fortysixandtwo Posted October 30, 2016 Posted October 30, 2016 1080 ultra default with no mods. Played through the intro, saved and exited after leaving Riverwood for Bleak Falls. Ran ~50fps indoors and 45 outdoors until the sun started going down and the god rays went nuts - worst I saw was 30fps. Might dumb it down a notch or two and see what happens. I don't have a system capable of running crazy graphical overhauls on the original Skyrim, so this game looks great to me (similar to PureVision ENB and 2k lite w/ SFO) and runs better too. Zero crashes or stuttering. Just can't wait for NPC overhauls to be ported over so they don't look like ghoulish meth heads. System: Windows 7 Premium 64bit CPU: Core2Quad 8300 @ 2.5 MHz RAM: 8GB DDR3 MOBO: Stock HP (my next upgrade) GPU: MSI GTX 960 HDD: WD Black 2tb
Spectre_Ops Posted October 30, 2016 Posted October 30, 2016 System Specs: Windows 10 Pro AMD FX 8350 4.8GHZ OC Nvidia GTX 1080 32GB Ram Main Drive: 512GB Samsung 850 Pro Game installation Drive: 1TB WD Raptor (Upgrading to a 1TB Samsung SSD soon) Game Settings and Performance: 3840x2160 Anti aliasing: TAA Graphics at Ultra FPS: ~55-60 GPU usage: 98% CPU usage: 20%
Wurger41 Posted October 30, 2016 Posted October 30, 2016 System Specs: CPU: I7 4790K @ 4.4 Ghz (O'Clocked & water cooled.) RAM: 16 Gb @ 1600Mhz GPU: GTX 980 G1 4Gb w/Windforce aircooling Win10 64 bit, Pro All game settings maxed/Ultra, steady 60 FPS at 1080p (monitor limit). Ran OK on previous drivers, updated today to latest, seems very stable, No issues with GPU temp (low 60s, or watercooling low 50's) Bring on da Mods!! Brett
Citronella Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 CPU: FX-4100 (3,60 Ghz) GPU: GTX 960 4GB, RAM: 8GB, System: Win10 64 bit. Ultra settings, Godrays High, 1080p - Opening scene around 24 FPS, outside Helgen cave 29 FPS, Overally it was a clusterfuck: 60 FPS then suddenly 20+ and on top of that I had random FPS drops in some places when looking at spot X from different angle. I was shocked when I saw this, I've been running heavily-modded Skyrim (Around 140GB of mods, 100+ .esp's and an ENB) with stable framerate; avg. 45 I had to disable VSYNC in INI's and force it through Nvidia Inspector; This fixed my FPS issues, haven't dropped below 45 FPS since then and my FPS skyrocketted to avg. 60 For example outside Helgen cave I had avg. 29 FPS, after doing what I mentioned above I had 55 FPS outside the cave. I also increased draw distance by little and made some other changes inside my .ini's to get slightly better graphics, which did cost me around 3 FPS. If someone is having the same issue as I had then HERE is quick tutorial I made on how to get rid off this problem. AFAIK it also solves issues with low FPS caused by Godrays.
PubliusNV Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 CPU: i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M RAM: 32G OS: Win10 Home 64 After making the ini changes suggested above by @IE33, and turning on VSync in the NVIDIA control panel, I'm getting a rock solid 60 fps. Thanks for the tip!
yatol Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 what's the point of that topic? their benchmark is also a joke, stil waiting for a real one to see if there's a reason to use that "new" engine
Zithan Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 System specs: * CPU: Intel i5-3570 * RAM: 16GB * GPU: GeForce GTX 670 * OS: Windows 7 64bit * Resolution: 1920x1200 * Settings: High Runs at mostly 50-60 FPS, considering my computer is almost as old as the original Skyrim, I think that is a pretty good deal. Just for extra info on what I am running, here is the mods I have installed: * UNP BASE Skinny Body * Fair Skin Complexion * Feminine Argonian * Feminine Khajiit UNP Minidresses Collection UNP Spice Gear Collection Unofficial Skyrim Special Edition Patch Rich Skyrim Merchants 2x Static Mesh Improvement Mod Realistic Lighting Overhaul Realistic Night Eye The mods marked with * are un-ported mods Edit: Would also like to point out I have not edited my ini files at all yet, but might look into it to be able to jump up to Ultra at 60FPS.
