Incest Fetish

[KoolHndLuke]

5 minutes ago, Idyll said:

 

How dare you have a completely fair disposition with hints of a case to case approach in a world were we often forget it's populated by people and not digits, how dare you make sense and think for yourself!

 

Burn 'em! Together with the same-blood breeding witches and their husband brother who loves her handicaped body that became this way due to an accident, how dare he develop a fetish over time to better handle the situation and make himself and his wife happier!

 

And their dog as well - it was it that began sexual motions at her handicaped, armless, legless, defenceless body but it's not burning on that account, it's burning on account of having "been fucked" by this lecherous, inbreeding filth whose sentiments were most likely an excuse to bring humanity down from the household out!

 

Burn it, burn it, burn it all!

Couple of quotes from one of my fave philosophers;

 

“In order to know virtue, we must first acquaint ourselves with vice.”

 

Not relevant but still like it;

 

“When she's abandoned her moral center and teachings...when she's cast aside her facade of propriety and

lady-like demeanor...when I have so corrupted this fragile thing and brought out a writhing, mewling, bucking, wanton whore

for my enjoyment and pleasure.....

enticing from within this feral lioness...growling and scratching and biting...taking everything I dish out to her.....at that moment she is never more beautiful to me. ”

[Miauzi]

Vor 45 Minuten sagte KoolHndLuke:

Meine Mutter hat mir einmal von einem Buch mit dem Titel „Flowers in the Attic“ erzählt, das sie gelesen hat, und ich war wirklich überrascht, wie es ihre Ansichten über Inzest komplett verändert hat. Sie argumentierte tatsächlich, dass sie – obwohl sie immer noch sehr dagegen war – dass sie Liebe und Zuneigung als sehr verständlich/natürlich ansah. Nun … zum Kontext, diese Frau war zutiefst religiös, stur und sehr ablehnend und kompromisslos gegenüber jeder anderen Form von Sex als der zwischen einem einvernehmlichen Mann und einer Frau. Ich denke, mein Punkt hier ist, zu versuchen , den Dingen gegenüber offen zu bleiben, ohne reflexartig zu reagieren. In meiner Zeit hier bei LL habe ich das getan und sehr viel über andere und mich selbst gelernt. Insgesamt war es aufschlussreich.

 

 

My own learning phase began 17 years ago - with the death of my mother
and today, at the age of 60, I can say that it will probably never be completed

But I made the biggest boost or maybe learning leap a few months after the death of my mother - when I fell into a deep hole - which, in addition to all the personal suffering, also caused the walls I had reached to collapse...
..and I, for example, found the courage to act with my fetishes (latex) in a limited public (regulars' table meeting).

I found people who were just as "crazy" as I was - or even more "crazy" - but in a positive way
and
do spoke to each other -> respectfully!

A very important lesson for me - even if you don't share the "kink" of your counterpart - it's not up to you to judge him...
..on which you yourself will not be condemned (yes - that's what it says somewhere in the Bible)

[Guest]

4 hours ago, RohZima said:

No one has answered the question of what turns them on about the fetish? ?

 

I'm genuinely curious as to why people think it's sexy.

> I said earlier I do not know how to explain what turns me on thinking about having a sex with my brother or/and sister. There is something that makes me very aroused when thinking about it. What makes it so intense and what does it start it, I have no idea.

Edited November 16, 2022 by Evaloves4

[Idyll]

3 hours ago, KoolHndLuke said:

“In order to know virtue, we must first acquaint ourselves with vice.”

 

Exactly.

 

Plus, the "wrongs" we know now will be replaced with new ones once they're "solved" and the same crap will happen again with another, newer "wrong" anyway, it might even have been something done like normal until then too.

[Idyll]

39 minutes ago, RohZima said:

No one has answered the question of what turns them on about the fetish? ?

 

I'm genuinely curious as to why people think it's sexy.

 

The fact that it's not well perceived is definitely a part of it, considering it's considerable as a sexual deviancy.

