Sonic Racing: Crossworlds

[Cunkles]

1 hour ago, kurokoi1 said:

no mod?

funny you should mention that... 🤐

[Obligitury]

3 hours ago, kurokoi1 said:

no mod?

Totes needs to be modded

[Unkwn37]

8 hours ago, Catnatic said:

Did somebody say femboy Tails?

I mean, this is unmistakably a boy who looks very feminine.

 

Well, the fact that she's human instead of an anthro animal makes this request a little odd as a mod variation. The model can be handy as a base though.

I could try maybe, I save my Blender project in increments so I do have a featureless model of her ready, but I still need to do the textures properly.

 

Anyway, progress update on a naturally nude Arle with the fun bits. I spent the past few hours refining her vulva and butt and I'm quite happy with it.

Next up, I need to work on her chest, but I couldn't resist adding in the nipples already so here's another draft of her nude body.

Great Progress so far, cant wait to see her on a board

[kuromicola]

5 hours ago, Cunkles said:

funny you should mention that... 🤐

ive been wanting a roll mod for months please link it if its ever finished

[Catnatic]

9 hours ago, kurokoi1 said:

I can't believe they're actually doing that and getting away with it, in an age where puritanism has apparently surged online.

But then again, this is Japan, they're usually a lot more lax with panties and upskirts. If Sega was still like that. I wouldn't had to make the Amy and Cream panties mod.

  

On 5/13/2026 at 6:24 PM, Future Tails said:

This is looking really good. Btw were you still doing one for Miku?

Not my top priority but I might do a revealing version of her outfit, or straight up nude with her canonical proportions one day.

Edited May 16 by Catnatic

[Catnatic]

Someone asked me to do a male version of Nude Arle.

Although drastically turning her to look more like a (masculine) boy including facial features and body physique (similar to that male Rouge mod) would be more work, I can do like femboy Arle which would be quite topical to do, given the recent discussion on femboys last page.

However, I'll be concentrating on finishing the female version and if I'm going to implement the male version, I need to nail the penis physics first.

[ScoutTheSaneless]

18 minutes ago, Catnatic said:

Someone asked me to do a male version of Nude Arle.

Although drastically turning her to look more like a (masculine) boy including facial features and body physique (similar to that male Rouge mod) would be more work, I can do like femboy Arle which would be quite topical to do, given the recent discussion on femboys last page.

However, I'll be concentrating on finishing the female version and if I'm going to implement the male version, I need to nail the penis physics first.

Looks good! Could, in the future ofc, these two models be combined? or perhaps even member size options? mostly asking out of curiosity :3

[Zorai]

5 hours ago, Catnatic said:

I can't believe they're actually doing that and getting away with it, in an age where puritanism has apparently surged online.

But then again, this is Japan, they're usually a lot more lax with panties and upskirts. If Sega was still like that. I wouldn't had to make the Amy and Cream panties mod.

 

Yeah, Japan has always had a pretty lax stance on these sorts of things. They still have rules but they don't shy away from fan service.

That, and media tends to not view butts as sexual a lot of the time, thankfully.

 

I think Sega only does it due to having more of a presence in the West, as Sonic is more popular in the US and other places then in Japan.

[GuyIncognito383]

On 5/13/2026 at 2:13 AM, Sensual Sage said:

I can post the next update of this in the UI Modding thread if it’s recommended but this is the next Crosstalk UI I’m working on 

It would be nice to have this in the UI thread, we need more activity over there!

[Sensual Sage]

33 minutes ago, GuyIncognito383 said:

It would be nice to have this in the UI thread, we need more activity over there!

I’ll post the finished version there!

[Catnatic]

I'm sorry to go on a rant here but because lots of people including lurkers are reading this thread, I figure I'll spread the word here about a certain popular website's inconsistent moderation because this has just infuriated me. For some fucking reason, the moderators of rule34.xxx has something against me for sharing my own content.

 

After nearly a year of letting my posts stay up there, they suddenly decided to remove these posts for the reason being they're "ads".

This isn't the first time they've done this, they removed my pixel art edits before for no reason, and now they've recently removed my mod previews for 3D Sonic games: 

   

Except there's no rules in their TOS and upload guidelines that states advertisement or self-promoting is forbidden. 

Meanwhile, UltraHyper's work is still allowed to be shown on the site despite literally doing the same thing - promoting their mods.

So what the hell is going on? If promoting mods is bad, then why are these still up?

