Sonic Racing: Crossworlds

[ClosetOfDoom]

1 hour ago, SinsAwakening said:

Some improvements were made, but the pelvis makes the animations look weird tho. Besides that, I might add jiggle physics to it before finishing the mod.

I think it just means you need to size the body down as a whole, not the head, though.

[Catnatic]

21 hours ago, Catnatic said:

I'm sorry to go on a rant here but because lots of people including lurkers are reading this thread, I figure I'll spread the word here about a certain popular website's inconsistent moderation because this has just infuriated me. For some fucking reason, the moderators of rule34.xxx has something against me for sharing my own content.

 

After nearly a year of letting my posts stay up there, they suddenly decided to remove these posts for the reason being they're "ads".

This isn't the first time they've done this, they removed my pixel art edits before for no reason, and now they've recently removed my mod previews for 3D Sonic games: 

   

Except there's no rules in their TOS and upload guidelines that states advertisement or self-promoting is forbidden. 

Meanwhile, UltraHyper's work is still allowed to be shown on the site despite literally doing the same thing - promoting their mods.

So what the hell is going on? If promoting mods is bad, then why are these still up?

Is it because the uploader has a different name so these posts don't count as (self) promotion? So what, should I just use an anonymous account with a different name to work around this arbitrary restriction? That is just fucking stupid, and strangely anti-artist that goes against the point of the site for not letting me showcase my own work. 

 

Is it because UltraHyper's models are more humanoid, curvier and sexier so they belong on the site while my own posts should be removed because my version of the models are boring for being faithful to the characters' proportions? I hope that isn't an actual arbitrary factor to why my posts should be removed, considering there exists several tags like "on_model", "accurate_body_type", "accurate_proportions", "accurate_model" on many other posts. 

 

Is there some sort of double standards going on where UltraHyper is significantly more popular than me and thus is able to get away with having their mods shared on that site while me, a nobody, is in the wrong for being the one to show off my own stuff there? Like really, you're picking on the little guy? Again, that is weirdly anti-artist.

 

I get that the main point of rule34.xxx is mainly sharing 2D artworks, 3D renders, and animations than sharing game mods, but there's over a thousand posts tagged "nude_mod" in which many of them are low-effort screencaps; many of them are still up though. Yet when I put all the effort in making proper on-style thumbnails and comparison charts, my posts should be removed for being "ads" or even "lq" which means low quality. Like what the fuck?

 

Those nude mods screenshots aren't "lq" but my comparison chart of a mod is?

Yes, this is considered low quality apparently, it's subtle as a small thumbnail but you can definitely notice changes on close up!

 

I think this post was removed for the same reason, if not "ad":

But you know what's the strangest part? They still keeping this screenshot up.

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=10478173

So if I don't do any fancy presentations with on-style headings, labels, and borders, then they're not "low quality" or "advertisement"? What?!

But then at the same time after removing almost all of my posts, they still keep two of my mods' thumbnails that has that exact fancy presentation?

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216228

https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9216183

So what exactly is going on with this bullshit? Do the moderators of rule34.xxx have something against me, or are they incompetently inconsistent with what's allowed?

Because otherwise, why not just leave me alone and let my posts be? So what if I'm "advertising" or promoting my own stuff?

If other people can upload screenshots of their nude mods there, why can't I do it for my own mods? Where's the harm in that?

 

And that's another thing, calling my mod showcases "ads" or "advertisement" is a horrid descriptor for an artist who's just showcasing/promoting their own FREE mods.

e621 is also guilty of removing my posts for the same reason, even though there have been a few other posts there that also showcased game mods.

Advertising implies that a product or service is being offered. My mods are neither of those, and paywalling/commercialising them would go against my own principles.

I made it sternly clear that these mods are available for free to download in the description/comments, and nothing about my thumbnails and comparison charts have ever implied my mods cost money. Again, if other people got away with sharing screencaps of nude mods or 3D renders of the same nude models, then I should be allowed to share my own mods/models as well.

 

Again, I apologise for bringing petty off-site drama here but as a modder/artist, it's absolutely infuriating that sharing my mods elsewhere is limited for asinine reasons.

Like I can't even share my mods to Nexus anymore because the moderators there have their heads up their arses regarding fictional characters' ages, even if they've been decanonised. Otherwise, my NSFW Amy Pack would've still be up and I would've released more mods there.

18 hours ago, Equa_Cetera said:

It's weird to describe but it's probably the text format that makes it feel more like an ad for a mod and less like porn because it's presenting as information
UltraHyper's stuff is probably still allowed because it minimizes the text and fully focuses on the actual lewd stuff
I won't pretend I know what's going on in the backend but that's my theory at least

17 hours ago, asdf732 said:

I think the presentation really matters for this.

Comparing your removed pictures to the ones that stayed and UltraHyper's pics, they feel more like showcases rather than a "list" of options available in the mod you link, like, they feel sorta more natural to find on a Rule34 site than a list of options that you'd find on a mod site.

