SexoutNG - Beta (2.10.93b10) release thread

[Thenryb]

I used a character which had never had any of the sexout mods active. I activated the beta and sexkey and it worked fine. I added Positioning which did not function but it did not crash the game. Then came Strap-on Sex, which functioned fine. Then I added one of my favorites, SexoutSex as updated by Chancellor Kremlin) and I experienced the kind of glitch with Willow described earlier and an outright crash with Dr Strauss in Novac (the kind described by Meos77 where sex appears to start and then you go to a loading screen and crash). Sexout Willow was non-functional.

 

 

[prideslayer]

Now that's a decent bug report! I'll grab sexoutsex and see if I can discover anything. Astymma is not available at present so I'll look into fixing positioning as well.

[Meos77]

It happened to me again after i did what you said with a clean save and started to reactivate stuff.   It happened to SexoutSex.  I am still not done so I will continue trying to see if I can break the game .

[prideslayer]

Ok. Was it sexoutsex or sexoutsexlite? The latter is CKs and the one I'm looking at now. It has a bunch of errors in fnvedit that may be the cause of the problems.

[Meos77]

it is sexoutsex.

 

here is the load order so far i have tested without sex active.

[Thenryb]

Even having SexoutSex (the latest version) in my load order crashed the game even if it was not used to initiate sex.

[prideslayer]

Ok.

 

The positioning fix was easy, I have posted an updated esp in that thread.

[prideslayer]

2.6.85b25 in OP

- Sanitizer + CSE recombination

 

This is the same one I made a 'private' beta of a few days ago. Heard no additional issues, so here it is. This one combines CSE and SAN into a single effect once again, and introduces a mess of new UDFs I'll document later.

[prideslayer]

A quick test with SexoutSexLite worked fine, no crashes, sex worked as expected. I'll test the full version w/ SCR a bit later on but I'm starting to suspect your crashes aren't directly related to the sexout ESM. Sexout clean save might be in order.

[Guest tomm434]

Do you want me to run through the scene again?

[Thenryb]

Another mod where the animations do not play (at least in my game) with Beta 24 is wsex.esp (the sexout override for Sexual innuendo). I suspect Pride is just dying to look at that one:)

[prideslayer]

Do you want me to run through the scene again?

I would appreciate it, should be your favorite scene by now right?

 

Another mod where the animations do not play (at least in my game) with Beta 24 is wsex.esp (the sexout override for Sexual innuendo). I suspect Pride is just dying to look at that one:)

I wrote it.. it's not high on my priority list. I'll take a look when I can.

[Guest tomm434]

Same thing - in stage 12 there were no sex with player+mutant01.

 

I'll asume that I have to check if scene works wiith every beta you publish untill you upload stable version,

Sexout25.rar

[prideslayer]

This should be the last one affecting that stuff, I'll check it out, probably a quick fix (I hope).

[prideslayer]

Tomm let me ask you something quickly.

 

In stage 12, why is the SexoutBegin for Sydney + Mutant06 being cast on the player?

[Guest tomm434]

Well, I guess that I've heard from you long time ago that there is no difference who I cast spell on. But now that you say it, there is only 1 scene in which I cast spell on player for both animations I'll go check that out.

[Guest tomm434]

yep, that was my mistake - now stage works fine. Thanks. I'll never do that thing again. I just never thought there's something wrong with it, sorry.

[prideslayer]

The Sexout:Start vars *must* be on the actor you do the CIOS on -- the CIOS doesn't have anywhere else to look for them.

 

So both of these will fail for different reasons / in different ways

 

actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorA" actorA
actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorB" actorB
actorA.CIOS SexoutBegin

actorC.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorA" actorC
actorC.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorB" actorD
actorA.CIOS SexoutBegin

That will fail because the second CIOS isn't on actorC (who holds the NX vars). One of those two will actually start, the other won't, and the one that starts will have the vars from the first set.

 

actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorA" actorA
actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorB" actorB
actorA.CIOS SexoutBegin

actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorA" actorC
actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorB" actorD
actorA.CIOS SexoutBegin

This looks better at first glance but will still fail. Only the C+D will take place -- those vars (set on actorA) will overwrite the A+B vars since the CIOS is a spell, not a function -- it doesn't start until the script calling it is over.

 

Things like this are ugly, but "fine" though heavily discouraged:

actorC.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorA" actorA
actorC.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorB" actorB
actorC.CIOS SexoutBegin

actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorA" actorC
actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorB" actorD
actorA.CIOS SexoutBegin

Should probably work today since the NX vars and CIOS targets in each act are the same, but don't do this, and don't count on it working forver.

[prideslayer]

Oh also, if you switch to the new call syntax with the UDFs then none of that applies, as there is no spell. It's pretty easy to use.

 

This

actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorA" actorA
actorA.NX_SetEVFo "Sexout:Start::ActorB" actorB
actorA.CIOS SexoutBegin

Translates to this:

call fnSexoutActPrep
call fnSexoutActSetRef "ActorA" actorA
call fnSexoutActSetRef "ActorB" actorB
call fnSexoutActRun

You can put as many in a row as you like:

call fnSexoutActPrep
call fnSexoutActSetRef "ActorA" actorA
call fnSexoutActSetRef "ActorB" actorB
call fnSexoutActRun

call fnSexoutActPrep
call fnSexoutActSetRef "ActorA" actorC
call fnSexoutActSetRef "ActorB" actorD
call fnSexoutActRun

No CIOS to worry about.

[Guest tomm434]

Thanks.

 

 

 

Should probably work today since the NX vars and CIOS targets in each act are the same, but don't do this, and don't count on it working forver.

It's none of my business but if I were you I would post this guide in SexoutAPI thread and left it be. In my opinion it's not something crucial that needs to be implemented (wasting your time in process). And who else would be stupid enough to setNX vars for different animations on 1 actor anyway...

 

 

[prideslayer]

Yeah I'm rewriting the whole API document, just keep getting sidetracked by bugs.

[prideslayer]

Odessa, everything still working OK for you?

[prideslayer]

Regarding SexoutSex (not lite), it's overriding the sexout positioning script for some reason or another. It's not going to work like that. I'll notify CK in his thread, delete the modified record, and test some more.

[prideslayer]

Regarding SexoutSex (not lite), it's overriding the sexout positioning script for some reason or another. It's not going to work like that. I'll notify CK in his thread, delete the modified record, and test some more.

Only tested twice but it works fine with the current beta if I delete the overridden script with fnvedit. CK should be able to fix whatever it is he's doing there, not a beta problem; modifying records in the sexout ESM is "unsupported."

[Thenryb]

I have noticed that the player character does not completely redress after sex. Only the armor, gloves and hat. Any other accessories, like a belt remain unequipped. I agree that sexout sex seems to work if the overidden script is deleted.