slso SexLab Separate Orgasm SE

[skyrim482]

Does the latest version  not support Sl beta 9? Bar fills correctly up but no orgasms. Using 1.7.6 SE version.

Nothing is overwriting SLSO not using edging, Separate orgasms enabled in SL.  

 

Edit- Whoops I didnt realize SL had been updated outa of beta I will update that and try again.

Edited December 18, 2021 by skyrim482

[Leeraa]

I have the same issue. Enjoyment high, bars maxed out but no orgasm

[Chloe Rose]

Hi all

 

OK >> i re-confirm too. Max enjoyement >> no orgasm 

 

A: you didnt enable separate orgasms  >> I DID

A: you have ai edging enabled >> OPTION IS DISABLED

A: you overwrote slso scripts with something else >> NOPE it is not. At least MO2 doesnt show SLSO as overwritten

A: make sure your character meet orgasm conditions >> ??? Which ones :)?

A: disable orgasm conditions >> DID THAT. STILL NO ORGASM

A: enable orgasms/effects in sexlab >> DID THAT. ALWAYS DO

 

Ok... to cut short on the discussion i made a test.

- Did a fresh game. With V 1.7.6 >> gone to BanneredMare>> saves the game >> made the PC whore herself. >> no orgasm.

- I BRUTALLY disabled in MO2 V1.7.6 and enabled V1.7.3 >> reloaded the BanneredMare save >> BAM!! : pc is squirting, moaning and orgasmin' like a true *BIIP* she is  

 

So yes... something between the two versions is wrong. Don't know what. Might not be SLSO but SLSO andmy lack of updates or something like that but ...voila

Lucky me i had v173 in my archives

 

[DocClox]

4 hours ago, Chloe Rose said:

Hi all

 

OK >> i re-confirm too. Max enjoyement >> no orgasm 

 

A: you didnt enable separate orgasms  >> I DID

A: you have ai edging enabled >> OPTION IS DISABLED

A: you overwrote slso scripts with something else >> NOPE it is not. At least MO2 doesnt show SLSO as overwritten

A: make sure your character meet orgasm conditions >> ??? Which ones :)?

A: disable orgasm conditions >> DID THAT. STILL NO ORGASM

A: enable orgasms/effects in sexlab >> DID THAT. ALWAYS DO

 

Ok... to cut short on the discussion i made a test.

- Did a fresh game. With V 1.7.6 >> gone to BanneredMare>> saves the game >> made the PC whore herself. >> no orgasm.

- I BRUTALLY disabled in MO2 V1.7.6 and enabled V1.7.3 >> reloaded the BanneredMare save >> BAM!! : pc is squirting, moaning and orgasmin' like a true *BIIP* she is  

 

So yes... something between the two versions is wrong. Don't know what. Might not be SLSO but SLSO andmy lack of updates or something like that but ...voila

Lucky me i had v173 in my archives

 

 

Was coming here to post this very thing.

 

[edit]

 

Updated Sexlab to the full, non-beta, 163 version and the problem goes away. Fancy that!

 

Edited December 20, 2021 by DocClox

[Chloe Rose]

2 hours ago, DocClox said:

 

Updated Sexlab to the full, non-beta, 163 version and the problem goes away. Fancy that!

 

 

Hmmm. Ok. Thats good news  !

Unfortunately i can't switch right now because of mods dependant of my SL version.

Sooooo... next time maybe. 

[Ed86]

3 hours ago, DocClox said:

 

 

[edit]

 

Updated Sexlab to the full, non-beta, 163 version and the problem goes away. Fancy that!

 

 matching appropriate sexlab version with appropriate slso version, i didnt know that was possible

 

[Chloe Rose]

35 minutes ago, Ed86 said:

 matching appropriate sexlab version with appropriate slso version, i didnt know that was possible

 

 

Ed86  Yes its indeed WoW... but look at the topic and wonder how many people made that mistake.

