Hollow Knight Silksong nude mods

[MrNok]

6 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Yeah, don't listen to Anthur. Those look spectacular, and they fit extremely well with the environment. It may clash a bit when seen next to other characters, but I highly doubt that will be an issue, lol.

He specifically asked for feedback, which Anthur, and multiple others, provided. I get what you're trying to say, but straight up saying "no, don't listen to the feedback you requested" is definitely not how one should go about actually saying it.

That being said, I rather agree with Anthur on this one. I wouldn't go as far as to say the shadows look bad, just that I personally prefer the shadowless version.

As for the censored version, I'd prefer the 'no-underwear' variant, basically how Miclbero first drew it. The boob window is cool tho

Edited October 31, 2025 by MrNok

[ClosetOfDoom]

1 hour ago, MrNok said:

He specifically asked for feedback, which Anthur, and multiple others, provided. I get what you're trying to say, but straight up saying "no, don't listen to the feedback you requested" is definitely not how one should go about actually saying it.

That being said, I rather agree with Anthur on this one. I wouldn't go as far as to say the shadows look bad, just that I personally prefer the shadowless version.

As for the censored version, I'd prefer the 'no-underwear' variant, basically how Miclbero first drew it. The boob window is cool tho

Then you should just wait for Miclbero's version, instead of critiquing one that is obviously headed another direction. They didn't ask for preferences, they asked for feedback on the current sprites. Asking for a redesign is an entirely different thing here, and would require a ton more work.

 

I don't think people understand that asking for feedback doesn't mean "I'll redo the whole thing if you ask", it means "Point out where this could use some improvements", and "improvements" doesn't mean "redesign". Saying they just "don't look good at all" is just false. Perhaps it's not to yours or Anthur's liking, but that doesn't mean they look bad. Just wait for the other version.

In sprite work, narrowing down your design always comes first, then you create the rest of the sprites based on that design. We are way too far along for a redesign, unless you're the studio that made the first Sonic The Hedgehog movie, and even then, it was mostly a 3D model swap, rather than redesigning hundreds of sprites.

 

I hope I've made my point clear.

Edited October 31, 2025 by ClosetOfDoom

[MrNok]

3 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

instead of critiquing one that is obviously headed another direction

Nowhere in my message was there a critique of any kind. The only exception being the critique of your attitude. It's not the first time I see you straight up telling people what they should and shouldn't do. Case in point, the very first message in your reply is you doing exactly that. Don't you think that's a little entitled?

 

Just so there aren't any misunderstandings, no, telling other people what to do is not the same as expressing your opinion.

 

3 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

They didn't ask for preferences, they asked for feedback on the current sprites

How do you expect people should give feedback on a subjective matter without expressing their preferences in said matter?

 

3 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Asking for a redesign is an entirely different thing here, and would require a ton more work.

Again, nowhere in my message did I ask for any single thing.

 

3 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

I don't think people understand that asking for feedback doesn't mean "I'll redo the whole thing if you ask", it means "Point out where this could use some improvements"

Well, it seems we've found the root cause of this misunderstanding. No, asking for feedback doesn't mean "I'll redo the whole thing if you ask". Nor does it mean "Point out where this could use some improvements". What it does mean is that a person who's asking is interested to know an opinion on their work, be it a critique or simply how people see it.

 

3 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Saying they just "don't look good at all" is just false

What's false is that sentence right there. A subjective sentence can't be true or false, that's why it's called subjective.

 

3 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

I hope I've made my point clear.

The only thing clear to me is that there seems to be a misunderstanding of several key concepts on your part

 

TLDR:

Not asking for a redesign nor am I offering any critique (to the artists). Simply giving my opinion. What the artists decide to do or not do is entirely up to them, I'm simply happy that there's something in the works.

 

Well, there's also the fact that your attitude rubbed me the wrong way...

Edited October 31, 2025 by MrNok

[ClosetOfDoom]

13 hours ago, MrNok said:

Nowhere in my message was there a critique of any kind. The only exception being the critique of your attitude. It's not the first time I see you straight up telling people what they should and shouldn't do. Case in point, the very first message in your reply is you doing exactly that. Don't you think that's a little entitled?

 

Just so there aren't any misunderstandings, no, telling other people what to do is not the same as expressing your opinion.

 

How do you expect people should give feedback on a subjective matter without expressing their preferences in said matter?

 

Again, nowhere in my message did I ask for any single thing.