Again, there's no written rules explicitly stating that advertising (or self-promotion) is disallowed.

I get that it doesn't need to be said that people shouldn't be posting actual advertisement on a booru site, but it's absurd to even consider my posts are "advertising" just because I put down labels for each variation, for clarification sake. Like why is that even problematic exactly to provide an additional bit of textual information?

 

I understand that rule34.xxx is mainly about posting pornographic artwork of copyrighted characters, but mere nudity of the characters depicted in a non-sexual manner do get posted there and nudity itself isn't necessary pornographic nor sexual. But because rule 34 goes by that logic anyway, my posts should meet that criteria with the characters been edited to be naked. When my posts are up, absolutely no one was complaining about my posts looking like advertisements because they properly understood the point of my posts in spite of the presentation - it's a showcase of a nude mod with various variations.

If you search up my removed posts on e6, people have been supportive with positive comments and tons of upvotes and favourites.

 

Speaking of e6, if a mod showcase with text is problematic, then how come these three promotions for nude mods have been approved while mine don't?

My posts have been removed partially because they're "screencaps" which is fair enough in that regard, but that's precisely why I made my nude mod showcases as stylised presentations so sharing these preview screenshots together wouldn't be low-effort, but then that counts as "advertising" now? Well, that's not fucking fair.

There's even someone just posting screencaps of their texture mod, and they've been approved. So again, why are my showcases should be considered wrong?

17 hours ago, asdf732 said:

When you think about it, there's lots of pictures or videos on r34 sites that advertise the artists' Patreon or whatever, but those still remain up because the main point was to showcase the content and then tell people to support them instead of telling people to support you (by downloading the mod) first and then they'll get to see the full content advertised (even though there's not much difference).

If they're going by that logic, that is just odd when you can literally see the content with several uncensored screencaps as part of the preview/thumbnail before even downloading the mod. And again, nobody was complaining about how the mod was presented. It's just some random pretentious moderator(s) thinking they're doing everyone a favour by removing my posts when they're not even causing any harm to anyone in any way. All they did was dickishly inconveniencing me who just wanted to share my work for free with stylised presentation (because I like doing that), and other people that would've appreciate stumbling upon an actual on-model nude mod of a game they like on a porn site.

 

They don't even just remove my posts with presentation value, they have actually removed RAW screenshots of my nude mods (no text or anything special) for no apparent reason when it's no different to the many screenshots of nude_mods you see on rule34.xxx.

This is one example, this image was on rule34.xxx but now it's gone:

And just for an extra kick in the dick, there's even a comparison chart of a nude mod for Marvel Rivals that is still up.

That post is literally doing the same thing I'm doing for my own mods. If there's any consistency, they would've either removed that post too, or keep my own posts up.

I feel like I'm being targeted at this point for no good reason, like how dare I find stylised bodies of cartoon characters attractive that I even made nude mods out of them...

Edited May 17 by Catnatic

[Zorai]

23 minutes ago, Catnatic said:

Again, there's no written rules explicitly stating that advertising (or self-promotion) is disallowed.

I get that it doesn't need to be said that people shouldn't be posting actual advertisement on a booru site, but it's absurd to even consider my posts are "advertising" just because I put down labels for each variation, for clarification sake. Like why is that even problematic exactly to provide an additional bit of textual information?

 

I understand that rule34.xxx is mainly about posting pornographic artwork of copyrighted characters, but mere nudity of the characters depicted in a non-sexual manner do get posted there and nudity itself isn't necessary pornographic nor sexual. But because rule 34 goes by that logic anyway, my posts should meet that criteria with the characters been edited to be naked. When my posts are up, absolutely no one was complaining about my posts looking like advertisements because they properly understood the point of my posts in spite of the presentation - it's a showcase of a nude mod with various variations.

If you search up my removed posts on e6, people have been supportive with positive comments and tons of upvotes and favourites.

 

Speaking of e6, if a mod showcase with text is problematic, then how come these three promotions for nude mods have been approved while mine don't?

My posts have been removed partially because they're "screencaps" which is fair enough in that regard, but that's precisely why I made my nude mod showcases as stylised presentations so sharing these preview screenshots together wouldn't be low-effort, but then that counts as "advertising" now? Well, that's not fucking fair.

There's even someone just posting screencaps of their texture mod, and they've been approved. So again, why are my showcases in the wrong?

If they're going by that logic, that is just odd when you can literally see the content with several uncensored screencaps as part of the preview/thumbnail before even downloading the mod. And again, nobody was complaining about how the mod was presented. It's just some random pretentious moderator(s) thinking they're doing everyone a favour by removing my posts when they're not even causing any harm to anyone in any way. All they did was dickishly inconveniencing me who just wanted to share my work for free with stylised presentation (because I like doing that), and other people that would've appreciate stumbling upon an actual on-model nude mod of a game they like on a porn site.

 

They don't even just remove my posts with presentation value, they have actually removed RAW screenshots of my nude mods (no text or anything special) for no apparent reason when it's no different to the many screenshots of nude_mods you see on rule34.xxx.

