pokemon Pokémon Nude Mods Project

[Catnatic]

7 hours ago, Viewier said:

Important Announcement!!!

 

The Moemon thread just got nuked. Like, it's completely and utterly gone.

I assume that the reasoning is just because it was too sexual for the moderators since Moemon are on average younger than most Pokemon humans, they did not state that the mods were made for nonsexual nudist purposes, and some of the sprites were made sexual and given bigger boobs.

 

Though to say that I am not terrified that my thread will be straight up nuked would be false. I've built a community here and tried my best to keep creeps out. I fully believe that nudity should be considered nonsexual and it would break my heart if this entire thread was completely nuked because the moderators deem it fit for deletion even if I do my best to ensure that nobody is sexualized in these mods, but instead just able to be nudist and free.

 

With that said, I am willing to allow Moemon thread refugees in here to continue making sprites, with the condition that they do not make them more sexual than they are in their original forms. That one Dragonite sprite I remember that changed the angle to show her butthole is an example of going way too far.

 

I do not want my thread to be deleted. So much would be lost.

We really need our own website/forum where we can safely post these sorts of things without fear of being suddenly taken down by some moderator.

I know there's one other forum where posting nudity of younger characters is accepted but I acknowledge it's not really a great place to be in if you don't like those creeps.

15 hours ago, losstie27 said:

My dream for these kinds of mods is for somebody to make all of the pokemon anatomically correct like they should be (or at least the ones that could be). The few anthro mods out there don't really do anything for me because they're too sexual. Me and Catnatic already did it for Red and Blue, but it'd be awesome to be able to play as a nudist trainer with my Eevee and Arcanine beside me with their sheathes out like they would be in the real world.

I recall someone here has a motherload of nude sprites and that also includes lots of anatomically-correct Pokemon sprites.

Although I don't really know the source of these sprite edits and who have made them, but it's at least something.

[Rosefan64]

Maybe with every sprite update, reiterate that this project is about non-sexual nudity. And if anyone starts being creepy here, call them out on it. Keep this thread clean.

 

But it won't hurt to back up these mods, though.

 

Can you pin a comment? Have one with ground rules if you can.

Edited July 7 by Rosefan64

[Areyon3339]

18 hours ago, Viewier said:

Important Announcement!!!

 

The Moemon thread just got nuked. Like, it's completely and utterly gone.

I assume that the reasoning is just because it was too sexual for the moderators since Moemon are on average younger than most Pokemon humans, they did not state that the mods were made for nonsexual nudist purposes, and some of the sprites were made sexual and given bigger boobs.

 

Though to say that I am not terrified that my thread will be straight up nuked would be false. I've built a community here and tried my best to keep creeps out. I fully believe that nudity should be considered nonsexual and it would break my heart if this entire thread was completely nuked because the moderators deem it fit for deletion even if I do my best to ensure that nobody is sexualized in these mods, but instead just able to be nudist and free.

 

With that said, I am willing to allow Moemon thread refugees in here to continue making sprites, with the condition that they do not make them more sexual than they are in their original forms. That one Dragonite sprite I remember that changed the angle to show her butthole is an example of going way too far.

 

I do not want my thread to be deleted. So much would be lost.

 

For what it's worth, the thread as of April was saved on the wayback machine. Not sure if anyone has backups of the stuff after that

Edited July 7 by Areyon3339

[Viewier]

8 hours ago, Rosefan64 said:

Maybe with every sprite update, reiterate that this project is about non-sexual nudity. And if anyone starts being creepy here, call them out on it. Keep this thread clean.

 

But it won't hurt to back up these mods, though.

 

Can you pin a comment? Have one with ground rules if you can.

I can't pin comments, but I do have a set of rules on the first post.

[Viewier]

30 minutes ago, Areyon3339 said:

 

For what it's worth, the thread as of April was saved on the wayback machine. Not sure if anyone has backups of the stuff after that

oh for real? Send the link.

[reporting]

Isnt it possible Moemon Official reported it for the stolen sprites?

[Viewier]

1 hour ago, reporting said:

Isnt it possible Moemon Official reported it for the stolen sprites?

Huh, I guess that is also possible.

 

Also, wow, I did not expect the word "reporting" to be a free account name.

[losstie27]

On 7/7/2026 at 4:49 AM, Catnatic said:

I recall someone here has a motherload of nude sprites and that also includes lots of anatomically-correct Pokemon sprites.

Although I don't really know the source of these sprite edits and who have made them, but it's at least something.

 

I haven't seen that. That could be a promising start, though if the angle is nonsexual nudity, there couldn't be any knots or erections allowed. Additionally the modders would have to figure out some way to handle different genders for the pokemon.

