pokemon Pokémon Nude Mods Project

[Viewier]

16 hours ago, Yapyap_ said:

Hello! Silver still has his clothes in the male-only version of HG

I think it should be fixed now? Go back to the downloads page.

[Viewier]

I finally started on the file system for Nude GSC based on how @Catnatic said it was set up in the decompilation project.

https://github.com/pret/pokecrystal/tree/master/gfx

It's lucky that Cal (that one trainer who looks like Ethan for some reason) keeps the Gold and Silver sprite for Ethan, so no sprites get unused.

Also, I find it funny that the catching tutorial dude is stored alone with the battle effects, since Ethan and Kris's back sprites and front sprites are together in the same folder. Thankfully, the angel and devil battle effects are already naked, so those don't need any edits.

file system.zip

Edited December 13, 2025 by Viewier

[Dwellernumber765]

On 11/14/2025 at 8:40 PM, Morgil said:

Gotta say, I absolutely love this one simply due to the reference 

 

So uh
I did some digging around and found out this sprite was made by a pedophile, like one with a pretty fucking huge art gallery of just lolis and children, and also the creator of many many well made sprites I've seen in the motherload files or been passed around in this thread
I'll try to find all of them from the motherloads and sprites stuff I got and just rat them out of the motherload file I got lol

Edited December 14, 2025 by Dwellernumber765

[Viewier]

7 hours ago, Dwellernumber765 said:

So uh
I did some digging around and found out this sprite was made by a pedophile, like one with a pretty fucking huge art gallery of just lolis and children, and also the creator of many many well made sprites I've seen in the motherload files or been passed around in this thread
I'll try to find all of them from the motherloads and sprites stuff I got and just rat them out of the motherload file I got lol

Sweet Jesus.

Do you know if any sprites currently being added to GSC are from them?

I'll remove them and open them up to submissions again if so.

Twins and Picnicker are the ones I think could have been by them, due to them being the youngest ones we currently have, but their sprites look respectful and not lewd enough that I don't know.

I do NOT want a pedo's sprites in this project.

[Dwellernumber765]

On 11/14/2025 at 11:16 PM, Dwellernumber765 said:

That’s a pretty nice collection, though please do tell us where you got some of these from so that we can completely avoid them in the future since some of these are… incredibly focused on a specific archetype of characters.

 

2 hours ago, Viewier said:

 

Twins and Picnicker are the ones I think could have been by them, due to them being the youngest ones we currently have, but their sprites look respectful and not lewd enough that I don't know.

I do NOT want a pedo's sprites in this project.

I did inspect that too since this guy made a good amount of sprites for those game

Turns out the part where I ask for the name in this reply became so true as so many pedophilic sprites in those image came from this fucker

 

The sprite board for GSC you have rn doesn’t have anything he made fortunately, the one he did for those two are insanely different in a very bad way

Though the motherload had some of his filth in there, the one I can name out of the top of my head rn is the one where Leaf is covering herself and blushing

 

Such a fucking shame too, god gave artistic skills to so many bad people, I first saw his sprites and was like “yo this guy is actually good” before viewing his other work and never wanted to skew my eye balls out more😭
 

Also man I wish they allow thread maker to remove post in thread @Edit edd unfortunately has a link to their profile in the following messages from when he provided the resources

If only I had created a Pixiv account and actually checked back then😔
 

Update: It's not some pedophilic sprites, pretty much every sprite that guy made on those picture

Edited December 14, 2025 by Dwellernumber765

[personmcguy]

oooooh thats... not great. if any of those sprites ended up in anything i'm happy to replace them

[Viewier]

6 hours ago, Dwellernumber765 said:

 

I did inspect that too since this guy made a good amount of sprites for those game

Turns out the part where I ask for the name in this reply became so true as so many pedophilic sprites in those image came from this fucker

 

The sprite board for GSC you have rn doesn’t have anything he made fortunately, the one he did for those two are insanely different in a very bad way

Though the motherload had some of his filth in there, the one I can name out of the top of my head rn is the one where Leaf is covering herself and blushing

 

Such a fucking shame too, god gave artistic skills to so many bad people, I first saw his sprites and was like “yo this guy is actually good” before viewing his other work and never wanted to skew my eye balls out more😭
 

Also man I wish they allow thread maker to remove post in thread @Edit edd unfortunately has a link to their profile in the following messages from when he provided the resources

If only I had created a Pixiv account and actually checked back then😔
 

Update: It's not some pedophilic sprites, pretty much every sprite that guy made on those picture

Well, I'll believe you on that. It's just that the sheet that had the kimono x octillery image was where I got those two and the sailor, at least I think.

Though, as "lolislimer" said, half of the sprites are from him and half are from them.

