Is Babette considered Loli?

[DarkRavage]

I'm thinking about making a replacer for babette. The moral question is whether of not she is considered a child. Technically she is a vampire for over hundreds of year old. That would make her legal right?

[Miyu Miyu]

yes...but her appearance as a child can spark a controversy ... if it is in a sexual way....in my opinion that is 

[srayesmanll]

Take a look at rule 13, and specifically the link there ( http://www.loverslab.com/topic/27346-02162014-attention-policy-change-regarding-content-with-underage-characters/ ).

[myuhinny]

No she is still a child no matter how old she is suppose to be and she is flagged as one. You can make a replacer but it has to be acceptable.

[winny257]

I would have you also on the forum rules indicated.   
what you're doing private is your thing but as soon as it becomes public there will criminally!
it is a thing of the moral, for me is Babette a CHILD even if she were a thousand years old, she was bitten as a child of a vampire. 

[Cock Sucker]

As long as it's not a "sexual" or "provocative" change it should be fine, having underwear on the mesh helps also.

 

as an example have you seen the follower Lamae? First two versions you could "strip" her nude which caused an up roar 3rd version fixed it by messing around with the mesh / paths, 4th and current version? placed mesh underwear and / cute "clean" cloths and thus was ALLOWED even on nexus. ( and nexus usually goes mental on anything child like / risky )

 

If your version is like this it should be fine.

[darkevilhum]

Unless you're blind and deaf, she's a child.

[tenzan]

This place is pretty open and welcome to all types of weird stuff.. but sometimes you just seriously have to get your personal shit sorted out.

[aqqh]

i suppose you can consider her a midget 

 

As for her replacer and her use in sexlab mods... using an actor of low height in sexlab scene leads to severe case of animation misalignment.

Dont bother.

I just looks stupid and nothing else.

[Sural Argonus]

I am not ashamed to admit I am not up on all the terms, but even I know this one. I agree even tho she was born a couple hundred years prior, doesn't change the fact that she is still a child.  Even if her mind isn't 

She will forever be a Loli.  Unless you do a replacer for her with an older body, then LL will say no way.

 

[Guest]

Extract from rules, N 13:

"As we are typically associated as being an adult pornographic community, we will not allow any sort of nudity or sexual content involving characters that could be seen as depicting somebody as underage. This includes any character that could be seen as loli, shota, child, or underage teen, regardless of it's position as a virtual character or the intent to be passed off as a mystical race who only looks young; the only thing that matters in this respect is what the character appears to be at a glance.

For further details on this matter, check the related announcement"

 

Babette from Elders Scrolls Wiki:

"At the age of ten, Babette was bitten by a vampire, becoming one herself. She's lived over three hundred years as one, and boasts about how her innocent appearance makes killing easier."

 

 

And so it should be considered 10 years old (vampires do not age.)

As other member stated: no nudity and no sex. Other mods are OK.

 

 

Topic Locked.