Jump to content

The Banning Game - II


Recommended Posts

Quote
2 hours ago, ZenBuddhist said:

 

UN-CON-DI-TION-AL-LY • BAN-NED ! ! ! 

for constantly counting the number of syllables of e-ty-mo-lo-gi-cal-ly Latin vocables.

 

BANNED! for thinking that banned has two syllables (which I could forgive if you were using it in a poem).

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for thinking that banned has two syllables (which I could forgive if you were using it in a poem).

 

B A N N E D ! ! !
 

for not perceiving the deep irony imbued in sundering "Ban•ned" into two syllables:


1. since my text clearly inferred etymologically Latin vocables;

2. inasmuch "ban" is originally a Romanian term; and
3. because the Romanian language is directly derived from Latin,

then it can be deemed as a two-syllable word.

(gee, i'm really pushing it. Plato; Socrates: help ! ! ! )

Link to comment
Quote
7 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said:

 

B A N N E D ! ! !
 

for not perceiving the deep irony imbued in sundering "Ban•ned" into two syllables:


1. since my text clearly inferred etymologically Latin vocables;

2. inasmuch "ban" is originally a Romanian term; and
3. because the Romanian language is directly derived from Latin,

then it can be deemed as a two-syllable word.

(gee, i'm really pushing it. Plato; Socrates: help ! ! ! )

 

BANNED! for dragging a couple of old Hellenes into this.

Link to comment
36 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for being anti-Euroskeptic (can an American be a Euroskeptic?)

 

and 

 

¡ ¡ ¡ B A N N E D ! ! !

 

from both the EU and LL for failing to read the 961000 articles on the subject found in Google's search.

 

 

899042069_ScreenShot2019-05-30at1_56_51PM.png.1c4041a4f4130e09373aba1c7293b28d.png

 

Link to comment
Quote
27 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said:

 

and 

 

¡ ¡ ¡ B A N N E D ! ! !

 

from both the EU and LL for failing to read the 961000 articles on the subject found in Google's search.

 

 

899042069_ScreenShot2019-05-30at1_56_51PM.png.1c4041a4f4130e09373aba1c7293b28d.png

 

 

BANNED! for quoting Google as a source.

Link to comment
On 5/30/2019 at 7:29 PM, Psalam said:

BANNED! for quoting Google as a source.

Banned for even reacting to a post that quotes google (well this escalates nice and quick, doesn't it?)

Link to comment
Quote
4 hours ago, worik said:

Banned for even reacting to a post that quotes google (well this escalates nice and quick, doesn't it?)

 

BANNED! for banning using something that might result in a Googolplex of related posts (bans).

Link to comment
30 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for banning using something that might result in a Googolplex of related posts (bans).

BANNED for banning someone who banned and got banned in fear of banned Googooloophophia :scream:

Link to comment
Quote
1 hour ago, ZenBuddhist said:


and

 

¡ ¡ ¡ B A N N E D ! ! !

 

for the unauthorised use of Slippery-Slope and Circular arguments!!!

 

Politically BANNED! That is, your right to free speech is revoked for as long as you disagree with me.

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, Psalam said:

Politically BANNED! That is, your right to free speech is revoked for as long as you disagree with me.


Metaphysically 
 

   ¡ ! ¡ B A N N E D ! ¡ !   

 

for assuming i should agree with you! LL's community rules ARE crystal clear on that rather grey area;

"18a. We may be an adult-oriented community, but don't be stupid: never ever expect other members to agree with you and your opinions; doing so will result in instant ban."

Link to comment
Quote
20 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said:


Metaphysically 
 

   ¡ ! ¡ B A N N E D ! ¡ !   

 

for assuming i should agree with you! LL's community rules ARE crystal clear on that rather grey area;

"18a. We may be an adult-oriented community, but don't be stupid: never ever expect other members to agree with you and your opinions; doing so will result in instant ban."

 

BANNED! for flagrantly misquoting rule #2 - "Don't be a jerk."

Link to comment
Quote
3 minutes ago, worik said:

BANNED!!!!!! for exaggerating the value of "!" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

BANNED! for using exclamation points in the numbers of 6-1-21 which, as everyone knows, is properly a lock:

 

Image result for 6121

Link to comment
16 hours ago, Psalam said:

BANNED! for using exclamation points in the numbers of 6-1-21 which, as everyone knows, is properly a lock:


and musically BANNED!!! guitaristically BANNED!!! Jazzistically BANNED!!!

 

for implying that the number 6121 is a lock-related-only integer when all guitarists worldwide have — since its creation in 1964 — related such magical and cardinal four digit symbol to the Gretsch model 6121: the famous "Chet Atkins" semi-acoustic!!!


 

848350063_ScreenShot2019-06-02at10_29_08PM.png.53c3ed6d53b172315a1f5d2179233ee4.png

Link to comment
Quote
8 hours ago, ZenBuddhist said:


and musically BANNED!!! guitaristically BANNED!!! Jazzistically BANNED!!!

 

for implying that the number 6121 is a lock-related-only integer when all guitarists worldwide have — since its creation in 1964 — related such magical and cardinal four digit symbol to the Gretsch model 6121: the famous "Chet Atkins" semi-acoustic!!!


 

848350063_ScreenShot2019-06-02at10_29_08PM.png.53c3ed6d53b172315a1f5d2179233ee4.png

 

BANNED! for thinking anything associated with an obscure country musician should be know by everyone!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use