On 11/14/2025 at 1:50 PM, Edit edd said:

I didn't do that one this guy did I just resized it and cropped it, the first gen ones are half me half him. 

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/74059425

I remember discovering this guy when I used pixiv. So much talent wasted on being a weirdo who sexualizes child characters. Some of their stuff is really high quality pixel art, but it's ruined by them being a creep.

Edited December 14, 2025 by Viewier

[Mx. Downbad]

Should we add "don't be a creep/pedo/lolicon" to the rules

 

Like as much as I understand that we're working in a grey area, there is a line that some people have crossed that a bit too much

Edited December 15, 2025 by Mx. Downbad

[Catnatic]

1 hour ago, Mx. Downbad said:

Should we add "don't be a creep/pedo/lolicon" to the rules

 

Like as much as I understand that we're working in a grey area, there is a line that some people have crossed that a bit too much

As far as I'm concerned with lolicons (and shotacons), they supposedly only care for underaged fictional characters and are the most likely to be willing to draw nude edits of these character sprites than most other people here.

 

I understand that it can be very discomforting if they have a portfolio full of sexualised artworks of these characters but as long as they stick to only fictional characters, I don't see why I should care if they're not harming any real person because after all, drawing these works or engaging in such things is their outlet.

It's their way of safely relieving themselves from otherwise deplorable desires that actually harms people.

 

It's honestly kinda why I'm not quite keen on putting them on the same level as pedophiles.

With lolicons/shotacons, I can understand they're just trying to cope with what their silly brains find attractive.

With actual creepy pedophiles though, yeah, I think we can all agree we don't want anything to do with them.

 

That said though, I do agree that it's preferably best to have only artists that's more into nudism than sexualisation.

I think we only got away with what we've been doing with the younger characters all this time because they're not the focus, they're just byproducts of the modding project's goal which is to make a believable alternate universe of the Pokémon world where nudism is widely embraced.

Edited December 15, 2025 by Catnatic

[Mx. Downbad]

6 minutes ago, Catnatic said:

As far as I'm concern with lolicons (and shotacons), they supposedly only care for underaged fictional characters and are the most likely to be willing to draw nude edits of these character sprites than most other people here.

 

I understand that it can be very discomforting if they have a portfolio full of sexualised artworks of these characters but as long as they stick to only fictional characters, I don't see why I should care if they're not harming any real person because after all, drawing these works or engaging in such things is their outlet.

It's their way of safely relieving themselves from otherwise deplorable desires that actually harms people.

 

It's honestly kinda why I'm not quite keen on putting them on the same level as pedophiles.

With lolicons/shotacons, I can understand they're just trying to cope with what their silly brains find attractive.

With actual creepy pedophiles though, yeah, I think we can all agree we don't want anything to do with them.

 

That said though, I do agree that it's preferably best to have only artists that's more into nudism than sexualisation.

I think we only got away with what we've been doing with the younger characters all this time because they're not the focus, they're just byproducts of the modding project's goal which is to make a believable alternate universe of the Pokémon world where nudism is widely embraced.

That was well said and well thought out, I can agree with it. As long as everyone maintains good conduct I'm generally not bothered.

[Dwellernumber765]

2 hours ago, Catnatic said:

As far as I'm concerned with lolicons (and shotacons), they supposedly only care for underaged fictional characters and are the most likely to be willing to draw nude edits of these character sprites than most other people here.

 

I understand that it can be very discomforting if they have a portfolio full of sexualised artworks of these characters but as long as they stick to only fictional characters, I don't see why I should care if they're not harming any real person because after all, drawing these works or engaging in such things is their outlet.

It's their way of safely relieving themselves from otherwise deplorable desires that actually harms people.

 

It's honestly kinda why I'm not quite keen on putting them on the same level as pedophiles.

With lolicons/shotacons, I can understand they're just trying to cope with what their silly brains find attractive.

With actual creepy pedophiles though, yeah, I think we can all agree we don't want anything to do with them.

 

That said though, I do agree that it's preferably best to have only artists that's more into nudism than sexualisation.

I think we only got away with what we've been doing with the younger characters all this time because they're not the focus, they're just byproducts of the modding project's goal which is to make a believable alternate universe of the Pokémon world where nudism is widely embraced.

I do not want to see a guy who looks at child characters in a sexual way draw a child character nude because clearly he wasn't viewing nudity as casualty when making it, he's seeing the sexuality in it. Why should we allow pedophile to play part in this community project, knowing doing so would allow him to gain recognition and repect from the same people who has the same fucked up sexual desire in the process, simply because he was projecting his fantasy elsewhere. We can't just be fine with pedophilia to exist simply because it exist on a different plane of existence.