I'am not criticising. Just saying that often "the obvious" for one... is mystery for another and obviously people DON"T read often. In this particular case this is because i just use SLSO since ages and i DO NOT re-read each time the header lol  

If i may suggest... just a tiny message inside game after a reload ... something like "Ooo you stupid TWAT !!! Go and grab the latest version of SL. Your's is out of date like your's father spermatos! " xD... or something something... you know

[Ed86]

1 hour ago, Chloe Rose said:

Ed86  Yes its indeed WoW... but look at the topic and wonder how many people made that mistake.

I'am not criticising. Just saying that often "the obvious" for one... is mystery for another and obviously people DON"T read often. In this particular case this is because i just use SLSO since ages and i DO NOT re-read each time the header lol  

If i may suggest... just a tiny message inside game after a reload ... something like "Ooo you stupid TWAT !!! Go and grab the latest version of SL. Your's is out of date like your's father spermatos! " xD... or something something... you know

but then i would need to maintain 3 sources of SLSO instead of 1, for each version of sexrim/skylab

 

[skyrim482]

45 minutes ago, Ed86 said:

but then i would need to maintain 3 sources of SLSO instead of 1, for each version of sexrim/skylab

 

With ashal still getting SL togeather Its a fair point to at least keep the last version of the prior SLSO SL version you made, uploaded. The SL framework is a mess and they wont post any change logs so stuff is breaking and not working and you cant know whats even different. Its a Mess Rn I tried updating and like other people went back to SLb9 because of breaking mods on the new SL version.

[DocClox]

4 hours ago, Ed86 said:

 matching appropriate sexlab version with appropriate slso version, i didnt know that was possible

 

You could, you know, save the big, sarcastic pictures for the people who aren't trying to save you time and trouble by answering their own and/or other people's questions. Just saying.

[Chloe Rose]

3 hours ago, Ed86 said:

but then i would need to maintain 3 sources of SLSO instead of 1, for each version of sexrim/skylab

 

Well... anyway....

I have a question. This damned patch for SLAR (and i emphasize on the RRRRrrrrrrrrRRrrr:)) ... is it necessary when using SLAX?

[Ed86]

16 hours ago, DocClox said:

 

You could, you know, save the big, sarcastic pictures for the people who aren't trying to save you time and trouble by answering their own and/or other people's questions. Just saying.

sorry, but you/others are not saving my time by not reading 2 posts above you with the same question/answer, installing slso version on wrong version of sexlab( which it will obviously not work) and then posting here that something is broken, and not even bothering with logs or versions

ofc i understand that your time is more precious than mine, sitting here trying to read your minds and guessing what could have gone wrong

Just saying.

Edited December 21, 2021 by Ed86

[Ed86]

15 hours ago, Chloe Rose said:

Well... anyway....

I have a question. This damned patch for SLAR (and i emphasize on the RRRRrrrrrrrrRRrrr:)) ... is it necessary when using SLAX?

who knows

search slax script sources for "SLSO" if its there, than maybe its not necessary

[skyrim482]

17 hours ago, Chloe Rose said:

Well... anyway....

I have a question. This damned patch for SLAR (and i emphasize on the RRRRrrrrrrrrRRrrr:)) ... is it necessary when using SLAX?

Nope! trust me do not use the SLAR patch with the SLAX or the SLAM aroused frameworks. They are built with SLSO intagrated if you use that patch with SLAX it will break aroused and SLSO.

[Chloe Rose]

40 minutes ago, skyrim482 said:

Nope! trust me do not use the SLAR patch with the SLAX or the SLAM aroused frameworks. They are built with SLSO intagrated if you use that patch with SLAX it will break aroused and SLSO.

 

Thanks  !

[DocClox]

3 hours ago, Ed86 said:

sorry, but you/others are not saving my time by not reading 2 posts above you with the same question/answer, installing slso version on wrong version of sexlab( which it will obviously not work) and then posting here that something is broken, and not even bothering with logs or versions

ofc i understand that your time is more precious than mine, sitting here trying to read your minds and guessing what could have gone wrong

Just saying.

 

Well then I do apologize for wasting your time by trying to help. I'll try and make sure it never happens again. And you're welcome, by the way

Edited December 21, 2021 by DocClox

[safado]

On 12/20/2021 at 4:11 PM, Chloe Rose said:

Well... anyway....

