DonQuiWho Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 Just now, donkeywho said: BANNED! for not knowing the it's the Non-Conformists who are the more intellectually inquisitive and hence meaningfully inspired, whereas conformists merely accept things 'as is', eg that the ensuing consequences of devouring some Col Sanders Funky Chicken inevitably leads to throwing up all over the keyboard with attendant ethereal consequences for those receiving the stream of regurgitated bits and bites BANNED! for voluminous writing of prodigious shit
DonQuiWho Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 Just now, donkeywho said: BANNED! for voluminous writing of prodigious shit BANNED! for being self aware!
DonQuiWho Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 Just now, donkeywho said: BANNED! for being self aware! BANNED! for being
DonQuiWho Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 Just now, donkeywho said: BANNED! for being BANNED! ?
ZenBuddhist Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 29 minutes ago, donkeywho said: BANNED! for conforming to the established view of non-conformists ¡ ¡ ¡ B A N N E D ! ! ! for implying that a true non-conformist has the moral, æethical, and intellectual grounds for developing an actual view on anything; 46 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for being silly on this obviously deeply intellectual and meaningful thread. ¡ ¡ ¡ D O U B L E • B A N N E D ! ! ! for being an orthodox formalist who understands ARTWORK as SILLINESS.
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 17 minutes ago, donkeywho said: BANNED! ? BANNED! for dominating the thread allowing no one else to get a word in edgewise when they have very important things to say that would make a real difference but you have to just keep right on talking without even pausing for breath so that you turn blue while you continue to spew forth your mindless invective and hog the screen to yourself without the first thought for others ... ***passes out*** 1
ZenBuddhist Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for dominating the thread allowing no one else to get a word in edgewise when they have very important things to say that would make a real difference but you have to just keep right on talking without even pausing for breath so that you turn blue while you continue to spew forth your mindless invective and hog the screen to yourself without the first thought for others ... ***passes out*** B A N N E D ! ! ! for posting your rant here instead of the R A N T I N G • T H R E A D ! ! ! 1
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 8 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: B A N N E D ! ! ! for posting your rant here instead of the R A N T I N G • T H R E A D ! ! ! BANNED! for shouting and waking me up. 2
ZenBuddhist Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 41 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for shouting and waking me up. B A N N E D ! for exhorting the Capital Sin of Sloth on such a beautiful Friday!
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: B A N N E D ! for exhorting the Capital Sin of Sloth on such a beautiful Friday! BANNED! just because (I still haven't reached full consciousness).
ZenBuddhist Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! just because (I still haven't reached full consciousness). oh! man! B A N N E D ! ! ! for implying any human being can ever reach full consciousness!
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 43 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: oh! man! B A N N E D ! ! ! for implying any human being can ever reach full consciousness! BANNED! for not recognizing all the fully self-conscious people around you (like cats in a room full of rocking chairs). 1
ZenBuddhist Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 11 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for not recognizing all the fully self-conscious people around you (like cats in a room full of rocking chairs). oh! man! B A N N E D ! ! ! for being such a perceptive, insightful, and intellectual being!
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 35 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: oh! man! B A N N E D ! ! ! for being such a perceptive, insightful, and intellectual being! BANNED! because it's just that kind of day!
ZenBuddhist Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 22 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! because it's just that kind of day! B A N N E D ! ! ! for believing and professing today is that kind of day!
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 8 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: B A N N E D ! ! ! for believing and professing today is that kind of day! BANNED! for being unable to accept that today IS that kind of day.
worik Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 27 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for being unable to accept that today IS that kind of day. BANNED for having certain "days". (Banned on behalf of all the "other days")
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 16 minutes ago, worik said: BANNED for having certain "days". (Banned on behalf of all the "other days") BANNED! for buying into the egalitarian socialist dogma. Next you'll be telling me that all people are created equal.
worik Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 17 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for buying into the egalitarian socialist dogma. Banned for mentioning égalité without liberté and fraternité! ??
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 1 minute ago, worik said: Banned for mentioning égalité without liberté and fraternité! ?? BANNED! for Francophilia (does that mean you're a fan of Francisco Franco? - these Romance languages can get confusing.) 1
worik Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 20 minutes ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for Francophilia (does that mean you're a fan of Francisco Franco? - these Romance languages can get confusing.) BANNED for confusing France (left) and Spain (right)!
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 1 minute ago, worik said: BANNED for confusing France (left) and Spain (right)! BANNED! for being less than helpful. Is a Francophile a fan of France or Franco (or both)?
ZenBuddhist Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for being less than helpful. Is a Francophile a fan of France or Franco (or both)? B A N N E D ! ! ! for intentionally limiting the morphological possibilities of "Francophile" to mere two. since • "-Phile:" denoting fondness for a specified thing, from Greek philos — ‘loving’ and • "Franco-:" 1. French — e.g. francophone (a French-made telephone) | Franco-German (a French-made German); 2. from medieval Latin Francus — 'Frank;' 3. Relating to The Franks (vide below); <——— 3. Relating to the Spanish general and dictator Francisco Franco, head of state between 1939 and 1975. then it's clear that "Francophile" refers, in nearly all cases, to a special fondness to The Franks — a collection of Germanic peoples whose name was first mentioned in 3rd Century Roman sources and associated with tribes on the Lower and Middle Rhine, on the edge of the Roman Empire. posteriorly the term became associated with later Romanized Germanic dynasties within the collapsing Roman Empire who eventually commanded the whole region between the rivers Loire and Rhine. they then imposed power over many other post-Roman kingdoms and Germanic peoples, and still later they were given recognition by the Catholic Church as successors to the old rulers of the Western Roman Empire. 1
Psalam Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, ZenBuddhist said: B A N N E D ! ! ! for intentionally limiting the morphological possibilities of "Francophile" to mere two. since • "-Phile:" denoting fondness for a specified thing, from Greek philos — ‘loving’ and • "Franco-:" 1. French — e.g. francophone (a French-made telephone) | Franco-German (a French-made German); 2. from medieval Latin Francus — 'Frank;' 3. Relating to The Franks (vide below); <——— 3. Relating to the Spanish general and dictator Francisco Franco, head of state between 1939 and 1975. then it's clear that "Francophile" refers, in nearly all cases, to a special fondness to The Franks — a collection of Germanic peoples whose name was first mentioned in 3rd Century Roman sources and associated with tribes on the Lower and Middle Rhine, on the edge of the Roman Empire. posteriorly the term became associated with later Romanized Germanic dynasties within the collapsing Roman Empire who eventually commanded the whole region between the rivers Loire and Rhine. they then imposed power over many other post-Roman kingdoms and Germanic peoples, and still later they were given recognition by the Catholic Church as successors to the old rulers of the Western Roman Empire. All true, and Charlemagne (and his earliest successors styled themselves "King of the Franks" only later was it "King of France". Still, BANNED! for loquaciousness and the construction of an impressive wall of text.
ZenBuddhist Posted June 14, 2019 Posted June 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Psalam said: BANNED! for loquaciousness and the construction of an impressive wall of text. ¡ ¡ ¡ B A N N E D ! ! ! for deeming an insignificant half-wall of wordiness as an impressive wall of text!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now