Sonic Racing: Crossworlds

[asdf732]

7 minutes ago, ninjahedgehog said:

IMHO, we can't be letting the tone policers dictate what we discuss in the sites that they don't even moderate. I am never for banning and dealing consequences for breaking a platform's rules in A DIFFERENT PLATFORM! or for testing the rules with edge cases.

If we're just loser gooners than Nock and ppl like him should just leave us to our modding here, in a forum known for gooner mods, just as we're expected to leave communities that we don't vibe with alone. The only reason they don't is because of a holier than though virtue signal attempt where you think you're making the world better by not allowing objectionable content. 

Look that was just about derailing the convo with a lewd Cream pic with the suggestion of lewding Maria. Like, a sort of "read the room" thing.

 

12 minutes ago, kurokoi1 said:

I need to remind you that someone has already made mods for Maria in Shadow Generation, and how can I avoid problems when posting them? I'm just suggesting ideas; if someone has already done something, they can send it via DM.

The Maria mod was what probably got that thread nuked.

[ninjahedgehog]

3 minutes ago, asdf732 said:

Look that was just about derailing the convo with a lewd Cream pic with the suggestion of lewding Maria. Like, a sort of "read the room" thing.

 

The Maria mod was what probably got that thread nuked.

IDK, I think the thread could use some derailing. We're over here stuck complaining about your typical powerdrunk moderator in a different site


I also want to ask something about Modder conduct. I understand not being cool with reposting someone else's mod. But is it really fair to be mad that someone mods your mod?, when the whole point is modding the game in a way that the devs may or not approve of? It comes off as "you're only upset because you don't like my alterations to your mod". Is everyone just expected to make a mod from scratch to not get in trouble?

[kurokoi1]

16 minutes ago, asdf732 said:

Look that was just about derailing the convo with a lewd Cream pic with the suggestion of lewding Maria. Like, a sort of "read the room" thing.

 

The Maria mod was what probably got that thread nuked.

1 Yes, the other one where the mod is still active, no, and it was already explained how to avoid that after what happened, Cream has already been modded and published here, as has Sage

[goonbro18]

13 hours ago, LordGTVerse said:

NO SHOT people are hating on SonicOnBox's mods. Dude has been doing awesome work on peoples OC's and other character mods.

 im not surprised people are throwing a fit because of the rouge tails. I think the bigger concern is that people say he has a history of scamming? Haven't seen a source but I care more about that then him making a weird mod once in  awhile. 

[lovelydaytosee]

31 minutes ago, asdf732 said:

GB also is a host to a wide variety of NSFW mods and content (just look at the Genshin page), therefore it has some pretty good tools to hide and obfuscate NSFW content by using a variety of tags for various content warnings.

 

The problem is that lite nsfw still shows up even while not logged in. its just blurred. Moderators also cant control this, There absolutely needs to be a soft withhold that just hides mods rather than stops the download entirely. At the least, better moderation tools then just slamming the nuke button to reduce frustration. I 100% get the blurred content thing, I just dont agree with banning all content. Especially stuff like gothic rouge which was completely covered. that would be tame by most people's standards. (not talking the big tiddie one, just talking the simple one with earrings, black wings, and red bra) 

 

44 minutes ago, asdf732 said:

 

The Sonic community is host to loads of lewd, pornographic, and fetishistic content. Some of the community's most prolific members have consumed and even created such content. It's part of our identity at this point.

 

Idk if people know this, but there's a beautiful picture of rouge nude in a hot bath with candles around her. that was done by someone who works for SEGA. So yah. it's ingrained. 

[asdf732]

4 minutes ago, lovelydaytosee said:

Idk if people know this, but there's a beautiful picture of rouge nude in a hot bath with candles around her. that was done by someone who works for SEGA. So yah. it's ingrained. 

Holy shit you're right, it's this piece made by Karasuno (the person who currently makes the Sonic channel(?) art)

 

Honestly, eternally based and big titted.

