Better Children Plus Beasts. BCPBv02b Skyrim

[daxloves]

Since nexus decided to lock it up FOREVER it seems and many people keep wanting it here it is, still unchanged from b4. I haven't done squat to it and prolly never will. I don't even play the game anymore.

 

So here it is BCPB V02b ..... Enjoy. Just don't expect me to actually finish it. If anyone wants to modify it or whatever have a ball.

BCPB-OptionalCBBEbody.7z

BCPB-OptionalUNPbody.7z

BCPB-OptionalNeverNude.7z

BCPB-MainFilesV02b.7z

[Uriel]

That's for Skyrim i suppose?

[daxloves]

Yes, sorry about that. Title updated to say so.

[zippy57]

If that's true than this site is going to "lock it up FOREVER" as well.

[DSXX]

If that's true than this site is going to "lock it up FOREVER" as well.

 

So what's the difference between this and Loli (Children of the Sky) mod then exactly? That should be locked up too as well then, they're essentially the same.

[zippy57]

If there's Loli content on LL then it's here because no moderator caught it.

[gregathit]

As far as I am aware child body mods are perfectly fine. The key distinction is if the loli (or whatever you want to call it) is being used in a sexual way. This mod contains nothing along those lines that I could find. If this is not true let me know.

[Luna_Natsume]

Honestly I never understood the fascination... ever since 'Children of the Wasteland' in Fallout3, I have seen a steady increase in the amount of 'loli' and little kid mods using age inappropriate outfits and subject matter. I have always been a 'live and let live' kind of guy, but these mods really are just a thinly veiled pedophilic fantasy. If someone would explain how using one of these mods -doesn't- encourage age-inapproriate imagery, or context... I would love to hear the reasoning behind it.

 

Not to be the devils advocate, but seriously this is dancing on the razors edge of morality. If you could play the game from the perspective of a child, wearing regular vanilla clothing/armor... that's one thing... but giving the same child a CBBE/UNP/ect body and access to all the skimpy outfits is over the line. Those kids are easily under the age of 12 and wearing slutty outfits isn't socially acceptable in any country that this game is played.

 

Am I wrong?

[thesapien]

I just watched all of American made cartoon Avatar: The Last Airbender, all 3 seasons over the last two weeks or so, which is now one of my favorite series in any genre for all time. But according to a few posters here, the series should be illegal. Many of the girls had breasts! OMG! And did you see some of their outfits! Remember Katara in a swimsuit or when Tosh accidentally kissed an older girl!

 

Yeah, people need to chill.

 

But if it were up to me, I'd post this thread in the regular non-adult download section. Why is it in the adult section? The title and section seem to contradict one another, no?

 

Edit: Maybe it's meant to allow for making petite or smaller adults, given that it adds breasts, or just to allow for young adults and realism in that regard and which ever is up left up to the user. I've no problem with that. We can't allow for our fear of some users permit us to ban things like Avatar.

[zippy57]

And how many of those characters were shown with full-frontal nudity?

[thesapien]

I couldn't get it to work. Oh well.

 

zippy57, naked kids are just naked kids. But, anyways, according to the readme:

The Childs will have your current default adult body. Installing the Optional body mesh will replace your default body with one that has a much smaller emalebody_0.nif and a well proportioned femalebody_1.nif resulting in the ability to go from flat/skinny for child races to ample for adults.

So it sounds like it was intended to make the child characters into adults, perhaps petite adults. I suppose it could be used to make young adult girls with breasts who are imagined to be underage and then used with another mod to make them do sexual things, but, seriously, banning this for what others might do while using other mods? Have you ever used a 3D app like Poser which comes with nude models, including children? Would you deem that app illegal because of what it could be used for? Hey, let's just ban Skyrim for including children in the first place.

[zippy57]

You didn't answer my question; you said by this logic we should ban Avatar because it has breasts. The problem isn't the presence of breasts, it's the nudity. The lack of nudity in Avatar makes your argument irrelevant to the situation at hand. And who said anything about banning Skyrim because it has children in it? Certainly not anyone here.