[whateverdontcare]

10 minutes ago, losstie27 said:

 

I haven't seen that. That could be a promising start, though if the angle is nonsexual nudity, there couldn't be any knots or erections allowed. Additionally the modders would have to figure out some way to handle different genders for the pokemon.

Starting in generation 4 separate male and female sprites is a base feature. Generation 3 is the most rom hacked generation, every mechanic you could imagine has been put in it before, so the way to do it should be established out there already. Somewhere.

[personmcguy]

 Mails here

[ScoutTheSaneless]

5 hours ago, personmcguy said:

 Mails here

"here's the mail, the mail it never fails"

[Amazingfan]

On 7/9/2026 at 1:11 AM, losstie27 said:

though if the angle is nonsexual nudity, there couldn't be any knots or erections allowed.

Aren't knots just a normal part of anatomy? When it comes to erections, it's pretty whatever(I can live without them, lol), but I recall seeing them allowed around these parts in the past and a lot of male mons probably wouldn't even have anything visible if they are not in some way erect(Which I guess could be viewed as good for any project making them "nude" because that would mean less sprite edits need to be created).

[NexusOfChaos]

7 minutes ago, Amazingfan said:

Aren't knots just a normal part of anatomy? When it comes to erections, it's pretty whatever(I can live without them, lol), but I recall seeing them allowed around these parts in the past and a lot of male mons probably wouldn't even have anything visible if they are not in some way erect(Which I guess could be viewed as good for any project making them "nude" because that would mean less sprite edits need to be created).

knots and erections are almost exclusively sexual in nature, as they are caused from sexual arousal. as for not having anything visible if not erect, there's sheathes and genital slits, or of course being flaccid

Edited July 10 by NexusOfChaos

[Zorai]

15 hours ago, NexusOfChaos said:

knots and erections are almost exclusively sexual in nature, as they are caused from sexual arousal. as for not having anything visible if not erect, there's sheathes and genital slits, or of course being flaccid

 

Most pokemon, if anatomical, wont have flaccid cocks unless their similar to machamp in terms of being very human like and not furry. Male furried mammals should have sheaths. Avians, both male and female, should have cloacas. Same for reptiles of both male and female should have slits, and aquatics as well. Only mammals have a visible difference really. The main choice, imo, is if female pokemon will have anatomical bits or not. I know some are okay with it, while others aren't.

 

That, and plant like pokemon could be excluded entirely, as plants have their own way of breeding. An example being Bulbasaur having genitals, as its both mammal reptile and plant. But something like Bellsprout shouldn't have any, as its purely a plant, imo.

Edited July 11 by Zorai

[losstie27]

3 hours ago, Amazingfan said:

Aren't knots just a normal part of anatomy? When it comes to erections, it's pretty whatever(I can live without them, lol), but I recall seeing them allowed around these parts in the past and a lot of male mons probably wouldn't even have anything visible if they are not in some way erect(Which I guess could be viewed as good for any project making them "nude" because that would mean less sprite edits need to be created).

They are, and potentially they could be there, it's not like it would be that weird to see an animal with its dick out of its sheath in public (if you own horses, you definitely know). But it's also not my hypothetical project, it would be up to Viewier. The visibility issue is also why I think this mod should be done with Black / White, as it's the only game with full body back sprites (off the top of my head), meaning pretty much every pokemon could have its anus and balls/spade visible. The only issue with that being, it's also the gen with the most pokemon, before they went 3D. Potentially we could split it up, and focus on one generation of pokemon at a time, but it'd still be a ton of work.
 

 

2 hours ago, Zorai said:

 

Most pokemon, if anatomical, wont have flaccid cocks unless their similar to machamp in terms of being very human like and not furry. Male furried mammals should have sheaths. Avians, both male and female, should have cloacas. Same for reptiles of both male and female should have slits, and aquatics as well. Only mammals have a visible difference really. The main choice, imo, is if female pokemon will have anatomical bits or not. I know some are okay with it, while others aren't.

 

That, and plant like pokemon could be excluded entirely, as plants have their own way of breeding. An example being Bulbasaur having genitals, as its both mammal and plant. But something like Bellsprout shouldn't have any, as its purely a plant, imo.

This, and also there is literally mountains of anatomically correct pokemon art we could use as reference. The artist Rapistwerewolf (insane name), has a GIANT collection of every pokemon up to gen 3, and counting.

Also, I think we should definitely make the females anatomically correct too. It would feel weird to give them humanoid parts/none at all while the men still get to rock their dicks out.