 

Sonic is full of fanmade porn, and we shouldn't systemically reject it when nobody's getting hurt.

[goonbro18]

5 minutes ago, asdf732 said:

Holy shit you're right, it's this piece made by Karasuno (the person who currently makes the Sonic channel(?) art)

 

Honestly, eternally based and big titted.

 

Sonic is full of fanmade porn, and we shouldn't systemically reject it when nobody's getting hurt.

I just dont think the sonic franchise is ever gonna get rid of the stigma of the nsfw art or at least fan content that isn't squeaky clean in general. We get made fun of for shit every Fandom suffers from, but when its Sonic its suddenly the most degenerate shit ever made by man. 

[ninjahedgehog]

27 minutes ago, goonbro18 said:

I just dont think the sonic franchise is ever gonna get rid of the stigma of the nsfw art or at least fan content that isn't squeaky clean in general. We get made fun of for shit every Fandom suffers from, but when its Sonic its suddenly the most degenerate shit ever made by man. 

The sonic fandom isn't the only place that suffers that double standard. you know how it goes "they wanna treat ppl like they're not real, act like fictional characters are real ppl, and get mad at you for knowing the difference"

[Suziezusi]

1 hour ago, goonbro18 said:

 im not surprised people are throwing a fit because of the rouge tails. I think the bigger concern is that people say he has a history of scamming? Haven't seen a source but I care more about that then him making a weird mod once in  awhile. 

rouge tails where

[ClosetOfDoom]

5 hours ago, falden said:

I heard there's some drama going on here.

 

First: I do not condone how Nock is publicly ridiculing the people here. Dragging this onto Twitter and publicly ridiculing you for normal adult activities is incredibly immature. That aside, he is angered because he learned that ProDaGamer used his mod as a base for his own mod, which I do not condone either. Since you're all modders here and as modders we kind of have a moral code of not stealing each other's work, I find it regrettable that no one spoke out against this.

 

Concerning the further refinement and kind of dialing back of rules: that is actually mostly my doing.

 

So, timeline of events since I last posted here:

1. We set the rule to "No exposed genitals or breasts". This rule was suggested to us by an admin. I actually immediately identified a problem with this phrasing because "no exposed breasts" is really ambiguous. How much of the breasts is allowed to be exposed. In fact someone here asked that same question and I replied with "bikini style is within rules". Of course not necessarily everyone who posts adult mods on GB is also active here so this may not have reached everyone.
2. NooNoods, the one user who consistently tries to skirt our rules and then raises support tickets when we complain, uploads Reverse Bunny Suit Rouge, which basically interprets our rule in the minimal way possible: by covering Rouge's nipples with pasties and otherwise just having her tits on full display. This was not what we intended with the rule.
3. At first I allow it because at least it is properly tagged Partial Nudity, but Nock disagrees and withholds the mod. The user raises a support ticket. They raise the valid argument that the rule is ambiguous (in the same way that I had already identified). Since I don't really think the mod is problematic, we try to find a way to set the rule at an objective cut-off point, and adjust it to "No exposed genitals or breasts with exposed nipples". The mod is unwithheld.
4. I have second thoughts. Rouge is one thing. What if someone uploads other younger cast members with pasties, like Amy. I don't want to have to explain that that is in line with our rules. On top of that, the whole list of top mods is slowly becoming boob enlargements (I've seen people complain about this). I go talk to the admins. It turns out that this is not what was intended with the "no exposed genitals or breasts" line they had given us, So they dial it back to its original meaning (bikini style), but this time refer directly to the content ratings so the expectation is completely unambiguous. The following ratings are no longer allowed: "Partial Nudity", "Full Nudity", "Fetishistic", "Sexual Content", "Lewd Angles and Poses".
5. We are now in the process of evaluating mods, checking if they match these content ratings and deciding what to do with them. Some mods don't really qualify for the new rule, but also don't really feel problematic, like the Aqua mod, which would fall under "Partial Nudity" because of exposed buttocks. We're still seeing if we can reach some kind of compromise there.

