The Banning Game - II

[Guest]

34 minutes ago, donkeywho said:

Banned for being right again

Banned for encouraging Psalam, when you know he probably has things in hand

[netruss1964]

2 hours ago, LadySmoks said:

Banned for encouraging Psalam, when you know he probably has things in hand

BANNED for excess negativity and implication, Palm always has it in hand. ( Aviso, Achtung, Attention: some spelling errors are intentional. ).

[Guest]

29 minutes ago, netruss1964 said:

BANNED for excess negativity and implication, Palm always has it in hand. ( Aviso, Achtung, Attention: some spelling errors are intentional. ).

Banned for false sense of assuredness without empirical evidence to support (or pics)

[worik]

8 hours ago, LadySmoks said:

Banned for false sense of assuredness without empirical evidence to support (or pics)

BANNED for using a much more complex sentence than:

Quote

PICTURES! Or it didn't happen!

 

Edited November 8, 2021 by worik
compleX

[Psalam]

3 hours ago, worik said:

BANNED for using a much more compley sentence than:

 

BANNED for being a slave to the modern, instant communication society (Ever heard of Photoshop?)

[Evaloves4]

3 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED for being a slave to the modern, instant communication society (Ever heard of Photoshop?)

> banned for using old ways

[Psalam]

3 minutes ago, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for using old ways

BANNED because I always heed Robert Frost - "two roads diverged in a wood and I - I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference."

[Evaloves4]

Just now, Psalam said:

BANNED because I always heed Robert Frost - "two roads diverged in a wood and I - I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference."

> banned for risking your life taking less traveled road while Romans built wise and safe roads

[Psalam]

Just now, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for risking your life taking less traveled road while Romans built wise and safe roads

BANNED because "where are they now?" (the Romans not the roads)

[Evaloves4]

Just now, Psalam said:

BANNED because "where are they now?" (the Romans not the roads)

> banned for no road is 100% safe

[Psalam]

6 minutes ago, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for no road is 100% safe

BANNED for that is true. After all, every road has other people on it (just how many is what Robert Frost alluded to).

[Evaloves4]

4 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED for that is true. After all, every road has other people on it (just how many is what Robert Frost alluded to).

> banned for i like road crowded with lesbians and female bisexuals

[Psalam]

6 minutes ago, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for i like road crowded with lesbians and female bisexuals

BANNED because sadly they make up only a small fraction of the people in the road

[Evaloves4]

33 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED because sadly they make up only a small fraction of the people in the road

> banned for not investing in wider roads

[Psalam]

2 minutes ago, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for not investing in wider roads

BANNED because I have done so, as I understand it, you are the one who prefers their "roads" narrow.

[Evaloves4]

2 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED because I have done so, as I understand it, you are the one who prefers their "roads" narrow.

> banned for I don't know what are you talking about

[Psalam]

43 minutes ago, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for I don't know what are you talking about

BANNED because I was talking about things that I think should be large and curvy and you have expressed otherwise

[Evaloves4]

1 minute ago, Psalam said:

BANNED because I was talking about things that I think should be large and curvy and you have expressed otherwise

> banned for I understand now and banned for loving curvy girls

[Psalam]

5 minutes ago, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for I understand now and banned for loving curvy girls

BANNED for loving girls whose bodies could just as easily belong on teenage boys

[Evaloves4]

Just now, Psalam said:

BANNED for loving girls whose bodies could just as easily belong on teenage boys

> banned for petite girls' bodies are best

[Psalam]

1 minute ago, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for petite girls' bodies are best

BANNED because, as those Romans you brought up earlier would say, de gustibus non est disputandam (and my Latin is also rusty so don't get all over me if I spelled something incorrectly)

[worik]

35 minutes ago, EvalovesEP said:

> banned for petite girls' bodies are best

BANNED BANNED BANNED!!!

Because the ultimate advantage of women vs men is that you can tell which side  the face is and which side the ass is.

 

Spoiler

? Try to do that ☝️with men. Failure is guaranteed.

 

Edited November 8, 2021 by worik

[worik]

30 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED because, as those Romans you brought up earlier would say, de gustibus non est disputandam 

BANNED because that ☝️ is exactly why their empire went down to the sewers

[Psalam]

6 minutes ago, worik said:

BANNED because that ☝️ is exactly why their empire went down to the sewers

BANNED because THEY are the reason that we HAVE sewers

[worik]

15 minutes ago, Psalam said:

BANNED because THEY are the reason that we HAVE sewers

BANNED because I like our sewers

Spoiler

? .. as long as nobody is having a closer look what you could find down there.