germanicus Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 Shane - I have a wish to make. You don't have to fulfill it if you don't want to. You see, I'm not a fan of certain rough animations, especially rough behind animation since it is glitched. Player's and NPC's penis are behind their body. I posted that problem weeks ago to Ashal with the picture. He and other confirmed some script error in that animation that temporarily can't be fixed. I do not know if it will be fixed with the new release of SL, but anyhow, I don't like that animation at all. Is it possible to to replace that one with arok reverse cowgirl animation or add a tag to it?
shane4244 Posted April 21, 2014 Author Posted April 21, 2014 Shane - I have a wish to make. You don't have to fulfill it if you don't want to. You see, I'm not a fan of certain rough animations, especially rough behind animation since it is glitched. Player's and NPC's penis are behind their body. I posted that problem weeks ago to Ashal with the picture. He and other confirmed some script error in that animation that temporarily can't be fixed. I do not know if it will be fixed with the new release of SL, but anyhow, I don't like that animation at all. Is it possible to to replace that one with arok reverse cowgirl animation or add a tag to it? Well if I removed the "Rough" tags from the rough options then there would be no point in having that option at all. It would just pull up the same animations as using the vaginal option. You can just stick to the animation catagories you like you don not have to ever use the rough or anal option to advance the quest. All animation groups give the same quest advancement so pick from the ones you want to see.More than likely it will be fixed in the next release anyway I personally haven't noticed a problem but I don't pay much attention to alignments anyway. I was think of adding a "on top" tag for another option which would bring up any animations that SexLab has labeled "on Top" like the cowgirl for example but I kind of feel like there are too many to begin with but I do like that one so I may add it in the future. Edit: I just noticed the new SexLab 1.50 is out I'll be busy testing for a little while.
germanicus Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 I'm afraid that we didn't understand each other well. I didn't want you to remove the rough animation tag in anal, but replace rough behind or add an arok reverse cowgirl, which is also anal. You see, your mod is letting me have only three rough animations, although in my list all animations are on in SL. But, it is OK with me if you think that there is nothing to be changed.
shane4244 Posted April 21, 2014 Author Posted April 21, 2014 I'm afraid that we didn't understand each other well. I didn't want you to remove the rough animation tag in anal, but replace rough behind or add an arok reverse cowgirl, which is also anal. You see, your mod is letting me have only three rough animations, although in my list all animations are on in SL. But, it is OK with me if you think that there is nothing to be changed. It doesn't work like that it only picks three animations because SexLab currently only has 3 animations that have both "anal" and "behind" tagged and I don't even have rough in that option unless your being raped. I can add another anal catagory that includes all "anal" animations which most will be similiar to the vaginal ones if you want and label the old one Anal from behind or something like that. I can't change one animation in the group I have being filtered out by tags to fall in another catagory without chnaging the entire group that is picked. I want to see only "behind" animations for my anal option in my game but like I said I'm not opposed to making another anal catagory if that what you want. But I can't change one animation in that group for another without it changing all the animations picked in that group.
germanicus Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 I see. Please, forgive my ignorance. Now I know. Thanks for taking time to explain this to me.
shinji72 Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 Shane - I have a wish to make. You don't have to fulfill it if you don't want to. You see, I'm not a fan of certain rough animations, especially rough behind animation since it is glitched. Player's and NPC's penis are behind their body. I posted that problem weeks ago to Ashal with the picture. He and other confirmed some script error in that animation that temporarily can't be fixed. I do not know if it will be fixed with the new release of SL, but anyhow, I don't like that animation at all. Is it possible to to replace that one with arok reverse cowgirl animation or add a tag to it? Germanicus, the sorry state of rough behind animation can be fixed! I too was sorry about the penis behind the back (in one of the best and most frequently used animation). Try to download this skeleton. It has many plus (like HDT real physics)... but above all fixes completely the back penis issue! http://www.loverslab.com/files/file/676-xp32-maximum-skeleton-extended/
shane4244 Posted April 21, 2014 Author Posted April 21, 2014 I see. Please, forgive my ignorance. Now I know. Thanks for taking time to explain this to me. Like I said I don't mind adding another anal catagory it's just never been brought up before. It's just that a lot of the options for "anal" are the same that get pulled up for "vaginal" since you can use either hole with most of them lol . That is why I don't have it like that in the mod. You would for the most part see the same stuff in "vaginal" as "anal" so it would it would be more like a duplicate catagory. I'm not actually making up my own tags I'm using the existing tags from the animations in the SexLabFramework.