I apologize for the "flip-flopping" effect this has had on your mods. I genuinely want to find a sweet spot where everyone is satisfied with the established rules.

Thanks for at least recognizing Nock's immaturity. Sucks that pretty much all NSFW mods are banned.

 

I personally feel like it's a problem as a whole on GB, not just within the Sonic category. GB has always been undecided on which games should or shouldn't have NSFW mods. Thing is, since kids are able to make accounts on there without much age verification, and there are likely a lot of kids on the site, it might be good to go to extremes in this case, which would be fully banning NSFW content on GB entirely. Anything lewd in any sense.

 

Could perhaps make an alternate "after dark" sister site, which would require stronger age verification process. Perhaps call it "GamePeach" instead. That way there wouldn't be any crossover between regular and adult mods and modders. Would also mean GameBanana could still host users under 18. Just an idea.

[ClosetOfDoom]

1 hour ago, asdf732 said:

Holy shit you're right, it's this piece made by Karasuno (the person who currently makes the Sonic channel(?) art)

 

Honestly, eternally based and big titted.

 

Sonic is full of fanmade porn, and we shouldn't systemically reject it when nobody's getting hurt.

Hilarious she's still wearing gloves, lol.

[AsiagoSandwich]

2 hours ago, ninjahedgehog said:

I also want to ask something about Modder conduct. I understand not being cool with reposting someone else's mod. But is it really fair to be mad that someone mods your mod?, when the whole point is modding the game in a way that the devs may or not approve of? It comes off as "you're only upset because you don't like my alterations to your mod". Is everyone just expected to make a mod from scratch to not get in trouble?

I've always thought that mods should be considered shareware, due to the nature of what they are. Once you release a free "add-on" people are free to put more work into it and tweak it to their liking

[Unkwn37]

17 hours ago, falden said:

I heard there's some drama going on here.

 

First: I do not condone how Nock is publicly ridiculing the people here. Dragging this onto Twitter and publicly ridiculing you for normal adult activities is incredibly immature. That aside, he is angered because he learned that ProDaGamer used his mod as a base for his own mod, which I do not condone either. Since you're all modders here and as modders we kind of have a moral code of not stealing each other's work, I find it regrettable that no one spoke out against this.

 

Concerning the further refinement and kind of dialing back of rules: that is actually mostly my doing.

 

So, timeline of events since I last posted here:

1. We set the rule to "No exposed genitals or breasts". This rule was suggested to us by an admin. I actually immediately identified a problem with this phrasing because "no exposed breasts" is really ambiguous. How much of the breasts is allowed to be exposed. In fact someone here asked that same question and I replied with "bikini style is within rules". Of course not necessarily everyone who posts adult mods on GB is also active here so this may not have reached everyone.
2. NooNoods, the one user who consistently tries to skirt our rules and then raises support tickets when we complain, uploads Reverse Bunny Suit Rouge, which basically interprets our rule in the minimal way possible: by covering Rouge's nipples with pasties and otherwise just having her tits on full display. This was not what we intended with the rule.
3. At first I allow it because at least it is properly tagged Partial Nudity, but Nock disagrees and withholds the mod. The user raises a support ticket. They raise the valid argument that the rule is ambiguous (in the same way that I had already identified). Since I don't really think the mod is problematic, we try to find a way to set the rule at an objective cut-off point, and adjust it to "No exposed genitals or breasts with exposed nipples". The mod is unwithheld.
4. I have second thoughts. Rouge is one thing. What if someone uploads other younger cast members with pasties, like Amy. I don't want to have to explain that that is in line with our rules. On top of that, the whole list of top mods is slowly becoming boob enlargements (I've seen people complain about this). I go talk to the admins. It turns out that this is not what was intended with the "no exposed genitals or breasts" line they had given us, So they dial it back to its original meaning (bikini style), but this time refer directly to the content ratings so the expectation is completely unambiguous. The following ratings are no longer allowed: "Partial Nudity", "Full Nudity", "Fetishistic", "Sexual Content", "Lewd Angles and Poses".
5. We are now in the process of evaluating mods, checking if they match these content ratings and deciding what to do with them. Some mods don't really qualify for the new rule, but also don't really feel problematic, like the Aqua mod, which would fall under "Partial Nudity" because of exposed buttocks. We're still seeing if we can reach some kind of compromise there.