 

Well, it seems we've found the root cause of this misunderstanding. No, asking for feedback doesn't mean "I'll redo the whole thing if you ask". Nor does it mean "Point out where this could use some improvements". What it does mean is that a person who's asking is interested to know an opinion on their work, be it a critique or simply how people see it.

 

What's false is that sentence right there. A subjective sentence can't be true or false, that's why it's called subjective.

 

The only thing clear to me is that there seems to be a misunderstanding of several key concepts on your part

 

TLDR:

Not asking for a redesign nor am I offering any critique (to the artists). Simply giving my opinion. What the artists decide to do or not do is entirely up to them, I'm simply happy that there's something in the works.

 

Well, there's also the fact that your attitude rubbed me the wrong way...

Sure, you didn't give the critiques yourself, but my problem was that you were defending an opinion that clearly wants a redesign, and you agreed with the preference that fueled said opinion.

 

And as I said, it is far too late in the game for a redesign. If you and Anthur just prefer Miclbero's version, then maybe Anthur shouldn't critique IEatMulch's version just so they make it look more like Miclbero's version. It's just way too much work as it is, you get it?

Edited November 1, 2025 by ClosetOfDoom

[MrNok]

1 hour ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Sure, you didn't give the critiques yourself, but my problem was that you were defending an opinion that clearly wants a redesign, and you agreed with the preference that fueled said opinion.

So what you're saying is that your opinion is right and everyone who disagree with you is wrong, is that it?

 

1 hour ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

And as I said, it is far too late in the game for a redesign. If you and Anthur just prefer Miclbero's version, then maybe Anthur shouldn't critique IEatMulch's version just so they make it look more like Miclbero's version. It's just way too much work as it is, you get it?

It's obvious you either haven't read a word I wrote in my previous message or simply chose to ignore it, so I won't bother pointing out the very same mistakes you're making here. Already wasted enough time as it is...

[Anthur]

Yeah, if I also said "Don't listen to ClosetOfDoom" you'd be a little angry, wouldn't you?

 

It's no problem if you don't agree with my opinion, but it's feedback still, and it's not ok for you to say it isn't just because you don't agree with it.

 

My point is that those more shadows are an overcharged design, there are benefits on not adding those much shadows: visual clarity, less work for the artist, a style that is easier and more similar to the rest of the game's sprites, problems when animating (those shadows will probably be a pain in the ass for them to not look like a .gif full of noise), etc.

 

The enemy of artists is overperfectionisim. Sometimes a minimalistic approach is better, specially because having to add the boob window and the nipples and the vagina. You say "it's just way too much work as it is" as if I was telling the artist to do more work. No, you are misunderstanding. I'm asking him to do less.

 

YOU are the one asking him to do more work (more shadows, more everything) under the excuse of "let the artist do what he wants" or "its far too late in the game to do a redesign". I'm telling him it's not necesary and might be, in fact, a bad choice, for him because the ammout of work, for the work itself because it may create problems, and also because it may not be that good style choice at all.

 

At the end of the day, it's the artist's choice, not yours, not mine. But let people give feedback, specially if he asked. Then the artist will, in fact, do whatever he wants as he desires. But stop silencing other's feedback and opinions. You did the same when people commented about the vagina/nipples colors.

 

 

 

Edited November 1, 2025 by Anthur

[ClosetOfDoom]

4 hours ago, Anthur said:

Yeah, if I also said "Don't listen to ClosetOfDoom" you'd be a little angry, wouldn't you?

 

It's no problem if you don't agree with my opinion, but it's feedback still, and it's not ok for you to say it isn't just because you don't agree with it.

 

My point is that those more shadows are an overcharged design, there are benefits on not adding those much shadows: visual clarity, less work for the artist, a style that is easier and more similar to the rest of the game's sprites, problems when animating (those shadows will probably be a pain in the ass for them to not look like a .gif full of noise), etc.

 

The enemy of artists is overperfectionisim. Sometimes a minimalistic approach is better, specially because having to add the boob window and the nipples and the vagina. You say "it's just way too much work as it is" as if I was telling the artist to do more work. No, you are misunderstanding. I'm asking him to do less.

 

YOU are the one asking him to do more work (more shadows, more everything) under the excuse of "let the artist do what he wants" or "its far too late in the game to do a redesign". I'm telling him it's not necesary and might be, in fact, a bad choice, for him because the ammout of work, for the work itself because it may create problems, and also because it may not be that good style choice at all.

 

At the end of the day, it's the artist's choice, not yours, not mine. But let people give feedback, specially if he asked. Then the artist will, in fact, do whatever he wants as he desires. But stop silencing other's feedback and opinions. You did the same when people commented about the vagina/nipples colors.