germanicus Posted April 21, 2014 Posted April 21, 2014 Shane - I have a wish to make. You don't have to fulfill it if you don't want to. You see, I'm not a fan of certain rough animations, especially rough behind animation since it is glitched. Player's and NPC's penis are behind their body. I posted that problem weeks ago to Ashal with the picture. He and other confirmed some script error in that animation that temporarily can't be fixed. I do not know if it will be fixed with the new release of SL, but anyhow, I don't like that animation at all. Is it possible to to replace that one with arok reverse cowgirl animation or add a tag to it? Germanicus, the sorry state of rough behind animation can be fixed! I too was sorry about the penis behind the back (in one of the best and most frequently used animation). Try to download this skeleton. It has many plus (like HDT real physics)... but above all fixes completely the back penis issue! http://www.loverslab.com/files/file/676-xp32-maximum-skeleton-extended/ Thank you shinnji, very much. Appreciate it. SHANE - no problem at all, You are very patient with me and I respect that. Let me just mention that my favorite anal animation is arok reverse cowgirl. I don't want you give more trouble since you already are overwhelmed with preset mod correction. Can't wait to see the changes and play your mod again.
germanicus Posted April 22, 2014 Posted April 22, 2014 Shane . I just played with one of my characters who is married. Among all lines I also find that he has a line "for doing a favor for discount from merchants" since spouses are selling and buying things too. Is that meant to be or...?
shane4244 Posted April 22, 2014 Author Posted April 22, 2014 Shane . I just played with one of my characters who is married. Among all lines I also find that he has a line "for doing a favor for discount from merchants" since spouses are selling and buying things too. Is that meant to be or...? I've never been married in game if they are added to the "Job Vendor faction" after you get married the answer would be yes that dialog would come up. When you get married in game you are able to buy/sell items to your spouse? I didn't know this if I'm understanding you correctly. I can easily put a condition check in to keep the dialog from coming up since it does not make much sense with a spouse. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
germanicus Posted April 22, 2014 Posted April 22, 2014 Yes, I have two characters that a married. Spouses' are a house seller/buyers set by Vanilla. So, it will be good if you can remove that line from showing in the dialog box since there is so many options already to have sex with your spouse. Thank you.
magicrealm Posted April 22, 2014 Posted April 22, 2014 i disagree on germanicus. i dont want to install another mod just to have sex with my followers / spouse. well, i just wanted to ask for compability with the new sexlab thanks mr
shane4244 Posted April 22, 2014 Author Posted April 22, 2014 i disagree on germanicus. i dont want to install another mod just to have sex with my followers / spouse. well, i just wanted to ask for compability with the new sexlab thanks mr He was referring to the new merchant dialog not the dialog for having sex with your follower/spouse. Which I agree with I just wasn't aware of it until he told me. I'll have an update with full support with SexLab 1.50+ soon. Should work with 1.50+ plus now with a few errors in the log with certain animations. It's up to you guys but I would wait until i have a version with full support before using any options for sex with this mod.
germanicus Posted April 23, 2014 Posted April 23, 2014 The mod is working great with 1.51. I already use it with my 3 characters ant so far no problem at all.
shane4244 Posted April 23, 2014 Author Posted April 23, 2014 The mod is working great with 1.51. I already use it with my 3 characters ant so far no problem at all. Thanks but there are some issues just nothing thats going to keep it from working. I'm packing the update right now. I'll have it up in a few min.
shane4244 Posted April 23, 2014 Author Posted April 23, 2014 YAY! Thanks shane. You're awesome. I have no idea how to get married in skyrim so let me know if the merchant dialog issue is fixed with spouses. It should not show up on spouses now unless you married a merchant to begin with. Shouldn't show up on spouses at all actually.
germanicus Posted April 23, 2014 Posted April 23, 2014 No problem. I love your mod so will enjoy in playing it.
