Jump to content

[mod] [Abandoned] [Rimworld] Genital support patch for Lost Forest


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/15/2020 at 11:29 AM, Ed86 said:

this removes all harmony patches of LF, sort of last resort

imo its better to make local copy of LF and use dnspy to remove "n" from LF assembly

LostForestRimworldReEnabler.7z 1.8 MB · 31 downloads

So it appears that the author of Lost Forest made a counter to this, as well. Apparently, having this installed displays a message saying Lost Forest will never be compatible with mature content and then spawns a manhunter pack.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Ronnie21093 said:

So it appears that the author of Lost Forest made a counter to this, as well. Apparently, having this installed displays a message saying Lost Forest will never be compatible with mature content and then spawns a manhunter pack.

Yep, IGNI completely broke RJW compatibility. The patch I've given out so far no longer works.

So you can either learn to edit the part of the code that blocks RJW with dnSpy yourself or just move one from LF.

Posted

At this point, no need to force patch their mod, they dont want it and actively wanna block it and evry other attempt of it then why even bother. At this point i feel like making an alternative race mod siilar to it would be better than deal with the douche author, we're free to do that at least anyways. Why feed them any more attention when they disable comments, make restrictive patches n have to keep checking this forum for the patches anyways? Other race mods exists as well and we dont need prepare carefully or this mod since other mods can do the same or similar stuff, and there's duplicate mods for same race n even foods etc that conflict so making a similar mod wont be same, and since it's not open source then any of the implementation would be different than theirs and Wine for Linux exists on same principle so no legal issues as well.

Posted
14 hours ago, arnabbiswas said:

At this point, no need to force patch their mod, they dont want it and actively wanna block it and evry other attempt of it then why even bother. At this point i feel like making an alternative race mod siilar to it would be better than deal with the douche author, we're free to do that at least anyways. Why feed them any more attention when they disable comments, make restrictive patches n have to keep checking this forum for the patches anyways? Other race mods exists as well and we dont need prepare carefully or this mod since other mods can do the same or similar stuff, and there's duplicate mods for same race n even foods etc that conflict so making a similar mod wont be same, and since it's not open source then any of the implementation would be different than theirs and Wine for Linux exists on same principle so no legal issues as well.

dont give up sen-pie!

Posted

I personally haven't played Rimworld in ages and thought of coming back but then when I was checking updates for my mods, I saw this entire debacle.

 

I must admit it's saddens me to see the author of the original mod going up so far to the extent to try to block RJW, I can't see the justification in it even though I like the original mod quite a bit. :( 

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, GuiltySweets said:

So does this patch work with current LF? since its not being updated anymore?

The gender balancing patch does still work. But since LF doesn't work with rimjobworld anymore, it has become pointless.

Posted
12 hours ago, bearlyAlive said:

The gender balancing patch does still work. But since LF doesn't work with rimjobworld anymore, it has become pointless.

Wasn't the patch by Ed86 meant to make LF work with RJW again? The author of LF hasn't updated his mod since June 21st, so that patch should still work, I believe?

Posted
27 minutes ago, Ronnie21093 said:

Wasn't the patch by Ed86 meant to make LF work with RJW again? The author of LF hasn't updated his mod since June 21st, so that patch should still work, I believe?

Maybe, I haven't tried ED86's mod, I just removed the block myself with dnSpy.

Posted
On 6/30/2020 at 11:21 AM, bearlyAlive said:

I just removed the block myself with dnSpy.

I just got done doing this with the latest version of LF... and boy did he have a hard-on for keeping this mod out.

I also turned the Unique Spawn Check method into a always true operation.. and now my game runs faster.

Also after updating and doing this my game doesn't crash when I quit to desktop....

 

Remember everyone, LF doesn't contain RJW specific "MALICIOUS CODE" /s

 

A bit off topic, and this may be the fault of the decompiler, but man is this code spaghetti.

Posted

I haven't looked at the LF code too much, just what I needed to enable RJW.

But I'm currently working on his other mod and either the de-compiler really messed up, or there's some shit quality code here.

Posted

Greetings, i attempted to do this on my own but I must be blind...
Successfully removed the code that Some_Maj posted a while back but instead of being named "n", it was named "p" and saved the mod locally. Is there anything else i should be looking out for?
I've been going back and forth on the code for a few days but the Survivor quests just don't want to spawn.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!