 

 

 

Then just wait for Miclbero's version, dude. That's the design you like better, so stop saying this one should go that direction.

 

I really don't think you guys understand how sprite work flow works. Once you have a design down, your work flow is entirely centered on that design, and changing the work flow is more of a chore than you might think. It's also very much a smack in the face when someone says all the sprites you've done (and there are already a good chunk done) are just bad-looking. Which is what you said.

 

I'm a sprite artist myself, so I would kinda understand. Adding shadows may be more work, but there's nothing worse than someone implying you should go back and redraw the sprites you've already finished, especially if you've already done a decent amount. Plus, these ones were shaped with the shading in mind, so it's really not as simple as just "removing the shadows". You can tell this one started with the intention of having the advanced shading, so a complete body reshape would also be part of the process of redrawing all the sprites they've already finished.

 

Miclbero's version will be just what you're hoping for. When I see newer mods come out that I don't think look good, I just go back to the ones I like, and I don't say stuff like "I think it would look better if it were more like the other one", because at that point you're better off just using said other one, instead of hoping this one ends up being a duplicate of the one that already exists.

 

Plus, look at most of the replies to IEatMulch's posts. A vast majority are positive and think the design looks really good despite your opinion, so your negativity towards it is outweighed and unwarranted anyway.

 

The fact of the matter is this: both of you want a mod that has no shading, no boob window, and no clear genitals.

 

That's just a different mod in general.

 

This mod is not meant to be the previous mod. Plus, I know you wouldn't be here critiquing this one if Miclbero's was finished, so what you should be doing is hoping for someone else to finish that one, rather than for IEatMulch to adhere to Miclbero's design.

Edited November 1, 2025 by ClosetOfDoom

[MrNok]

4 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

The fact of the matter is this: both of you want a mod that has no shading, no boob window, and no clear genitals

Holy smokes, I think we just found PirateSoftware's protege or something... The guy refuses to back down when he's clearly in the wrong, invents his own narrative and now he even has his own "I worked in Blizzard for 7 years so I know what I'm talking about" card. That's just wild...

I can now see that you're going to quintuple down no matter what anyone else says, so I won't bother with further replies

[ClosetOfDoom]

4 hours ago, MrNok said:

Holy smokes, I think we just found PirateSoftware's protege or something... The guy refuses to back down when he's clearly in the wrong, invents his own narrative and now he even has his own "I worked in Blizzard for 7 years so I know what I'm talking about" card. That's just wild...

I can now see that you're going to quintuple down no matter what anyone else says, so I won't bother with further replies

Look, all I'm saying is that you guys are projecting your voices in the wrong direction. If you like mod #1 better than mod #2, great! But don't try to tell mod #2 that it should be another mod #1, otherwise it's literally just a duplicate, lol.

 

You feel me?

[Suziezusi]

10 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Look, all I'm saying is that you guys are projecting your voices in the wrong direction. If you like mod #1 better than mod #2, great! But don't try to tell mod #2 that it should be another mod #1, otherwise it's literally just a duplicate, lol.

 

You feel me?

been reading, but what you're saying is two mods should be different from each other right? just making sure IM following your point properly too lmao, I agree btw, I think both versions should offer their own styles and one shouldn't strive to be like the other when they're clearly going different directions 

[Catnatic]

11 hours ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Look, all I'm saying is that you guys are projecting your voices in the wrong direction. If you like mod #1 better than mod #2, great! But don't try to tell mod #2 that it should be another mod #1, otherwise it's literally just a duplicate, lol.

 

You feel me?

Nah, they got nothing so one of them resorted to ad hominem attacks instead.

 

I mean really, someone having personal experience with sprite work equates to them having worked in a controversial game company and also supporting an anti game preservationist? That's just wild... Is it so hard to just agree to disagree and move on instead of ridiculing one another?

[ClosetOfDoom]

2 hours ago, Suziezusi said:

been reading, but what you're saying is two mods should be different from each other right? just making sure IM following your point properly too lmao, I agree btw, I think both versions should offer their own styles and one shouldn't strive to be like the other when they're clearly going different directions 

That is entirely my point, yes. They want IEatMulch's mod to be Miclbero's mod, and their critiques are purely fueled by the fact that neither are fully finished yet.

[ClosetOfDoom]

2 hours ago, Catnatic said:

Nah, they got nothing so one of them resorted to ad hominem attacks instead.

