Jump to content

mercplatypus

Members
  • Posts

    543
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Gender
    He/Him

Recent Profile Visitors

1,672 profile views
  1. Anything that relies on the Fallout 4 script Extender will be affected. At the very least several of the most important dependencies require F4SE to be up to date, so they will all break. This mod can work just fine on it's own without any of the soft dependencies as long as AAF and this mod get updated for F4SE. I have a feeling the next major update will have to remove things that simply aren't getting updated or supported anymore. When this happened in Skyrim there were a ton of mods that just simply did not get updated and fell by the wayside. Fallout 4 has always had a smaller modding base and it's entirely possible that several of the major soft dependencies simply don't get updated.
  2. Wasn't offering to help with writing the story. I expect you've got that fully on lock. I was offering more help on things like if you get stuck trying to work through a story element being a sound board or doing proofreading. Think more along the lines of the person you have that reads through the rough draft to see if everything makes sense. Offers there if you ever think you'd benefit from a second set of eyes, no worries if not.
  3. It isn't needed, there's just some use for some of it's features if you do decide to have it. If you do the mod gives you the option of making your character a Tsex masochist. You absolutely can skip it if you want and you won't miss out on anything.
  4. I wrote the entire story for a couple of mods over in Skyrim including all the dialogue. I'm shit when it comes to computer work, but story work is something I can help you out with if you'd like. Usually it just boils down to "how do I make this make sense?"
  5. The feature to approach muties outside the pit while pacified would be a good addition that carries over to the rest of the game. Not too wild on the name. It's a bit too smart for any of the local mutants. You could argue that he's awest coast mutant which did have intelligent mutants, but they were all sterile. If he's a product of the Commonwealth wasteland it'd be more fitting if he had a name more in line with what's already in the pit. Cunt Crusher, Pussy Pounder, Fuck Master, Big Daddy, or something similar would probably work a bit better. Have some fun with it.
  6. Played through this. I like the additions but I think the next update is really going to need to focus on building out the rest of the mod outside the breeding pit. I'm talking about all the connections to various spots around the commonwealth or possibly even just focusing on getting that super mutant companion up and running. Everything inside the pit is working as advertised. The perks get applied, the values get updated, and everything is working for me as advertised. Not the wildest fan of having both USB type V and Exhibitionist as they heavily conflict with each other, but being able to decline one or the other is good.
  7. This is going to breathe some new life into the FO4 scene. A BDSM framework that's actually getting attention and improvements is huge. I appreciate DD but we needed something designed from the ground up for this game. This does mean I'll need to start a new game again. Such is the price of progress.
  8. I have to say that I second this idea. Maybe not necessarily after the first whipping, but if it was similar to how you have a chance to gain one rank after whippings similarly to how you can gain multiple ranks of animal friend training with Snoopy it might be a nice addition. It does make sense that you would become tougher over time. Granted it might be difficult to determine what would be fair for the chance of getting the perk. Too high and you could have the thing maxxed out by the end of Pest Control without issue, too low and it might as well never exist. I still think it would be worth at least a look as a possible addition.
  9. I am not talking about the legality of this either. Legally speaking she signed the paperwork and it doesn't matter because the paperwork is all legal. This is all about morality. From what I understand she works with a non profit that specializes in helping all women associated with the sex industry to leave the industry. She also shares her testimony publicly to help others learn from her mistakes to help others not repeat those mistakes. This is roughly the porn equivalent of a recovering junkie or alcoholic wanting to help other junkies and alcoholics clean themselves up and go sober. What you are saying basically would boil down to saying that she shouldn't have anything at all to say about the matter because she was involved in it. It's a standard we would not intelligently or reasonably hold for any woman forced into prostitution or for people who committed a serious crime at a young age and turned their lives around in prison. The only meaningful difference is that her decisions she regrets involve material we can use to sexually gratify ourselves regardless of her wishes on the matter. At the end of the day it really boils down to one question. Are you the kind of person who thinks that you have an absolute right to exploit some one's biggest fuck up in their life forever regardless of their wishes for that fuck up to be removed from the internet solely because you can use it to provide yourself sexual gratification, or do you think she should be shown a little decency knowing full good and well that there are literally millions of other women out there proud to have that material that you can use for your purposes with no moral question at all. The only reason we allow things to live forever in the internet is because humanity as a whole tends to be pretty awful at morality. I say if she wants her images and videos and photos removed, the amount of revenue being generated can't be so much that it really matters to the $100 billion per year industry can't live without it. I might have had a different perspective if we were talking about her making something last week, but we're talking about 20 years ago.