 

Even if one doesn't care about the "moral" aspect of it, the risks that come along with same-blood progeny baking still make it "undesirable" to produce from such practice which in and of itself makes for the exhilarating part of it.

 

Similar to people bungee jumping loving the thrill of it regardless of the risk they may kill themselves - though there are precautions and standards for the equipments used in bungee most times but that's not known to every who partake and still they do thinking about the risks they don't realise are minimal for the most part.

 

A thrill thing, I think, and also perhaps romance if there are feelings between the members.

[Gukahn]

3 hours ago, RohZima said:

about the fetish?

Because its majorly a forbidden Desire a Number of people might have or thought about and it's almost always a combination of other things, like already mentioned the Age play, Authority, Older Men/Women with younger Women/Man, Twins (no Man on this PLANET can tell me they wouldn't love to have a 3 Some with Twins. ) Maybe even corruption fantasy. Like.. I Have 2 Characters in one of my storys, Twins, the sole Reason I choose to use Twins was just that, one to corrupt and the other one already on her way to become slutty and open. So we have here quite a few fetishes neatly combined in the little Package we call Incest/Twincest, whatever. ? So maybe it's not so much about the Idea of 2 related adults having sex but the big Number of other kinks that come with it no matter the combination? Milf, forced, old,young and so on?

 

Hard to explain it to be honest ?

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Gukahn said:

 (no Man on this PLANET can tell me they wouldn't love to have a 3 Some with Twins. ) Maybe even corruption fantasy.

 

Hard to explain it to be honest ?

[RohZima]

4 hours ago, Idyll said:

 

The fact that it's not well perceived is definitely a part of it, considering it's considerable as a sexual deviancy.

 

Even if one doesn't care about the "moral" aspect of it, the risks that come along with same-blood progeny baking still make it "undesirable" to produce from such practice which in and of itself makes for the exhilarating part of it.

 

Similar to people bungee jumping loving the thrill of it regardless of the risk they may kill themselves - though there are precautions and standards for the equipments used in bungee most times but that's not known to every who partake and still they do thinking about the risks they don't realise are minimal for the most part.

 

A thrill thing, I think, and also perhaps romance if there are feelings between the members.

 

https://poestories.com/read/imp

[Miauzi]

Um - yes - so Christianity - but Islam and Judaism also assume that Adam and Eve were the first people

At the latest when it comes to their children, I ask myself how and where the required reproductive partners come from

So I haven't been able to find anything there so far - but I've only read the Bible up to this point and then put it down confused

does anyone know more??

[Gukahn]

2 hours ago, Miauzi said:

their children

Mothafuckas

[Guest]

3 hours ago, Miauzi said:

Um - yes - so Christianity - but Islam and Judaism also assume that Adam and Eve were the first people

At the latest when it comes to their children, I ask myself how and where the required reproductive partners come from

So I haven't been able to find anything there so far - but I've only read the Bible up to this point and then put it down confused

does anyone know more??

> Actually, according to Jewish tradition, Lilith was first Adam's wife. She was succubus. The Bible doesn't mention her as his first wife. Anyway, incest as term didn't exist in ancient times before god established the law. Everyone fucked everyone. Homosexuality, bisexuality lesbianism, sodomy and similar practices were defined as sin later, by the establishment of the god's law. When the law came, people still practiced these sexual "sins" and sons married their queen mothers so that the kingdom will stay within the family. There were many incestuous combinations which you hardly can find in the Bible, but you can read about them in other Jewish ancient traditional non canonical books.

> I am sure some others have more insight in this than me. I do not know the bible well, but I have read it.