I have a question. This damned patch for SLAR (and i emphasize on the RRRRrrrrrrrrRRrrr:)) ... is it necessary when using SLAX?

 

This maybe rude, but is a proof (to me) that you guys/girls are spamming the support forum with already answered questions.

 

There is also a trend with people installing SLSO 1.7.4.1 or newer over Sexlab 1.63b9.

 

From SLAX description page written on September 25, 2019.-----------------

SLSO integration is built-in - SLSO is not required, this is a soft dependency.

Do NOT install the SLSO patch for SLA(R) over this - I believe it claims to be something to do with Animation Appropriate Arousal in the SLSO FOMOD.

If you install the SLA(R) SLSO patch onto SLAX, you will break SLAX completely.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Edited December 22, 2021 by safado

[safado]

FYI,

I have experienced that during new game init of SLSO 1.7.x, the init process may deadlock Sexlab and cascade to other mods like ZAZ and DD.

I initiated the game without SLSO.ESP enabled and after setting everything and 3 save reloads. Restarted with SLSO selected and tested with a manual triggered Sexlab Animation, and it executed properly.  If the init "deadlocks", sexlab MCM will be blank and likely to have more than 50 scripts suspended in papyrus' active script queue.

[Ed86]

12 hours ago, safado said:

 

This maybe rude, but is a proof (to me) that you guys/girls are spamming the support forum with already answered questions.

 

There is also a trend with people installing SLSO 1.7.4.1 or newer over Sexlab 1.63b9.

 

From SLAX description page written on September 25, 2019.-----------------

SLSO integration is built-in - SLSO is not required, this is a soft dependency.

Do NOT install the SLSO patch for SLA(R) over this - I believe it claims to be something to do with Animation Appropriate Arousal in the SLSO FOMOD.

If you install the SLA(R) SLSO patch onto SLAX, you will break SLAX completely.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

but... that would need reading... who does that in 2k21?

[skyrim482]

Look idk why people are being rude here and leaving smart remarks. Its Christmas time so everyone just calm down.

The fact of the matter is alot of people dont know SL updated and when they look at it, they dont update it because a ton of people are having issues and there is NO CHANGE LOG on the new sl versions. That is no fault of this mod but people might not have noticed the 1.63b9 to just 1.63 V would have required  a SL update when they downloaded the last SLSO version.

As far as SLAX goes that mod is unfinished and there is like 4 or 5 people who have made patches to get it working, so people are READING there just is a ton of information to go over and its easy to miss the SLAR patch, because  I made the mistake myself. Here's how, I read to remove that patch, I checked my load order and I couldn't find the SLAR patch to uninstall so my slax was broken. I later realized it was a SLSO fomod option I forgot about and thats why it seemed hard to find.  The point being, people read and still can have issues and always will. If you dont want to help people thats fine, but lets not make people feel like shit for seeking help because answering a few questions on here can resove issues for countless others who might be having the same issues and search the thread. Remember we all have different levels of experience with modding and creation, even crossing language barriers for some. Lets all keep working together for be better overall experience. Happy Holidays everyone ?

Edited December 22, 2021 by skyrim482

[4nk8r]

6 hours ago, skyrim482 said:

Look idk why people are being rude here and leaving smart remarks. Its Christmas time so everyone just calm down.

The fact of the matter is alot of people dont know SL updated and when they look at it, they dont update it because a ton of people are having issues and there is NO CHANGE LOG on the new sl versions. That is no fault of this mod but people might not have noticed the 1.63b9 to just 1.63 V would have required  a SL update when they downloaded the last SLSO version.

As far as SLAX goes that mod is unfinished and there is like 4 or 5 people who have made patches to get it working, so people are READING there just is a ton of information to go over and its easy to miss the SLAR patch, because  I made the mistake myself. Here's how, I read to remove that patch, I checked my load order and I couldn't find the SLAR patch to uninstall so my slax was broken. I later realized it was a SLSO fomod option I forgot about and thats why it seemed hard to find.  The point being, people read and still can have issues and always will. If you dont want to help people thats fine, but lets not make people feel like shit for seeking help because answering a few questions on here can resove issues for countless others who might be having the same issues and search the thread. Remember we all have different levels of experience with modding and creation, even crossing language barriers for some. Lets all keep working together for be better overall experience. Happy Holidays everyone ?