 

You have to consider the other mods available on this site. People tend to freak out when the words "child" and "porn" are in close proximity. When you host a nude mod for children you're already likely to get a negative response. When you host it on a site that also has things like this you are inviting trouble that could quite possibly get this site shut down if someone complains about it.

 

EDIT: And considering the presence of mods like this the typo in the thread title isn't helping matters.

[thesapien]

Yeah, people do certainly freakout!

 

I did answer your question. I brought up Avatar because I thought maybe this mod could be used to play as a young character. I didn't get it to work so can't say for sure. Then you implied that it might allow for your character to be nude while imagining your character is underage, if you removed your armor while playing as really young. My response was two part. One, a naked child is quite normal, natural, and should not be immediately deemed an object of sexual desire. Two, it seems this mod is not meant for making playable children anyway; it's meant for turning the child model into a more adult model.

[zippy57]

Actually, you still haven't answered my question. It was a simple yes or no question and you have yet to respond with either.

 

Both of your points are correct, but with your first you assume the presence of a logical individual. A slippery slope argument is only existant when there is a lack of proof that the hypothetical situation would occur. There is nothing to suggest Skyrim would be banned because it simply contains children. There is tons of precedent to suggest someone would freak out over naked children, let alone naked children on a site that provides sexual content, regardless of its context and that they would report it and that the site could be shut down because of it.

 

I just don't want the site shut down if the wrong person stumbles across this. I have read news articles about parents being arrested because they took pictures of their children taking baths. Law enforcement agencies like to jump on situations like this and people tend to not ask questions when they do. In a lot of situations it's stupid. It would be in this one. But it's very possible for it to be misconstrued here. ESPECIALLY since it's in the Adult Mods section. Had it been in the normal section I never would have said anything but this being where it is throws up all kinds of red flags.

 

And seriously, someone fix the thread title.

[Jimjim117]

What's wrong with the title, I can't see any typo, maybe I'm just blind. Also if you really wanted this thread removed the best act on your part would be to stop posting so it sinks into the realms of oblivion. The only thing your argument is doing (although I agree it is justified) is bumping the thread so more people find the mod.

[Ark of Truth]

As far as I am aware child body mods are perfectly fine. The key distinction is if the loli (or whatever you want to call it) is being used in a sexual way. This mod contains nothing along those lines that I could find. If this is not true let me know.

 

It's ok as long as it a fully developed body but short person, so it doesn't look like a child. As far as I was told.

 

Your not allowed to do anything with sex and children as far as I am aware. Just leave to Ashal to sort out that's what I do

[RyokoRHM]

freaks will be freaks, whether in skyrim or elsewyr. (yeah, i know, bad pun...)

 

if someone made a child porn mod, then i'd understand the hate, and the puritanical comments. child mods are meant to be immersion mods for those of us who don't go crazy with the content. if we decide to use mods like this or CotS, that doesn't make us pedophiles in the same way that buying a gun doesn't make the vast majority of us murderers. pedophiles will be pedophiles no matter what's available to them, and no actual children were hurt in the making of these mods.

[labrat]

What's wrong with the title' date=' I can't see any typo, maybe I'm just blind.

[/quote']

 

Erm. I think it's supposed to be Better Children + Breasts. The idea being to rid Skyrim of the dough-featured monsters inflicted on it and replace them with better looking (legal for your jurisdiction) teenagers or small adults.

 

If anyone was enjoying righteous indignation at the thought that this was a bestiality mod I fear that they may be disappointed.

[Niobia]

If this is the mod that I think it is, I can see why the OP didnt bother with screenshots. Because the mod I'm thinking it is, just makes children into small adults without changing their face or anything, it just makes them short.

 

But idk if that's this mod or not, but I remember seeing the one I described on the nexus with the same name as this one.