RUD3DUD3 Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 CPU Intel Core i5 2500k GPU Asus Strix Gtx 960 OC 4GB Ram 8 GB DDR3 OS Windows 10 64bit Performance is mostly solid there are places where i used to struggle with original 32bit game but in remaster i'm getting smooth 60fps there. performance does drop in some places to lower 50's or even lower but mostly it stays at locked 60fps.
nunu87 Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 Win10 Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q8400 @2.66 ghz 8go DDR2 ram GTX 580 VRAM1500 A really old Pc, and still the game run like a charm with everything at medium / hight settings. 60 fps caped inside, 40 - 50+ outside.
chevalierx Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 tetsted with unique grass + verdant grass + 7 go of texture it same with old skyrim but no shutter i5 4460 12 go 970 gtx Ssd
sapphirethunder Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 i5 6600K @ 4.4Ghz 16Gb DDR4 2400Mhz GTX 1060 @ 2100Mhz/8500Mhz Installed on HDD instead of SSD, but still loads quite fast. I guess the engine uses RAM more for loading now than the drive itself. stable 75fps (monitor has been overclocked from 60Hz to 75Hz) no matter what happens. CPU and GPU utilizations are all at 50%. With GPU occassionally peaking at 60%. This is with lot's of background windows open like Discord, HW monitoring programs, browser with A LOT tabs.
wow1337 Posted October 31, 2016 Posted October 31, 2016 Intel Xeon 1231v3 (@3.4 GHZ) Geforce 970 GTX Win 7 SSD 1920x1200 No mods (so far) Everything @ maximum => 59,9 fps with 90% GPU Power usage on the ride to Helgen
lttalos Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 i5 3570K OC 4.0Ghz 16GB DDR3 2133 CL11 AMD R9 Fury Nitro SSD In addition I have a few mods installed, and have only had two crashes in over 24 hours of game time. Defaulted to ultra settings, file hacked to 3440x1440 to do a FPS test. I normally play at 2560x1440 borderless windowed. Most of the time my FPS stayed in the 50s or higher. The lowest was 42 and that happened when I was adsorbing a dragon soul in a forested area. If I was staying with the 3440x1440 I'd probably drop a couple of settings, but at 2560x1440 I have no problems.
Iyeru Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 CPU: AMD FX-8350 (at 4.0 GHz, Stock speed.) GPU: AMD 390X from MSi (at stock speeds) Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z RAM: 32GB DDR3 SSD: SAMSUNG 850 EVO (250GB) (This is the only drive on the system.) OS: Windows 10 x64 Pro The game runs smoothly, but has FPS drops (all the way down to 30 or more) when looking toward palces with a lot of models to draw (Outside Windhelm, The Rift, anywhere with tons of trees, etc.) This is on Ultra / Maximum settings.
sapphirethunder Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 CPU: AMD FX-8350 (at 4.0 GHz, Stock speed.) GPU: AMD 390X from MSi (at stock speeds) Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z RAM: 32GB DDR3 SSD: SAMSUNG 850 EVO (250GB) (This is the only drive on the system.) OS: Windows 10 x64 Pro The game runs smoothly, but has FPS drops (all the way down to 30 or more) when looking toward palces with a lot of models to draw (Outside Windhelm, The Rift, anywhere with tons of trees, etc.) This is on Ultra / Maximum settings. You probably already know this, but just want to say: your problem there is the cpu. 8350 is simply too weak for 390X. By going just with Intel i5 6600K, you would not drop under 50-60's anymore.
Iyeru Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 CPU: AMD FX-8350 (at 4.0 GHz, Stock speed.) GPU: AMD 390X from MSi (at stock speeds) Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z RAM: 32GB DDR3 SSD: SAMSUNG 850 EVO (250GB) (This is the only drive on the system.) OS: Windows 10 x64 Pro The game runs smoothly, but has FPS drops (all the way down to 30 or more) when looking toward palces with a lot of models to draw (Outside Windhelm, The Rift, anywhere with tons of trees, etc.) This is on Ultra / Maximum settings. You probably already know this, but just want to say: your problem there is the cpu. 8350 is simply too weak for 390X. By going just with Intel i5 6600K, you would not drop under 50-60's anymore. Can';t afford it. And won't be able to for the next 5 years, so yeah.
