%; investigations that come up with a higher cleaned pay gap have neglected one of the previous mentioned factors.

However even the authors of studies that say the cleaned pay gap is 4% always point out that it's virtually impossible to consider all factors that may lead to a different payment (e.g. how frequently and aggressively you ask for pay raise, how many days you're on a business trip each year, how long your trip to work is etc.), and do not prove discriminaton of women. Economists are consensus that a pay discrimination of women in the work force, if it even exists, is too small to be statistically measurable.

Link to comment

On the pay gap - I don't know a single woman that makes less than a man doing the same job with the same seniority.  However, I don't know any CEO's of multi-national corporations where the last discrepancy in pay scale would seem to lie.  I also don't give a shit about those pay scales because, to me, it seems like they are just whining that they can't buy a solid gold Bently and have to settle for gold plate.

Link to comment

 

I hate self-plugging, but Chesko and I worked on a mod called "Arissa The Wandering Rogue", with this in mind. We really wanted to build a story with her, and feel like a friend. She's just who she is, with her own agenda, and someone who can hold her own. There's a nice regard system in place that allows her to react accordingly based on your actions and other things, so it adds another element of game play. :)

 

It's pretty much been all of my free time, especially in the last several months, and I'm quite proud with the type of character she is.

 

 

I know this is pretty late and off topic. but I wanted to say, Arissa is my second favorite Follower mod I have tried. She is really well done.

 

Link to comment

Every feminist that I know - every single one - would acknowledge that there are serious problems faced by boys and men, including those brought up.  They would then go on to point out that essentially this is the same issue as the one they are dealing with, that the existing gender roles dictated towards both boys and girls unfairly force certain expectations of behavior on them.  The constant focus for boys on being properly masculine (must be tough! can't be gay!), is just the flip side of the coin for girls on being properly feminine (don't speak up! focus on being pretty!), and they view themselves as fighting the same fight in both cases.

I don't think most of your feminist friends have bad intentions but spreading the myth of toxic masculinity won't help males, on the contrary it actually hurts them, especially boys.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbLK-2RYnD8.

Link to comment

Let's play a game called Ugly Shirt With No Context. Here's how it works: I show you an Ugly Shirt With No Context

post-10712-0-37845300-1415945884_thumb.jpg

and you tell me what people are complaining about and why. If you look up the Context for the Shirt, or already know about it, you automatically lose. Restriction waived! I want to see what people think without knowing anything about the Shirt except the Shirt.

 

If you manage to make my brain hurt any more than it already did from reading the reactions to the Shirt, you win one genuinely fake No-Prize.

 

SCOREBOARD

Dr. Thang: -9001 WINNER!

Link to comment

 

Every feminist that I know - every single one - would acknowledge that there are serious problems faced by boys and men, including those brought up. They would then go on to point out that essentially this is the same issue as the one they are dealing with, that the existing gender roles dictated towards both boys and girls unfairly force certain expectations of behavior on them. The constant focus for boys on being properly masculine (must be tough! can't be gay!), is just the flip side of the coin for girls on being properly feminine (don't speak up! focus on being pretty!), and they view themselves as fighting the same fight in both cases.

I don't think most of your feminist friends have bad intentions but spreading the myth of toxic masculinity won't help males, on the contrary it actually hurts them, especially boys.

Look, I don't have reliable internet access anywhere but work (temporarily in a good spot, but only for a bit), so I'm not really even capable of arguing the point very much at all, but that's really a ) not at all what I said, and B ) not at all supported by the video or the link you provided.

 

A) All I was responding to in that regard was the idea that the forced indoctrination in regards to a male having to be a certain way in order to be either normal or properly male was problematic and hurtful for those that, for whatever reason, neither fit that mold or desire it, and does, in fact, also hurt those boys. Making the jump from there to "spreading the myth of toxic masculinity" was your doing, not mine, and not the people I was referencing in that regard.

 

B.1) Your video itself says that the problem isn't spreading a particular myth of the toxicity of masculinity, but rather that too often there is no differentiation between healthy masculine behaviors and toxic masculine behaviors. I'd agree partially with that, but personally would strip it of gender notions and simply say that there should be differentiation between boldness (properly masculine) and over-afgressiveness (toxic masculinity). Those are using her own terms, she is speaking as an offshoot of gender studies so of course she will revolve in that language, but I don't necessarily find boldness or over-aggressiveness a trait of masculinity but rather an aspect of humanity in general. Girls and boys can be both things, demonstrably. One is potentially harmful, one is potentially helpful, in either sex or gender. One should be encouraged, one should probably be discouraged, in either sex or gender.

 

B.2) Sort of an offshoot of B.1., but the basic point of that article was that too much attention was being paid towards girls and their learning, potentially as a pendulum effect from previous generations' higher attention towards boys. I don't know anybody who would say that's not a bad thing, and that all students deserve a relatively equal chance at learning. But again, this is causing a genderized simplification of an issue where the problem is potentially at the level of an individual. The article suggests that boys and girls learn differently, but that presupposes the fact that all boys learn similarly and all girls learn similarly. The truth is that individuals learn at different paces, and often respond to different things in different ways. That of course complicates the issue past what fits into a nice little headline or makes for an easy to link to study, and makes serving all learning styles far more difficult and probably not achievable, but it is still true.

Link to comment

Here, for all of you people actually defending feminism. Feel free to remind yourself that a feminist bashed a man who landed a spacecraft on a comet....because of the shirt he was wearing, which for the record was made and given to him by a female friend . For all of you who still don't get it she was basically arguing because if the way he wad dressed he was asking for it. Fell free to keep defending your utter bullshit but it will never change the fact it's bullshit. 

 

http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/13/7213819/your-bowling-shirt-is-holding-back-progress

 

https://twitter.com/ellypriZeMaN/status/532927131098300416

 

attachicon.gif1.pngattachicon.gif2.jpgattachicon.gif3.pngattachicon.gif4.pngattachicon.gif5.png

 

Thumbs up for being such petty plebs

 

 

 

God, this pisses me off. Some people just need to be burned.

 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use