I apologize for the "flip-flopping" effect this has had on your mods. I genuinely want to find a sweet spot where everyone is satisfied with the established rules.

Not to be mean but it feels like any time these mods are discussed based on a moderator's actions on that site, the modders don't get any explanation or clarity for days except immature responses then suddenly the moderator or someone seems to grow a conscience and decides to clear up the situation later than at the time when the mod is withheld but with what seems to be a "Pass the buck around" explanation pattern. Started Zor, then Nock, now you with the GB admins agreeing to get it changed? (Edit: It has been clarified that we are still speaking with Zor. I apologize for not realizing this, but will only edit this in rather than remove portions of my response to avoid misinterpretation of my thoughts at time of posting) We all know that's too inconsistent for the site's current and historical uploads. If this has been confirmed to be true then I'm sorry I missed it. I just can't shake the feeling that this subject is getting passed around with the person who gets this tossed on their lap just not being bothered to handle it till it starts to grow because of the subject at hand.

I can agree that a sage/cream nude mod is not for the general audience to be indicated to exist with its title shown and a blurred photo on the page, but an Amy mod? She's canonically no different to Blaze or Rouge at this point as confirmed by official media to be put in a similar category to cream and sage for restrictions.

 

That aside, the larger boobs mods as explained by another user would die down eventually as much as any other mod does. It's not as though they were some Deviant Art Inflation mod (if someone here is into this tag and reading, I am very sorry to throw your preferred theme under the bus, but it's the one thing I can think of that would generally not be as accepted aside from the obvious such as loli, shota, grapes, etc), it's a canonical body rogue was robbed of when SEGA though to appeal to general audience instead of taking the current actions of having a set of media for general and another geared towards its now adult fans.

 

The ratings bans at this point feels like it does nothing but empower the moderators like Nock to interpret any mod in which way they seem fit (we already know what he thinks).

 

This whole situation is fucked for sure, but you all as the moderation team need to get on the same level....and I'm sorry, but fucken clean house you tards! The issue of Nock being a minor moderating adult content has not been addressed by you all at all!

Edited November 16, 2025 by Unkwn37
Added apology as I didn't intend to attack anyone's tag preference. As adults, you do you

[OmniShamble]

I 100% agree that Amy should be considered an adult. Especially since people consider Sonic an adult nowadays and Amy has a crush on him. What, are gonna say that any SonAmy art is actually art of a minor with an adult?

 

And you can't just say to treat them both as minors because people ship Sonic with Shadow, and people ship Shadow with Rouge, and people consider them both to be adults. The consensus even since ages were removed is that any Mobian with a "medium" body type or larger (Sonic, Shadow, Rouge, Big, Vanilla, etc.) are adults and anyone who's Tails's size or smaller is a child.

 

Also, you can't even go by the curvature mentality because even unmodded, Blaze is a stick compared to Amy and Wave.

 

I'm rambling a bit because I'm tired, but I just think people latch onto "Amy is 12! The Sonic Heroes instruction booklet said so!" too hard when the only adults in Heroes were Vector, Big, and Eggman as Rouge was 17 at the time and she was fannon'd into being in her 30s because Kathleen Delaney gave her such a deep and mature tone.

 

Now that I think about it, that's probably how people started to ignore canon ages at the time. Rouge was fannon'd into being much older than she really is and it spiraled from there through shipping.

[kuromicola]

Putting this here cuz some of yall are weird as hell about this.

