Guest nvidiot Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 System Specs: * OS : Windows 10 (Build 1607 aka Anniversary) * CPU: Intel Core i5 750 @ 4.0 GHz * Motherboard: ASUS P7P55D * RAM: 8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz * SSD: Kingston V300 240GB * GPU: Gigabyte R9 390 G1 Gaming 8GB Impressions: Rock solid 60 fps throughout skyrim no matter the intensity of action. This is with 10 or so mods installed (including texture packs)... I disabled the in-game Vsync and enabled AMD's frame target control to 60 fps, as in-game vsync dropped my fps alot. Capping the fps via crimson fixed the fps spikes for me and GPU temp and usage are nominal (65-70C temps max for GPU). CPU usage is also consistent as well as compared to Original Skyrim, 40-50% usage across all cores (max temps hitting no more than 60C). Overall I'm very satisfied and impressed with the increased stability and smoothness the switch to 64-bit provides. EDIT: Using 1080p resolution, GPU usage hovering around 3.3-3.5GB VRAM
peculiaris Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 GPU: EVGA GTX 1060 SC OS: Windows 10 RAM: 8GB Motherboard: H87M-plus CPU: Intel i5-4440 @3.10 GHz @1920x1080 I assume it runs at 60fps (see below) @2560x1440 Steady 60fps at all times @3840x2160 Around 35fps at all times outside, around 38fps inside : / What part of my pc should I upgrade for a more impressive fps counter @3840x2160? RAM, CPU or Motherboard? Why would you ever upgrade mobo for more perfomance in games. Upgrade GPU and CPU. only upgrade MOBO for a newer CPU like Kaby Lake coming next year. Wow upgrading your MoBo for more performance ._. now I've heard everything. I meant RAM or CPU & Motherboard... My motherboard supports up to LGA 1150 but I can consider switching to LGA 1151 Well that would be useless, because the jump from haswell/broadwell to skylake/cabylake isn't worth it and after that there will be a new socket so... just stay with 1150. Kinda tautology but, I'll do some more research on skylake/kabylake... Is it really that bad? Its the same performance as Haswell so you are pretty much spending more money for the same performance.
gorbachev Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 Not bad so far, need a monitor upgrade. Specs: Motherboard: gigabyte z170 gaming 5 motherboard Processor: i3-6100 overclocked to 4.5 Ghz and liquid cooled RAM: Corsair vengeance 8GB DDR4 300mhz GPU's: 2x 970 GTX xtreme gaming OC edition runing both 500mhz higher clock Max everything at 2k res not dropping below 120 FPS in caves and 112 in tam. like I said need a better monitor!
chevalierx Posted November 5, 2016 Posted November 5, 2016 cpu :4460 3.3 gpu 970gtx ram 12 go -texture 2k all -cbbe body -NPc85 -All in one buijin -enb beta - riverwood enchenced mod (add tree , plante) -verdant se i have drops in riverwood from 60 to 30 fps it same with old skyrim lol
quin666 Posted November 5, 2016 Posted November 5, 2016 cpu :4460 3.3 gpu 970gtx ram 12 go -texture 2k all -cbbe body -NPc85 -All in one buijin -enb beta - riverwood enchenced mod (add tree , plante) -verdant se i have drops in riverwood from 60 to 30 fps it same with old skyrim lol Same problem right? Same old Skyrim right? Don't bring up ENB and texture mods in Hardware compatiblity topic.
chevalierx Posted November 5, 2016 Posted November 5, 2016 cpu :4460 3.3 gpu 970gtx ram 12 go -texture 2k all -cbbe body -NPc85 -All in one buijin -enb beta - riverwood enchenced mod (add tree , plante) -verdant se i have drops in riverwood from 60 to 30 fps it same with old skyrim lol Same problem right? Same old Skyrim right? Don't bring up ENB and texture mods in Hardware compatiblity topic. ???????????? if not compared to the old with the same mod ? what mean of compare ?
yatol Posted November 5, 2016 Posted November 5, 2016 ????????????if not compared to the old with the same mod ? what mean of compare ? that's to try to make sse look better than what it really to get more people to switch to update more mods for them tfc and go under the ground, that small river have a huge fps impact (more with bigger water textures) you are wasting a lot of fps rendering stuff you can't even see
quin666 Posted November 5, 2016 Posted November 5, 2016 cpu :4460 3.3 gpu 970gtx ram 12 go -texture 2k all -cbbe body -NPc85 -All in one buijin -enb beta - riverwood enchenced mod (add tree , plante) -verdant se i have drops in riverwood from 60 to 30 fps it same with old skyrim lol Same problem right? Same old Skyrim right? Don't bring up ENB and texture mods in Hardware compatiblity topic. ???????????? if not compared to the old with the same mod ? what mean of compare ? We want know hardware and performance, you adding unknown variables can reduce or destroy frame rate in heartbeat. You see frame counter on top right side both pictures?