TamaChan Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 os: 10(pro) cpu: i5 4590 4 core running at 3.5 gpu: 980 ti 6gb running at ~1200 ram: 16gb ddr3 running at 1600 storage: installed on a wd black caviar hdd 6gb/s 7200rpm 1tb reolution running at ultra settings 1080p. with a second 1080p monitor for chrome and stuff. gpu:40% was the highest, on average about 25% cpu: 25% was highest, on average about 15-20% ram: varied, highest I saw was about 2, on average about 1.5 spawned 50 wolves for stress test gpu:in the 30s never above 40% cpu: max was 35% ram this is where I got the max of 2, but overall still about 1.5 don't have anything for checking frames, but it has been stable and smooth the entire time I have been playing(since release), so definitely always above 60 ran an experiment a couple days ago. turned surround on. the game was smooth the whole time at 3440x1080 on 2 1080p monitors. time to main menu: about 6 seconds, but most of that is the bethesda logo. the time between the bethesda logo and the main menu appearing is about .1 second. load game time: about 2.7 seconds load time: <1 second, with the exception of fast traveling between 2 locations on the over world. that takes about 2-3 seconds. one big issue I have had with se is the game crashing if I don't close touch keyboard, apparently a big problem between 10 and se, for a lot of people.
mdama09 Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 GPU: EVGA GTX 1060 SC OS: Windows 10 RAM: 8GB Motherboard: H87M-plus CPU: Intel i5-4440 @3.10 GHz @1920x1080 I assume it runs at 60fps (see below) @2560x1440 Steady 60fps at all times @3840x2160 Around 35fps at all times outside, around 38fps inside : / What part of my pc should I upgrade for a more impressive fps counter @3840x2160? RAM, CPU or Motherboard? Why would you ever upgrade mobo for more perfomance in games. Upgrade GPU and CPU. only upgrade MOBO for a newer CPU like Kaby Lake coming next year.
Malo Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 GPU: EVGA GTX 1060 SC OS: Windows 10 RAM: 8GB Motherboard: H87M-plus CPU: Intel i5-4440 @3.10 GHz @1920x1080 I assume it runs at 60fps (see below) @2560x1440 Steady 60fps at all times @3840x2160 Around 35fps at all times outside, around 38fps inside : / What part of my pc should I upgrade for a more impressive fps counter @3840x2160? RAM, CPU or Motherboard? Your problem is you went for a mid range GPU for 4k rendering, which doesn't match. The amount of VRAM isn't the only factor for rendering games at massive resolutions. You need at lead a 1070 minimum for 4k ideally.
quin666 Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 Intel core i7 5820k 3.30 GHz Nvidia GTX 980 ti 4GB Ram 16.0 DDR4 1 TB HDD 120 GB SSD Windows 10 64 bit Motherboard X99A SLI Plus 2560x1080 Game struggling stay at 60 fps max out graphics. Drop below 45 fps turn around look into distance or looking around, but shot back up 60 fps in heartbeat. I use Geforce Experience fix my graphic option, 60 fps cap 90% of time except for rare 50 fps. No overclocking, no high performance.
peculiaris Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 GPU: EVGA GTX 1060 SC OS: Windows 10 RAM: 8GB Motherboard: H87M-plus CPU: Intel i5-4440 @3.10 GHz @1920x1080 I assume it runs at 60fps (see below) @2560x1440 Steady 60fps at all times @3840x2160 Around 35fps at all times outside, around 38fps inside : / What part of my pc should I upgrade for a more impressive fps counter @3840x2160? RAM, CPU or Motherboard? Why would you ever upgrade mobo for more perfomance in games. Upgrade GPU and CPU. only upgrade MOBO for a newer CPU like Kaby Lake coming next year. Wow upgrading your MoBo for more performance ._. now I've heard everything.