 

I mean really, someone having personal experience with sprite work equates to them having worked in a controversial game company and also supporting an anti game preservationist? That's just wild... Is it so hard to just agree to disagree and move on instead of ridiculing one another?

I will admit to having a hard time letting stuff go, but it also just really makes me sad that many don't realize the implications of their criticisms. Critiques and criticisms, while not demands per se, are very much made in the hopes that the modder will adhere to them, and is therefore, by nature, more than an opinion or preference. And when you attach your personal preference to said critique, it's not as much of a critique as it is a request at that point.

 

I get it, not my creation, so I really have no say in the matter, but having done loads and loads of sprite work over the years (please never try to mod Sonic Mania), it's very disheartening when someone says your sprites look "bad" (which is what Anthur did, or perhaps "not good", if I recall), even if you know it's not really that objective.

 

Sure, some people won't like these sprites, but if they're going to leave a critique like that, they should be more considerate about the way they express their distaste. Phrases like "It's not my cup of tea" or "It's not that visually appealing to me" are much more kind, and frankly, accurate.

 

Now, what you could call "bad" is if a sprite is missing a piece, or maybe the animation is not totally stable, then yeah, that's poorer quality, and would look objectivrly better if they fine-tuned it. That is what critiques are for, to help point out those little things that need fixing and such, which is the kind of feedback most modders are looking for. And again, that's not artstyle preference or shading opinions, that's just making sure the sprites you've drawn function properly.

 

@Anthur @MrNok

 

Here's perhaps a simpler example:

 

It's the same for music, to be honest. When a punk-rock artist asks for feedback on their punk-rock song, they're looking for critiques on mix, master, maybe execution and such, so like balancing volumes, or maybe how in-sync everything is. The least helpful thing someone can say is "it would sound better as a country song". While the idea is cool, the opinion is wildly unhelpful. It's definitely possible the song could sound interesting as a country song, and perhaps would give it a new flavor. However, regardless of whether or not that's true, that's not the kind of feedback the punk-rock musician was asking for, so the feedback in that setting is pretty rude, and that's ignoring the fact that turning it into a country song would require a complete re-recording with new tones and likely new instruments, and all played in different styles, possibly styles the punk-rock musician doesn't know how to play or simply doesn't like.

 

Just like the punk-rock song, IEatMulch's shading is a stylistic choice. It may not be your preference, but the words "good", "bad", "better", or "worse" do not belong in stylistic choice opinions.

 

I could go on and on, but as long as I get no replies, I'll leave it alone here.

Edited November 2, 2025 by ClosetOfDoom

[Suziezusi]

3 hours ago, Catnatic said:

Nah, they got nothing so one of them resorted to ad hominem attacks instead.

 

I mean really, someone having personal experience with sprite work equates to them having worked in a controversial game company and also supporting an anti game preservationist? That's just wild... Is it so hard to just agree to disagree and move on instead of ridiculing one another?

i think what they were getting at is doom here isn't backing down and immediately saying they were right, therefore they're just like that guy everyone makes fun of for being objectively wrong and still claiming hes right...unfortunately the two situations aren't the same like they're trying to say lol. if you want a mod to be just like another mod, just go get that other mod instead

[MrNok]

4 hours ago, Catnatic said:

Is it so hard to just agree to disagree and move on instead of ridiculing one another?

If it was simply a difference of opinion, then I wouldn't have said a word.

My problem with ClosetOfDoom is that he promotes his own opinion (which is fine-ish) and actively suppresses everyone who disagrees (which is definitely not fine). He does this under pretenses of "noo, you can't tell the artist what you did or didn't like about their work, they would have to REDESIGN EVERYTHING theen!", which is simply not true. I already pointed this out multiple times, along with several other points, and he didn't address a single one of those.

 

Instead he invented a narrative where I want the artist to immediately stop whatever they've been doing and only do what I tell them to. Which is also entirely untrue, obviously. That's just another thing that I already said earlier, which ClosetOfDoom simply chose to ignore.

Edited November 2, 2025 by MrNok

[insanity906]

just a thought instead of hornet playing her needle she rubs herself off ? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[ClosetOfDoom]

1 hour ago, MrNok said:

If it was simply a difference of opinion, then I wouldn't have said a word.

My problem with ClosetOfDoom is that he promotes his own opinion (which is fine-ish) and actively suppresses everyone who disagrees (which is definitely not fine). He does this under pretenses of "noo, you can't tell the artist what you did or didn't like about their work, they would have to REDESIGN EVERYTHING theen!", which is simply not true. I already pointed this out multiple times, along with several other points, and he didn't address a single one of those.