 

Nock is a 17 year old with dumb 17 year old beliefs, no amount of shitting on him is going to change that. I think what hes doing is dumb and shitty, but nothing is more pathetic than arguing with a child. Yall need to redirect this to the adults with mod privileges and get on their asses for not conducting adult business like adults. Nock is a symptom of the problems with moderation, not the cause. What nock is doing is obviously shitty and immature but ultimately this isnt a conversation we should even be having with him in the first place cuz he shouldn't be a mod to begin with. Why are grown ass adults moderators hanging around a 17 year old anyway? Thats the real question that should be asked here.

Edited November 15, 2025 by kuromicola

[Unkwn37]

1 minute ago, kuromicola said:

Putting this here cuz some of yall are weird as hell about this.

 

Nock is a 17 year old with dumb 17 year old beliefs, no amount of shitting on him is going to change that. I think what hes doing is dumb and shitty, but nothing is more pathetic than arguing with a child. Yall need to redirect this to the adults with mod privileges and get on their asses for not conducting adult business like adults.

There have been callouts to the moderation team in general, but of course for the last pages we've been getting updated on Nock in particular cause he's still on the subject and only a couple of the others in the moderation team have reached out. I believe we've yet to hear back from Zor and falden has recently peeked out from the trenches to speak up.

 

4 minutes ago, kuromicola said:

What nock is doing is obviously shitty and immature but ultimately this isnt a conversation we should even be having with him in the first place cuz he shouldn't be a mod to begin with.

Well that's the problem. He IS a mod and a moderator's job includes providing his reasoning for his actions and holding discussion over the subject at hand. He is NOT supposed to be in this position in any way shape or form and the only other current feedback options we've had have ignored this part of the conversation because they know it is wrong but don't seem to be wanting to do anything about it.

 

7 minutes ago, kuromicola said:

Why are grown ass adults hanging around a 17 year old anyway? Thats the real question that should be asked here.

I'm gonna be honest, I don't think anyone wants to be the first one to start throwing the possible accusations twittards do on a daily basis. They potentially may have their reasoning....not a good one regardless of what it is given the subject, but we wouldn't want to childishly slander someone of such actions without evidence as sheer stupidity and negligence could just as easily explain the current situation of his mod status.

[shootingstarCR]

4 hours ago, Suziezusi said:

rouge tails where

it was a recent mod created by SonicOnBox with a Blaze Lanolin but it went private. was not on GB just on Twitter

[kuromicola]

40 minutes ago, Unkwn37 said:

There have been callouts to the moderation team in general, but of course for the last pages we've been getting updated on Nock in particular cause he's still on the subject and only a couple of the others in the moderation team have reached out. I believe we've yet to hear back from Zor and falden has recently peeked out from the trenches to speak up.

 

Well that's the problem. He IS a mod and a moderator's job includes providing his reasoning for his actions and holding discussion over the subject at hand. He is NOT supposed to be in this position in any way shape or form and the only other current feedback options we've had have ignored this part of the conversation because they know it is wrong but don't seem to be wanting to do anything about it.

 

I'm gonna be honest, I don't think anyone wants to be the first one to start throwing the possible accusations twittards do on a daily basis. They potentially may have their reasoning....not a good one regardless of what it is given the subject, but we wouldn't want to childishly slander someone of such actions without evidence as sheer stupidity and negligence could just as easily explain the current situation of his mod status.

The point in this isnt to throw around pedophile allegations the point is that theres a degree of irresponsibly from the adult modstaff that is far more important to question than to just constantly ramble about a 17 year old being a 17 year old. 

 

Also fuck you for the ablism and all the other dogshit youre implying from "twittards"

[Unkwn37]

1 hour ago, 5kulkin said:

I do believe that Negligence has a big part of this, not only from admins, but also for his parents. They should know better, it's 2025, not 2007. The internet is not safe for children and it's clear SOMEBODY spends most of his life on the internet trying to control people like toys. Nock was never fit to moderate, somebody call this child's mother.

 if they even care to begin with, that's another issue on its own.