[Zorai]

40 minutes ago, losstie27 said:

They are, and potentially they could be there, it's not like it would be that weird to see an animal with its dick out of its sheath in public (if you own horses, you definitely know). But it's also not my hypothetical project, it would be up to Viewier. The visibility issue is also why I think this mod should be done with Black / White, as it's the only game with full body back sprites (off the top of my head), meaning pretty much every pokemon could have its anus and balls/spade visible. The only issue with that being, it's also the gen with the most pokemon, before they went 3D. Potentially we could split it up, and focus on one generation of pokemon at a time, but it'd still be a ton of work.

 

Typically, if an animal has an erection, it usually means they're horny. While I wouldn't mind that for the male anthros, it would make things come off as sexual, which would defeat the whole purpose of what Viewer wants. To keep things none sexual.

 

42 minutes ago, losstie27 said:

This, and also there is literally mountains of anatomically correct pokemon art we could use as reference. The artist Rapistwerewolf (insane name), has a GIANT collection of every pokemon up to gen 3, and counting.

Also, I think we should definitely make the females anatomically correct too. It would feel weird to give them humanoid parts/none at all while the men still get to rock their dicks out.

 

My only gripe with female pokemon being anatomical would be how much work would need to go into making it look proper. I may not be a sprite artist for this project, but I imagine it would be a tad annoying trying to make it work. It could just look too weird and/or out of place depending on the pokemon.

[losstie27]

12 minutes ago, Zorai said:

My only gripe with female pokemon being anatomical would be how much work would need to go into making it look proper. I may not be a sprite artist for this project, but I imagine it would be a tad annoying trying to make it work. It could just look too weird and/or out of place depending on the pokemon.

I don't think it necessarily has to be difficult if you don't make it difficult. Here's an edit I did of Vulpix in like 5 minutes. I'm also not saying *no* pokemon should have human like genitalia. Some pokemon it would probably fit better on honestly, like if we did the Hypno line for example.

[Zorai]

3 hours ago, losstie27 said:

I don't think it necessarily has to be difficult if you don't make it difficult. Here's an edit I did of Vulpix in like 5 minutes. I'm also not saying *no* pokemon should have human like genitalia. Some pokemon it would probably fit better on honestly, like if we did the Hypno line for example.

 

In that regard it does work. I was thinking of the anthros, like Delphox or Gardevoir.

[personmcguy]

This is your captain speaking, a flock of corviknights is headed stright for us, prepare for emergency procedures

 

[Rosefan64]

15 hours ago, Zorai said:

An example being Bulbasaur having genitals, as its both mammal and plant.

Isn't the "saur" of Bulbasuar supposed to be like "dinosaur"? Shouldn't it be a reptile?

[Zorai]

5 minutes ago, Rosefan64 said:

Isn't the "saur" of Bulbasuar supposed to be like "dinosaur"? Shouldn't it be a reptile?

 

Yes, actually. It would be a reptile also due to its skin looking more like scales. My bad on that one.

[losstie27]

4 hours ago, Zorai said:

 

Yes, actually. It would be a reptile also due to its skin looking more like scales. My bad on that one.

I feel like we could maybe fudge some of the non-mammals into having hybrid genitals for the sake of giving them something to look at. A genital slit would hardly be visible on Bulbasaur in the same way it would on Ekans. Not to mention, even though it is reptilian, Bulbasaur is also in an egg group with many mammals, implying a breeding cross compatibility.

[ScoutTheSaneless]

4 hours ago, Rosefan64 said:

Isn't the "saur" of Bulbasuar supposed to be like "dinosaur"? Shouldn't it be a reptile?

i was under the impression that the Bulbasaur line are ancient frogs, just look at how Venusaur runs

[Zorai]

2 hours ago, losstie27 said:

I feel like we could maybe fudge some of the non-mammals into having hybrid genitals for the sake of giving them something to look at. A genital slit would hardly be visible on Bulbasaur in the same way it would on Ekans. Not to mention, even though it is reptilian, Bulbasaur is also in an egg group with many mammals, implying a breeding cross compatibility.

 

Would depend on Viewer and how she would want to showcase it. As nice as it would be to see, not all pokemon would have their bits exposed/seen. Delphox, as an example, technically wears a dress of its own fur. One could argue it can be trimmed and acts more like clothing, but fur is still natural and could be seen as no different then body hair.

 

Pokemon like Meowscarada could, depending on how one sees it, take off their mask and plant scarf whenever. 

 

2 hours ago, ScoutTheSaneless said:

i was under the impression that the Bulbasaur line are ancient frogs, just look at how Venusaur runs

 

I believe they are inspired by horned frogs specifically.

[ScoutTheSaneless]

15 hours ago, Zorai said:

I believe they are inspired by horned frogs specifically.

There's been a decent theory that the grass starters are based on extinct animals to some degree