Edited November 16, 2022 by Evaloves4

[Miauzi]

Vor 12 Minuten sagte Evaloves4:

> Eigentlich war Lilith nach jüdischer Überlieferung zunächst Adams Frau. Sie war Sukkubus. Die Bibel erwähnt sie nicht als seine erste Frau. Wie auch immer, Inzest als Begriff existierte in der Antike nicht, bevor Gott das Gesetz einführte. Jeder hat jeden gefickt. Homosexualität, Bisexualität, Lesbismus, Sodomie und ähnliche Praktiken wurden bis zur späteren Errichtung des Gottesgesetzes als Sünde definiert. Als das Gesetz kam, praktizierten die Menschen immer noch diese sexuellen „Sünden“ und Söhne heirateten ihre Königinmütter, damit das Königreich in der Familie bleibt. Es gab viele inzestuöse Kombinationen, die Sie kaum oder gar nicht in der Bibel finden, aber Sie können darüber in anderen jüdischen alten traditionellen nichtkanonischen Büchern lesen.

> Ich bin sicher, einige andere haben mehr Einblick in dies als ich. Ich kenne die Bibel nicht gut, aber ich habe sie gelesen.

So without incest between parents and children of the very first family, humanity would not exist at all?
Yes - that's what I thought when I read it 45 years ago (during my puberty) and at the same time about current sexual morality.

So if, according to science, genetic damage from such relationships (in their children) is so terribly often to be expected - one would probably not have gotten beyond the first 10 generations...
.. what is actually wrong then?
The story of Adam and Eve as the first humans or that incest ruins the genetic makeup?

?

[Guest]

13 minutes ago, Miauzi said:

So without incest between parents and children of the very first family, humanity would not exist at all?
Yes - that's what I thought when I read it 45 years ago (during my puberty) and at the same time about current sexual morality.

So if, according to science, genetic damage from such relationships (in their children) is so terribly often to be expected - one would probably not have gotten beyond the first 10 generations...
.. what is actually wrong then?
The story of Adam and Eve as the first humans or that incest ruins the genetic makeup?

?

> The genetic deformations as the result of incestious sex aren't so often as scientists claims they are. I am not saying they are not happening but deformations are also happening between non related sex partners. It is "X" chromosome to blame. But I am sure you know that. Listen, I do respect you and I have no motive to teach you about it. I am just sharing from what I have read and heard form my Prince who has some theological knowledge because of his father who was protestant theologian. Anyway, since incest is the sin that Bible teaches against, it also came to the black list of the modern moral laws and bylaws. Take nutritionists for example: some groups says how eating fat is totally bad for our health and that we should avoid eating it, while their opponents says, it is healthy if you eat it controllably and with measure. There are certain scientific areas that I do not agree with at all. That's why I think scientists exaggerate about the percentage of deformed children conceived in incestuous sex.

[Miauzi]

Vor 30 Minuten sagte Evaloves4:

> Die genetischen Deformationen als Folge von inzestösem Sex sind nicht so häufig, wie Wissenschaftler behaupten, dass sie es sind. Ich sage nicht, dass sie nicht passieren, aber Deformationen passieren auch zwischen nicht verwandten Sexualpartnern. Das Chromosom „X“ ist schuld. Aber ich bin sicher, das weißt du. Hören Sie, ich respektiere Sie und ich habe kein Motiv, Sie darüber zu unterrichten. Ich teile nur mit, was ich von meinem Prinzen gelesen und gehört habe, der aufgrund seines Vaters, der protestantischer Theologe war, einige theologische Kenntnisse besitzt. Wie auch immer, da Inzest die Sünde ist, gegen die die Bibel lehrt, kam es auch auf die schwarze Liste der modernen moralischen Gesetze und Verordnungen. Nehmen Sie zum Beispiel Ernährungswissenschaftler: Einige Gruppen sagen, dass der Verzehr von Fett absolut schlecht für unsere Gesundheit ist und dass wir es vermeiden sollten, während ihre Gegner sagen, dass es gesund ist, wenn Sie es kontrolliert und mit Maß essen. Es gibt bestimmte wissenschaftliche Bereiche, mit denen ich überhaupt nicht einverstanden bin. Deshalb denke ich, dass Wissenschaftler mit dem Prozentsatz missgebildeter Kinder, die bei inzestuösem Sex gezeugt wurden, übertreiben.

Don't worry - I have no intentions of accusing anyone of that.

