Jump to content

Count to 1,000,000

Guest

By Guest,
in Big Board of Fun

Recommended Posts

Ernest Lemmingway

Ernest Lemmingway

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, donttouchmethere said:

maybe it helps to watch 8112 lemmings jumping over a cliff? ⛰️??

at least Walt Disney loved to watch that ??

Thanks for that reminder of animal cruelty. Now I have 8113 reasons to loathe Diz-knee. And don't take their properly spelled name in vain! Do you want to get sued?!

Link to comment
Psalam

Psalam

Posted
Posted
Spoiler
2 minutes ago, worik said:

... because the 8117 most expensive ones are excluded and govern the work of those who are at home now? ? It must be hard to be a chieftain without any underlings.

 

 

It's truly a good thought but it overlooks the 8118 politicians and political appointees that have the most highly paid jobs of all and are not "Furloughed"!

Link to comment
worik

worik

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Psalam said:

It's truly a good thought but it overlooks the 8118 politicians and political appointees that have the most highly paid jobs of all and are not "Furloughed"!

It is said the lowest pay of one of those is 8119 USD per day ... but surely that's only a rumor. I couldn't imagine any of those would work for such a morsel.

Link to comment
Psalam

Psalam

Posted
Posted
Spoiler
2 hours ago, worik said:

It is said the lowest pay of one of those is 8119 USD per day ... but surely that's only a rumor. I couldn't imagine any of those would work for such a morsel.

 

 

Actually the US President would only have to work 50 days at 8120 dollars per day to make his official salary. Wait, do you think he actually works that many? ?

Link to comment
Psalam

Psalam

Posted
Posted
Spoiler
12 minutes ago, worik said:

Maybe they have a rule: at the 8121st day in office you have to start to do something good in return for your salary.

Maybe that's why they limited the duration for this type of job.

 

 

You're right, of course. The 2922 days that a US President is allowed to serve is far less than the 8122+ that members of the legislative and judicial branches can, and have, served.

Link to comment
worik

worik

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Psalam said:

that members of the legislative and judicial branches can, and have, served.

I think, they will limit that duty, too. 8123 days at the most. Otherwise, they would be too much in danger of doing something good by random accident. Unthinkable.

 

Link to comment
Psalam

Psalam

Posted
Posted
Spoiler
13 hours ago, worik said:

I think, they will limit that duty, too. 8123 days at the most. Otherwise, they would be too much in danger of doing something good by random accident. Unthinkable.

 

 

 

Even if they took 8124 votes on each of those days the chances of them not making things worse, instead of better, is infinitesimal.

Link to comment
worik

worik

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Psalam said:

Even if they took 8124 votes on each of those days the chances of them not making things worse, instead of better, is infinitesimal.

By common math, this would require a minimum of  8125 lucky events ??? or major selfless deeds  :classic_angel: per day to compensate a single one of those bad decisions. ?

Link to comment
Psalam

Psalam

Posted
Posted
Spoiler
16 minutes ago, worik said:

By common math, this would require a minimum of  8125 lucky events ??? or major selfless deeds  :classic_angel: per day to compensate a single one of those bad decisions. ?

 

 

Even using calculus (much less common math) it is hard to see how they could help the majority when they are so in the pockets of their  >8126 donors.

Link to comment
worik

worik

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Psalam said:

to try to get those numbers closer together.

:classic_biggrin: Not sure if it helps to compensate for the loss of numbers, but at least for the aforementioned gap the numbers

  • 251
  • 252 and
  • 253

are now accounted for. If each and every of the 8127 readers in this thread will do the same we won't have to worry :classic_rolleyes:

Link to comment
Psalam

Psalam

Posted
Posted
Spoiler
5 minutes ago, worik said:

:classic_biggrin: Not sure if it helps to compensate for the loss of numbers, but at least for the aforementioned gap the numbers

  • 251
  • 252 and
  • 253

are now accounted for. If each and every of the 8127 readers in this thread will do the same we won't have to worry :classic_rolleyes:

 

 

Oddly, if you remove the first digit (leaving 127) and multiply it by 64 (2**6) you get our next contestant 8128.

Link to comment
worik

worik

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, CPU said:

8127 times I explained that the number of posts does not match because all posts that do not contain the number are hidden.

That must have been at lot of work for the 8129 moderators of LL to read each post thoroughly and take action where necessary. ?

Or is it that I am mistaken and we only have 8 full and a 129/1000th part time moderators? ?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

View Community Rules

Help Support LoversLab

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use