This is one example, this image was on rule34.xxx but now it's gone:

And just for an extra kick in the dick, there's even a comparison chart of a nude mod for Marvel Rivals that is still up.

That post is literally doing the same thing I'm doing for my own mods. If there's any consistency, they would've either removed that post too, or keep my own posts up.

I feel like I'm being targeted at this point for no good reason, like how dare I find stylised bodies of cartoon characters attractive that I even made nude mods out of them...

 

I'll admit, it is a bit odd that two different sites with different admins have taken down your mod showcases. While I don't personally believe it intentional targeting, I think its just bad moderation in place. Unless the two sites share a moderator or somehow coordinated the take down if both sites took them down the same day or week. Its still unfair considering how long they've been up, and how long other things have been up that are more or less the exact thing you've posted.

 

I'd say try contacting the e6 admins to see what the reasoning was. Pictures on there don't really get taken down unless reported, then reviewed by staff. Although they might just give a bullshit reason for it. Like I said in my other post, they're really bad at doing their job at times.

[i_like_juice]

hey guys i got into using blender recently. is this model any good?

[SinsAwakening]

20 hours ago, DDRay said:

I know the chances are slim, but would it be possible for a version without the nips? (And pussy, but that looks harder to remove)

 

Maybe if I was more experienced with blender, but as of now no

[ScoutTheSaneless]

1 hour ago, kayussy said:

hey guys i got into using blender recently. is this model any good?

Those models look great! Is that a futa Arle or am i trippin?

[evanburguer6767]

almost every menu asset is done, theres only missing the extra menu tab

[ScoutTheSaneless]

2 hours ago, kayussy said:

hey guys i got into using blender recently. is this model any good?

Also, will there be downloads when theodels are ready?

[Unkwn37]

1 hour ago, evanburguer6767 said:

almost every menu asset is done, theres only missing the extra menu tab

Where can we get the actual pictures? So good to just have them in game in mod only

[Future Tails]

On 5/15/2026 at 9:04 PM, Catnatic said:

Not my top priority but I might do a revealing version of her outfit, or straight up nude with her canonical proportions one day.

I do like how you make your models as canonically as possible. I also just like how your models look in general.

[rizaadon007]

11 hours ago, ScoutTheSaneless said:

Those models look great! Is that a futa Arle or am i trippin?

i think they're going for femboy arle. futa would also include the pussy, but i can't tell if it's there from just that pic, lol.

models do look great tho!

[evanburguer6767]

10 hours ago, Unkwn37 said:

Where can we get the actual pictures? So good to just have them in game in mod only

i actually made them, soon im sending the raw and the normal assets

[kurokoi1]

...i need to say it?

[Sensual Sage]

1 minute ago, kurokoi1 said:

...i need to say it?

Why November out of all months 🥀 

[SinsAwakening]

24 minutes ago, kurokoi1 said:

...i need to say it?

How do we not have a female tails mod like this?

[DDRay]

27 minutes ago, kurokoi1 said:

...i need to say it?

I like everything about it... except the humanoid feet. That spoils it for me.

[SinsAwakening]

After about a week, my first mod is now somewhat finished enough to play! No jiggle physics added yet, but when I figure out how to do it, I will update it.

[Mr.LewdFiction34]

3 minutes ago, SinsAwakening said:

After about a week, my first mod is now somewhat finished enough to play! No jiggle physics added yet, but when I figure out how to do it, I will update it.

gonna use this alongside the Hue hue hue trick sound mod lol

[asdf732]

13 minutes ago, SinsAwakening said:

After about a week, my first mod is now somewhat finished enough to play! No jiggle physics added yet, but when I figure out how to do it, I will update it.

I gotta step up with my Sally mod.

[edendowner]

1 hour ago, SinsAwakening said:

After about a week, my first mod is now somewhat finished enough to play! No jiggle physics added yet, but when I figure out how to do it, I will update it.

Dumb question, but what's it over?

[ClosetOfDoom]

2 hours ago, edendowner said:

Dumb question, but what's it over?

Take a wiiiiild guess, lol.

[SinsAwakening]

4 hours ago, edendowner said:

Dumb question, but what's it over?

It’s over Metal Sonic. I’ll make one over the ai skin later

[edendowner]

5 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Take a wiiiiild guess, lol.

But I'm asking for clarification. Can never be too sure when you're autistic and specifics aren't mentioned.

 

3 hours ago, SinsAwakening said:

It’s over Metal Sonic. I’ll make one over the ai skin later

Alright, cool.

[SinsAwakening]

9 hours ago, SinsAwakening said:

After about a week, my first mod is now somewhat finished enough to play! No jiggle physics added yet, but when I figure out how to do it, I will update it.

My dumbass sent the wrong version. New one uploaded with properly positioned animations.

[evanburguer6767]

hey everyone, here it is, menu overhaul ready to port, if someone wants to add it ingame, the folders are already in order.

UI overhaul 2.rar