Chromosome X - the massively degenerated one - only about 200 genes instead of like the big sister Y with more than 1000
(even the blueprint of the penis is on "Y" * hahaha *)

I come back to the conversation I mentioned with my psychologist - that was more than 15 years ago
Addressing my concerns about her rating of my fetishes (latex, corsets, ultra heels, etc.) - she said something even more important:
"Human beings (almost the only species) in the animal kingdom are capable of sex 365 days a year - this would not be needed for reproduction (it would even be harmful).
Why did nature "set it up" anyway? -> Because it serves as a social (interpersonal) regularity.
Because that way people can reduce stress that would otherwise lead to violent conflicts between them!
Suppressing sex - "rationing" it, so to speak, is one of the most powerful instruments of power in a religion (like Christianity)"
The tabooing of sex, or at least some parts of sex, is the result of millennia of brainwashing.
In the end, this is the only way to classify "incest" if you simultaneously tell people something about "Adam-and-Eve" (while not telling Lilith).
--
for this reason, separating erotic acts (like kissing or holding hands or hugging) from "sex" is pretty silly to me

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, Miauzi said:

Don't worry - I have no intentions of accusing anyone of that.

Chromosome X - the massively degenerated one - only about 200 genes instead of like the big sister Y with more than 1000
(even the blueprint of the penis is on "Y" * hahaha *)

I come back to the conversation I mentioned with my psychologist - that was more than 15 years ago
Addressing my concerns about her rating of my fetishes (latex, corsets, ultra heels, etc.) - she said something even more important:
"Human beings (almost the only species) in the animal kingdom are capable of sex 365 days a year - this would not be needed for reproduction (it would even be harmful).
Why did nature "set it up" anyway? -> Because it serves as a social (interpersonal) regularity.
Because that way people can reduce stress that would otherwise lead to violent conflicts between them!
Suppressing sex - "rationing" it, so to speak, is one of the most powerful instruments of power in a religion (like Christianity)"
The tabooing of sex, or at least some parts of sex, is the result of millennia of brainwashing.
In the end, this is the only way to classify "incest" if you simultaneously tell people something about "Adam-and-Eve" (while not telling Lilith).
--
for this reason, separating erotic acts (like kissing or holding hands or hugging) from "sex" is pretty silly to me

> You see, the church taught for centuries how sex is bad and it only serves for reproduction. Enjoying in sex and experiencing orgasm is from the devil. Sex is also reduced to the married partners and so on and so on. Exploring body pleasures using various assets (latex, toys, posses and whatever can help) is good and needed. Sex is still not fully discovered area. That's why I have no problem about people who find their pleasures in practices I would never do understanding that some of them wouldn't do some or none of my sexual practices. We all want to have perfect pleasure and orgasms. That's why sex is unexploited and always interesting part of our lives

[Miauzi]

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musketier_mit_Hieb_und_Stich

 

hatte den fast vergessen - aber soben wieder entdeckt - läuft gerade auf ARTE

warum ich das verlinke?

da gibt es ein Geschwisterpaar...

?

[KoolHndLuke]

On 11/16/2022 at 10:14 AM, Miauzi said:

"Human beings (almost the only species) in the animal kingdom are capable of sex 365 days a year - this would not be needed for reproduction (it would even be harmful).
Why did nature "set it up" anyway? -> Because it serves as a social (interpersonal) regularity.

Why the fuck did nature "set anything up"? 

 

But seriously, it seems just as likely our capacity for sex is somehow linked to our capacity to destroy both ourselves and everything around us. In short- survival of the species despite our other tendencies. 

Edited November 19, 2022 by KoolHndLuke

[an angel of blood]

for the love of me i can't remember if ive posted in this thread before, but if not a should have, this has been the biggest thing for me for a long time... the thought of anything with any of my actual family members is so incredibly disturbing, it makes me seriously uncomfortable to have intrusive thoughts of that, but incest kink is still huge to me... and not just in a sexual way. i've always felt drawn to it, the idea of falling in love with, or being abused by, or being abused by and then falling in love with, a mother or sister... honestly my main comfort fantasy both sexually and otherwise is just... having an older sister who knows how to work me and is trying to groom me or use me and i just fall hopelessly for her. it's so much comfort to me even when i imagine it to be a heavily abusive dynamic... i could talk so much about it but i just dont feel i can. only two people know much of it.