Is it because the uploader has a different name so these posts don't count as (self) promotion? So what, should I just use an anonymous account with a different name to work around this arbitrary restriction? That is just fucking stupid, and strangely anti-artist that goes against the point of the site for not letting me showcase my own work. 

 

Is it because UltraHyper's models are more humanoid, curvier and sexier so they belong on the site while my own posts should be removed because my version of the models are boring for being faithful to the characters' proportions? I hope that isn't an actual arbitrary factor to why my posts should be removed, considering there exists several tags like "on_model", "accurate_body_type", "accurate_proportions", "accurate_model" on many other posts. 

 

Is there some sort of double standards going on where UltraHyper is significantly more popular than me and thus is able to get away with having their mods shared on that site while me, a nobody, is in the wrong for being the one to show off my own stuff there? Like really, you're picking on the little guy? Again, that is weirdly anti-artist.

 

I get that the main point of rule34.xxx is mainly sharing 2D artworks, 3D renders, and animations than sharing game mods, but there's over a thousand posts tagged "nude_mod" in which many of them are low-effort screencaps; many of them are still up though. Yet when I put all the effort in making proper on-style thumbnails and comparison charts, my posts should be removed for being "ads" or even "lq" which means low quality. Like what the fuck?

 

Those nude mods screenshots aren't "lq" but my comparison chart of a mod is?

Yes, this is considered low quality apparently, it's subtle as a small thumbnail but you can definitely notice changes on close up!

 

I think this post was removed for the same reason, if not "ad":

But you know what's the strangest part? They still keeping this screenshot up.

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=10478173

So if I don't do any fancy presentations with on-style headings, labels, and borders, then they're not "low quality" or "advertisement"? What?!

But then at the same time after removing almost all of my posts, they still keep two of my mods' thumbnails that has that exact fancy presentation?

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216228

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216183

So what exactly is going on with this bullshit? Do the moderators of rule34.xxx have something against me, or are they incompetently inconsistent with what's allowed?

Because otherwise, why not just leave me alone and let my posts be? So what if I'm "advertising" or promoting my own stuff?

If other people can upload screenshots of their nude mods there, why can't I do it for my own mods? Where's the harm in that?

 

And that's another thing, calling my mod showcases "ads" or "advertisement" is a horrid descriptor for an artist who's just showcasing/promoting their own FREE mods.

e621 is also guilty of removing my posts for the same reason, even though there have been a few other posts there that also showcased game mods.

Advertising implies that a product or service is being offered. My mods are neither of those, and paywalling/commercialising them would go against my own principles.

I made it sternly clear that these mods are available for free to download in the description/comments, and nothing about my thumbnails and comparison charts have ever implied my mods cost money. Again, if other people got away with sharing screencaps of nude mods or 3D renders of the same nude models, then I should be allowed to share my own mods/models as well.

 

Again, I apologise for bringing petty off-site drama here but as a modder/artist, it's absolutely infuriating that sharing my mods elsewhere is limited for asinine reasons.

Like I can't even share my mods to Nexus anymore because the moderators there have their heads up their arses regarding fictional characters' ages, even if they've been decanonised. Otherwise, my NSFW Amy Pack would've still be up and I would've released more mods there.

Edited May 16 by Catnatic

[Zorai]

10 minutes ago, Catnatic said:

I'm sorry to go on a rant here but because lots of people including lurkers are reading this thread, I figure I'll spread the word here about a certain popular website's inconsistent moderation because this has just infuriated me. For some fucking reason, the moderators of rule34.xxx has something against me for sharing my own content.

 

After nearly a year of letting my posts stay up there, they suddenly decided to remove these posts for the reason being they're "ads".

This isn't the first time they've done this, they removed my pixel art edits before for no reason, and now they've recently removed my mod previews for 3D Sonic games: 

   

Except there's no rules in their TOS and upload guidelines that states advertisement or self-promoting is forbidden. 

Meanwhile, UltraHyper's work is still allowed to be shown on the site despite literally doing the same thing - promoting their mods.

So what the hell is going on? If promoting mods is bad, then why are these still up?

Is it because the uploader has a different name so these posts don't count as (self) promotion? So what, should I just use an anonymous account with a different name to work around this arbitrary restriction? That is just fucking stupid, and strangely anti-artist that goes against the point of the site for not letting me showcase my own work. 