 

Well, considering the SE variant of SLAX is unofficial, as you've mentioned, anyone deciding to use it in SE should expect a bit of rough weather if they aren't sure what they are doing or haven't pulled together all the information about it.  Add to that the flux over AE update shenanigans (one more is due out any day), cascading to SKSE64 updates, various DLL updates...all external factors to many of the mods in question, requiring a clued-in audience to navigate accurately.  Then they limp into the support thread, many times the wrong threads, and blame their failure on the mod instead of their lack of competency in their chosen mod manager, modding concepts, reading comprehension and/or laziness.

 

Other than those with language barriers, anyone messing with any of this right now that isn't already a modding veteran is just asking for grief and shade.  Stray off the beaten path, get eaten by tired mod authors that have answered the same things over and over...mostly about stuff out of their control.  Though I do think Ed86 can be a bit too spicy at times

[slimshady546]

Still couldn't get to work with the latest SLSO. I had a problem that my character couldn't get her arousal down after scenes only the male npcs was working fine. I had my framework updated already.  Gave up and got back to using the old version (1.6.7 SL1.63b8) and got it working normally again. Glad I still had the old version lying in my drive lol

[Ed86]

On 12/22/2021 at 4:51 PM, skyrim482 said:

Look idk why people are being rude here and leaving smart remarks. Its Christmas time so everyone just calm down.

The fact of the matter is alot of people dont know SL updated and when they look at it, they dont update it because a ton of people are having issues and there is NO CHANGE LOG on the new sl versions. That is no fault of this mod but people might not have noticed the 1.63b9 to just 1.63 V would have required  a SL update when they downloaded the last SLSO version.

As far as SLAX goes that mod is unfinished and there is like 4 or 5 people who have made patches to get it working, so people are READING there just is a ton of information to go over and its easy to miss the SLAR patch, because  I made the mistake myself. Here's how, I read to remove that patch, I checked my load order and I couldn't find the SLAR patch to uninstall so my slax was broken. I later realized it was a SLSO fomod option I forgot about and thats why it seemed hard to find.  The point being, people read and still can have issues and always will. If you dont want to help people thats fine, but lets not make people feel like shit for seeking help because answering a few questions on here can resove issues for countless others who might be having the same issues and search the thread. Remember we all have different levels of experience with modding and creation, even crossing language barriers for some. Lets all keep working together for be better overall experience. Happy Holidays everyone ?

yea... should probably ignore everyone, unless there real bugs, frontdesk is not for salty ed

[assult]

5 hours ago, slimshady546 said:

Still couldn't get to work with the latest SLSO. I had a problem that my character couldn't get her arousal down after scenes only the male npcs was working fine. I had my framework updated already.  Gave up and got back to using the old version (1.6.7 SL1.63b8) and got it working normally again. Glad I still had the old version lying in my drive lol

Hello, can you upload that version ?

 

[Ed86]

On 11/15/2021 at 4:29 PM, OsmelMC said:

 

okay......... i think your implementation of realtime/fix is broken

 

RealTime[0] = SexLabUtil.GetCurrentGameRealTime()
 

float function GetCurrentGameRealTime() global
    Form TimeScale = Game.GetFormFromFile(0x3A, "Skyrim.esm")
    float fTimeScale = 1
    if TimeScale && TimeScale != none
        fTimeScale = (TimeScale as GlobalVariable).GetValue()
    else
        fTimeScale = 20.0 ; Skyrim default TimeScale
    endIf
    if fTimeScale < 1
        fTimeScale = 1.0
    endIf
    return (Utility.GetCurrentGameTime() / fTimeScale) * 86400.0
endFunction

 

; Obtains the current game time in terms of game days passed (same as the global variable)
float Function GetCurrentGameTime() native global

 

.... so thread.realtime[] is always the same whole day, which kind of prevents orgasms on triggering on 1st day, and probably prevent maless/creatures orgasms up to 3 first days

 

and probably breaks bunch of other stuff

 

so that is probably the reason  ppl come and complain their actors cant orgasm