peculiaris Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 GPU: EVGA GTX 1060 SC OS: Windows 10 RAM: 8GB Motherboard: H87M-plus CPU: Intel i5-4440 @3.10 GHz @1920x1080 I assume it runs at 60fps (see below) @2560x1440 Steady 60fps at all times @3840x2160 Around 35fps at all times outside, around 38fps inside : / What part of my pc should I upgrade for a more impressive fps counter @3840x2160? RAM, CPU or Motherboard? Why would you ever upgrade mobo for more perfomance in games. Upgrade GPU and CPU. only upgrade MOBO for a newer CPU like Kaby Lake coming next year. Wow upgrading your MoBo for more performance ._. now I've heard everything. I meant RAM or CPU & Motherboard... My motherboard supports up to LGA 1150 but I can consider switching to LGA 1151 Well that would be useless, because the jump from haswell/broadwell to skylake/cabylake isn't worth it and after that there will be a new socket so... just stay with 1150.
kuroinoakuma Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 Intel core i7 5820k 3.30 GHz Nvidia GTX 980 ti 4GB Ram 16.0 DDR4 1 TB HDD 120 GB SSD Windows 10 64 bit Motherboard X99A SLI Plus 2560x1080 Game struggling stay at 60 fps max out graphics. Drop below 45 fps turn around look into distance or looking around, but shot back up 60 fps in heartbeat. I use Geforce Experience fix my graphic option, 60 fps cap 90% of time except for rare 50 fps. No overclocking, no high performance. That's kinda weird you're having problems staying at 60fps on a CPU & GPU similar to mine, yet with less pixels being produced than me. I'm hitting 110-120fps in game (dips to 90 if moving VERY fast or loading new area) with the following: CPU: i7-5820K (OC'd to a flat 4.0GHz with a 40x multi, cooled by CM Nepton 120XL). RAM: 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Dominator Platinum 2400MHz C14 (XMP to 2666MHz C14). Mobo: MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition. GPUs: 2x EVGA 6GB GTX 980Ti SC+ ACX2.0+ (1100MHz Core/1750MHz VRAM clocks. Custom watercooling loop). SLI but game only rendering on GPU 1/Monitor card with VRAM contents being duplicated to GPU 2. OS: Win10 Pro (Build 10240). Monitor: Acer XG270HU (2560x1440, 144Hz max, set at 120Hz in NCP). Storage: 500GB Samsung EVO 850 (S:SE installed here) + 4TB Seagate Barracuda.
Malo Posted November 2, 2016 Posted November 2, 2016 Kinda tautology but, I'll do some more research on skylake/kabylake... Is it really that bad? At 4k resolution, your bottleneck is your GPU.
quin666 Posted November 3, 2016 Posted November 3, 2016 Intel core i7 5820k 3.30 GHz Nvidia GTX 980 ti 4GB Ram 16.0 DDR4 1 TB HDD 120 GB SSD Windows 10 64 bit Motherboard X99A SLI Plus 2560x1080 Game struggling stay at 60 fps max out graphics. Drop below 45 fps turn around look into distance or looking around, but shot back up 60 fps in heartbeat. I use Geforce Experience fix my graphic option, 60 fps cap 90% of time except for rare 50 fps. No overclocking, no high performance. That's kinda weird you're having problems staying at 60fps on a CPU & GPU similar to mine, yet with less pixels being produced than me. I'm hitting 110-120fps in game (dips to 90 if moving VERY fast or loading new area) with the following: CPU: i7-5820K (OC'd to a flat 4.0GHz with a 40x multi, cooled by CM Nepton 120XL). RAM: 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Dominator Platinum 2400MHz C14 (XMP to 2666MHz C14). Mobo: MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition. GPUs: 2x EVGA 6GB GTX 980Ti SC+ ACX2.0+ (1100MHz Core/1750MHz VRAM clocks. Custom watercooling loop). SLI but game only rendering on GPU 1/Monitor card with VRAM contents being duplicated to GPU 2. OS: Win10 Pro (Build 10240). Monitor: Acer XG270HU (2560x1440, 144Hz max, set at 120Hz in NCP). Storage: 500GB Samsung EVO 850 (S:SE installed here) + 4TB Seagate Barracuda. A lot people reporting same problem just like me with very high to mid PCs, never thought happen me. Next step uncap frame rate.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.