Jump to content

Cyberpunk 2077 Mod Creation Thread


shouganai

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, Maxim J said:

You talk about pre relese censoring or after release. I speak about after release. The censored rouge sex scene and the censored Joy toy blowjob.

Both before and after release. Most of the top CDPR managers distanced themselves from the project. Once it was released MS and Sony have had their way with it since.

Posted
On 2/18/2022 at 9:41 AM, Maxim J said:

From what I know modders work with CDPR, so maybe we will have some modding tools. sex will be a great addition to the story, you have porn adverts, dildos all over the game, buttplugs. Your characters have a vegine and a dick, that they can't use lol.

 

CDPR promised much more sex and not only they underdiliverd( Sex/relationships are better in witcher 2/3), they also censored the game after hot fix 1.05. I remember with rouge you actually had a sex scene with her(Censored), one of the joytoys gave you a pretty detalied blowjob(Censored).

 

I really hope we will get better modding tools.

Well, a lot of players seem to like the changes in gamemechanics from the last patches. Only Kotaku is totally in denial, saying "nothing changed" while youtubers all over the planet can point out how some things play radically different. And, ofcourse, Kotaku is upset about Panam sending a couple of suggestive selfies. No sane person would ever take that website serious, but we can only hope CDPR doesn't take them serious either. Seems like they're still upset for being locked out of previewing because of the silly demands they made from CDPR pre-launch.

Posted
2 hours ago, MyFirstSony said:

Well, a lot of players seem to like the changes in gamemechanics from the last patches. Only Kotaku is totally in denial, saying "nothing changed" while youtubers all over the planet can point out how some things play radically different. And, ofcourse, Kotaku is upset about Panam sending a couple of suggestive selfies. No sane person would ever take that website serious, but we can only hope CDPR doesn't take them serious either. Seems like they're still upset for being locked out of previewing because of the silly demands they made from CDPR pre-launch.

 

At this point CDPR only looks at the money, and I think they are looking at player feedback.

Posted
2 hours ago, Maxim J said:

 

At this point CDPR only looks at the money, and I think they are looking at player feedback.

I don't think it's CDPR that's looking at the money so much as it is Microshit and Sony. Those two invested in the game then fucked it up now they're scrambling trying to get some gain out of it. The original intent by CDPR was to once again push the envelope of what a game could be and contain; sex, nudity, language and human physicality. They ran out of time and money though and that's when Microshit and Sony jumped in because they knew what a success that would be. They , however, did NOT want all the sex and nudity and didn't realize that by taking that out the game would NOT do as well as the Witcher series. That was and is the problem. We can only hope that any future CDPR projects DO NOT include Microshit and SonyNONONO's involvement.

Posted
12 hours ago, Oldwolf58 said:

I don't think it's CDPR that's looking at the money so much as it is Microshit and Sony. Those two invested in the game then fucked it up now they're scrambling trying to get some gain out of it. The original intent by CDPR was to once again push the envelope of what a game could be and contain; sex, nudity, language and human physicality. They ran out of time and money though and that's when Microshit and Sony jumped in because they knew what a success that would be. They , however, did NOT want all the sex and nudity and didn't realize that by taking that out the game would NOT do as well as the Witcher series. That was and is the problem. We can only hope that any future CDPR projects DO NOT include Microshit and SonyNONONO's involvement.

Indeed, the SJW corporate culture ruins gaming/cinema.

 

As I've said modders would most likely fix it, and we will se a big thread here like with skyrim/fallout 4

Posted

When did CDPR ever get money from Sony or Micro$oft? As far as I know the only money they ever got was from the Polish government to develop the online mode.

Posted

Now that 1.5 update has made this game relatively close to what was promised, should it perhaps finally get it's own sub-forum?  Prolly like Paradox sub-forum, so just a CDPR sub-forum (since I'm assuming W3 prolly also has mods, I wouldn't know, don't play it).

Posted
37 minutes ago, -Player1- said:

 

"Now that 1.5 update has made this game relatively close to what was promised"

 

Are you lost?

There is so much, so much still completely missing, broken or simply bugged. After a what, almost one and a half years?

We were told we get 2 updates for free, yet 1.5 counts as one of them, although it's just what should have been included in the start.
The next update will be alike, mark my words. And then we will be asked to pay for a dlc for 30 bucks. 