 

I'm honestly concerned at this point that there are possibly more minors running moderation on the site than adults who have the mental capacity to be in charge. Age aside this kid has shown he simply is unfit to be in charge of such responsibilities. The only thing I can think of that will be dumber at this point is the possibility he may be close to being 18 and the site adults are ignoring the situation till the day of and will just throw their hands in the air and say they can't do anything about it then.

 

*rant*

Its not just GB when we look at the bigger picture, we saw how Nexus has its own issues leaving us with little options for little options on where to get mods that are not moderated to such an unnecessary degree that also has the convince of mod browsing like those sites do. LL is a forum and you either go through pages of text to find the mod, or the thread has someone take the time to perform a community service to link it all to the start of the thread (then there's the possible nuking that loses it all over one post, Shadow gens rip).

 

This immature, holier than thou, smooth brain behavior has been rampant all over the gaming industry for too long and mods were originally the solution to the corporate problem until people like Nock decided they needed to police others on content they themselves don't like.

*end rant*

 

1 hour ago, kuromicola said:

Also fuck you for the ablism and all the other dogshit youre implying from "twittards"

Ablism? My sympathies if they actually are medically challenged, but I don't recall bringing up any disabled individual in the context of my post.

To be perfectly clear, my use of twittards is in reference to those who do nothing but call others pedos and biggots for a living on the platform because of opposing views, refusal to accept the facts, or straight up refuse discuss their view like an adult. Hell, rather than attacking people on that platform, they could find peace by using the block feature and the do not show nsfw content filter readily available on the site. If your offended by that, I don't need to explain or argue further and will leave it at that.

Edited November 15, 2025 by Unkwn37
grammar

[Suziezusi]

54 minutes ago, shootingstarCR said:

it was a recent mod created by SonicOnBox with a Blaze Lanolin but it went private. was not on GB just on Twitter

T~T

[Suziezusi]

1 hour ago, shootingstarCR said:

it was a recent mod created by SonicOnBox with a Blaze Lanolin but it went private. was not on GB just on Twitter

if it was ever downloadable I hope it was archived by someone, if not then I guess hoping itd become downloadable now after backlash would be silly

[Zorai]

9 hours ago, falden said:

I heard there's some drama going on here.

 

First: I do not condone how Nock is publicly ridiculing the people here. Dragging this onto Twitter and publicly ridiculing you for normal adult activities is incredibly immature. That aside, he is angered because he learned that ProDaGamer used his mod as a base for his own mod, which I do not condone either. Since you're all modders here and as modders we kind of have a moral code of not stealing each other's work, I find it regrettable that no one spoke out against this.

 

Concerning the further refinement and kind of dialing back of rules: that is actually mostly my doing.

 

So, timeline of events since I last posted here:

1. We set the rule to "No exposed genitals or breasts". This rule was suggested to us by an admin. I actually immediately identified a problem with this phrasing because "no exposed breasts" is really ambiguous. How much of the breasts is allowed to be exposed. In fact someone here asked that same question and I replied with "bikini style is within rules". Of course not necessarily everyone who posts adult mods on GB is also active here so this may not have reached everyone.
2. NooNoods, the one user who consistently tries to skirt our rules and then raises support tickets when we complain, uploads Reverse Bunny Suit Rouge, which basically interprets our rule in the minimal way possible: by covering Rouge's nipples with pasties and otherwise just having her tits on full display. This was not what we intended with the rule.
3. At first I allow it because at least it is properly tagged Partial Nudity, but Nock disagrees and withholds the mod. The user raises a support ticket. They raise the valid argument that the rule is ambiguous (in the same way that I had already identified). Since I don't really think the mod is problematic, we try to find a way to set the rule at an objective cut-off point, and adjust it to "No exposed genitals or breasts with exposed nipples". The mod is unwithheld.
4. I have second thoughts. Rouge is one thing. What if someone uploads other younger cast members with pasties, like Amy. I don't want to have to explain that that is in line with our rules. On top of that, the whole list of top mods is slowly becoming boob enlargements (I've seen people complain about this). I go talk to the admins. It turns out that this is not what was intended with the "no exposed genitals or breasts" line they had given us, So they dial it back to its original meaning (bikini style), but this time refer directly to the content ratings so the expectation is completely unambiguous. The following ratings are no longer allowed: "Partial Nudity", "Full Nudity", "Fetishistic", "Sexual Content", "Lewd Angles and Poses".
5. We are now in the process of evaluating mods, checking if they match these content ratings and deciding what to do with them. Some mods don't really qualify for the new rule, but also don't really feel problematic, like the Aqua mod, which would fall under "Partial Nudity" because of exposed buttocks. We're still seeing if we can reach some kind of compromise there.