[daxloves]

OMG. to anyone thinking this is about bestiality.... wow, just go away. If you play Skyrim you know it has Beast races and the game did not provide children for said Beast races. This does.

 

This mod contains NO TEXTURES. So if YOU decide to use textures with nips and pubes on a child then that is YOUR doing. It was designed to make children of ALL races playable in a way that they can use any armor, not just one special piece made specifically for that mesh.

 

I will not be responsible for what textures others may choose to use. A pervert will make anything they choose to perverted.

 

"Plus" instead of a "+"... really?

 

As for what section its in. I don't friggin care where it is, move it, burn it, run it over and throw it in the trash for all I care.

[labrat]

 

 

What's wrong with the title' date=' I can't see any typo, maybe I'm just blind.

[/quote']

 

Erm. I think it's supposed to be Better Children + Breasts. The idea being to rid Skyrim of the dough-featured monsters inflicted on it and replace them with better looking (legal for your jurisdiction) teenagers or small adults.

 

If anyone was enjoying righteous indignation at the thought that this was a bestiality mod I fear that they may be disappointed.

 

 

 

I stand corrected - it is supposed to be beasts, 'though meant in a wholesome way, so the puritans can just put those flaming torches and pitchforks down right now

[Luna_Natsume]

I found a few screenshots from a mod featured on this very site. A mod that is obviously quite popular due to 1482 posts made within the thread.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clearly these are meant to be kids around 10 years old. Do you suppose the author of this mod spent all the time making those freckled faces so they could look like 'small/short adults'? I honestly don't think so. These screenshots were taken from the very first post, made by the author of the mod himself. What that says to me, is that the author intended the mod to be used in this way. The first screenshot had the breasts blurred out, meaning that he was aware it was inappropriate, but posted it anyway. This thread features nude screenshots in plentiful amounts, I encountered 2 in the last 10 pages alone. In regards to the Avatar, Katara wasn't wearing silverlight armor, or a thong bottom, or a see-through top. So I don't know if your Katara reference really has a bearing on this topic.

 

I'm not trying to be hostile or an asshole here, I am just trying to understand the reasoning behind mods like this. I have 4 kids, all boys, and my 10 year old has several female friends that he plays with... and I can tell you for a fact, that none of them would be wearing clothes like this, or as skimpy, or revealing. So help me understand in what context that this mod is considered socially acceptable.

[DSXX]

It's based off anime(?) and people want extremely anime-ish characters in their game, just like Oblivion. To an extent, there's no harm in that, but what people do with their exceptionally young characters in their own game is another matter, and personal at that. Can't do anything about it either, just down to the individual. I'm assuming the clothing is part of the anime theme as well.

[K1ngDelaFey]

I wonder what would happen if you actually try to be hostile or an asshole...

 

Why don't you go ahead and report the mod to a moderator? Or complain in the mods thread instead of making a drama and spamming a non-related thread?

 

Socially accepted really? murder, theft, decapitations, drug abuse... sounds familiar? it is all in Skyrim! and guess what? no actual people is affected because is a freaking game! pixels if you want to put it that way!

 

If Children of Skyrim is accepted in this forum and is not braking any rules and you feel offended by it's contents, please, by all means, walk away! and stick to mods that are socially accepted according to your standards.

 

It's a single player game! You are like people complaining about a mod that makes potions weightless for example..."Your mod sucks because it makes the game unbalanced and breaks my immersion"

 

Don't download it, don't use it and stay away for your own sake!

 

Speaking of dramas...

 

Great mod Children of the Sky! Thank you jiitek

[gregathit]

Guys, let's please stop spamming this thread with non-mod related issues. The mod is fine as it is, according to the forum rules and that is the end of the discussion, at least in this thread anyway.

 

If you want to discuss whether or not child mods should\should not be allowed, then please do so in the Off Topic Section here: http://www.loverslab.com/Forum-Off-Topic--11

 

 

Thank you for your cooperation,

Greg

Moderator