Bro, they care for money, and money alone. We have to realize that they went the easy route, the EA/Ubisoft route.

And let's not talk about all the lies we were told. Y'all cry about Todd, yet cdpr is doing the exact same and people still buy it.

 

Bro, don't bro me.  I said "relatively close."  Not "exactly."  As for it being about the money alone, it was ALWAYS about the money.  They ain't a non-profit.  Grow up.  Don't be naïve.  If you bought into the hype and paid full price, that's on you.  I waited and got half off.

 

Anyways, so CDPR sub-forum anyone, y/n?

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, ghostfalll said:

 

Bro, don't bro me.  I said "relatively close."  Not "exactly."  As for it being about the money alone, it was ALWAYS about the money.  They ain't a non-profit.  Grow up.  Don't be naïve.  If you bought into the hype and paid full price, that's on you.  I waited and got half off.

 

Anyways, so CDPR sub-forum anyone, y/n?

 

No, really? They need to earn what they have spent in order to pay the bills? Really, bro? they aren't the welfare? Now you tell me, bro.

Bro, don't get into your nerd's rage over a simple fact.

And you tell me to grow up, bro?

 

I didn't spend a single penny on the game for i got it from my viewers, bro.

You think you dodged a bullet, any bullet, waiting? Bro!?

That's not how this works, bro, don't be naive, bro!

 

Also, i deleted my original post, Brosef stalin.

No time for this kinda thang, Marco brolo.

I've should'a realized this earlier, Wolfgang amadeus brozart.

People tend to get all upperdy for no real reason nowadays, brozilla.

 

This may calm you:

Spoiler



Attention, lot's of Shrek inside.

Edited by -Player1-
Posted

Are you still discussing about modding the game (that is actually moddable) or just trolling?

Next troll post will close the thread and get a warning to the author.

Posted
On 2/24/2022 at 5:27 PM, ghostfalll said:

Anyways, so CDPR sub-forum anyone, y/n?

 

There's clearly no need for a subforum yet... Games here get a subforum when their modding activity grows larger than Adult Gaming can sustain. Like with Rimworld or Stellaris.
This is the CP2077 Mod Creation Thread, and it's had 1 mod posted in the last 6 months... A texture replacer.

I hope like hell that some amazing release of WolvenKit comes out which opens up Cyberpunk and explodes the scene to Skyrim levels of modding... But the content has to come before the subforums; not the other way around.

Posted
17 hours ago, TheCaptn said:

 

There's clearly no need for a subforum yet... Games here get a subforum when their modding activity grows larger than Adult Gaming can sustain. Like with Rimworld or Stellaris.
This is the CP2077 Mod Creation Thread, and it's had 1 mod posted in the last 6 months... A texture replacer.

I hope like hell that some amazing release of WolvenKit comes out which opens up Cyberpunk and explodes the scene to Skyrim levels of modding... But the content has to come before the subforums; not the other way around.

 

i unfortunately have to agree with this cyberpunk 2077 is kinda in the same position that skyrim was in when it first came out and there was no script extender for i think it was like a year

it would be very nice if there was a subfourm but until there is more mods available i have to agree that we need to wait for one

 

now on to some more productive topics what i think can be done so far is

  • texture replacers 
  • model replacers (flashback to thomas the train dragon)
  • obligatory nude mods
  • lewd load screens

what i don't believe can be done till some sort of good script extender comes out is

  • sex framework
  • new in game hacks
  • nsfw encounter/events/quest
  • the mods that require a sex framework like the inevitable defeat type sex mods
Posted
On 2/28/2022 at 12:39 PM, z3r0theshadowblade said:

 

  • lewd load screens

what i don't believe can be done till some sort of good script extender comes out is

  • sex framework
  • new in game hacks
  • nsfw encounter/events/quest
  • the mods that require a sex framework like the inevitable defeat type sex mods

 

Fair enough, I guess I had assumed that a few more of the Nexus mods had also migrated here since some peeps hate Nexus.  But looking at Wolvenkit, it seems to include a script extender (RED4ext).  Does it suck or something, hard to use maybe?  I understand that CDPR poached at least part of the Wolvenkit team to "improve mod support" (ie, fix shit, I guess), but updates still seem to be dropping for Wolvenkit... more just curious for now.