I apologize for the "flip-flopping" effect this has had on your mods. I genuinely want to find a sweet spot where everyone is satisfied with the established rules.

 

Are you changing these rules again based on actual, serious, logical discussions? Or are you doing it just to appease someone who shouldn't be on the mod team in general? Cause right now, it just sounds like yall are doing it just to get the child on the team to calm down and to stop making noise on it. I don't hate Nock, I get it, as I was similar at that age with other things. But I will stand by the fact that he shouldn't be on any mod team or authority position. Especially when he's acting like this.

 

If you want to find a sweet spot, then boot him off the team and just allow Partial Nudity. Anything Fetishistic can be kept here, as well as Sexual Content, Lewd Angles and Poses, and Full Nudity. This isn't hard. At all. I am in these types of positions, I have been in NSFW ones before. I had the unfortunate benefit of running the shit show that was a NSFW modding server. I know what I'm talking about when it comes to these things and I know when a change is being made just to appease a single person whining about these changes.

 

The sweet spot is there, you simply aren't taking it for some reason, and I can only imagine that reason being Nock, and maybe a few others who shouldn't be seeing these mods in general, but are choosing too just to fight ghosts. If you all truly care about a middle ground, then you need to put your foot down and actually moderate like adults. If no NSFW at all? Fine, we can live with just posting here. My gripe is yall flip flopping constantly and then letting a child throw a hissy fit about us on Twitter and Discord.

 

6 hours ago, ninjahedgehog said:

I also want to ask something about Modder conduct. I understand not being cool with reposting someone else's mod. But is it really fair to be mad that someone mods your mod?, when the whole point is modding the game in a way that the devs may or not approve of? It comes off as "you're only upset because you don't like my alterations to your mod". Is everyone just expected to make a mod from scratch to not get in trouble?

 

Permission should always be given first and foremost before editing anyone's mod, as time, effort, and work was put into it. Its simply courtesy, really. Teto isn't owned by him, and anyone can easily replicate Teto by editing Miku, which is what should've been done. At that point, no mod would've been stolen. As someone on GB made a Infinite mod of his own (Not as good as the actual Infinite mod, with voice lines and such, but still Infinite nonetheless), no one claimed either stolen, nor had issue with one another since neither was stolen. Both were made from a base. If the nude Teto mod was made from Miku as a base, then Nock couldn't claim stolen. And no one would take issue with it.

 

Its why Surge hasn't gotten a nude mod yet, since we don't have permission to do so, and no one wants to try and port of those bad mobile models into the game. Especially with how good the current Surge mod is. Its just not worth it without permission.

 

3 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Thanks for at least recognizing Nock's immaturity. Sucks that pretty much all NSFW mods are banned.

 

I personally feel like it's a problem as a whole on GB, not just within the Sonic category. GB has always been undecided on which games should or shouldn't have NSFW mods. Thing is, since kids are able to make accounts on there without much age verification, and there are likely a lot of kids on the site, it might be good to go to extremes in this case, which would be fully banning NSFW content on GB entirely. Anything lewd in any sense.

 

Could perhaps make an alternate "after dark" sister site, which would require stronger age verification process. Perhaps call it "GamePeach" instead. That way there wouldn't be any crossover between regular and adult mods and modders. Would also mean GameBanana could still host users under 18. Just an idea.