shane4244 Posted April 23, 2014 Author Posted April 23, 2014 Updated SexLabWorkingGirl NoNZaZ version.6.6 April 23, 2014 -removed Brynjolf from random approach and player approach options-added more condition checks for Companion/Player whore mode-added a conditon check to exclude spouses from merchant dialog-Reversed lead for Female Oral options-Added more conditions for normal working girl options and Player Whore mode to make it possible to do both at the same time(still a small window of error but possible)-added condition check for merchant discounts to keep from stacking the effect-More script tweaking to older parts of the mod-made fully compatable to SexLab version 1.51+(should still work with 1.39b) Always turn off companion/player whore mode before updating and *fire all companions* who have whored for you and use the reset quests option in the MCM(this option will not reset quest progress in the mod) *By fire companions I mean fire them with the dialog option from the mod "I don't need you to work for me any more" Updating from .6.1 or higher to .6.6 just overwrite the files load your game, wait/sleep a few hours, savegame, load your save and play I noticed with the newest ZaZ some options will use ZaZ animations if ZaZ is present.. I'll leave it up to you guys if want me to put supress tag options for ZaZ I will if you don't I'll leave it as is. I'm impartial to this. Dedicated ZaZ content will be present in the future but with the exception of the pissing on the player option it will be the very distant future.
germanicus Posted April 23, 2014 Posted April 23, 2014 Just downloading your file, as I'm doing this it came to my mind that I forgot to ask you something. OK, last night I played with one of my male characters. He approached to Adrainne Avennichi asking for a discount. She agreed be she said the she wants to fuck him in the ass because she like to be in a man's position. So I agreed, hoping that animation will be male fuck female, but she took a strapon and started to fuck him. This is a question, not complain: is this suppose to be, female fucks male in consensual sex?
shane4244 Posted April 23, 2014 Author Posted April 23, 2014 Just downloading your file, as I'm doing this it came to my mind that I forgot to ask you something. OK, last night I played with one of my male characters. He approached to Adrainne Avennichi asking for a discount. She agreed be she said the she wants to fuck him in the ass because she like to be in a man's position. So I agreed, hoping that animation will be male fuck female, but she took a strapon and started to fuck him. This is a question, not complain: is this suppose to be, female fucks male in consensual sex? Yes that is intentional and the main reason I have the option to back out of it. There is a random chance to get that option but there is also the chance to get the option to fuck her up the ass among other things. Just like in real life sometimes you get asked to do things you don't want to do but you can always say no. This is the only option like that if your playing a male PC with a female vendor the rest of the options with female vendors are normal male lead positions.
germanicus Posted April 23, 2014 Posted April 23, 2014 I see. No problem, I asked that since it was his first time being fucked by female merchant. Usually they were fucked by him. But, no problem, now I know. Question related to it: if I switch position after accepting the offer to be fucked in the ass, with a female so that she will be fucked, would switching positions cause some script error?
shane4244 Posted April 23, 2014 Author Posted April 23, 2014 I see. No problem, I asked that since it was his first time being fucked by female merchant. Usually they were fucked by him. But, no problem, now I know. Question related to it: if I switch position after accepting the offer to be fucked in the ass, with a female so that she will be fucked, would switching positions cause some script error? I wouldn't think so or ashal wouldn't give you the abilty to do that. To be honest the only toggle key I've ever used in SexLab is the advance stage and the recently added end animation to make sure the 'hook stage" functions work. I would think the strap-on would still be on the female if you did that but I'm not sure.
germanicus Posted April 23, 2014 Posted April 23, 2014 I see. I'm asking that since I usually switch position when a male NPC wants to fuck my PC. There is a key in MCM menu that is letting the player to do that. So far never had a problem with switching position in RP TDf's mod, and some others. I never tested if the swithicg position key works in your game. (Which wuld be nice to add if you can) - but you're the boss.
shane4244 Posted April 23, 2014 Author Posted April 23, 2014 I see. I'm asking that since I usually switch position when a male NPC wants to fuck my PC. There is a key in MCM menu that is letting the player to do that. So far never had a problem with switching position in RP TDf's mod, and some others. I never tested if the swithicg position key works in your game. (Which wuld be nice to add if you can) - but you're the boss. If it works with those it should work with mine. I was just saying I've never tested it. When I said I wouldn't think so I was referring to causing errors in you log we all use the same framework to make the mods the option to change positions is in the framework if it works for one it should work for all I'm not doing anything abnormal with the framework.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now