Posted
4 hours ago, ghostfalll said:

 

Fair enough, I guess I had assumed that a few more of the Nexus mods had also migrated here since some peeps hate Nexus.  But looking at Wolvenkit, it seems to include a script extender (RED4ext).  Does it suck or something, hard to use maybe?  I understand that CDPR poached at least part of the Wolvenkit team to "improve mod support" (ie, fix shit, I guess), but updates still seem to be dropping for Wolvenkit... more just curious for now.

from what i understand the (RED4ext) is a comunity script extender they just link if memory serves right there were two or three script extenders and i think two of them use lua

Posted (edited)
On 3/3/2022 at 3:49 PM, ghostfalll said:

 

But looking at Wolvenkit, it seems to include a script extender (RED4ext).  Does it suck or something, hard to use maybe?  I understand that CDPR poached at least part of the Wolvenkit team to "improve mod support" (ie, fix shit, I guess), but updates still seem to be dropping for Wolvenkit... more just curious for now.


I don't really understand the technical side of things, but the impression I get is that just having a script extender doesn't seem to make a huge difference on its own...

Bethesda games start out with a really high degree of script access, just from the CK, and then the extender applies to that and it gets 'longer' over time... i.e. It continues extending year after year.
But In CDPR games we've never really had any script access at all, and the extender seems like it's still building up some of the most basic functionality necessary for future advances... i.e It's still in the process of working up to 'Square 1'.

To get sex working in the game we need skeleton access, the ability to inject new animations, and the ability to align and sync those animations between actors... And that still seems so far away to me that it's hard to be hopeful at the point. And I'm not confident that CDPR are really all that committed to modding... It seems to me like they want the cache and longevity that an active mod scene can bring, but without giving up any of their iron grip on game assets and systems.

My biggest hope was that their source code being leaked would make that impossible, but it doesn't seem to have worked out that way.

Edited by TheCaptn
Posted
11 minutes ago, TheCaptn said:


I don't really understand the technical side of things, but the impression I get is that just having a script extender doesn't seem to make a huge difference on its own...

Bethesda games start out with a really high degree of script access, just from the CK, and then the extender applies to that and it gets 'longer' over time... i.e. It continues extending year after year.
But In CDPR games we've never really had any script access at all, and the extender seems like it's still building up some of the most basic functionality necessary for future advances... i.e It's still in the process of working up to 'Square 1'.

To get sex working in the game we need skeleton access, the ability to inject new animations, and the ability to align and sync those animations between actors... And that still seems so far away to me that it's hard to be hopeful at the point. And I'm not confident that CDPR are really all that committed to modding... It seems to me like they want the cache and longevity that an active mod scene can bring, but without giving up any of their iron grip on game assets and systems.

My biggest hope was that their source code being leaked would make that impossible, but it doesn't seem to have worked out that way.

 

Bethesda games do start out with a high degree of scrip access but thats as far as i understand because there using the ck to make there games

 

as far as i understand cdpr does not use the wolven kit to make there games it's a addon for modders as far as i have been able to tell

 

it is true To get sex working in the game we need skeleton access, the ability to inject new animations, and the ability to align and sync those animations between actors and as i understand the scriptextender/wolvenkit are just not there yet keep in mind there pretty new and keep in mind cdpr just got the game to a pretty playable state

Posted
On 3/9/2022 at 6:32 PM, z3r0theshadowblade said:

as far as i understand cdpr does not use the wolven kit to make there games it's a addon for modders as far as i have been able to tell

 

it is true To get sex working in the game we need skeleton access, the ability to inject new animations, and the ability to align and sync those animations between actors and as i understand the scriptextender/wolvenkit are just not there yet keep in mind there pretty new and keep in mind cdpr just got the game to a pretty playable state

CDPR I'm sure has an actual in-house engine, wolvenkit is cobbled together by skilled enthusiasts (of which CDPR has poached a few).  And yeah, maybe comparing CDPR to Bethesda easiest since so much modding of Bethesda products, but Bethesda generally seems to release basically complete products; maybe W3 was just an anomaly, not part of a pattern... or maybe just having the GOG store pays the bills, but not dividends.