 

An after dark sister site would honestly be the best course of action. I love GB, but as it stands, their rules are iffy and subject to change on a dime when regarding NSFW. In absolute fairness, they are a more tamer site for mods, unlike Nexus, and usually host Sega/Nintendo games a lot better then what Nexus can do. Despite Nexus allowing those types of mods, its a site no one really likes dealing with either, especially when a single flag gets mods into trouble. (I have other gripes with Nexus but that's neither here nor there).

 

It is fully GB's fault, really. They don't really know what they want with rules regarding NSFW, and it either runs wild (Like with Genshin), or not at all (Like with Crossworlds right now). I agree there needs to be proper protections in place, but its hard to do without invading people's privacy. At the end of the day, its the parent's job to moderate what their children do, not us. Its a tricky thing to try and balance without catering to one or either side. Its just easier to go the SFW route, which I fully understand.

 

39 minutes ago, kuromicola said:

The point in this isnt to throw around pedophile allegations the point is that theres a degree of irresponsibly from the adult modstaff that is far more important to question than to just constantly ramble about a 17 year old being a 17 year old. 

 

Also fuck you for the ablism and all the other dogshit youre implying from "twittards"

 

Agreed. Those types of allegations should never be thrown about without actual evidence. It can seriously hurt people's lives, especially if its unfounded. The real question is why he's allowed on the team and why aren't they doing anything about it.

[kuromicola]

32 minutes ago, Unkwn37 said:

 if they even care to begin with, that's another issue on its own.

 

I'm honestly concerned at this point that there are possibly more minors running moderation on the site than adults who have the mental capacity to be in charge. Age aside this kid has shown he simply is unfit to be in charge of such responsibilities. The only thing I can think of that will be dumber at this point is the possibility he may be close to being 18 and the site adults are ignoring the situation till the day of and will just throw their hands in the air and say they can't do anything about it then.

 

*rant*

Its not just GB when we look at the bigger picture, we saw how Nexus has its own issues leaving us with little options for little options on where to get mods that are not moderated to such an unnecessary degree that also has the convince of mod browsing like those sites do. LL is a forum and you either go through pages of text to find the mod, or the thread has someone take the time to perform a community service to link it all to the start of the thread (then there's the possible nuking that loses it all over one post, Shadow gens rip).

 

This immature, holier than thou, smooth brain behavior has been rampant all over the gaming industry for too long and mods were originally the solution to the corporate problem until people like Nock decided they needed to police others on content they themselves don't like.

*end rant*

 

Ablism? My sympathies if they actually are medically challenged, but I don't recall bringing up any disabled individual in the context of my post.

To be perfectly clear, my use of twittards is in reference to those who do nothing but call others pedos and biggots for a living on the platform because of opposing views, refusal to accept the facts, or straight up refuse discuss their view like an adult. Hell, rather than attacking people on that platform, they could find peace by using the block feature and the do not show nsfw content filter readily available on the site. If your offended by that, I don't need to explain or argue further and will leave it at that.

Youre not gonna convince me that you can portmanteau a literal slur to be okay cuz its about someone i dislike. Stop talking 

[ninjahedgehog]

man. Didn't expect that this to be a space where it's a big deal to call ppl "retarded". Unless an actual mentally challenged person pipes up saying it bothers them, it's not your place to tone police for the sake of a community you're not a part of.

Edited November 15, 2025 by ninjahedgehog

[Catnatic]

1 hour ago, kuromicola said:

Youre not gonna convince me that you can portmanteau a literal slur to be okay cuz its about someone i dislike. Stop talking 

Can we not have this argument while we're in the middle of an important conversation? Last thing we need is to get into infighting because of sensitive petty matters.

No reasonable person here actually thinks it's OK to belittle actual mentally challenged people just because they essentially calling other people stupid, idiots or morons.

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying you're wrong for being offended over the slur. I'm not saying that person is okay for using the slur.

I'm not comfortable using any slurs myself. However, this is not the time to make a big deal out of it and I don't want this to lead to any infighting.

Edited November 15, 2025 by Catnatic