  10. Here's my 2 cents on the matter. Did she make some serious money from her adult film work? Absolutely. Did she accept the money at the time? Absolutely. Is it completely unreasonable to think that she'd reach a point in her life where she's grown to greatly dislike the porn industry? No, it isn't. Is it truly hypocritical of her to make some serious life changes and realize she doesn't want that material out there anymore? Not in the slightest. If she's joined the Christian faith, which looks down on porn, and she is actively trying to clean everything up I think that she should have some consideration. I would ask people to consider a guy who took a job working for the government or enlisting in the military only to find out after getting past the propaganda realizing they can't stand that government. Sure, depending on the job he'd have benefitted from tens of thousands, or if they had a security clearance, potentially millions of dollars spent to get him where he is at that time. He could have potentially earned a substantial amount in benefits and pay during his contract. We wouldn't view it as hypocritical of that guy to finish his contract and want to never work for the government again. We wouldn't view it as hypocritical if he began actively advocating against what that government was doing. Sure, one is a job that could have a significant impact on things in society and the other is just porn, but the main point is the same. If anyone in porn wants out and is actively turning down royalties and by their actions showing that they want themselves as far from where they got their start as they can, then I think respecting their wishes is appropriate. Turning down $15k a month is nothing to sniff at. There's plenty of other porn stars out there who are actively and enthusiastically involved in the business. I do think that it's unfortunate that she will never be able to remove her porn work going forward, but that's the nature of those kinds of agreements when you're in an industry where your image is going to be out there. Keeping a mod private is a very small thing, but even porn stars and former porn stars should have some basic courtesy the same as anyone else would want.
  11. I honestly don't remember what the name of the first computer game I played was. I remember that it was 8-bit and that it was one of those games where you had you sprite, another sprite and needed to plot a trajectory to hit it back around 1991-1992. The sprites were super basic and I remember you couldn't really tell what they were supposed to be by just looking at them. I think the first console and console game I got my hands on was Ultraman for Super Nintendo in the early to mid 90's. I did toy around with an Atari at one point, but that was owned by a friend who had gotten it as a collector's item.
  12. Looks like getting rid of Sim Settlements 2 was all that was needed. That slightly annoys me as I liked using it to build settlements I didn't want to build up myself, but it wasn't vital. Thanks for the heads up.
  13. I am running into an issue with the current release. The mod does not progress any quest stages after an AAF scene, forcing me to manually force the quests forward with console commands each and every single time. This is consistent with every single AAF scene. For example the first scene with Murphy in the speakeasy will play, but the quest remains stuck at stage 140. If I console command it forward everything will play just fine until the next AAF scene (usually I skip the walk, which would mean my normal next scene is Jared in the Whorehouse) where we'll talk, then he'll have sex with my character, then progress will stop again. I double checked to make sure I have AAF 171 Beta and do not have Native Sync. I also disabled the tried with the LLFP plugin enabled in real handcuffs and with it disabled. I've tried using the UAP patch and Indarellos patch. I've made sure Commonwealth Slavers is at the bottom of my load order. I'm uploading a copy of one of my papyrus logs. I'm awful at reading through these, but I'm hoping some one here can see were everything is going pear shaped. This is new game from character creation all the way to the scene with Murphy in the speakeasy. Papyrus.1.log
  14. I can see where the problem is. In English sleeping with someone means having sex with them. Both perks are triggered by having sex with someone, not by just sleeping in a bed. You need to have sex with at least one NPC, masturbation will not work, and for town bicycle you need settlers in the settlement. Companions only count as settlers in the settlement when they are available to follow you. If this is the very beggining of the game where Codsworth refuses to follow you, then the game does not count him for Town Bicycle. Get a settler there and have sex with them, you should see both perks activate after you finish.
  15. I would state that it would be a nice to have thing, but really can't see it as a priority. Besides, I think it would likely be better to talk with whoever is maintaining FPE and FPER for that kind of integration as it would really just boil down to swapping the adult super mutant from vanilla once the kid is fully grown into an adult from the workshop. Everything else of benefit would come from the workshop itself. As it is without any work you can build a button that auto generates a super mutant for your settlement, so just getting rid of the one you birthed and pushing the button to make a new one to take it's place isn't that much trouble for right now. It's a super fast and effective workaround which means that it would really make more sense to focus on higher priority items like connecting the tunnels and whatnot.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. For more information, see our Privacy Policy & Terms of Use