If you find children/childlike character hot then you should seek help, not a safe space so that you can explore those sexual desire further because who the hell knows what stupid shit you're gonna do and think when fictional porn addiction catches up to you, making them no longer satisfy you and affect your normal everyday mind too ?

[Catnatic]

2 hours ago, Dwellernumber765 said:

I do not want to see a guy who looks at child characters in a sexual way draw a child character nude because clearly he wasn't viewing nudity as casualty when making it, he's seeing the sexuality in it. Why should we allow pedophile to play part in this community project, knowing doing so would allow him to gain recognition and repect from the same people who has the same fucked up sexual desire in the process, simply because he was projecting his fantasy elsewhere. We can't just be fine with pedophilia to exist simply because it exist on a different plane of existence.

If you find children/childlike character hot then you should seek help, not a safe space so that you can explore those sexual desire further because who the hell knows what stupid shit you're gonna do and think when fictional porn addiction catches up to you, making them no longer satisfy you and affect your normal everyday mind too ?

I literally said we shouldn't allow pedophiles as we don't want anything to do with them and I made it sternly clear that I agree only artists with an affinity for nudism should be allowed into the project to maintain the integrity of the mod project being about casual nudity as it's not supposed to be inherently sexual (despite the irony that we're in a porn site).

 

I'm just saying that people engage in lolicon/shotacon as a outlet to safely ventilate their sickening urges so they won't actually harm anyone which is what matters.

Same reason why people indulge in bestiality or animal genitalia mods here, so those people won't exploit actual animals. (Yes, this site explicitly allows such mods.)

It's the same way how people listen to metal or extreme music to cope with their frustration, and how violent video games can actually help people release their pent-up anger, aggression, and stress than they ever cause said aggression. Taking these outlets away and just telling them to "go seek help" because you believe people expressing their questionable desires in a virtual/fantasy environment would lead to them actually committing them in real life comes across as misguided, ignorant, and cynical to me.

Edited December 15, 2025 by Catnatic

[keeperpkgo]

having a lot of fun

[keeperpkgo]

4 hours ago, Dwellernumber765 said:

I do not want to see a guy who looks at child characters in a sexual way draw a child character nude because clearly he wasn't viewing nudity as casualty when making it, he's seeing the sexuality in it. Why should we allow pedophile to play part in this community project, knowing doing so would allow him to gain recognition and repect from the same people who has the same fucked up sexual desire in the process, simply because he was projecting his fantasy elsewhere. We can't just be fine with pedophilia to exist simply because it exist on a different plane of existence.

If you find children/childlike character hot then you should seek help, not a safe space so that you can explore those sexual desire further because who the hell knows what stupid shit you're gonna do and think when fictional porn addiction catches up to you, making them no longer satisfy you and affect your normal everyday mind too ?

It must be difficult to live like that. holy shit
I really don't like people like that. They pollute every environment they're a part of.
 

[keeperpkgo]

3 hours ago, Catnatic said:

I literally said we shouldn't allow pedophiles as we don't want anything to do with them and I made it sternly clear that I agree only artists with an affinity for nudism should be allowed into the project to maintain the integrity of the mod project being about casual nudity as it's not supposed to be inherently sexual (despite the irony that we're in a porn site).

 

I'm just saying that people engage in lolicon/shotacon as a outlet to safely ventilate their sickening urges so they won't actually harm anyone which is what matters.

Same reason why people indulge in bestiality or animal genitalia mods here, so those people won't exploit actual animals. (Yes, this site explicitly allows such mods.)

It's the same way how people listen to metal or extreme music to cope with their frustration, and how violent video games can actually help people release their pent-up anger, aggression, and stress than they ever cause said aggression. Taking these outlets away and just telling them to "go seek help" because you believe people expressing their questionable desires in a virtual/fantasy environment would lead to them actually committing them in real life comes across as misguided, ignorant, and cynical to me.

There's no point in explain, most people just have to condemn others. Classic behavior.

[Dwellernumber765]

3 hours ago, Catnatic said:

I literally said we shouldn't allow pedophiles as we don't want anything to do with them and I made it sternly clear that I agree only artists with an affinity for nudism should be allowed into the project to maintain the integrity of the mod project being about casual nudity as it's not supposed to be inherently sexual (despite the irony that we're in a porn site).

 

I'm just saying that people engage in lolicon/shotacon as a outlet to safely ventilate their sickening urges so they won't actually harm anyone which is what matters.

Same reason why people indulge in bestiality or animal genitalia mods here, so those people won't exploit actual animals. (Yes, this site explicitly allows such mods.)