 

Instead he invented a narrative where I want the artist to immediately stop whatever they've been doing and only do what I tell them to. Which is also entirely untrue, obviously. That's just another thing that I already said earlier, which ClosetOfDoom simply chose to ignore.

That's really not the case here. My point was that Anthur was pretty directly saying that IEatMulch's work was objectively bad. I respect opinions, but stylistic choices are neither good nor bad. You can say you don't like it, but don't call it bad, as that's just inaccurate and hurtful.

 

Like I said, critiques are put out there for a reason, in hopes that the artist will heed their advice. That advice was just very negative and more destructive than constructive, so it was unhelpful. Look at my punk-rock example in my previous comment, please.

Edited November 2, 2025 by ClosetOfDoom

[Suziezusi]

8 hours ago, MrNok said:

If it was simply a difference of opinion, then I wouldn't have said a word.

My problem with ClosetOfDoom is that he promotes his own opinion (which is fine-ish) and actively suppresses everyone who disagrees (which is definitely not fine). He does this under pretenses of "noo, you can't tell the artist what you did or didn't like about their work, they would have to REDESIGN EVERYTHING theen!", which is simply not true. I already pointed this out multiple times, along with several other points, and he didn't address a single one of those.

 

Instead he invented a narrative where I want the artist to immediately stop whatever they've been doing and only do what I tell them to. Which is also entirely untrue, obviously. That's just another thing that I already said earlier, which ClosetOfDoom simply chose to ignore.

ClosetOfDoom isnt "suppressing" anyone lmao

[MrNok]

8 hours ago, Suziezusi said:

ClosetOfDoom isnt "suppressing" anyone lmao

I'm simply baffled... What do you call the following then?

 

On 10/31/2025 at 6:04 PM, ClosetOfDoom said:

Then you should just wait for Miclbero's version, instead of critiquing one that is obviously headed another direction. They didn't ask for preferences, they asked for feedback on the current sprites. Asking for a redesign is an entirely different thing here, and would require a ton more work.

 

On 11/1/2025 at 11:12 AM, ClosetOfDoom said:

Sure, you didn't give the critiques yourself, but my problem was that you were defending an opinion that clearly wants a redesign, and you agreed with the preference that fueled said opinion.

 

On 11/1/2025 at 11:12 AM, ClosetOfDoom said:

If you and Anthur just prefer Miclbero's version, then maybe Anthur shouldn't critique IEatMulch's version just so they make it look more like Miclbero's version. It's just way too much work as it is, you get it?

 

On 11/1/2025 at 5:56 PM, ClosetOfDoom said:

Then just wait for Miclbero's version, dude. That's the design you like better, so stop saying this one should go that direction.

There's also his "Yeah, don't listen to Anthur." message, which I can't figure out how to quote as it's on previous page.

 

And before anyone else says that I, or Anthur for that matter, constantly ask the artist to "redesign everything", I emplore you, show me the message where any one of us does such a thing. Please, I insist.

 

I'll also repeat this particular point here, tired as I am of repeating the same thing over and over...

On 10/31/2025 at 9:37 PM, MrNok said:

No, asking for feedback doesn't mean "I'll redo the whole thing if you ask". Nor does it mean "Point out where this could use some improvements". What it does mean is that a person who's asking is interested to know an opinion on their work, be it a critique or simply how people see it.

 

Edited November 3, 2025 by MrNok

[IEatMulch]

Good news, i got the sprite sheet to animation frames software working and now im using the animation frames in krita to get things looking smoother. Here's the look down animation as an example of what it would look like in motion, and as far on how it looks in game. Also i had o zip it to upload it. It didn't look super jaring to me, but I get other people can be bothered by it. Unfortunately it is also true removing the shadows isnt really that feasible. Additionally part of the reason I split of into my own style was that I didnt feel like I was nailing the original style as well I would have liked. At this point I am kinda hoping someone else would pick up the original style, since to me it didn't seem like my forte. Something I would totally be open to changing tho, is boobs size, especially for this animation if yall feel like this is too big.

ezgif.com-animated-gif-maker_1.zip

Edited November 3, 2025 by IEatMulch
typo

[ClosetOfDoom]

39 minutes ago, IEatMulch said:

Good news, i got the sprite sheet to animation frames software working and now im using the animation frames in krita to get things looking smoother. Here's the look down animation as an example of what it would look like in motion, and as far on how it looks in game. Also i had o zip it o upload it. It didn't look super jaring to me, but I get other people can be bothered by it. Unfortunately it is also true removing the shadows is really phisiable. Additionally part of the reason I split of into my own style was that I didnt feel like I was nailing the original style as well I would have liked. At this point I am kinda hoping someone else would pick up the original style, since to me it didn't seem like my forte. Something I would totally be open to changing tho, is boob's size, especially for this animation if yall feel like this is too big.

ezgif.com-animated-gif-maker_1.zip 48.29 kB · 1 download

Seems like a good size to me, though I am fairly biased toward big boobs in general, so take it with a grain of salt. Either way, nice work so far.