 

Is it because UltraHyper's models are more humanoid, curvier and sexier so they belong on the site while my own posts should be removed because my version of the models are boring for being faithful to the characters' proportions? I hope that isn't an actual arbitrary factor to why my posts should be removed, considering there exists several tags like "on_model", "accurate_body_type", "accurate_proportions", "accurate_model" on many other posts. 

 

Is there some sort of double standards going on where UltraHyper is significantly more popular than me and thus is able to get away with having their mods shared on that site while me, a nobody, is in the wrong for being the one to show off my own stuff there? Like really, you're picking on the little guy? Again, that is weirdly anti-artist.

 

I get that the main point of rule34.xxx is mainly sharing 2D artworks, 3D renders, and animations than sharing game mods, but there's over a thousand posts tagged "nude_mod" in which many of them are low-effort screencaps; many of them are still up though. Yet when I put all the effort in making proper on-style thumbnails and comparison charts, my posts should be removed for being "ads" or even "lq" which means low quality. Like what the fuck?

 

Those nude mods screenshots aren't "lq" but my comparison chart of a mod is?

Yes, this is considered low quality apparently, it's subtle as a small thumbnail but you can definitely notice changes on close up!

 

I think this post was removed for the same reason, if not "ad":

But you know what's the strangest part? They still keeping this screenshot up.

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=10478173

So if I don't do any fancy presentations with on-style headings, labels, and borders, then they're not "low quality" or "advertisement"? What?!

But then at the same time after removing almost all of my posts, they still keep two of my mods' thumbnails that has that exact fancy presentation?

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216228

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216183

So what exactly is going on with this bullshit? Do the moderators of rule34.xxx have something against me, or are they incompetently inconsistent with what's allowed?

Because otherwise, why not just leave me alone and let my posts be? So what if I'm "advertising" or promoting my own stuff?

If other people can upload screenshots of their nude mods there, why can't I do it for my own mods? Where's the harm in that?

 

And that's another thing, calling my mod showcases "ads" or "advertisement" is a horrid descriptor for an artist who's just showcasing/promoting their own FREE mods.

e621 is also guilty of removing my posts for the same reason, even though there have been a few other posts there that also showcased game mods.

Advertising implies that a product or service is being offered. My mods are neither of those, and paywalling/commercialising them would go against my own principles.

I made it sternly clear that these mods are available for free to download in the description/comments, and nothing about my thumbnails and comparison charts have ever implied my mods cost money. Again, if other people got away with sharing screencaps of nude mods or 3D renders of the same nude models, then I should be allowed to share my own mods/models as well.

 

Again, I apologise for bringing petty off-site drama here but as a modder/artist, it's absolutely infuriating that sharing my mods elsewhere is limited for asinine reasons.

Like I can't even share my mods to Nexus anymore because the moderators there have their heads up their arses regarding fictional characters' ages, even if they've been decanonised. Otherwise, my NSFW Amy Pack would've still be up and I would've released more mods there.

 

Imo you have every right to be annoyed by that, especially when it comes to e6. As the admins on there can be really terrible at their jobs. Especially when they want to ignore character ages just to enforce certain tags on it, despite the characters being adults. Canonically and by the artist. They cherry pick quite a damn lot.

[Equa_Cetera]

2 hours ago, Catnatic said:

I'm sorry to go on a rant here but because lots of people including lurkers are reading this thread, I figure I'll spread the word here about a certain popular website's inconsistent moderation because this has just infuriated me. For some fucking reason, the moderators of rule34.xxx has something against me for sharing my own content.

 

After nearly a year of letting my posts stay up there, they suddenly decided to remove these posts for the reason being they're "ads".

This isn't the first time they've done this, they removed my pixel art edits before for no reason, and now they've recently removed my mod previews for 3D Sonic games: 

   

Except there's no rules in their TOS and upload guidelines that states advertisement or self-promoting is forbidden. 

Meanwhile, UltraHyper's work is still allowed to be shown on the site despite literally doing the same thing - promoting their mods.

So what the hell is going on? If promoting mods is bad, then why are these still up?

Is it because the uploader has a different name so these posts don't count as (self) promotion? So what, should I just use an anonymous account with a different name to work around this arbitrary restriction? That is just fucking stupid, and strangely anti-artist that goes against the point of the site for not letting me showcase my own work. 

 

Is it because UltraHyper's models are more humanoid, curvier and sexier so they belong on the site while my own posts should be removed because my version of the models are boring for being faithful to the characters' proportions? I hope that isn't an actual arbitrary factor to why my posts should be removed, considering there exists several tags like "on_model", "accurate_body_type", "accurate_proportions", "accurate_model" on many other posts. 