It's the same way how people listen to metal or extreme music to cope with their frustration, and how violent video games can actually help people release their pent-up anger, aggression, and stress than they ever cause said aggression. Taking these outlets away and just telling them to "go seek help" because you believe people expressing their questionable desires in a virtual/fantasy environment would lead to them actually committing them in real life comes across as misguided, ignorant, and cynical to me.

I suppose we should stop arguing about this topic already, and I apologies for pitching in so much into this. This is like what ? The 3-4th time this topic was brought up.
Though I seriously don't feel comfortable being so half heartedly about stuff like that, shit's been a hot topic especially recently and I do feel the need to have a hard opinion on this especially since we're working in such a grey area. My apologies.
 

14 minutes ago, keeperpkgo said:

There's no point in explain, most people just have to condemn others. Classic behavior.

[Viewier]

37 minutes ago, keeperpkgo said:

having a lot of fun

fire pfp, Killa.

More people should use sprites from these projects as pfps.

[keeperpkgo]

1 hour ago, Viewier said:

fire pfp, Killa.

More people should use sprites from these projects as pfps.

I'm still working on that part, I want to put a nice background on it. I finally removed the overlay borders from the emulator, and tonight I'll change my profile picture.


I don't know why they put that button down there, but I changed it to forward toggle. is working reat

 

Edited December 15, 2025 by keeperpkgo

[Guest]

My two cents that no one asked for. The vitriol for lolicon stuff in the pokemon threads have made 0 sense to me given that pokemon being a primarily kid friendly game has most of the protagonist characters ambiguously be around the age of 10-15.

If we were to lump all lolicon into pedophilia then the pokemon threads shouldn't exist period due to pokemon protags being unambiguously not adults. Unless someone were to make unique sprites for all the younger trainer classes, I.E. Protags, some gym leaders, lasses, youngsters, etc.

That's not including the seeming hypocrisy for the moemon thread including the moemon that are without a doubt a loli.

It's this kind of arguing / moral grandstanding that's prevented me from wanting to contribute to any sprite edits.

 

It feels like a weird moral debate over what is ultimately fictional and affects 0 people.

 

However, have a low effort edit of the parasol lady from the sprite edit folder.

 

 

 

Remember. Reality and fiction are separate: FOREVER.

 

Edit; You get nothing forever.

Edited December 18, 2025 by Hugh Neutron

[Yapyap_]

i'd say it's better to just move on from this debate. it's probably gonna derail this project imo or at least slow it down if it continues

[personmcguy]

GSC E4 time!!

Man I'm so glad his sprites don't show off his old design too much

And once again Koga is a bitch with his pose

And Bruno needs to be difficult in some way (lord knows it's not in game) so i guess its here

And Karen is already done!

[personmcguy]

1 hour ago, Yapyap_ said:

i'd say it's better to just move on from this debate. it's probably gonna derail this project imo or at least slow it down if it continues

And nice pfp! As a fellow Lance enjoyer, i hope i did the rest of us proud with that sprite

 

Edited December 16, 2025 by personmcguy

[personmcguy]

As great as the Erika sprite we had is, it altered her pose too much so I wanted to edit it a little more and ended up removing the whole ass kimono (also got her OW sprites done)

Edited December 16, 2025 by personmcguy

[Catnatic]

1 hour ago, Yapyap_ said:

i'd say it's better to just move on from this debate. it's probably gonna derail this project imo or at least slow it down if it continues

I'm afraid progress on the nudism mod for Gold, Silver, and Crystal is going to be slow anyway because building ROMs of these Game Boy games are really finicky.

When Viewier gave me the sprites to replace the game's original assets, the compiler complains about the sprites being too big in byte size.

I know how to optimise/compress them but it's still not enough as I get the same errors, and it's only going to get worse when more sprites get edited/replaced.

So far, I was only able to build a ROM for Gold and that's by rearranging the section lists in the "pics_gold.asm" file.

Here's a screenshot:

In order for me to build the ROM, I had to move two sprites out of their sections and put them in a new section which seems to work but I'm afraid that'd cause sprite glitches like it happened to Abra in my own romhack.

 

I could do the same for Silver but apparently, the "pics.asm" file for each version is different:

And that's precisely how I got complaints about sections "Pics 2", "Pics 3", and "Pics 10" being too big.

When I did Gold, it only complained about "Pics 2" which was easier to sort out. But for Silver, that's going to be complicated to deal with.

Although, if per-disassembly tools for romhacking like Pokemon Sprite Editor could get around the byte size errors with no in-game issues, it might be better to work with that.

Edited December 16, 2025 by Catnatic

[keeperpkgo]

59 minutes ago, personmcguy said:

GSC E4 time!!

Man I'm so glad his sprites don't show off his old design too much

And once again Koga is a bitch with his pose

And Bruno needs to be difficult in some way (lord knows it's not in game) so i guess its here

And Karen is already done!