Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

i wonder if this is why.

Int Function ActorGetBiologicalFunctions(Actor Who, Bool Cached=TRUE)
{determine what this actors body is able to accomplish. returns a bitwised
integer that defines the capaiblities of this actor.}

	Int Value = 0

	If(Cached)
		Value = StorageUtil.GetIntValue(Who,"SGO.Actor.Biologicalfunctions",0)
		If(Value != 0)
			;; if we found cached data use it. this should prevent us getting our
			;; shit reset while in a temporary state like vampire lord or werewolf.
			;; also, speed.
			Return Value
		EndIf
	EndIf

	Int Sex = SexLab.GetGender(Who)

...

that would basically make it impossible to detect if you changed genders after doing something sgo cares about. going into werewolf form was causing gems to be lost because apparently male is the only option as far as the game is concerned.

Posted

its plausable that sexlab's creature gender may allow werewolves to work right, these days. requires testing to know. i would expect to get a gender of 3 if the player is a werewolf and also female beforehand with what i see in this sexlab code. if it does work i can disable that cache and then futa switching should technically work.

 

hilariously ashal seems to have oversighted futa creatures as this will not support that.

int function GetGender(Actor ActorRef)
	if ActorRef
		ActorBase BaseRef = ActorRef.GetLeveledActorBase()
		if sslCreatureAnimationSlots.HasRaceType(BaseRef.GetRace())
			if !Config.UseCreatureGender
				return 2 ; Creature - All Male
			else
				return 2 + BaseRef.GetSex() ; CreatureGenders: 2+
			endIf
		elseIf ActorRef.IsInFaction(GenderFaction)
			return ActorRef.GetFactionRank(GenderFaction) ; Override
		else
			return BaseRef.GetSex() ; Default
		endIf
	endIf
	return 0 ; Invalid actor - default to male for compatibility
endFunction

http://www.loverslab.com/topic/16623-skyrim-sexlab-sex-animation-framework-v161b-updated-jan-7th-2016/?p=1560727

 

Posted

 

i wish that this mod could recognize sexlab genders that i set in the sexlab menu or use Sexlab Eager NPC's gender hotkey that sets the sexlab gender or auto sets gender via SoS detection.

 

so that when i have my futa character in the male position it doesn't give the pc and npc a gem.

 

now i know that there is no way to detect who is who in the male or female position. but thats why we have the sexlab genders setting in the sexlab menu now woo.

 

This is the change I'd be happy to see. 

 

But, like several have said above, for me this is mod is intuitive, stable and essentially trouble free. If going back through to change which gender check gets used is either a hassle or might make it less stable, never mind!

 

well with player succubus quest there is a hotkey to toggle the penis (lel) to be visible. then there is sexlab eager npc's that has a auto switch for genders when it detects a npc or pc has a penis on them. psq and slen with the penis hidden the gender still shows as male though, which slen has a hotkey that you can specify to toggle genders for pc and when targeting a npc. so a toggle for a penis and a toggle for genders woo.

 

its plausable that sexlab's creature gender may allow werewolves to work right, these days. requires testing to know. i would expect to get a gender of 3 if the player is a werewolf and also female beforehand with what i see in this sexlab code. if it does work i can disable that cache and then futa switching should technically work.

 

hilariously ashal seems to have oversighted futa creatures as this will not support that.

int function GetGender(Actor ActorRef)
	if ActorRef
		ActorBase BaseRef = ActorRef.GetLeveledActorBase()
		if sslCreatureAnimationSlots.HasRaceType(BaseRef.GetRace())
			if !Config.UseCreatureGender
				return 2 ; Creature - All Male
			else
				return 2 + BaseRef.GetSex() ; CreatureGenders: 2+
			endIf
		elseIf ActorRef.IsInFaction(GenderFaction)
			return ActorRef.GetFactionRank(GenderFaction) ; Override
		else
			return BaseRef.GetSex() ; Default
		endIf
	endIf
	return 0 ; Invalid actor - default to male for compatibility
endFunction

http://www.loverslab.com/topic/16623-skyrim-sexlab-sex-animation-framework-v161b-updated-jan-7th-2016/?p=1560727

 

don't think ashal would have expected futa creatures at the time lol.

Posted

I have a little Problem with the filled Gems..... Well I don't get filled Gems... Any Ideas about what went wrong?

 

Yes. Check the MCM and make sure the option for filled gems is turned on.

Posted

 

I have a little Problem with the filled Gems..... Well I don't get filled Gems... Any Ideas about what went wrong?

 

Yes. Check the MCM and make sure the option for filled gems is turned on.

 

thats how i found out that I could get filled gems...

Will they only come up if i inseminate the Victimn... can I get them just my self? do I have to insert filled gems?

Posted

You can insert any gem, filled or not, as well as inseminate a female character. Then you can make the character give birth. Any gems that come out that have increased in size at least once will be filled as long as you have that option turned on.