 

Is there some sort of double standards going on where UltraHyper is significantly more popular than me and thus is able to get away with having their mods shared on that site while me, a nobody, is in the wrong for being the one to show off my own stuff there? Like really, you're picking on the little guy? Again, that is weirdly anti-artist.

 

I get that the main point of rule34.xxx is mainly sharing 2D artworks, 3D renders, and animations than sharing game mods, but there's over a thousand posts tagged "nude_mod" in which many of them are low-effort screencaps; many of them are still up though. Yet when I put all the effort in making proper on-style thumbnails and comparison charts, my posts should be removed for being "ads" or even "lq" which means low quality. Like what the fuck?

 

Those nude mods screenshots aren't "lq" but my comparison chart of a mod is?

Yes, this is considered low quality apparently, it's subtle as a small thumbnail but you can definitely notice changes on close up!

 

I think this post was removed for the same reason, if not "ad":

But you know what's the strangest part? They still keeping this screenshot up.

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=10478173

So if I don't do any fancy presentations with on-style headings, labels, and borders, then they're not "low quality" or "advertisement"? What?!

But then at the same time after removing almost all of my posts, they still keep two of my mods' thumbnails that has that exact fancy presentation?

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216228

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216183

So what exactly is going on with this bullshit? Do the moderators of rule34.xxx have something against me, or are they incompetently inconsistent with what's allowed?

Because otherwise, why not just leave me alone and let my posts be? So what if I'm "advertising" or promoting my own stuff?

If other people can upload screenshots of their nude mods there, why can't I do it for my own mods? Where's the harm in that?

 

And that's another thing, calling my mod showcases "ads" or "advertisement" is a horrid descriptor for an artist who's just showcasing/promoting their own FREE mods.

e621 is also guilty of removing my posts for the same reason, even though there have been a few other posts there that also showcased game mods.

Advertising implies that a product or service is being offered. My mods are neither of those, and paywalling/commercialising them would go against my own principles.

I made it sternly clear that these mods are available for free to download in the description/comments, and nothing about my thumbnails and comparison charts have ever implied my mods cost money. Again, if other people got away with sharing screencaps of nude mods or 3D renders of the same nude models, then I should be allowed to share my own mods/models as well.

 

Again, I apologise for bringing petty off-site drama here but as a modder/artist, it's absolutely infuriating that sharing my mods elsewhere is limited for asinine reasons.

Like I can't even share my mods to Nexus anymore because the moderators there have their heads up their arses regarding fictional characters' ages, even if they've been decanonised. Otherwise, my NSFW Amy Pack would've still be up and I would've released more mods there.

It's weird to describe but it's probably the text format that makes it feel more like an ad for a mod and less like porn because it's presenting as information

UltraHyper's stuff is probably still allowed because it minimizes the text and fully focuses on the actual lewd stuff

I won't pretend I know what's going on in the backend but that's my theory at least

Edited May 16 by Equa_Cetera

[asdf732]

3 hours ago, Catnatic said:

I'm sorry to go on a rant here but because lots of people including lurkers are reading this thread, I figure I'll spread the word here about a certain popular website's inconsistent moderation because this has just infuriated me. For some fucking reason, the moderators of rule34.xxx has something against me for sharing my own content.

 

After nearly a year of letting my posts stay up there, they suddenly decided to remove these posts for the reason being they're "ads".

This isn't the first time they've done this, they removed my pixel art edits before for no reason, and now they've recently removed my mod previews for 3D Sonic games: 

   

Except there's no rules in their TOS and upload guidelines that states advertisement or self-promoting is forbidden. 

Meanwhile, UltraHyper's work is still allowed to be shown on the site despite literally doing the same thing - promoting their mods.

So what the hell is going on? If promoting mods is bad, then why are these still up?

Is it because the uploader has a different name so these posts don't count as (self) promotion? So what, should I just use an anonymous account with a different name to work around this arbitrary restriction? That is just fucking stupid, and strangely anti-artist that goes against the point of the site for not letting me showcase my own work. 

 

Is it because UltraHyper's models are more humanoid, curvier and sexier so they belong on the site while my own posts should be removed because my version of the models are boring for being faithful to the characters' proportions? I hope that isn't an actual arbitrary factor to why my posts should be removed, considering there exists several tags like "on_model", "accurate_body_type", "accurate_proportions", "accurate_model" on many other posts. 