Posted
1 hour ago, Thebananaman5 said:

Greetings, i attempted to do this on my own but I must be blind...
Successfully removed the code that Some_Maj posted a while back but instead of being named "n", it was named "p" and saved the mod locally. Is there anything else i should be looking out for?
I've been going back and forth on the code for a few days but the Survivor quests just don't want to spawn.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!

That's not entirely accurate anymore, besides the harmony patch there's also another block deeper in the code if you're using the latest version.
But if you scroll up, Ed86 posted the modified dll, that should make it run.

Posted
20 hours ago, bearlyAlive said:

That's not entirely accurate anymore, besides the harmony patch there's also another block deeper in the code if you're using the latest version.
But if you scroll up, Ed86 posted the modified dll, that should make it run.

Thank you kindly, giving it a go!

Posted
8 hours ago, Elgate said:

Does Ed version come with the already patched genital support? Or do I have to take it as well?

The genital support is seperate, although if you already have race support you don't need it anymore

Posted

The author of the mod of the "Lost Forest" IGNI, must really have "Abrasive" & "Very Neurotic" trait for certain.

 

Author: "Bandits attack! What do?"

Everyone: "We fight! We knock them all out! Win!"

Author: "And then?"

Everyone: "We capture them and make them healthy again!"

Author: "And then you release them..."

Everyone: "No! We make them wives and slaves." 

Author: (#`д´)ノ "NO! YOU CAN'T DO THAT! BECAUSE I SAY SO!"

Author: (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ) "I hate you all so much! REEEEE!"

 

p.s. Someone really mess up the author... "Foxia" is originally Korean.

It's Kuhimo a.k.a. SCP-953 │ Metamorphic │ Polymorphic Humanoid │ Keter ?

Posted

Ey, I've been gone for a bit.

 

Ed, you're a meme. ♥️

 

So I was out of the loop for quite a bit. Seems IGNI got the mod delisted by moderators for violating the EULA or something and people have been going on a little comment war regarding "ethics" in rimworld, basically.

 

I need a bigger cup of coffee to sip from.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/21/2020 at 1:59 PM, Ronnie21093 said:

So it appears that the author of Lost Forest made a counter to this, as well. Apparently, having this installed displays a message saying Lost Forest will never be compatible with mature content and then spawns a manhunter pack.

The message and the countermeasures will display as long as you install RJW.The so-called 'gift' in the message seems to triple the frequency of attacks (perfect, a free assult strenthen mod lol). No idea whether IGNI will add more malicious codes in the future or not.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I'm just coming back to Rimworld after a while off and checking up on the status of my favourite mods only to find it looks like I missed even more of a shit show with LF. Mod author made it summon manhunters now or something?

 

Whats the status of LF now? Does 1.1 work with 1.2? If not what do I need to do to make it work now? Any help would be appreciated.

Posted
2 hours ago, torill said:

I'm just coming back to Rimworld after a while off and checking up on the status of my favourite mods only to find it looks like I missed even more of a shit show with LF. Mod author made it summon manhunters now or something?

 

Whats the status of LF now? Does 1.1 work with 1.2? If not what do I need to do to make it work now? Any help would be appreciated.

1.1 does not work with 1.2, and (apparently) the author of LF doesn't want anyone updating it to 1.2

Posted

Could someone post a link or something for the latest version that works with these patches... There should be no problem posting links or so to a mod without asking (as you do not change it), just helping someone get an older version of a mod (research proposes perhaps).

  • 9 months later...
Posted

I'm not saying you should use dnSpy and it's a good thing no one can use reflection in Visual Studio. against a serialized object.. if it happens to be in a protected class...

Or fork a copy to put on f95z...

 

That would be terrible thing to do... to take screen shots of the pixels/artwork and arrange them in such away that causes discomfort...

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1847010407

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, SimulatedFantasyHero said:

I'm not saying you should use dnSpy and it's a good thing no one can use reflection in Visual Studio. against a serialized object.. if it happens to be in a protected class...

Or fork a copy to put on f95z...

 

That would be terrible thing to do... to take screen shots of the pixels/artwork and arrange them in such away that causes discomfort...

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1847010407

 

 

I think the mod is pretty much dead, and I somehow doubt anyone here would wanna go through the effort of updating the mod to Rimworld version 1.2 just to eventually get told by the creator to take it down.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...