 

Considering how CDPR hyped a lot of stuff that they either I guess never intended to do or otherwise dropped, I guess it is possible that FULL mod support is more the former than the latter.  And yes, lood mods definitely primarily need skeletal rig access, but using GANs to generate new voice lines starting to become another aspect to explore (but freely, some service already charges to do this and they likely gonna get sued).  But one can still hope with wolvenkit peeps getting hired!

Posted
11 hours ago, Wasmachensachen said:

There is a development build of wolvenkit right now, where it is possible to replace animations. Adding animations seems to be totally possible too! It's getting there guys.

 

The video shows a proof of concept.

 

Screenshot_2022-03-13-20-04-37-87_572064f74bd5f9fa804b05334aa4f912.jpg

this proves my point the wolven kit is not ready for modding the games animations and until there is proper support for it there is just no way for a sex framework to be made and as ghostfall said "wolvenkit is cobbled together by skilled enthusiasts (of which CDPR has poached a few)" i believe cdpr keeps poaching the skilled modders before they have a chance to make good progress on the wolven kit because of the messy game launch these people that get poached are probably being sent to fix there mess

 

now all that being said all it takes is one skilled modder to create a framework i remember before the skyrim script extender was done someone had already had a framework if the LL community has proven one thing to me it's nothing can stop there modding powers

Posted
2 hours ago, z3r0theshadowblade said:

this proves my point the wolven kit is not ready for modding the games animations and until there is proper support for it there is just no way for a sex framework to be made and as ghostfall said "wolvenkit is cobbled together by skilled enthusiasts (of which CDPR has poached a few)" i believe cdpr keeps poaching the skilled modders before they have a chance to make good progress on the wolven kit because of the messy game launch these people that get poached are probably being sent to fix there mess

 

now all that being said all it takes is one skilled modder to create a framework i remember before the skyrim script extender was done someone had already had a framework if the LL community has proven one thing to me it's nothing can stop there modding powers

Ofc WolvenKit is not on the level of a CreationKit yet... How could it? They startet from almost zero. Taking this into account, it Is very impressive what they have archived by now. 

There is not as much in the way for a sex framework as you might believe... I think the only big stone, blocking the way for a sex framework is, the support of injecting custom animations.

 

And don't forget, importing custom animations was not possible for about a year after release of Skyrim as well. This is still only possible with weird workarounds like FNIS.

 

BTW. Modders have full access to the Cyberpunk scripting system with CET and redscript already. And there is a script extender called Red4ext.

Posted
On 3/14/2022 at 7:11 AM, Wasmachensachen said:

Ofc WolvenKit is not on the level of a CreationKit yet... How could it? They startet from almost zero. Taking this into account, it Is very impressive what they have archived by now. 

There is not as much in the way for a sex framework as you might believe... I think the only big stone, blocking the way for a sex framework is, the support of injecting custom animations.

 

And don't forget, importing custom animations was not possible for about a year after release of Skyrim as well. This is still only possible with weird workarounds like FNIS.

 

BTW. Modders have full access to the Cyberpunk scripting system with CET and redscript already. And there is a script extender called Red4ext.

so by that information the only thing we would be waiting on is the custom animations since there is full access to the scripting system now hopefully we don't get a weird workaround like fnis

Posted
On 3/14/2022 at 12:11 PM, Wasmachensachen said:

Ofc WolvenKit is not on the level of a CreationKit yet... How could it? They startet from almost zero. Taking this into account, it Is very impressive what they have archived by now. 

There is not as much in the way for a sex framework as you might believe... I think the only big stone, blocking the way for a sex framework is, the support of injecting custom animations.

 

And don't forget, importing custom animations was not possible for about a year after release of Skyrim as well. This is still only possible with weird workarounds like FNIS.

 

BTW. Modders have full access to the Cyberpunk scripting system with CET and redscript already. And there is a script extender called Red4ext.

Soon Cyberpunk will reach that level, There are a lot of people that want sex/naughty mods for the game.

Posted

At this point, all I want from CP77's modding capabilities is the ability to call upon already implemented animations. Like the animations they used for V to eat, drink, sit, lean, etc. that were implemented on quests but GOD KNOWS WHY they didn't implemented in sandboxing. That would include the ability to call upon the joytoy scenes structures to maybe implement more joytoys and more variety. That is a lot, but that would be enough for now.

Witcher 3 just got to that point with the Companion mod. freaking yeeeaaarss after. But I'm noticing Cyberpunk is moving a lot faster.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...