 

Is there some sort of double standards going on where UltraHyper is significantly more popular than me and thus is able to get away with having their mods shared on that site while me, a nobody, is in the wrong for being the one to show off my own stuff there? Like really, you're picking on the little guy? Again, that is weirdly anti-artist.

 

I get that the main point of rule34.xxx is mainly sharing 2D artworks, 3D renders, and animations than sharing game mods, but there's over a thousand posts tagged "nude_mod" in which many of them are low-effort screencaps; many of them are still up though. Yet when I put all the effort in making proper on-style thumbnails and comparison charts, my posts should be removed for being "ads" or even "lq" which means low quality. Like what the fuck?

 

Those nude mods screenshots aren't "lq" but my comparison chart of a mod is?

Yes, this is considered low quality apparently, it's subtle as a small thumbnail but you can definitely notice changes on close up!

 

I think this post was removed for the same reason, if not "ad":

But you know what's the strangest part? They still keeping this screenshot up.

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=10478173

So if I don't do any fancy presentations with on-style headings, labels, and borders, then they're not "low quality" or "advertisement"? What?!

But then at the same time after removing almost all of my posts, they still keep two of my mods' thumbnails that has that exact fancy presentation?

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216228

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216183

So what exactly is going on with this bullshit? Do the moderators of rule34.xxx have something against me, or are they incompetently inconsistent with what's allowed?

Because otherwise, why not just leave me alone and let my posts be? So what if I'm "advertising" or promoting my own stuff?

If other people can upload screenshots of their nude mods there, why can't I do it for my own mods? Where's the harm in that?

 

And that's another thing, calling my mod showcases "ads" or "advertisement" is a horrid descriptor for an artist who's just showcasing/promoting their own FREE mods.

e621 is also guilty of removing my posts for the same reason, even though there have been a few other posts there that also showcased game mods.

Advertising implies that a product or service is being offered. My mods are neither of those, and paywalling/commercialising them would go against my own principles.

I made it sternly clear that these mods are available for free to download in the description/comments, and nothing about my thumbnails and comparison charts have ever implied my mods cost money. Again, if other people got away with sharing screencaps of nude mods or 3D renders of the same nude models, then I should be allowed to share my own mods/models as well.

 

Again, I apologise for bringing petty off-site drama here but as a modder/artist, it's absolutely infuriating that sharing my mods elsewhere is limited for asinine reasons.

Like I can't even share my mods to Nexus anymore because the moderators there have their heads up their arses regarding fictional characters' ages, even if they've been decanonised. Otherwise, my NSFW Amy Pack would've still be up and I would've released more mods there.

 

25 minutes ago, Equa_Cetera said:

It's weird to describe but it's probably the text format that makes it feel more like an ad for a mod and less like porn because it's presenting as information

UltraHyper's stuff is probably still allowed because it minimizes the text and fully focuses on the actual lewd stuff

I won't pretend I know what's going on in the backend but that's my theory at least

Yeah I won't pretend to know about any of these sites' moderation history, but I think the presentation really matters for this.

Comparing your removed pictures to the ones that stayed and UltraHyper's pics, they feel more like showcases rather than a "list" of options available in the mod you link, like, they feel sorta more natural to find on a Rule34 site than a list of options that you'd find on a mod site.

When you think about it, there's lots of pictures or videos on r34 sites that advertise the artists' Patreon or whatever, but those still remain up because the main point was to showcase the content and then tell people to support them instead of telling people to support you (by downloading the mod) first and then they'll get to see the full content advertised (even though there's not much difference).

 

3 hours ago, Catnatic said:

Is it because UltraHyper's models are more humanoid, curvier and sexier so they belong on the site while my own posts should be removed because my version of the models are boring for being faithful to the characters' proportions? I hope that isn't an actual arbitrary factor to why my posts should be removed, considering there exists several tags like "on_model", "accurate_body_type", "accurate_proportions", "accurate_model" on many other posts. 

Besides I highly doubt that's the reason considering the type of content that's on both sites.

 

Did you talk to the moderators about it?

 

[Zorai]

15 minutes ago, asdf732 said:

 

Yeah I won't pretend to know about any of these sites' moderation history, but I think the presentation really matters for this.

Comparing your removed pictures to the ones that stayed and UltraHyper's pics, they feel more like showcases rather than a "list" of options available in the mod you link, like, they feel sorta more natural to find on a Rule34 site than a list of options that you'd find on a mod site.