prinyo Posted November 5, 2016 Posted November 5, 2016 It would be interesting to see what results do you get when turning off the game's vsync. I did a test running from Helgen to Riverwood. With the default vsync on I get 45-60 fps. When turned off I get 75-110 fps, most of the time around 95-100. Indoors I got to about 170fps. i7-4790, GTX 980
zigyzxz123 Posted November 26, 2016 Posted November 26, 2016 CPU: i7 5820k RAM: 32 GB DDR4 GPU: SLI GTX 980ti MB: Asrock x99 extreme4 OS: Windows 10 SSE installed on 120gb SSD for now. Rez 2560x1440 @60 FPS vsync on All settings set to ultra The game runs just fine for me, FPS locked at 60 and no CTD .
kmaaier Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 Operating System Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1 CPU Intel Core i7 5820K @ 3.30GHz 41 °C RAM 16,0GB Dual-Channel Unknown @ 1199MHz (15-15-15-35) Motherboard MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885) (SOCKET 0) 34 °C Graphics 8192MB ATI AMD Radeon R9 390 Series (Sapphire/PCPartner) 45 °C Storage 931GB TOSHIBA MKNSSDRE1TB ATA Device (SSD) 33 °C 931GB Seagate ST31000528AS ATA Device (SATA) 31 °C There was a windows 10 installed on this system but it cannot run without errors, freezes and crashes on this system (not skyrim related), so I revert back to windows 7. All settings ultra and it is absolutely very stable at 60 fps
Tinkering Solderbro Posted December 30, 2016 Posted December 30, 2016 AMD FX6300 Hexcore Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P 16GB Memory Radeon R9-270 Win8.1-64 FullHD Played over 4 hours without one single crash or lag, although playing with 20 mods on it. Opening doors to other cells happens in seconds, no papyrus lag. Framerate is capped to 60 FPS and only in huge cities with lot of action around it will drop to 45 FPS. Hardware isn't maxed out, less heat and fan speed as with the unigine performance test programs.
Pauduan Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 Potato: Core i3 3220 Gigabyte B75M Powercolour HD7750 1GB 8GB 1600MHz RAM Dell 3008WFP Game defaults to low settings. Manually turned shadows all the way down and removed grass. Had to turn the view distances down. Mods: UNP 2K (SD textures) skins - 3 or 4 types Some armor mods *cough* CoT-SE (no difference with or without) Assorted gameplay mod - Auto Unequip ammo, stones of Barenziah, Paarthurnax Low-res particles and low poly grass XPMSE and FNIS, plus animations included in XPMSE Apachii hair KS hairdos SG brows BBLS ReShade recolours only. Detail: low, with AO and FXAA enabled. My ini files are heavily tweaked to allow the game to run at all. 2560x is out of the question. at 1920x, game is just playable but FPS drops occasionally to 20 and below in outdoor areas when looking very far into the distance. Otherwise stays between 23 and 26. Indoors is solid 40-45fps indoors anywhere. I put about 10 hours into the game yesterday in the spirit of 'how low can you go'. Without Reshade additional 2-3fps outdoor and 5-8 indoors. Oldrim without ENB gives at least 5-7fps more with texture detail set to high, a minimal install of SMIM and a ton of 2k skin mods (not other custom textures in this potato). I still think Newrim looks a bit better overall though, apart from some unsightly neck seams on hitherto seamless textures. I have access to some other machines and will report once I do get to play them.
coldcrow Posted January 7, 2017 Posted January 7, 2017 OS - WIndows 10 Pro CPU - FX-8370 (OC 5ghz on water) MB - Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5RAM - 16GB 1866 EVGAGPU - Gigabyte R9 FURYSSD - Crucial M500 MT - ASUS VG248QE 144hzUltra settings with .ini tweek to raise FPS cap to 144 for my monitor and I average around 130 fps.CPU bounces around 20% to 60% loadGPU is at 100%
Rex89 Posted January 10, 2017 Posted January 10, 2017 OS : Windows 10 Home 64bit Processor: Intel® Core i7 920 2.67GHz turbo 2.93 GHz 8MBL3 LGA1366, cpu runs around 10 to 20%Memory: 12GB DDR3 1066 Triple ChannelMotherboard: something from dell Studio XPS 435t x58 ChipsetGraphics Card: PCI-E MSI GeForce GTX 660ti 2GB GDDR5 Power edition, gpu runs around 100% between 40 and 60FPS depending where your at. at the moment my gpu is a bottleneckMonitor Size: DELL 21" 1080
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.