 

but i also really like mother/daughter dynamics... to be mothered and cared for but also the potential for grooming me as i grow up, teaching me how to masturbate or have sex, maybe even nursing me if i'm humiliatingly honest.... it turns me on so much because of the intimacy and the power dynamics and how i'm the young one looking up to them. it makes me feel weak in the best way and i love feeling almost, or just plainly, manipulated by someone in that role, an older family member i live with, who blurs the boundaries between us and makes such inappropriate and taboo things a core part of our relationship. it feels so good and makes me feel warm and safe and yet unsafe, like i'm protected and loved for who i am, but not free, im clearly being tied into such a dangerous dynamic that has to be hidden from everyone... it feels special.

 

i even take on that role a lot with one of my girlfriends... i didn't expect to like the dominant side of it but it feels so nice too. she calls me mommy more than she calls me my name, we sometimes roleplay about it, having scenarios that play out just like i know i want, and it seems she wants the exact same, so i got lucky there... we're long distance so nothing physical yet, though we are planning a visit, but we talk about the intimate touch we want all the time. i'm often telling her how much i want to scoop her up or hold her head to my chest, and she often asks me to pet her hair or nurse her... it's so weird i know but it feels so raw and intimate and sweet. it is kind of weird to be called mommy by someone only a few months younger than you, but it's so nice hehe... she's so cute and it's nice to enjoy the other side of the coin. and i get to tie my fantasy above into it too, which makes it even dirtier but obviously i like that~

[Jexsam]

On 11/15/2022 at 8:33 PM, RohZima said:

No one has answered the question of what turns them on about the fetish? ?

 

I'm genuinely curious as to why people think it's sexy.

 

I touched on this in my initial post but basically it's the taboo of it.  Close family is the one group of people you absolutely positively should not want to fuck, which for some people makes it extremely appealing.  The only other groups that come close are animals and children, but neither of those are capable of consent, not to mention the physical and mental harm that could come to them from it.  But adult family members are fully grown adults capable of giving consent, meaning that even though you shouldn't, you absolutely can.

 

So, as I said before, it's the most taboo thing you can do while still having vanilla sex between two consenting adults.

 

Different people are going to have different takes, of course, and it may just be that that sensation of " they shouldn't be doing this" just isn't something that works for you the same way the "contrast" you've mentioned before does.

[Mr. Otaku]

27 minutes ago, RohZima said:

 

Absolutely... Shame I don't have a sister to try this theory out on...

 

 

"If you lack a sister, then find a mister"

 

-Sun Tzu (100% real quote)

[an angel of blood]

3 hours ago, RohZima said:

 

Absolutely... Shame I don't have a sister to try this theory out on...

 

 

it's insanely fucked up but i think i will be forever sad i didn't get to be a sister who had that kind of dynamic with a dominant, older sibling... why does it sound so appealing when it's literally abuse ?

[JessieJim]

I really like the House of Dragon's incest, I don't know why but it's horny. 

[Guest]

On 10/26/2022 at 7:53 AM, KoolHndLuke said:

With that in mind, what is it about this particular fetish that turns you on?

 

Is it not said "Forbidden Fruit tastes the Sweetest" or something to that effect??

Speaking from a Fantasy Level, Twins hooking up is hot, no matter what!

[beefers]

just ask the royal family, their family tree has almost no branches.

[Guest]

1 hour ago, beefers said:

just ask the royal family, their family tree has almost no branches.

 

Could be, risk of social status being crushed. Would apply to people that have on in the first place.

 

There was mutual prepurperty exchange as of "show me what THAT looks like" but can't think of anyone family related to get heated. If anything at most it all retracted equal to being near a very unattractive person.

 

Kink watching sure. After reaching nut clarity is back to square one and what the fuck I'm watching here.