When you think about it, there's lots of pictures or videos on r34 sites that advertise the artists' Patreon or whatever, but those still remain up because the main point was to showcase the content and then tell people to support them instead of telling people to support you (by downloading the mod) first and then they'll get to see the full content advertised (even though there's not much difference).

 

Besides I highly doubt that's the reason considering the type of content that's on both sites.

 

Did you talk to the moderators about it?

 

 

Both sites from what I've seen over the years have pretty bad moderation at times. Rule34 is a complete mess at times, especially in tagging, and many things end up breaking their rules quite a lot. Contacting them is pretty pointless really, unfortunately.

 

As for e6? They're really bad at enforcement with their rulings. As an example, they go by TWYS (Tag What You See) and its extremely biased and doesn't work as intended, as they take it by the literal meaning of it. If a character is an adult, acts like an adult, confirmed an adult, it will still get the "Young" tag solely due to the character being small sized. And the admins will refuse to change the tag despite being told otherwise due to taking the rule by its literal meaning.

 

That, if they see the quality of the image isn't too good, they will also delete it. Even if the image is intentional bad quality for a joke. And the admins of e6 call the site a "image archive site", they don't see it as a porn site. Dealing with them is also problematic, as many artists are banned on there simply for standing up to the tagging rules. One notable incident involving a mouse character that kept getting tagged as "Female" despite the artist clearly stating the character to be "Male".

Edited May 16 by Zorai

[Obligitury]

This is why i usually stick with gelbooru, its my go to for image browsing. Unless that site also has a "no advertisment" rule i dont lnow about.

[senkougami]

11 hours ago, Catnatic said:

Someone asked me to do a male version of Nude Arle.

Although drastically turning her to look more like a (masculine) boy including facial features and body physique (similar to that male Rouge mod) would be more work, I can do like femboy Arle which would be quite topical to do, given the recent discussion on femboys last page.

However, I'll be concentrating on finishing the female version and if I'm going to implement the male version, I need to nail the penis physics first.

if you do this you will be my hero, but i hope the normal version goes smoothly.
I don't really have anything to add to the moderation discussion other than mods on porn sites tend to be weirdly authoritarian towards anything they dont like

Edited May 16 by senkougami

[Cunkles]

17 hours ago, kuromicola said:

ive been wanting a roll mod for months please link it if its ever finished

It's gonna be a good while so hang tight, they're backed up with commissions at the moment. Also keep in mind that it won't *actually* be Roll but someone wearing their outfit...

[Neogaf]

is there a way to use the whisper and tangle decals from UltraHyper while using the pearl and marina outfits?

[Shadow2030]

15 hours ago, Catnatic said:

Someone asked me to do a male version of Nude Arle.

Although drastically turning her to look more like a (masculine) boy including facial features and body physique (similar to that male Rouge mod) would be more work, I can do like femboy Arle which would be quite topical to do, given the recent discussion on femboys last page.

However, I'll be concentrating on finishing the female version and if I'm going to implement the male version, I need to nail the penis physics first.

Femboy version would be nice~

 

[DDRay]

32 minutes ago, Neogaf said:

is there a way to use the whisper and tangle decals from UltraHyper while using the pearl and marina outfits?

I dunno if you're manual modding or using a modloader, but putting the decals above the Pearl and Marina mod should work

[breezytoe9287]

1 hour ago, Neogaf said:

is there a way to use the whisper and tangle decals from UltraHyper while using the pearl and marina outfits?

I think you just have to delete the mod files that overlap with each other thats at least the way it worked if you use speak ai for the ai racer skins but had a mod that changes the ai racers voice as well 

Edited May 16 by breezytoe9287

[DDRay]

59 minutes ago, breezytoe9287 said:

I think you just have to delete the mod files that overlap with each other thats at least the way it worked if you use speak ai for the ai racer skins but had a mod that changes the ai racers voice as well 

I use the Speak Ai. Audio mods are weird in that the mod you want overwriting others needs to go below the others.

[SinsAwakening]

Some improvements were made, but the pelvis makes the animations look weird tho. Besides that, I might add jiggle physics to it before finishing the mod.

[DDRay]

48 minutes ago, SinsAwakening said:

Some improvements were made, but the pelvis makes the animations look weird tho. Besides that, I might add jiggle physics to it before finishing the mod.

I know the chances are slim, but would it be possible for a version without the nips? (And pussy, but that looks harder to remove)