 

I can't seem to find the definition of "phisiable", though, but I think I get the gist.

 

As I imagined, it is a stylistic choice, and removing the shadows would be a far greater chore than finishing the rest with the style you already have.

 

Looks amazing so far! Best of luck with the rest! Thanks for the update!

Edited November 3, 2025 by ClosetOfDoom

[IEatMulch]

14 minutes ago, ClosetOfDoom said:

Seems like a good size to me, though I am fairly biased toward big boobs in general, so take it with a grain of salt. Either way, nice work so far.

 

I can't seem to find the definition of "phisiable", though, but I think I get the gist.

 

As I imagined, it is a stylistic choice, and removing the shadows would be a far greater chore than finishing the rest with the style you already have.

 

Looks amazing so far! Best of luck with the rest! Thanks for the update!

oops, my b, feasible. Just in the sense I probably should have made a back up of the sprites I made in the original style, not that there were more then like 10. But regardless I dont think I have em anymore

[MrNok]

1 hour ago, IEatMulch said:

Good news, i got the sprite sheet to animation frames software working and now im using the animation frames in krita to get things looking smoother. Here's the look down animation as an example of what it would look like in motion, and as far on how it looks in game. Also i had o zip it to upload it. It didn't look super jaring to me, but I get other people can be bothered by it. Unfortunately it is also true removing the shadows isnt really that feasible. Additionally part of the reason I split of into my own style was that I didnt feel like I was nailing the original style as well I would have liked. At this point I am kinda hoping someone else would pick up the original style, since to me it didn't seem like my forte. Something I would totally be open to changing tho, is boobs size, especially for this animation if yall feel like this is too big.

ezgif.com-animated-gif-maker_1.zip 48.29 kB · 1 download

I am somewhat afraid of saying this now, but I would indeed prefer a smaller boob size. Now I wonder if I should preface such statements with a bazillion disclaimers that this is simply my opinion and that you are free to ignore it... 

 

On the other note, I'm happy you managed to get the tool to work, as I made it specifically with this topic in mind. Hope it was at least somewhat usefull to you.

 

Thanks for putting your time in this and please, don't overwork yourself 

[IEatMulch]

57 minutes ago, MrNok said:

I am somewhat afraid of saying this now, but I would indeed prefer a smaller boob size. Now I wonder if I should preface such statements with a bazillion disclaimers that this is simply my opinion and that you are free to ignore it... 

 

On the other note, I'm happy you managed to get the tool to work, as I made it specifically with this topic in mind. Hope it was at least somewhat usefull to you.

 

Thanks for putting your time in this and please, don't overwork yourself 

Please dont feel bad for asking! The whole reason I asked now was because its not too late to change that part. I have just one animation done so there wouldn't be much lost progress. Since im changing the workflow and tweaking all the sprites ive done so far anyway. Is there a sprite from atlas1 that is maybe closer to what u think a smaller boob version would look good like?

Edited November 3, 2025 by IEatMulch

[ClosetOfDoom]

10 minutes ago, MrNok said:

I am somewhat afraid of saying this now, but I would indeed prefer a smaller boob size. Now I wonder if I should preface such statements with a bazillion disclaimers that this is simply my opinion and that you are free to ignore it... 

 

On the other note, I'm happy you managed to get the tool to work, as I made it specifically with this topic in mind. Hope it was at least somewhat usefull to you.

 

Thanks for putting your time in this and please, don't overwork yourself 

Small boob = preference (not opinion)

 

There's no shame in having a preference, and it's fine to insert your preference here since that's the kind of feedback they asked for.

 

Giving feedback is not a free-for-all in creative arts (music, art, animation, writing, etc.), but as long as you make sure to discern what type of feedback they're looking for, you'll be fine. Heck, if you're not sure what kind they're looking for, no harm in asking.

 

Also, nice work with the tool. I was unaware you were the one who made it, but it's bound to be extremely useful for many modders.