Posted

You can insert any gem, filled or not, as well as inseminate a female character. Then you can make the character give birth. Any gems that come out that have increased in size at least once will be filled as long as you have that option turned on.

 

they dont even have to have increased. i keep an empty oven at home just to fill gems pop in pop out because there are a few things that require specific sized gems in their recepies.

Posted

 

You can insert any gem, filled or not, as well as inseminate a female character. Then you can make the character give birth. Any gems that come out that have increased in size at least once will be filled as long as you have that option turned on.

 

they dont even have to have increased. i keep an empty oven at home just to fill gems pop in pop out because there are a few things that require specific sized gems in their recepies.

 

Sodo I have to wait another Cycle after, the Gems are turned into Black ones? Do they show up as filled Gems in the Menu?

Posted

So um...I don't want to sound like an idiot but I faced this issue. I used to use 3.0.6, no matter how many times (And the percentages set) a sexual acts happen, my character will not get pregnant with a gem. When I upgraded to 3.0.8 and doing a clean save, things turned out good; however, after the first time my character got pregnant with a gem it stopped working. To confirm that, there is no message being printed in the console command regarding if it failed or not (Noticed this happening by chance when it worked the first time).

 

Any ideas on how should I proceed? 

Posted

Can I make a suggestion?

First, when soul gem is damaged, it could create a soul gem shard, which will grow on its own.

Second, could amount of carried soul gems be limited by their size, like making a limit of 10, which will result in max capacity equal to one black soul gem and one greater.

But it could be a soft cap, and if player goes over this limit, he will be slowed at first (instead of being always slowed), then (at 1.5~2.0 of limit) start losing max health, if he goes over 3.0 he will lose stamina simply by walking, and after *5 he will rapidly lose health when moving. And - optionaly - it will force labour.

Third, could there be slider that limits gem size? Personally, I feel that almost free grand soul gems is a bit too much, and their growth better be limited to greater.

Thanks for reading. Sorry for my bad english.

Posted

I wanted that breasts and belly grow up at same rate per time.

so I set the values on MCM as below

 

Gem Max Capacity = 1 Gems

Gem Mature Time = 6 days

Milk Max Capacity = 6 bottles

Milk Produce Time = 24 hours (this is max of hours)

 

But the size of breasts already reached the max size visually when breast had got 3 bottles of milk. (after about 3 days of getting pregnant in game)

and breasts haven't got bigger anymore.

 

Is this normal?

or have i made a mistake?

Posted

Quick bug report:

 

Milk leak isn't happening to NPCs. My PC is male. 

 

(started a new game with a female PC and it worked on the PC)

 

I can confirm that the milk leak texture is only showing up on my female player character and not on any NPCs.

Posted

So um...I don't want to sound like an idiot but I faced this issue. I used to use 3.0.6, no matter how many times (And the percentages set) a sexual acts happen, my character will not get pregnant with a gem. When I upgraded to 3.0.8 and doing a clean save, things turned out good; however, after the first time my character got pregnant with a gem it stopped working. To confirm that, there is no message being printed in the console command regarding if it failed or not (Noticed this happening by chance when it worked the first time).

 

Any ideas on how should I proceed? 

 

I have the same issue whereby sexual acts won't produce gems, i'm running 307 but I had the same issue with 304 as well. Inserting gems and scaling seems to work fine though, i'm not sure exactly why it doesn't seem to register that sex acts are occuring if that's the reason for the lack of pregnancy.

Posted

but

Definitely not working on my end.

So how can I help debug the issue?

So im using v 308, and my female is considered as male by the mod :/

Can confirm. Once the mod considered all female NPCs male. I started a new game to fix it.

Posted

After further investigation, females are considered as futa, 'cause I can wank/milk and insert gems/birth at the same time

 

Also the milk leaking texture are upside down since I tried the mod for the first time

Posted

i am getting pretty frequent crashes and your Update Loop is always the last thing in my papyrus log

edit: no more crashes since i reduced the soul gems, seems like 6 is too much for my game to handle

Posted

(hmmm, thought I posted here last night, oh well)

 

The mod is operating as intended and is quite stable, thank goodness! (now if the rest of Skyrim would cooperate...)

 

So I, too, miss the Birth Largest option from previous versions. Could this be re-implemented? Alternatively, the menu option for Gems, where all the various types of gems are listed, could easily become a selection tool for birthing (extracting/removing - is that a better term?) only the gem types that you were interested in - for those special recipes that require a filled Common soul gem. The Induce Labor tab could be kept as normal, for the birth of all gems.

 

It'd be nice to remove just the Black Soul Gems so that I can start working on some other ones, without stopping progress on the smaller ones. Yes, I could Induce Labor and then put back only the pre-mature ones, but doing that over and over is a bit of a time sink.

 

Transferring gems does not need to be an all or nothing venture either. Using the same menu types as when inserting gems seems plausible (where you select from a list and then select a quantity).

 

If there is an easy fix that I could implement myself, please let me know. I have little coding experience, though.

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...